PepeLapiu, how did I reveal myself as a "complete idiot

[Killtown]

[PepeLapiu]

Stop derailing and diverting the topic and answer the questions which none of your no-planer buddies tried to answer and which you get out of your way to not answer. Here are the questions yet again:

So if there was no planes hitting the towers, how is it that every single video footage available show us a plane hitting the buildings? You can't drive a snowmobile into a shed in cottage country without people seeing it so how is it that we can't find a single video footage that reveals no plane hit the second tower? Surely some people would be on the opposite side of the building and would not see the plane coming in, they would only see the ensuing explosion without the plane. But of all those who were on the proper side, how is it that none of them can tell us that they saw the building explode without a plane going in? How is it that the perpetrators managed to confiscate every conceivable video of the impact and add "digital fakery" to them? How did they manage to make sure that nobody catches the building on video exploding without a plane going in?

[Killtown]

[PepeLapiu]

Never the less, aside from you not answering my questions, I will explain what's wrong with you. But in order to do so i will tell you about the 9/11 commission and their methods.

They started with a conclusion, the conclusion that 19 Muslims did it.
Then they proceeded to collect evidence which would support their conclusion. All evidence pointing elsewhere was simply dismissed or not mentioned at all. A simple example of this is the fundings of Al Queada. They said they looked into it and that they could not pinpoint the exact source of their financing and that it doesn't really matter because if they could not get money from one source, they would get it from an other source. In other words, don't follow the money.

Of course, it is well known that Al Queada was financed by the CIA, but they simply claim it's not important where the money came from and avoided mentioning the CIA fundings.

Then there is the airlines inside trading. They addressed that, only they claimed it's of no importance because the investors were not connected to the Al Queada. In other words, if the evidence does not point to Al Queada, they ignore it. But they also were very careful not to reveal who were the investors.

You do the same Killtown, you started with a conclusion: there were no planes. And you try to find evidence to corroborate your conclusion, all other evidence pointing away from your conclusion are deemed fake or not important or you simply ignore it all together. One instance of this is the guy who saw the plane coming from inside the building. That doesn't fit your conclusion so you just claim he lied. You don't need any proof that he lied, you don't need any evidence that he lied, you simply claim that he lied because that fits your stoopit no-planer conclusion.

This is not serious research, this is a very tunnel vision of doing things.

Your claims are simply stoopit Killtown, you are not a member of the truth movement, you are either a liar and a disinfo agent or a very bad researcher.

It is already difficult for us to tell people that bombs were in the buildings, now you want to suggest even more difficult to show, something that will make us all look crazier then we already are: there were no planes. When will you upgrade to the theory that there was no buildings either?

Keep posting anonymously dude, because if I find out where you are I will show you a hologram of a sick disinfo agent hanging off his shower curtain. And that is not a treat, that is a promise. People who speak the truth do not need to speak anonymously.

PepeLapiu a.k.a.
Guy Cotnoir
32 Citadel Meadows Gardens
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
1-403-390-7991

[PepeLapiu]

[Killtown]

[PepeLapiu]

What needs to be done to have you address the questions I ask? Here are the questions yet again:

So if there was no planes hitting the towers, how is it that every single video footage available show us a plane hitting the buildings? You can't drive a snowmobile into a shed in cottage country without people seeing it so how is it that we can't find a single video footage that reveals no plane hit the second tower? Surely some people would be on the opposite side of the building and would not see the plane coming in, they would only see the ensuing explosion without the plane. But of all those who were on the proper side, how is it that none of them can tell us that they saw the building explode without a plane going in? How is it that the perpetrators managed to confiscate every conceivable video of the impact and add "digital fakery" to them? How did they manage to make sure that nobody catches the building on video exploding without a plane going in?

[PepeLapiu]

How did they manage to make sure that nobody catches the building on video exploding without a plane going in?

[Jennifer]

[Jennifer]

[PepeLapiu]

Jennifer, Killtown is not a truther, Killtown is a liar and a disinfo agent. He should be strung up on the White House lawn right next to Bush and Cheney. I asked me questions politely several times and he kept ignoring them on several forums, not only the one forum. Only now that I get aggressive he claims he won't answer my questions because I am too aggressive, well that's a cop out because he has been ignoring my questions just as you have since the beginning.

And I don't promote the official story, that is a ridiculous claim. Re-read my OP and tell me where I promote the oh-fishy-all story.

