View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
uselesseater Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 629 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:51 am Post subject: Pushing Eugenics on School TV programme |
|
|
In the plum merchants this morning the TV was on showing school programes BBC 2 or C4 i think.
They were showing a very muscular Bull, selectively bred for this purpose.
Next thing they are on about selective breeding of humans and are pulling audience members out and using a computer programe to show what their offspring might look like. _________________ www.wytruth.org.uk
www.myspace.com/truthleeds |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
uselesseater Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 629 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it sure was real.
I think it was on at about 9:30 - 10. If anyone has a TV guide they might be able to find it.
Of course it was all done in a light hearted fashion, isn't that always the way? _________________ www.wytruth.org.uk
www.myspace.com/truthleeds |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
BBC Teens webpage is also disturbing.........'I am too tight for fingering' and 'How to chat up boys' 'My boyfriend tells me my vagina is too tight'... it goes on and on......free to all kids in school in IT..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yup. It's amazing what you find out on a 9/11 site.
94 questions to an 'Agony Aunt' about vaginas. All advice devoid of any moralising. Value-judgements here are only of the oblique and implicit kind.
Is this a caring, helpful, enlightened and socially responsible presentation or social engineering designed to promote our further collective degeneracy?
Answers on a postcard to someone who isn't me please..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Disco_Destroyer Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 6342
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Caz wrote: | BBC Teens webpage is also disturbing.........'I am too tight for fingering' and 'How to chat up boys' 'My boyfriend tells me my vagina is too tight'... it goes on and on......free to all kids in school in IT..... |
Sounds like The Sun and The Star to me and probably just about every other teen mag out there, ooh Idiocracy is coming true _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Except we pay and it's provided free and accessed at school, in lessons, never firewalled. And very hard to prevent. http://www.bbc.co.uk/scoopcps/teens/news/2005/09/12/25766.shtml Quote: | Q:Is fingering safe?
Could you tell me some things about fingering? Is it dangerous, and if so how? As a doctor is it something that you would encourage us not to do? I fingered myself a couple of times, just to see what it was like. My boyfriend has also fingered me. Please could you tell me why, when I did it it really hurt and when he did it, I really liked it? I don't want to sleep with him just yet (we have been going out for three months), but I do want to do sexual things with him.
A:
As a rule of thumb, put nothing in your vagina that you wouldn't have in your mouth.
On the one hand, fingering is safe sex. Little chance of STIs or pregnancy (that said - beware of spermy fingers). But there are hazards:
1.Fingernails* 2.Dirt 3.Excess prodding
With these in mind, let's answer your questions:
As a doctor, I say: If you fancy a finger - go finger. Just be gentle, clean and closely manicured.
So why is his fingering better than your DIY? Something to do with angles (even the bendiest girls have trouble), and something to do with being turned on by him. Remember turned on = wet + slippy + sensitive vagina = better fingering. Clasp your hands together. No big thrill, is it? Don't tell me it felt the same holding his hand, the first time.
*Incidentally, this is why you never catch your doc down the Nail Bar. Glittery extensions are antisocial during an internal examination.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 1616
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
What is the problem with giving young people accurate and sensible advice about sex? _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dogsmilk wrote: | What is the problem with giving young people accurate and sensible advice about sex? |
I skimmed the site for less than 5 minutes but came across a word (with its definition) I didn't recognise.
I wish I'd never read it....it's absolutely disgusting.
Innocence is precious............for the young and even, I now believe, to the likes of me (not quite so young).
This site is giving teenagers much more information than they are ever likely to ask for.....and for what point?
It is all about sex as recreation.
It is effectively cheerleading.
..........Let's hear it again. That good old Luciferians' catchphrase.......
................."Do what thou wilt."
Information is like art. It should be uplifting, have moral purpose and be (as they used to say)..........Godly.
Instead what we mostly get in the public domain is information and art as wilfuly corrupting propaganda. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
This seems to be happening elsewhere......there have been real concerns about the following, which was distributed free in tertiary institutions in Australia, although efforts have been made to remove them: The tone and use of language is similar, http://www.viceland.com/int/guide_student_au/htdocs/the_vice.php?count ry=au Quote: | ACADEMIC SUCCESS
Don’t worry so much. The most common mark is between 50 and 65 percent. Nobody gets As except weird brainiacs or Asian people. This looks great on graduation day but understand that they have endured years of overbearing parents, endless maths tests and “educational toys” for Christmas presents. For the men, when they get to 32, they spend thousands on rare Stars Wars figures because they never had them when they were young. The women? It usually manifests itself in a huge dildo collection, prostitution, madness, suicide, or becoming a sexually voracious, piss drinking slattern. Good six-month-girlfriend material if you can handle the suicide attempts.
| It's also outrageously racist. Use of language on bbc such as 'gf', 'bf', 'doc down the nail bar', 'bendy girls', 'free to go after someone brand new!'. In the magazine in Aus 'weird brainiacs', 'good six-month girlfriend material', 'the immigrant lady at the laundromat'. I have heard something similar from someone in Spain who has a three year old in school, just started, given worksheets of naked boy and girl, front and back, circle the difference. And a story about the c*** who sat on the hen and then there was an egg. Her mother is not pleased. She considers three too young to be learning about sex. With respect to the Academy school situation, which is being rushed into place in this country (and looks like it is happening in Aus and NZ, already happening in the US) these schools do not have to conform to the National Curriculum or schools laws (this is an issue with respect to exclusions in particular.) I heard a passing comment by someone about a particular Academy school in London, she felt that 'it is becoming more white'. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 1616
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kbo234 wrote: | Dogsmilk wrote: | What is the problem with giving young people accurate and sensible advice about sex? |
I skimmed the site for less than 5 minutes but came across a word (with its definition) I didn't recognise.
