Chomsky Weighs In On 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

[blackbear]

Noam Chomsky Weighs In On 9/11 Conspiracy Theories [VIDEO]

Adam Howard

The legendary linguist and activist explains why he's highly skeptical about Bush Administration involvement in perpetrating 9/11.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/66473/

Nomo
While acknowledging that he may be out-of-step with many of his colleagues on the left, Chomsky talks about why he doesn't believe that 9/11 was an "inside job." Among other things he believes that some aspect of the plan would have leaked and too many events on that day were too elaborate to have been planned to perfection and therefore would not have been worth the risk for the Bush Administration. However, he also speaks of how the attacks were the best thing to ever happen to corrupt regimes throughout the world. Check out the video to your right for more.

Jeff....Zionist Gatekeeper
I don't think Chomsky's so calculating about his rejection of conspiracy theory. I think he simply lacks the parapolitical frame of reference to see conspiracy.

Stickdog99See, al Qaeda is the only organization that can plan elaborate things like 9/11 without all those pesky leaks that are inevitable for any better funded, equipped, staffed and trained covert organization!

SecretsShame on Chomsky. I don't give him the benefit of the doubt. He's a master of rhetoric and analysis. The only silver lining I see is ... if that's the best argument for swallowing the OT, then ... heh, 911 Truth is inevitable.

http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=14319&sid=461c19 14fa9a8b1857d6385b10dc6ada

[IanFantom]

I think that will turn out to be a very powerful video once Chomsky has to admit that the science is there after all - especially the bit where he says they would have to be insane.

[kbo234]

What kind of a man is this?

He's a world-renowned thinker and establishment leftist whose university gets most of its funds from the Pentagon.

He rubbishes scientific evidence rather than demonstrating that arguments (re conservation of momentum and energy considering the free-fall collapses perhaps) are false. He states blythely that 'anyone who knows anything' about science dismisses these arguments out of hand.

This is quite simply lying bollox.

He is not a fool.......surely.

He can only be a 'gatekeeper' whose role (and he knows it) is to protect the criminals.

At the end he says "and if it was an inside job..so what? It doesn't matter."

This takes the breath away.

So understanding reality, identifying and (hopefully) punishing the hidden criminals and their organisations that control our governments is a pointless activity?

What a dark demonic creep this man is. So brilliant at painting the big picture....provided it is in abstract terms (the problem is......big government, greedy financiers, dictators.....etc.) and there is no one specifically to be identified as a wrongdoer.

His job is to affirm the judgement and sense of moral superiority of those leftists who would like to change the systems but also, ultimately, to leave them with a feeling of powerlessness and that all attempts at resistance are futile.