Am I being aggressive? -Damn f@cking straight I am!!
We were attacked on 9/11, we have had half of our money stolen from us in the form of taxes to finance 9/11, we are living under a total police state and moving toward even worst. I am aggressive as I not only have the right to get aggressive, that is my duty.

Hopefully you will one day stop peddling your ridiculous no-planer nonsense and get angry with me so we can both walk up to Washington or Ottawa and hang the f@ckers with a pitch fork stuck up their asses.

Killtown is an idiot, Killtown has no desire to speak the truth, Killtown speaks very little about the demolition of WTC and the videos of WTC-7. Killtown would rather peddle his nonsense instead of talking about the obvious. Killtown doesn't want to unite the truth movement, Killtown wants everyone to argue about stoopit ridiculous nonsense like no-planes and holograms and the likes.

Killtown should swing from a rope on the White House lawn - between Bush and Tom Flocco that is. Killtown does his best to ignore the following questions:

So if there was no planes hitting the towers, how is it that every single video footage available show us a plane hitting the buildings? You can't drive a snowmobile into a shed in cottage country without people seeing it so how is it that we can't find a single video footage that reveals no plane hit the second tower? Surely some people would be on the opposite side of the building and would not see the plane coming in, they would only see the ensuing explosion without the plane. But of all those who were on the proper side, how is it that none of them can tell us that they saw the building explode without a plane going in? How is it that the perpetrators managed to confiscate every conceivable video of the impact and add "digital fakery" to them? How did they manage to make sure that nobody catches the building on video exploding without a plane going in?

You do your best not to answer them too Jennifer, why is that?
Why are you contempt with not getting an answer for these questions? Even when you asked yourself on your forum with me not being there, they ignored and derailed the questions ..... why do you think that is?

[PepeLapiu]

How did they manage to make sure that nobody catches the building on video exploding without a plane going in?

[Killtown]

[PepeLapiu]

[Jennifer]

[PepeLapiu]

[Roadrunner]

On 9/11 nobody broadcast ANY plane live hitting the WTC. That's a fact. All the footage first broadcast showed not one plane colliding with the WTC. So the first 5 examples do not show a single collision of a plane with the tower. GET IT ???

Later, AFTER THE FIREBALLS, other stuff was brodcast. With plane images that appear to collide with the towers.

And even later, other stuff (again with fake planes added).

It really can't be more simple.

So you are not right. You have mixed things up completely. The televised footage from 9.11 does NOT show a plane going in to the towers. It shows the very opposite. 5 times out of 5 it fails to show a plane going in to any tower at the WTC. ONLY LATER DOES IT SHOW (OR APPEAR TO SHOW) PLANES COLLIDING WITH THE TWIN TOWERS.

OK ?

[PepeLapiu]

[PepeLapiu]

NO-PLANERS, ANSWER THE QUESTIONS:

So if there was no planes hitting the towers, how is it that every single video footage available show us a plane hitting the buildings? You can't drive a snowmobile into a shed in cottage country without people seeing it so how is it that we can't find a single video footage that reveals no plane hit the second tower? Surely some people would be on the opposite side of the building and would not see the plane coming in, they would only see the ensuing explosion without the plane. But of all those who were on the proper side, how is it that none of them can tell us that they saw the building explode without a plane going in? How is it that the perpetrators managed to confiscate every conceivable video of the impact and add "digital fakery" to them? How did they manage to make sure that nobody catches the building on video exploding without a plane going in?

[Jennifer]

[Jennifer]

[PepeLapiu]

[Jennifer]

[PepeLapiu]

NO-PLANERS, ANSWER THE QUESTIONS:

So if there was no planes hitting the towers, how is it that every single video footage available show us a plane hitting the buildings? You can't drive a snowmobile into a shed in cottage country without people seeing it so how is it that we can't find a single video footage that reveals no plane hit the second tower? Surely some people would be on the opposite side of the building and would not see the plane coming in, they would only see the ensuing explosion without the plane. But of all those who were on the proper side, how is it that none of them can tell us that they saw the building explode without a plane going in? How is it that the perpetrators managed to confiscate every conceivable video of the impact and add "digital fakery" to them? How did they manage to make sure that nobody catches the building on video exploding without a plane going in?

[chek]

[catfish]

And the battle rages on! The fireworks were good tonight eh?
O well night night everyone
sincere love to you all and sweet dreams,

David

[marky 54]

[PepeLapiu]

[ian neal]

[catfish]