I wish I'd never read it....it's absolutely disgusting.
Innocence is precious............for the young and even, I now believe, to the likes of me (not quite so young).
This site is giving teenagers much more information than they are ever likely to ask for.....and for what point?
It is all about sex as recreation.
It is effectively cheerleading.
..........Let's hear it again. That good old Luciferians' catchphrase.......
................."Do what thou wilt."
Information is like art. It should be uplifting, have moral purpose and be (as they used to say)..........Godly.
Instead what we mostly get in the public domain is information and art as wilfuly corrupting propaganda. |
What word was this?
Teenagers are having sex for fun. They always have and always will. I know I did. At least they're not getting married at 12 any more. And it least if they have access to information they can make more informed decisions. It's no good trying to pretend people don't enjoy shagging. The moral purpose is to ensure teen shagging is as safe and well informed as possible in a world where he internet is already bulging at the seams with hardcore.
But in actuality the Sexual Offences Act 2003 recently made the law a lot stricter regarding young people and sex.
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2003/ukpga_20030042_en_2#pt1-pb5-l1g13
At least these days we don't dress up youngsters like this to prevent the sin of onanism.
Which "Do what thou wilt" are you referring to?
If it is "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Love is the law. Love under will", then "each such act must be 'under will', chosen so as to fulfil and not to thwart the true nature of the being concerned".
Apparently you discover your 'true will' through achieving Knowledge and Conversation of your Holy Guardian Angel, though I don't know if that works as I've never tried it. But that "Do..." is not about running round doing whatever takes you fancy.
Or it could be the pagan "Do what though wilt an' it harm none", I dunno. They're the only two I know; Is there a different, specifically Luciferian one? If there is could you elaborate? Ta. _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are many children as well as teenagers in secondary schools , as young as ten, and public money is being spent in introducing them to the following, unsolicited http://www.bbc.co.uk/onelife/sex_relationships/relationships_all/chatt ing_up_skills/
Quote: | Take action
You've spent weeks eyeing them up across the school canteen and have discussed their every move with your mates. But somehow he/she remains a distant figure on your love horizon. So why not take matters into your own hands? Remember - you won't get any action til you take some action.
Repeat after me
Most people would love someone else to make the first move so let that be your mantra on the big day.
Pick a time when they're on their own - then you'll have their undivided attention without their mates sniggering in the background.
Be yourself. Don't jump in with anything too heavy. And don't try any cheesy lines - they're bound to come across as just plain cringey.
'Have you been working out?'
Once you've got them alone and have started working your chat-up charm, you need to make your intentions clear (assuming you've resisted the urge to go straight in for a snog).
Everyone loves flattery, so massage their ego with some heart-felt compliments. Take a deep breath and...ask them.
If they say no
Don't let fear of rejection put you off.
If they knock you back it could be for all kinds of reasons: they're too shy, they're already with someone or maybe their mate fancies you. Whatever the reason, they'll be so flattered that you asked they'll probably let you down very gently.
And when you've done it once, you'll realise that it's not really as big and scary an ordeal as you thought it was. So, what are you waiting for? Get out there!
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dogsmilk wrote: | kbo234 wrote: | Dogsmilk wrote: | What is the problem with giving young people accurate and sensible advice about sex? |
I skimmed the site for less than 5 minutes but came across a word (with its definition) I didn't recognise.
I wish I'd never read it....it's absolutely disgusting.
Innocence is precious............for the young and even, I now believe, to the likes of me (not quite so young).
This site is giving teenagers much more information than they are ever likely to ask for.....and for what point?
It is all about sex as recreation.
It is effectively cheerleading.
..........Let's hear it again. That good old Luciferians' catchphrase.......
................."Do what thou wilt."
Information is like art. It should be uplifting, have moral purpose and be (as they used to say)..........Godly.
Instead what we mostly get in the public domain is information and art as wilfuly corrupting propaganda. |
What word was this?
Teenagers are having sex for fun. They always have and always will. I know I did. At least they're not getting married at 12 any more. And it least if they have access to information they can make more informed decisions. It's no good trying to pretend people don't enjoy shagging. The moral purpose is to ensure teen shagging is as safe and well informed as possible in a world where he internet is already bulging at the seams with hardcore.
But in actuality the Sexual Offences Act 2003 recently made the law a lot stricter regarding young people and sex.
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2003/ukpga_20030042_en_2#pt1-pb5-l1g13
At least these days we don't dress up youngsters like this to prevent the sin of onanism.
Which "Do what thou wilt" are you referring to?
