FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Truth About Diversity

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The Bigger Picture
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:07 pm    Post subject: The Truth About Diversity Reply with quote

The Truth About "Diversity"

October 21, 2007



by Henry Makow Ph.D.

(This is a slightly revised version of an article that first appeared in June 2006.)

We are all affected by "Diversity" but few understand its true nature.

Warning: It isn't pretty.

"Diversity" is a massive long-term behavior modification program that uses minorities to disinherit the majority.

In English, "Diversity" means acknowledging different races, religions and "sexual orientations."

In New World Order doublespeak, "Diversity" is a devious way to dilute and discriminate against the white, heterosexual Christian majority in Europe, Canada and the US.

While it pretends to advocate equality, its real goal is to guilt mainly heterosexual White males into yielding position and power. The object is to prepare North America and Europe for inclusion in a "world government" run by the central banking cartel based in London.

This private cartel's power is measured by the fact that virtually every major corporation, educational institution and government agency provides "diversity training" (i.e. political re-education) to its employees. Even though studies show it has zero economic benefit, they spend eight billion dollars a year on it. Toyota alone plans to spend that much in the next ten years.

Here is an example of the shaming of Whites that takes place in these sessions. It is from the text, "Seeing Ourselves: Exploring Race Ethnicity and Culture" (1999) by Carl James.

A participant, Greg tells the group:

"As for my race, I am white but I never really had to think about it before. I don't feel that it ever affected the people with whom I associated or talked to. My two best friends are Black and (Canadian) Indian. I was brought up in a family that didn't believe in prejudice and I'm proud of that. If I don't like a person, it is because of their personality, not their race or heritage."

Now you'd think that Greg would pass with flying colors.

You didn't consider the hidden agenda. The author, a Diversity trainer, chastises Greg for assuming he is "the norm." Greg fails to acknowledge his "race privilege," that "invisible package of unearned assets" that is the "white colonial legacy." Whites like Greg deny "the ways in which they socially, culturally and politically produce relations of domination." (p.44)

In other words, Whites naturally oppress other people. That sounds like vicious racism to me.

Can you see what's happening? These Diversity sessions lay guilt trips on Whites, especially males, so they will yield power to compliant grateful minorities who have not earned it. This is a scam. Anyone who objects to this political agenda commits career suicide. That's political persecution.

I want to be clear that I think the human race is one family and God loves all people equally. Like Greg, I believe people should be judged on their merit alone, regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation.

I have no problem with "minorities" winning positions of power so long as they do it fairly. I welcome the rich contribution immigrants make.

But "Diversity" is not about fairness or enriching society. It promotes minorities not for their own sake, but as a way to undermine and control the majority.

IRONY

It's ironic that the central banking clique should lay this guilt trip on Whites when it is they who are responsible for imperialism and wars past and present. It is they who grew even richer through the slave and opium trades, and they who control organized crime today through their agents.

The US population is more than 75% White and Christian. The plan is for Whites to become a minority by 2050 or sooner. Whites are expected to stand by and become guests on their own house.

When Whites are a minority, no one will champion their rights. There are two million more females than males at US universities. Have you heard of any affirmative action programs for males?

"Diversity" is practically unheard of in China, Japan, Israel, India and Latin America. These countries are allowed to keep their racial character. But because people of European origin have a sense of material, spiritual and political privilege, they are the hardest to absorb in the New World Order. They are the targets of the "Diversity" program.

The central bankers use the tactic of "divide and conquer" to undermine the four pillars of our identity: race, religion, nation and family.

First, they pretended to champion the workers to get rid of the Tsarist regime in Russia. Then they pretended to champion women and homosexuals to undermine heterosexual values and the family. Finally they are duping Whites to passively accept discrimination and a greatly diminished status.

They use the same dog-eared playbook. (Select one) Workers, Jews, Blacks, homosexuals, women have been oppressed for centuries. Let the bankers put their (select one) front men (or womyn) in power.


CONCLUSION

Malleable and conformist, the masses will usually adopt the norm. When evil people set the norm, the masses will succumb to distorted and self-destructive behavior.

The banking cartel creates money using our national credit. As a result, society has been subverted by an alien power with a satanic agenda. Our poltical and kultural elites consist of traitors who, for example, allowed 9-11 to take place and covered it up. We are subjected to a constant stream of lies from these sanctimonious self-serving pawns.

In a poll taken Oct. 18, 2007, by the Toronto Globe and Mail, 63% answered "No" to the question: "Do you think Canada's multiculturalism policies have been a success?" The sample was roughly 11,000 and Globe readers tend to be liberals.