If it is "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Love is the law. Love under will", then "each such act must be 'under will', chosen so as to fulfil and not to thwart the true nature of the being concerned".
Apparently you discover your 'true will' through achieving Knowledge and Conversation of your Holy Guardian Angel, though I don't know if that works as I've never tried it. But that "Do..." is not about running round doing whatever takes you fancy.
Or it could be the pagan "Do what though wilt an' it harm none", I dunno. They're the only two I know; Is there a different, specifically Luciferian one? If there is could you elaborate? Ta. |
If you don't get it you don't get it.
Man needs an ultimate external authority of good to which he can refer his actions. If he regards himself (and his selfish feelings) as that authority it is most likely to lead to disaster.
...and although the decision to submit or not to submit to a higher authority is made by the self, there is a discrete and very important difference between where you end up, having made your selection between these these two choices (the outcomes of which are often polar oppostes). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
elohim Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 76 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Teenagers are having sex for fun. They always have and always will. I know I did. |
Of course, thats true.
However, what is undeniable is the effort to make this "normal", pushing it as acceptable.
Do you really think the swinging 20's or "free Love" o the 60's occured by chance?
The disintegration of sexual morals & destruction of the family was written about long ago by the "elites" who rule us.
The last vestige is the family unit. Attacked with propaganda, predictive programming & encouraging (forcing) parents to go out to work & leave their children.
EL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Come on kbo, let us know that word even with asterisks. Don't tease us with this.
The point and the problem is that prebuscent bodily exploration and teen sexual explorations are still majorily seen as 'wrong' so long after the half-fake/half-real revolution of the sixties.
The pre-sexual and sexual feelings of youth are still buried in a morass of moralistically hidden pornography of messed-up adult sexuality.
We lost the feeling of god inside us, expressed primarily through the orgasm, and most people still feel the dirty secondry feelings of that loss.
The elites wholly ride on the fear and confusion, deliberately engineered to be sure, the resulting chaos, best expressed in Abu Ghraib and elsewhere.
I'd suggest listening to Dogsmilk. He's one of the most intellectually assured people posting here. _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
dh wrote: | I'd suggest listening to Dogsmilk. He's one of the most intellectually assured people posting here. |
For sure.....but the people who have constructed the societal matrix this site is trying (in our own piddling little way) to oppose are more intelligent than me, you or dogsmilk.
Intelligence is not the point in this argument.
Anything can be justified.....and is. I work in a very dysfunctional unit (called a Comprehensive school) within the secondary education system.
Every new initiative that falls into our pigeonholes is thoroughly justified in terms of improving standards, improving behaviour, improving the curriculum, improving internal organisation, improving relations. The curriculum and schemes of work rarely last longer than a year. The coursework and exams structures change every two or three years. We are inspected to death. All this is utterly demoralising. The childrens' behaviour is often nightmarish. In most classes one is struggling to get a word in sideways to a whole class. There really are no serious consequences for the most disruptive behaviours.
As individuals the children are mostly nice people but collectively they rule and low-level diruption is what you are dealing with almost every minute of your day.
On Friday morning, two lessons before we broke up for half-term I called the management to my class and told them I'd had enough. I went home.
I do not struggle more than most other teachers in this school, many of whom are here from abroad on work permits. It is becoming impossible for schools to find the staff here in the UK.
This is a created nightmare. Created by think-tanks funded by banks. The headteacher says that most of these think-tanks are manned by graduate Old Etonians under 25, (and the like).
These are intelligent people. Their, and our, problem is not that there is a lack of intelligence but that that intelligence is misdirected......
.......in my opinion schools, like everything else, are under attack from the banking elite. They want us to be dysfunctional and demoralised. This leaves us feeling scattered, despairing, obviously unempowered, helpless even......and, most importantly from their point of view, all the easier to control.
My school is due another bunch of inspectors in the first week after half-term. I will not be submitting to any more of this rubbish. We had an 'inset day activity' after school last Wednesday week. It took all 10 in the science department working together over an hour and a half to produce a lesson plan for one lesson......in full accordance with the new advice for such lesson plans...starter, main lesson, individual and group practical activities within the main lesson, plenary, objectives for each part of the broken-down lesson (there were 6, as it happened), timeline SEN and EFL special provisions, differentiation by ability (this means, effectively, preparing two lessons within one) and other details register, homeworks two sets of books with problems selected for different abilities...and so on.
A colleague, an Iraqi Ph.D. in Chemistry sat at the back giggling. He said, "I'm sure the inspectors will be impressed but what will they say when the children walk into the classroom and start throwing sandwiches at each other?"
If you don't laugh, you cry.
If anyone hears of a headmaster and a school that is due an Ofsted inspection but is going to refuse to perform in front of these pointless fiends please let me know. That is a school within which I will be happy to work.
By the way, the chief inspector of schools in 1900, a Mr. Holmes, wrote a report for the government stating that the new tendency to standardisation and mass-cxompulsion within the British Education system was likely to produce a society of "sheep, not men". He was sacked, I believe.....
.......but sheep we are. Almost everyone in education knows that the whole Ofsted exercise is utter bollox and that the National Curriculum is inappropriate and, in all kinds of ways, an ongoing disaster........but who is prepared to do anything about it?
The bankers have already won, haven't they?........
......People moan and grumble but who is prepared to resist these people?
Only those compliant to the bankers' agenda thrive within the system.
The conditioning is all-but-complete. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These are a couple of videos well worth watching ‘Who controls your children?’ and ‘Maths Education: an inconvenient truth.’ http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-4398419790115760009&q=who+c ontrols+your+children&total=140&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plinde x=0 and http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr1qee-bTZI Although it’s recognised in these films that what is happening in education is about the shaping of children’s and teenager’s minds it is not clearly seen that this is about shaping minds specifically with respect to perspectives on race and sexuality. The Bettendorf Survey given to students in US schools: Which of the above are you most likely to assume does not speak fluent English? Which of the above do you think would be most likely to eliminate an entire race? If you could eliminate an entire race would you? If yes, which one? Do you think that homosexuality is a problem that society must deal with as strictly as possible? There is one Academy school in this country which, I understand, has taken one day a week from the teaching of traditional subjects to teach what they deem suitable (if I recall I think this is a faith school). If non-faith Academy schools are entitled to do the same, what would they consider suitable to teach on that day? There seems to be a plan to make all schools in this country into an Academy or a Trust school, but this hasn’t happened yet. We have a window of opportunity to act. ‘The Great City Academy Fraud’ by Francis Beckett worth a read. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | There is one Academy school in this country which, I understand, has taken one day a week from the teaching of traditional subjects to teach what they deem suitable (if I recall I think this is a faith school). |
Actually I got the detail wrong so I will quote from ‘The Great City Academy Fraud’, where I read this, by Francis Beckett ( 1997-2005 education correspondent for the New Statesman…writes on education for The Guardian):
He wanted business at the heart of the academy. Sir Norman’s design is therefore dominated by a huge replica stock market trading floor in the centre of the building, to remind the students of what really matters in life, which is of course making oodles of money. And the National Curriculum is crammed into four days, so that Friday can be spent entirely on business and enterprise. The children spend the day setting up their own businesses……
At Bexley, apart from the business Friday described above, there are several experiments going on, and these and their results have been described by a member of staff who wants to remain anonymous:
Students are never allowed a break outside of the school. They must stay in the building all day. Students are given two half-hour ‘brunch’ breaks. These are not at the same time as other students. These breaks are staggered throughout the day, from 9.30 a.m. to 2 p.m., so that different groups are together. Brunch takes place in a large room without windows. Students have no opportunity to let off steam and are constantly monitored. This causes considerable problems, as the inspectors discovered. Any students who have complained have basically been told that they are lucky to be in the academy and should shut up. It has been nicknamed the ‘Belmarsh Academy’ (after the local prison) as a result....
A parent, Clare Wood, made the same point in a local newspaper, the Bromley News Shopper:
There is no playground; nowhere for a bunch of unruly 11-16 year olds to let off steam. Even the prisoners at Belmarsh get an hour to enjoy the horrendous stench of Thamesmead. My son is, thankfully, in his final year at this institution, that is failing dismally in its Dickensian approach to young people….I am now threatened with a phone call from my son’s teacher who discovered him outside the building. Summer approaches, and these children are forbidden to go outside for the entire day…..Can someone please let these children play? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
karlos Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 2516 Location: london
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
there was something exactly like this on the Russel Brand show
some kids were told to pretend they were in the future and act out scenarios
when everyone got to 70 they were killed off
when someone got tooth ache they were told too take a suicide pill
etc
euthanasia and eugenics in practice from a young age
obviously brand was taking the p out of the show but it was originally a school programme _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Once I realised that there was a global ‘grooming’ of children and teenagers going on via the bbc teens webpages(http://www.bbc.co.uk/scoopcps/teens/news/2005/09/12/25766.sht ml for those of you who don't get it), and elsewhere in schools, I thought I might have a look at what the ‘faceless elite’ global paedophile ring was up to. I found the following on http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/Pedophocracy/child_ sexual_abuse_in_Brussels.htm Quote: | One of those taken into custody - Michel Lelievre, described in a May 2002 BBC report as a "drug addict and petty thief" - reportedly told his interrogators that at least some of the girls abducted by the ring "were kidnapped to order, for someone else.....grim rumors have been circulating that a second paedophile network at least as appalling may have been operating in parallel to that said to involve Dutroux....As the Los Angeles Times reported in January 1998, ‘the conviction remains stubbornly widespread that members of the uppercrust – government ministers, the Roman Catholic Church, the court of King Albert II – belonged to child sex rings, or protected them.....