The founding peoples of the West have a right to maintain their national character and see it flourish. Immigrants expect to integrate, while retaining their heritage. They don't expect to be used to undermine the majority.

So, let's not fall into their "divide and conquer" trap by focusing our indignation on minorities. They are manipulated as much as we. Let's focus on the central bankers and their lackeys, in politics, education, business and the media.

I know this goes against the grain for some. Ask yourself where did you get your attitudes. They were dinned into you by the media and education. We are being manipulated and duped and it's time we awoke.

Let me remind you: the term "politically correct" originated in the Communist Party of the USSR in the 1920's. It is not a coincidence that the term is part of our lexicon today. The same bankers who controlled the USSR then, secretly control the USA, Canada and Europe today.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
insidejob
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 475
Location: North London

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:10 pm    Post subject: racist Makow Reply with quote

Despite the insights that Makow provides, he has a strong streak of what can only be described as racism. His position on equality for women and gays is also suspect.

I'm not sure why so-called diversity is a plot by the Illuminati to bring about world government. What has the NWO got to do with 'making whites feel ashamed'? Some of Makow's view would probably find support by David Duke.

There is, of course, a right-wing, Christian, conservative, Southern racist strand that it part of the anti-NWO movement. They are the sorts of people who think that getting rid of Apartheid was a New World Order plot against the Christian country of South Africa. Jeff Rense is part of this strand of dangerous nonsense. He thinks that the NWO are in some way protecting 'the black community's racial war against whites' i.e. when black people commit crimes against white people.

The problem is that the racist views of these people are cloaked behind the movement against the NWO. What they will never do is come out and declare that they are in fact racist and they believe that whites are superior to blacks and should be treated as such.

As for 'diversity', this was invented by white people to avoid racial equality. But the idea that I as a black person should feel concerned about whites being told that there is racism in their societies is a joke.

Illuminati have infiltrated black communities. They co-opted the US' National Association of the Advancement of Coloured People. They seek to create 'black leaders'. They created a black Masonic order, Boule. They are most likely behind moves to create a pan-African government, which would, of course, have a single bank and single currency. The intention was to suppress black people's radical intent and maintain domination of black resources.

Many whites (and to be honest far too many blacks) think the idea that white are superior is merely reality. Whites have created civilizations and black, apparently, none.

'When we ruled' by Robin Walker, points to the truth. By 1871, British historians had all the documents and books they needed to show that most of the history of civilization has been the history of black people. Black civilizations began at least around 6,000 BC while European civilizations started around 500 BC. Westerns are in a position to suppress and lie about European written sources concerning black civilizations. They are in less of a position to do this concerning say Chinese sources.

Would Makow, Rense and the rest of the racists reveal this type of information? OR would it pain them too much?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Emmanuel
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 434

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can see why there is an attempt of making white males feel guilty.
Also as Alex Jones often points out white men are seen as pathetic victims in most tv programmes and advertising.

"Dr. Hawkins (Ref1) who is known for the development of the "Map of consciousness". Adopting a scale of 0, representing the consciousness field of death or nonexistence to 1,000, the highest level of awareness ever achieved on this planet (by great masters like Jesus, Buddha, and Krishna), Dr. Hawkins used Kinesiology to calibrate levels within the database of consciousness by listing the emotions prevalent within the levels of the map. These emotions are connected to what is known as Attractor Fields in modern physics, which is the reality field the person having a certain emotion is connected to and experiencing.

His research revealed that negative, anti-life and painful states calibrate below 200, the level of integrity and courage. The higher the level, the more power the Attractor Field has. Here it is important to note, that the calibration figures do not represent an arithmetic but a logarithmic progression. Thus, the level 200 is not twice the amplitude of 100, it is 100 to the tenth power. I will only mention some of the levels from the Map of Consciousness for the purposes of this article.

Shame falls at the bottom of the range (20). When this attitude dominates, people wish they were invisible and are feel disconnected from life force. At the level of Apathy (50) a person is filled with despair, feeling hopeless in life as their reality. Grief is at level 75, fear at 100, anger at 150, until we reach courage at 200. Willingness and optimism is at 310, reason and understanding at 400, love at 500 and non-duality or enlightenment at 600. The levels higher than to 1000 represent pure consciousness in more expansive ways."