‘slave’ auctions for sixteen-and seventeen-year-old boys were routinely held in Mexico. Some of the boys were featured in brutal snuff or ‘slasher’ movies....U.S. mental health professionals that claims that a child from Mexico ‘can be packaged, delivered, and sold deep within the United States in a short time,’ and that many are purchased solely “for the purpose of killing.” At the start of the year…Britain’s Scotland Yard was continuing to investigate reports that up to twenty children in London had been murdered in (snuff films) and the video tapes sold on the Continent. ‘not just once but repeatedly, evidence had come to the attention of police…..that for pleasure and profit, some of the exiled paedophiles in Amsterdam had murdered boys in front of the camera.....By that time, close to 1,500 people had been charged in the case, but not – as The Guardian noted – “those in high places who are believed to form a ‘paedophile lobby.’ ....the images shocked even veteran sex-crimes investigators, one of whom stated that the seized evidence left him speechless. It looks like the perpetrators are not dealing with human beings but with objects. | Thankyou kbo234 Quote: | It is all about sex as recreation. | With respect to the BBC and the capacity of someone(s) on their staff to produce such cunningly worded sites as the teens page (‘spermy fingers’, ‘doc at the Nail Bar’, ‘bendy girl’) I do wonder where they get these staff from. There must be a mechanism at work whereby people are employed who would like to write up sites like this, or have been trained to do so. The recruitment officer must have an interesting job. The following statement fills some of these gaps, again from ‘The Great City Academy Fraud’: Quote: | Capita….is expected to make £200 million in 2006. Among other contracts, it collects the television licence fee…runs large parts of the BBC’s personnel department…..It has a contract to manage the government’s strategy for improving literacy and numeracy in schools. The former executive chairman of Capita is Rod Aldridge, OBE, who also has an interest in academy schools. “Pledged £2 million to an academy in Blackburn via his personal charitable trust. His £35 million academy is to specialize in entrepreneurship, and 150 homes are being knocked down to build it. | So Capita makes sure we pay our TV Licence (one of my original complaints about the BBC teens webpage……I have paid for that to be there and so have all of you) and has a serious hand in the staffing of BBC.
Quote: | There seems to be some pernicious social engineering going on here. At the BBC I found a constant mantra by my Zionist producer was 'it's not sexy enough' and I felt a bit like a teenage boy again. Well who am I to say that this subject has nothing to do with sex? Ater all she's my boss. | My apologies for the red pill but the truth must be told.
Last edited by Caz on Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More schools to become academies, controlled by the likes of 3E's who are a subsidiary of Aecom, Pentagon subcontractor, or ARK, associated with Bilderberg, or Capita, likely responsible for BBC Teens page, enthusiastically twisting children's minds: 'Incidentally, this is why you never catch your doc down the Nail Bar. Glittery extensions are antisocial during an internal examination...' while teachers slave away.
Quote: | Shape up or else, Brown tells 670 schools
Gordon Brown: First major speech on education
Standards crackdown: Too many schools are still failing pupils
Nearly 700 comprehensives will be closed or taken over unless they achieve basic GCSE standards, Gordon Brown promised yesterday.
In his first major speech on education, the Prime Minister set a five-year deadline for better results at one in five secondary schools.
Local councils will use new powers to intervene in those that miss targets in five subjects including English and maths.
Schools could be shut down or made to hand over control to successful schools, including private ones.
Some could be converted into privately-sponsored academies. | kbo234 Quote: | .....in my opinion schools, like everything else, are under attack from the banking elite. They want us to be dysfunctional and demoralised. This leaves us feeling scattered, despairing, obviously unempowered, helpless even......and, most importantly from their point of view, all the easier to control.
My school is due another bunch of inspectors in the first week after half-term. I will not be submitting to any more of this rubbish. We had an 'inset day activity' after school last Wednesday week. It took all 10 in the science department working together over an hour and a half to produce a lesson plan for one lesson......in full accordance with the new advice for such lesson plans...starter, main lesson, individual and group practical activities within the main lesson, plenary, objectives for each part of the broken-down lesson (there were 6, as it happened), timeline SEN and EFL special provisions, differentiation by ability (this means, effectively, preparing two lessons within one) and other details register, homeworks two sets of books with problems selected for different abilities...and so on.
A colleague, an Iraqi Ph.D. in Chemistry sat at the back giggling. He said, "I'm sure the inspectors will be impressed but what will they say when the children walk into the classroom and start throwing sandwiches at each other?" |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://learning.channel4.com/support/programmenotes/micro/farmrevealed /prog1.html
The programme which this thread began with is this:
The Farm Revealed, a five part series, C4, 9.30am, Monday 8th-Friday 12th October, 2007.
Quote: | Rufus Hound presents The Farm Revealed– the series that investigates how biotechnology is set to change our lives forever.
The series takes a look at the biotechnology underlying modern techniques of food production, criminal investigation, drug manufacture and organ transplantation. Presenter Rufus Hound guides us through a maize of DNA, genes, transgenes and clones, with the help of geneticist Dr Chris Smith and bioengineer Professor Kevin Warwick. And down on the farm, Giles Corin and Olivia Judson report on the strange new breeds of animals that they have found there.
The five programmes in The Farm Revealed cover the following subjects:
Selective breeding and transgenics
DNA sequencing and analysis
Cloning
Tissue engineering
Bionics |
Note the 'Further Activities' for Programme One:
Quote: | Further activities
Eugenics
Read the article about the founder of the British Eugenics Society:
www.channel4.com/science/microsites/
S/science/life/biog_galton.html
Discuss the following:
What is eugenics and why was Francis Galton interested in the subject?
Is it unethical? Why or why not?
Is eugenics a realistic possibility?