_________________
www.freecycle.org
www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com
http://www.viking-z.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:17 am    Post subject: Re: racist Makow Reply with quote

insidejob wrote:
Despite the insights that Makow provides, he has a strong streak of what can only be described as racism. His position on equality for women and gays is also suspect.



I disagree.

It is not about being anti-anything, it is about understanding why the 'diversity' agenda is being heavily promoted by the powers-that-be.

Do you really believe that they have been pushing feminism, anti-racism and anti-homophobia propaganda because of their love for the idea of equality and universally applied value systems?

I suppose that is why the world is becoming a fairer place and that wealth is becoming ever more fairly distributed.

Come on. Get a grip.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
insidejob
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 475
Location: North London

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:19 pm    Post subject: Now white people are oppressed by racism Reply with quote

I think history tells you that the Illuminati have been behind the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, imperialism, white supremacy and, have given much support to the supremacy of the white male over all others. Now, according to Makow and all the rest of them, the Illuminati have discovered this has all been a mistake and now they are into racial equality, gender equality and rights for gays - all in an attempt to do down the poor, suffering white male. The white male, who looks enviously at the privileged lifestyle of blacks - they'd all swop places any day of the week - NOT.

The reality is that Makow gives the white male a privileged position, as the main architect of human civilization (WRONG!) and any attempt to challenge this is all an Illuminati plot. What they're trying to do is to get everyone down to the level of the world's poorest - so there we have it, the real goal of equality. And how could this happen? After all, white people and white men are superior and in no way should be 'on the same level' as the inferior races. And we know it's an Illuminati plot because they aren't white, they're really black.

Well, OK, I'm being a smart arse. It's easy to mock these David Duke notions. Of course, the real agenda of the Illuminati is to severely cut the populations of non-white races (especially them Chinese), which they are already doing a good job. And their use of feminism and anti-racism was to control not unleash it. But realising that means we can't feel sorry for the oppressed white man.

Or have I missed the real Illuminati agenda? And how exactly has anti-racism and feminism helped to achieve Illuminati goals?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What do you think is going on here (see below)?? Can this really be about anything other than undermining the majority in order to make them helpless in the long run.
What will also happen, if this strategy is successful, is that, in time individuals from these minorities will be promoted to positions of power and they will drag their friends up the ladder after them. They will be aware of how precarious their position is and will defend the modern 'system' as if their lives depended on it.


Schwarzenegger Institutionalizes Sexual Perversion
By Pat Shannan – American Free Press October 29, 2007

Gov.Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed into law four bills requiring all public school instruction and activities to positively portray trans-sexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to children as young as kindergarten.

He has also signed bills undermining marriage and infringing upon the moral conscience of business owners, churches, and nonprofit organizations.

On Friday the 13th, Schwarzenegger signed SB 777 (transsexual, bisexual, homosexual indoctrination of schoolchildren by requiring changes to all instruction and activities) and AB 394, 102 and 14 (transsexual, bisexual, homosexual indoctrination of students, parents, and teachers via “anti-harassment” training).

Signing the bills was a switch for Schwarzenegger, who vetoed nearly the same bills last year, in the midst of his reelection campaign.

“Arnold Schwarzenegger has delivered young children into the hands of those who will introduce them to alternative sexual lifestyles,” said Randy Thomasson, president of Campaign for Children and Families (CCF), which helped lead the statewide charge against these bills. “This means children as young as five years old will be mentally molested in school classrooms. Shame on Schwarzenegger and the Democrat politicians for ensuring that every California school becomes a homosexual- bisexual-transsexual indoctrination center.”

SB 777 prohibits any “instruction” or school-sponsored “activity” that “promotes a discriminatory bias” against “gender” (the bill’s definition includes cross-dressing and sex changes) and “sexual orientation” (the bill’s definition includes bisexuality). Because no textbook or instruction in California public schools currently disparages transsexuality, bisexuality, or homosexuality, the practical effect of SB 777 will be to require positive portrayals of these sexual lifestyles at every government-operated school.

Otherwise, “discriminatory” schools will be subject to intimidation and lawsuits by the State Department of Education. Under these bills, which will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2008, the following will be eliminated from California public schools because they are deemed to have a “discriminatory
bias”:

• Textbooks and other instruction that portray marriage as only between a man and a woman;

• Textbooks and other instruction that say people are born male or female (and not in between);

• Textbooks that leave out transsexual, bisexual, and homosexual historical figures;

• Sex education and school assemblies that omit the option of hormone injections, or sex changes;

• Homecoming king and queen contests that allow only boys to run for king and girls to run for queen;

• Separate bathrooms for boys and girls.