Could we really breed a race of super-intelligent humans? |
Note the similarities to the Bettendorf Survey:
http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1999/feb99/focus.html
Quote: | Do you think the United States was stolen from native Americans or do you think it was rightfully colonized by Europeans?
Do you regard yourself as a bigot?
Do you think homosexuality is a problem society must deal with as strictly as possible?
If you could eliminate an entire race, would you? (List by nationality or religion.)
If yes, which one? (Responses will not be published.)
Which nationality or religion do you think is responsible for the decline of the U.S. economy?
Which nationality or religion do you think is more susceptible to alcoholism? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paul wright wrote: | Come on kbo, let us know that word even with asterisks. Don't tease us with this.
The point and the problem is that prebuscent bodily exploration and teen sexual explorations are still majorily seen as 'wrong' so long after the half-fake/half-real revolution of the sixties.
The pre-sexual and sexual feelings of youth are still buried in a morass of moralistically hidden pornography of messed-up adult sexuality.
We lost the feeling of god inside us, expressed primarily through the orgasm, and most people still feel the dirty secondry feelings of that loss.
The elites wholly ride on the fear and confusion, deliberately engineered to be sure, the resulting chaos, best expressed in Abu Ghraib and elsewhere.
I'd suggest listening to Dogsmilk. He's one of the most intellectually assured people posting here. |
Now that's what I call revealing _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:27 pm Post subject: Re: Pushing Eugenics on School TV programme |
|
|
Kevin Warwick is one of the presenters on the school programme uselesseater complained about........The Farm Revealed: uselesseater wrote: | In the plum merchants this morning the TV was on showing school programes BBC 2 or C4 i think.
They were showing a very muscular Bull, selectively bred for this purpose.
Next thing they are on about selective breeding of humans and are pulling audience members out and using a computer programe to show what their offspring might look like. |
http://www.channel4learning.net/support/programmenotes/micro/farmrevea led/prog1_outline.html Quote: | Giles Corin reports from the farm where he meets the Belgian Blues. This breed has double muscle and the bulls resemble pumped-up bodybuilders.
07:00 – 11:14
Back in the studio, Rufus explores human selective breeding. He begins an audience breeding experiment in which he will merge photos of audience members two by two for three generations.
16:03 – 18:14
Rufus returns to the audience breeding experiment and Chris describes some of the more bizarre human genetic traits, such as tongue rolling. |
From Programme 5 of this series: http://www.channel4learning.net/support/programmenotes/micro/farmrevea led/prog5_activities.html
Quote: | Quote: | Presenter Rufus Hound and Professor Kevin Warwick guide a studio audience through the latest developments in bionics. We learn about the latest developments in mechanics and electronics that can transform the human body – intelligent prosthetics, computers that read minds and implantable silicone chips. This programme exposes the cutting edge of technologies that will transform humanity more than any other technology that has gone before it. Bionics blurs the boundaries between human and machine and will change the very meaning of the term 'human'. |
Quote: | Continue the studio discussion
Clip 1: 20:04 – 22:36
Opens with audience member saying, 'I was just wondering…'
Closes with Kevin Warwick saying, '…what you're actually feeling.'
The audience raises four different points for Kevin to address. Listen to each of the questions and Kevin's answers and discuss whether or not you agree with him........
Does Kevin Warwick present a utopian picture in the way that he presents his work on cybernetics? | |
Quote: | Tony Gosling:
Came across this idea on rense.com a long long time ago when Mr Warwick was plugging the 'digital angel' and quoting BT's Martlesham laboratories.
It does seem that Warwick is the only credible advocate for this technology and is always trotted out on these occasions. Maybe some of uis should interview him and see whether he thinks its a good idea to have a microchipped population and why?? |
Tony, that might be the case, but he's being trotted out to the kids via Channel Four TV Programmes on Eugenics........ I didn't think a sensible teacher would show a class a programme like this, until I realised the 'TeachFirst' programme as about getting inexperienced, unqualified teachers into the classroom, backed by Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Rothschilds etc, so we do have a mechanism for this sort of stuff to get to the kids. The interview, Tony, could be very interesting! I'd love to see that happening...... although if you look at what else is said on the notes from this school programme, it looks as if something else is going on as well. Quote: | Set in the, then, far future, Metropolis, is about a city in which a privileged few live charmed lives in complete ignorance of the fact that they are dependent upon a hidden mass of workers. The workers are confined to dark barracks where machines rule their lives. Society has become divided into thinkers and workers. Neither is complete and neither knows anything about the others. This world is turned upside down by an evangelical teacher and a malign mechanical copy of her.
When you have watched the film or read the plot, discuss its relevance today.
What is a utopia? Will robots eventually do all our work, so that we become thinkers or simply consumers? How do the workers resemble machines?
Does Kevin Warwick present a utopian picture in the way that he presents his work on cybernetics? | |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kevin Warwick is one of the presenters on the school programme uselesseater complained about........The Farm Revealed:
Quote: | uselesseater wrote:
In the plum merchants this morning the TV was on showing school programes BBC 2 or C4 i think.
They were showing a very muscular Bull, selectively bred for this purpose.