“Mom and Dad” as well as “husband and wife” effectively have been banned from California schools. “SB 777 will result in reverse discrimination against students with religious and traditional family values,” said Meredith Tourney, legislative liaison for Capitol Resource Institute. “These students have lost their voice as the direct result of Gov. Schwarzenegger’s unbelievable decision. The terms ‘mom’ and ‘dad’ or ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ could promote discrimination against homosexuals if a same-sex couple is not also featured.

“Parents want the assurance that when their children go to school they will learn the fundamentals of reading, writing and arithmetic —not social indoctrination regarding alternative sexual lifestyles. Now that SB777 is law, schools will in fact become indoctrination centers for sexual experimentation,” she said.

“We are shocked and appalled that the governor has blatantly attacked traditional family values in California,” said Karen England, executive director of Capitol Resource Institute.
www.americanfreepress.net/html/schwarzenegger.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
insidejob
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 475
Location: North London

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:10 pm    Post subject: Prejudice masquerading as conspiracy theory Reply with quote

kbo234,

Why on Earth do the Powers That Be need a whole equality program involving whole groups of people in order to get a few minority puppets in positions of power? All they need do is appoint a few of minority puppets and Bob’s your Uncle, minority puppets who’ll do anything to keep their power.

I’d begin to take you a bit more seriously if MI5 were staffed by black people. Or if whites were a minority in the police force. Of if the Queen was lesbian.

But let me let you into a secret. The top levels of the Masons, and Templars are white males. Bilderberg is largely made up of white males. To keep their members informed, the CFR send material to mainly white males. In order to become a member of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, it helps to be a white male. There are some black people who Rhodes Scholars, the vast majority are white males. The Neo-Cons are largely white males. Fox News is run by white males. Skull and Bones probably have no black members at all because they are white males. The City of London is run by white males. Do you see a pattern here?

Most worrying is this pernicious notion that multi-culturalism is undermining white people confidence. What does this mean? Switch to north London party where an English man complains that Scots are in a conspiracy to get their own back and destroy England. You see, the Tory Party is run by a Scot. The Lib Dems was run by a Scot. The Labour government is run by Scots. And it was a Scot, Tony Blair, that got England into the disasterous Iraq war. (Yes, this is what he said.) So, I'm supposed to believe that the centres of power in the UK, run mainly by English people, are allowing the Scots to take over and destroy them. Does any that make sense? No. So, what was he really on about?

He was upset because Celts are actively seeking to stop English people from dominating the UK. That is, he doesn’t like the idea that Celts don’t like English people telling them what to do.

This is where we get this ‘undermining white people’ dishonest clap trap. The truth is people who think like this are threatened because non-white are increasingly challenging the domination, exploitation and abuse they get off white people. And that’s what so upsetting to people like Makow.

Yet, it is white men who are really running the Illuminati show. So, where are Makow’s articles about the dangers posed by white males? Of course, he wouldn’t write such as article. Why? Because it would be silly!!! Do you get my drift?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
uselesseater
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 629
Location: Leeds

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The ruling class are behind both the racist supremacy movements and the phoney multicultural agenda. Multiculturalism is a positive thing but do you think the current status exists because our leaders are loving idealists thinking of our best interests?

I don't think so. Total, forced, multiculturalism is a necesity of the New World Order agenda.

Of course in the multicultural world then we would need a world goverment.

That's why we are brainwashed to hate out own culture, sometimes through the projecting the crimes of the British Empire onto the general population.

We are simply, seeing the phasing out of the power block used by the elite throughout the 20th century i.e. America and Great Britain. That's the plan, to bring us down to third world status, along with all the other nations, to harmonise us for World Government. Just so it's a seemless transition. It shouldn't surprise us as they have moved in and out of different civilisations, as it suited them over 1000's of years.

_________________
www.wytruth.org.uk

www.myspace.com/truthleeds
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What do you think is going on here (see below)?? Can this really be about anything other than undermining the majority in order to make them helpless in the long run.
What will also happen, if this strategy is successful, is that, in time individuals from these minorities will be promoted to positions of power and they will drag their friends up the ladder after them. They will be aware of how precarious their position is and will defend the modern 'system' as if their lives depended on it.


I really can't see what the fuss is about regarding this - as far as I can see all this legislation does is make it so non-heterosexual sexuality isn't taught as being the 'normal' sexuality which by default makes non-heterosexual orientation abnormal. How are we undermined by children being taught that some people are gay, that's the way it always has been and always will be and that's not a bad thing?