Next thing they are on about selective breeding of humans and are pulling audience members out and using a computer programe to show what their offspring might look like. |
http://www.channel4learning.net/support/programmenotes/micro/farmrevea led/prog1_outline.html
Quote: | Giles Corin reports from the farm where he meets the Belgian Blues. This breed has double muscle and the bulls resemble pumped-up bodybuilders.
07:00 – 11:14
Back in the studio, Rufus explores human selective breeding. He begins an audience breeding experiment in which he will merge photos of audience members two by two for three generations.
16:03 – 18:14
Rufus returns to the audience breeding experiment and Chris describes some of the more bizarre human genetic traits, such as tongue rolling. |
From Programme 5 of this series: http://www.channel4learning.net/support/programmenotes/micro/farmrevea led/prog5_activities.html
Quote: | Presenter Rufus Hound and Professor Kevin Warwick guide a studio audience through the latest developments in bionics. We learn about the latest developments in mechanics and electronics that can transform the human body – intelligent prosthetics, computers that read minds and implantable silicone chips. This programme exposes the cutting edge of technologies that will transform humanity more than any other technology that has gone before it. Bionics blurs the boundaries between human and machine and will change the very meaning of the term 'human'.
Continue the studio discussion
Clip 1: 20:04 – 22:36
Opens with audience member saying, 'I was just wondering…'
Closes with Kevin Warwick saying, '…what you're actually feeling.'
The audience raises four different points for Kevin to address. Listen to each of the questions and Kevin's answers and discuss whether or not you agree with him........
Does Kevin Warwick present a utopian picture in the way that he presents his work on cybernetics? |
Levin is also, justifiably, disturbed by Kevin Warwick’s involvement in this:
Quote: | Did anyone catch the One Show's feature on microchipping children? If you didn't, it simply beggared belief.
The segment started by cutting straight from a shot of a dog being chipped to a gang of running children. In a very cheerful, 'How clean is your house?' way, parents tried different tracking devices on their children (including an iKids device; ironic considering the recent news of the iPhone's 'back door'), while the presenter joyously suggested that 'the days of children being microchipped could be just around the corner.'
Then it cut to a defeated looking working class parent talking about how much peace of mind it would give her if her child could be chipped, quote 'I'd be able to relax, and they would have more freedom'. The Madeleine McCann incident was milked as reason for children to be tracked, this creepy cyborg from Reading University (seemingly a proponent, authority of, and pioneer of this technology), talked up the possibilities:
http://www.cyber.reading.ac.uk/people/K.Warwick.htm
Note his recent publications/projects:
"Implant Experiments"
"FIDIS: The future of Identity in the Information Society"
"Prospects for thought communication"
Might be worth a polite but firm email, asking exactly what he's thinking promoting the microchipping of children on BBC TV:
k.warwick@reading.ac.uk
Even Esther Rantzen chipped in (no pun intended) with a thumbs up, 'if it were safe and easy'.
Heaven help us. | As stated on the programme notes for ‘The Farm Revealed’ the programme was produced by a company called ‘Red Cinnamon’. ( http://www.redcinnamon.co.uk/index.html )
Quote: | Red Cinnamon is a small company that focuses on doing a few things very well. We specialise in:
• advising voluntary organisations on organising and developing their publishing
• helping voluntary organisations make effective and appropriate use of new technologies to deliver their services
• producing high-quality educational and information-based publications
• managing and commissioning content for educational and information-based websites
• producing annual reports
• setting up and running media appeals
them more than 50 years of experience in these fields working for such clients as the BBC, Barnardo's, Channel 4, Channel Five, Comic Relief, BBC Children In Need, Open University, GamCare, TimeBank, Pilotlight and the Responsibility in Gambling Trust. |
Do notice that David and Elizabeth Highton are Red Cinnamon’s founders and directors.
Is this the same David Highton?
From: http://www.zoominfo.com/Search/PersonDetail.aspx?PersonID=370890406
Quote: | Former NHS chief executive David Highton is now managing director of Patients Choice Partners, a consortium including personnel providers Nestor Healthcare and construction company Carillion. Mr Highton left Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals trust in March this year when the trust was facing debts of £20m, after three years as its chief executive. |
Notice David Highton has two profiles on zoominfo From: http://www.zoominfo.com/Search/PersonDetail.aspx?PersonID=881799759
Quote: | David Highton
Managing Director
Clinicenta Ltd
Managing Director1
Clinicenta Ltd
Headquarters Address:
Lodestone Patient Care Head Office: St George's House 3-5 Pepys Road,
Clinicenta is committed to the rapid delivery of local Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTCs) in order to complement the NHS provision of clinical services. By focusing on the ISTC model, we have been able to develop a fuller, more integrated range of services to support host.