The very title of the article betrays that it is nothing more than a homophobic rant. Unless we think non-heterosexuals are perverts.

Quote:
Now that SB777 is law, schools will in fact become indoctrination centers for sexual experimentation,” she said.
What does that mean? What experimentation? What indocrination? Are they frightened children might actually stop victimising their gay peers? Or are they frightened that all the kids will 'go gay'? After all, there is mention of 'alternative sexual lifestyles' as if one's sexuality is just a fashion statement.
We never got to be doing sexual experimentation in the classroom in my day. I feel cheated.

Quote:
children as young as five years old will be mentally molested in school classrooms.
What - young minds will routinely be exposed to the shocking revelation that sometimes people have two mummies or two daddies instead of one of each? Nooooo!!!!!!! How will they handle it?!


I don't see why this necessarily has to be incorporated into some bigger 'agenda'. Gay groups are lobbying for such things all the time and certainly have been in California for a long while. Mind you, according to some parties this means it's in the sinister hands of the so-called "homosexual agenda". If anyone knows what this actually is, I'd like to find out. If it involves playing records by the Village People, I am against it.

_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
insidejob
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 475
Location: North London

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:50 pm    Post subject: Upside down Reply with quote

uselesseater wrote:
The ruling class are behind both the racist supremacy movements and the phoney multicultural agenda. Multiculturalism is a positive thing but do you think the current status exists because our leaders are loving idealists thinking of our best interests?

I don't think so. Total, forced, multiculturalism is a necesity of the New World Order agenda.

Of course in the multicultural world then we would need a world goverment.

That's why we are brainwashed to hate out own culture, sometimes through the projecting the crimes of the British Empire onto the general population.


uselesseater,

Let me let you in on the realities of the world.

1. Cultural imperialism - where Western values and culture dominate non-Western countries to the extent that many in the non-Western world aspire to these values.

2. Multi-culturalism - where the West allows for limited and non-threatening aspects of non-Western values and culture into their institutions. (Like having a black artist exhibit in the ICA.)

Note, the Illuminati's multi-culturalism does not stretch to getting black people to run Bilderberg. It does not stretch to allowing non-Western countries to dominate the IMF and World Bank. It does not stretch to non-Western countries being dominant among the permanent members of the UN Security Council.

What does this tell you?

THAT THE ILLUMINATI ARE NOT INTO BLACK PEOPLE MUCH. THAT'S WHY THEY'VE BEEN SEARCHING FOR RACE SPECIFIC BIO-WEAPONS - TO KILL OFF LARGE NUMBERS OF BLACK PEOPLE!!!

The Illuminati DON'T NEED multiculturalism to bring about World Government, THEY NEED cultural imperialism. That's why their base is the City of London and not Georgetown, Guyana. That's why they control the global media and not Robert Mugabe.

As for the British Empire, it was financed by the Illuminati. Who financed the British East India Company? - the City of London. Who ran the British East Africa Company? - Cecil Rhodes of the Rhodes Milner Group. Now, according to you, these same people are now teaching us to hate the Empire they financed. I can't wait for them to start telling us how rotten they are for fooling us all into thinking that Crown Land in Jamaica is owned by the Queen rather than by them. But, I wouldn't bet on it.

And when, Bilderberg starts publicly attacking cultural imperialism, I may start thinking your points are not a little off the mark or TOTAL XXXXXXXX. At least the Illuminati aren't going to use your ideas to impose World Government.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
uselesseater
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 629
Location: Leeds

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Upside down Reply with quote

insidejob wrote:


uselesseater,

Let me let you in on the realities of the world.

1. Cultural imperialism - where Western values and culture dominate non-Western countries to the extent that many in the non-Western world aspire to these values.

2. Multi-culturalism - where the West allows for limited and non-threatening aspects of non-Western values and culture into their institutions. (Like having a black artist exhibit in the ICA.)



They want One World Cultural Imperialism but it's just semantics anyway.

insidejob wrote:

Note, the Illuminati's multi-culturalism does not stretch to getting black people to run Bilderberg. It does not stretch to allowing non-Western countries to dominate the IMF and World Bank. It does not stretch to non-Western countries being dominant among the permanent members of the UN Security Council.

What does this tell you?

THAT THE ILLUMINATI ARE NOT INTO BLACK PEOPLE MUCH. THAT'S WHY THEY'VE BEEN SEARCHING FOR RACE SPECIFIC BIO-WEAPONS - TO KILL OFF LARGE NUMBERS OF BLACK PEOPLE!!!