Chief Executive Officer2
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
Website: www.chelwest.nhs.uk
Website: www.skills.org.uk |
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/4/708/609
Quote: | David Highton
Managing Director at Clinicenta
Oxford, United Kingdom
Current
Non Executive Board Member at Skills for Health
Managing Director at Clinicenta
Past
• CEO at Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust
• CEO at Chelsea & Westminster NHS Trust
• Director of Finance and Business Development at Riverside Hospitals
• CEO at Ealing Health Authority
• Director of Finance and Purchasing at Ealing Health Authority
• Managing Director at Property Mail
• Director of Finance at Prudential Property Services (SE)
• Finance and Commercial Analyst at Watney Mann & Truman Brewers Ltd
• HO Financial Controller at Watney Mann & Truman Brewers Ltd
• Financial Controller (London) at RP Martin plc
• Finance Manager at Tunnel AVEBE Starches Ltd |
From: http://www.skillsforhealth.org.uk/page/about-us/board/biographies-and- photos
Quote: | Clinicenta Limited
David Highton
David is currently Managing Director of Clinicenta Limited - a provider of specialist clinical services to the NHS, and has previously held a number of Chief Executive posts within the NHS. | http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2856781.stm
Quote: | Boss leaves debt-hit NHS trust
The boss of a debt-ridden hospital trust has stepped down from his post.
David Highton is to leave the role of chief executive of the Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust in April.
The announcement of Mr Highton's departure comes after the trust revealed debts of £20m.
One MP has claimed Mr Highton, who has overseen a host of costly improvements at the struggling trust, left before he was forced to go. |
http://www.healthcarerepublic.com/news/pressRelease/602654/Clinicenta- partners-MediHome-provide-Hospital-Care-At-Home-services-patients-Sout h-London/
Clinicenta partners with MediHome to provide Hospital-Care-At-Home
Quote: | 15 September 2006: NHS patients will soon be able to choose to recover at home under the care of nurses from MediHome Limited, the Hospital-Care-At-Home company. MediHome, in partnership with Clinicenta, will provide this service for two new surgical treatment centres in South London.
MediHome Nurses will care for patients in their own homes following a wide range of operations instead of having to remain in hospital. These new surgical treatment centres are part of the Government's programme to widen the choice available to NHS patients. Clinicenta's two surgical units will start treating patients in April 2008.
David Highton, Managing Director of Clinicenta, said: "We are very pleased to be working with MediHome to deliver this innovative approach to patient care. NHS patients choosing to have their operations with Clinicenta will be able to enjoy a service that until now has only been available to patients who can afford private treatment." |
http://www.clinicenta.com/news/clinicenta_mgmt_team_announced.asp
Quote: | Heading up the operation for Clinicenta, the joint venture between support services and construction company Carillion and Lodestone Patient Care, one of the UK's leading independent providers of diagnostic imaging services is David Highton. |
Other Carillion joint ventures include Aspire Defence http://www.aspiredefence.co.uk/ which is is working with the MoD, through a partnering agreement, to provide 18,000 Army and civilian personnel with a modern living and working environment over the next 35 years.
http://www.whale.to/m/b12.html
Quote: | ...they found hope in the pioneering Vitamin B12 Unit at Westminster and Chelsea Hospital in London where they were told that Alex, now 13, had a vitamin B12 deficiency, which drastically exacerbated his autistic symptoms.
But as Alex was receiving treatment — including injections of vital B12 co-enzymes — the unit closed without warning.
The closure appalled families who relied on the unit.
Dr Bhatt negotiated with the hospital’s chief executive, David Highton, to keep the unit open at a cost of £200,000 a year.
But Mr Highton and the Chelsea and Westminster Trust Board —which has authority over the hospital’s £230 million health provision — refused to provide funding and claimed Dr Bhatt’s test procedures were experimental and unethical.
The suggestion is denied by Dr Bhatt, who ran the unit for 10 years and is recognised worldwide as a specialist in the condition.
He thinks the closure has more to do with funding and medical politics than ethics.
Parents were outraged not to be notified of the unit’s closure. They turned up for appointments to find it shut. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
petros Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 106 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dogsmilk wrote: |
Which "Do what thou wilt" are you referring to?
If it is "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Love is the law. Love under will", then "each such act must be 'under will', chosen so as to fulfil and not to thwart the true nature of the being concerned".
Apparently you discover your 'true will' through achieving Knowledge and Conversation of your Holy Guardian Angel, though I don't know if that works as I've never tried it. But that "Do..." is not about running round doing whatever takes you fancy.
Or it could be the pagan "Do what though wilt an' it harm none", I dunno. They're the only two I know; Is there a different, specifically Luciferian one? If there is could you elaborate? Ta. |
The pagan or wiccan rendering and the version from the 'book of the Law' are both from Crowley. Ultimately the difference between 'paganism' and Crowleyism satanism is superficial. Both come from the same rotten source. The 'spirit guides'/demons that Crowley served. see: http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/wicca.htm
Gerald Gardener was a Crowley follower and he invented modern paganism.
Quote: | Gardner claimed to have been initiated in 1939 into a tradition of religious witchcraft that he believed to be a continuation of European Paganism. He knew and worked with many famous occultists, not the least of which was Aleister Crowley
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gardnerian_Wicca
|
According to the book Wicca: Satan's white lie William Schnoebelen says that Wicca the neo-paganism we see today was formalised in the 1930s by a man called Gerald Gardner and he used the teachings of Crowley to invent this supposed ancient nature worshipping religion. He was also a pervert and many of the rituals involved naked women.
An amazing read. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|