The Illuminati DON'T NEED multiculturalism to bring about World Government, THEY NEED cultural imperialism. That's why their base is the City of London and not Georgetown, Guyana. That's why they control the global media and not Robert Mugabe.

As for the British Empire, it was financed by the Illuminati. Who financed the British East India Company? - the City of London. Who ran the British East Africa Company? - Cecil Rhodes of the Rhodes Milner Group. Now, according to you, these same people are now teaching us to hate the Empire they financed. I can't wait for them to start telling us how rotten they are for fooling us all into thinking that Crown Land in Jamaica is owned by the Queen rather than by them. But, I wouldn't bet on it.

And when, Bilderberg starts publicly attacking cultural imperialism, I may start thinking your points are not a little off the mark or TOTAL XXXXXXXX. At least the Illuminati aren't going to use your ideas to impose World Government.


Yeah I know about the Anglo American Establishment and that they white racists; although they hate the whites too.

Yes they establishment use the crimes of imperialism project guilt onto the common man in order for him to willingly give up his independence, security and freedom. This is known as propaganda i.e. they don't actualy agree with that.

Bilderberg? You do realise that they, themselves don't feel guilty or hate cultural imperialism?

_________________
www.wytruth.org.uk

www.myspace.com/truthleeds
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emmanuel
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 434

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The big boys Bilderberg, rothschilds, freemasons, mcdonalds are run by white males.
They dont want the rest of the population to be empowered, so they create a climate of shame and unempowerment for the avergae white male. This means they hold onto the power.
Feminism as much as I embraced it in the past, was controlled by the top too.
It was an excuse to get women to work and pay taxes. It has done a great job of breaking up families too.
I am not male or white

_________________
www.freecycle.org
www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com
http://www.viking-z.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dogsmilk wrote:


I really can't see what the fuss is about regarding this....


There is no fuss at all. that's the trouble.

We are collectively too dopey to realise the seriousness of what is being done to us.


Last edited by kbo234 on Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:27 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
paul wright
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Look at the diversity training of Common Purpose
How horrible is training as such
Anyone really want to be trained in a particular direction?
When I hear the word training I reach for my revolver
To misquote Goering or his ilk

_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 18335
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Christians haven't got a prayer in 'diversity' Britain...

......While they genuflect to Islam and 'respect' every oddball religion from paganism to devil-worship, they despise Britain's Judeo-Christian tradition and use every extent of their powers to crush it. It's only Christianity which is singled out for such vilification, as with the airport worker suspended for wearing a crucifix and the devout Christian registrar threatened with the sack for refusing to perform homosexual marriages.
Just imagine how they would have reacted had Mrs Petrie been a Muslim offering to pray to Allah for a patient's recovery. Anyone who objected would be accused of a 'hate crime' and dumped in a skip at the back of the mortuary.
What's really chilling about this case is that neither of the patients complained. It was only when news reached the ears of another nurse and a 'carer' that the full inquisition swung into action.
What kind of sick society have we become where self-righteous sneaks can ruin someone's career?

......

Why should Mrs Petrie, or anyone else, have to 'demonstrate a personal commitment to equality and diversity'? She can harbour whatever beliefs she likes, provided it doesn't interfere with her professionalism.
There's only one word to describe hatchet-faced harridans like administrator Alison Withers and the tell-tale creeps trying to get a dedicated nurse such as Caroline Petrie sacked for dispensing a little Christian kindness.
Sick.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1134463/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-C hristians-havent-got-prayer-diversity-Britain-.html

comments section wrote:

When I did my nurse training, a person's spiritual needs were to be taken into consideration and included in their careplan, part of that included their religious beliefs. This meant that religious dietery needs were acknowledged, contact with appropriate faith organisations (iman, rabbi, pastor etc) - the offer for prayer would not have been that unusual if the person was a christian as this lady said she was. Sadly the spiritual element of patient needs seems to have now become either ignored or just another box to be ticked. This is so sad as it denies a very important part of a person's recovery and reduces all people to nothing more than a machine. Also all assessments and careplans were hand written this meant that the nurse had to really think about the patient's needs. Again something really missing in today's profession. When my area of pratice was eventually reduced to the constant form filling mentallity with patients needs a secondary consideration it was time to go.
Click to rate Rating 28

- hellsbells, liskeard, UK, 04/2/2009 13:43

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The Bigger Picture All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group