Anthony Lawson (alias Agent 'Orange') - Busted !

[Roadrunner]

Wow, the movie by Anthony Lawson (alias Agent 'Orange') is 'essential viewing' ????!!!! The 'nose out' frames on this new video are the poorest quality anyone has ever seen. Why ? The 'fade to black' is laughably dealt with. So the media corporations all decided to switch camera shots at the exact moment of the event at the South Tower ? Hahahahaha ! And the 17 second co-ordination of broadcasts is not even dealt with. It's pathetic. It's more than that. It's silly. And now the 'plane' is dive-bombing from high up to the west !!!!!! It doesn't approach from the South any more ???? Amazing. How much more of this rubbish can you produce ?

That video proves some people are really getting rattled by NPT. The best thing that's happened to support NPT since 'September Clues'.

p.s. How soon will your 'expert' video friend Eric Salter finally deal with the very clear request for technical data made by Ace Baker (i.e. for data that was the basis of Salter's mythical debunking' of Baker ?)

You people have a real nerve, for sure. What's Salter's reply to Ace Baker ??? There isn't one. Verdict ? ...... Busted !

[John White]

Back again Prole?

[Roadrunner]

Not much of a welcome, is it ?

[Killtown]

[Mark Gobell]

[Roadrunner]

Ace Baker published a work on 9/11 media fakery. It was replied to by Eric Salter. Chek thinks Salter's is a great reply. But Ace Baker replied to Salter in great detail. (Maybe Chek doesn't know about that). Baker pointed out that Salter's criticism lacks basic technical justification. So Baker asked Salter to provide it.

To date, Baker and everyone else is still waiting. Salter has disappeared from the debate.

Starting to think Salter can't provide it.

[Mark Gobell]

John White ?

[John White]

[chek]

[Roadrunner]

Chek,

Do yourself a great favour. Find out what technical information is still being asked for from Eric Salter by Baker. It's basic stuff. Stuff that Baker already provided. But which Salter can't.

Ask anyone. Ask Jim Fetzer or anyone else who is following this issue. Better still, ask Baker himself. But please don't dismiss this. It's an example of how Salter just isn't prepared to provide the technical and scientific basis for his claims.

You should agree. It's a fact.

[chek]

[Roadrunner]

Salter 'exposed' Baker ????!!!!! Will you please stop lying Chek.

Let any neutral reader ask Baker himself whether Salter has provided his technical reasoning or not. He has NOT done so despite written request from Baker. You can contact numerous people to see that this is true. Salter cannot justify his arguments with technical data despite him being asked for it a long time ago.

So Salter, illusionist, delusionist, is shown to be engaged in 'pseudo-science'. Baker still waits for Salter's data. A typical example of misinformation. Salter, con-man.

[chek]

[Roadrunner]

Then, Chek, will you agree that we can establish the truth of this Baker/Salter issue on a special thread here on this forum ?

Either Salter has provided the technical support for his claims to Baker, or he has not. I say he has not. And I can prove it. You say Salter HAS provided the technical support for his claims.

Agreed ? How about letting members here see the case for themselves ? Do you agree ?

[Roadrunner]

Still waiting for an answer. Do you agree for this forum to examine ALL the material from the Baker/Salter debate on 9/11 'plane' televised images ?

Yes or No ?

You can't escape. Give us an answer, agent of misinformation. Or stop posing here as a member of the truth movement. Simple.

[alwun]

Ah Roadrunner - what it must be is that Chek is preparing his best shot. Three hours since he left his spoor on a thread. This will blow you, me and everybody away, I fear.

What a change from only yesterday, at this time.

come on Chek, give it up.

cheers Al..

[Roadrunner]

Alwun,

Guess they're having 'a bad day at the office', right ? LOL

[chek]

Check out those last three posts.

Just more hopeless and threadbare posturing from the no planer team.

I thought that fraudsters and their ilk would at least show some imagination.

By the way Al - I'm still waiting for your learned definition of 'cartoon cutouts' on that other thread you're studiously avoiding.

Only your great no planes mate Mark isn't doing too well with the diversionary tactics.

[Mark Gobell]

Chek.

Alwun is not my mate.

He sent me a DVD many many months ago, when I first joined in fact.

To my knowledge we haven't communicated since at all.

I feel no particular bond with Alwun, anymore that I do with you.

There. Settled ?

Why, when we are discussing that which you are evidently so passionate about, do you feel compelled to write such stuff ?

bear in mind here that you have me sociop. . . more syllables than I can muster, detached here.

[Roadrunner]

Still waiting for an answer Chek. Do you agree for this forum to examine ALL the material from the Baker/Salter debate on 9/11 'plane' televised images ?

Yes or No ?

You can't escape. Give us an answer, agent of misinformation. Or stop posing here as a member of the truth movement. Simple.

[chek]

[Roadrunner]

Still waiting for an answer Chek. Do you agree for this forum to examine ALL the material from the Baker/Salter debate on 9/11 'plane' televised images ?

Yes or No ?

You can't escape. Give us an answer, agent of misinformation. Or stop posing here as a member of the truth movement. Simple.

[Mark Gobell]

So Chek, why then do you feel compelled to post such stuff like Alwun is my mate when you have no proof of that ?

Demanding proof is your entire position is it not ?

Why do you feel compelled to post stuff like I am socio . . . bing bong too many syllabubles, detached ?

All I did was question the authenticity of a picture that you posted.

Surely, I'm allowed to do that aren't I ?

I mean, from where I've been viewing, questioning folk's piccies is your central argument isn't it ?

[alwun]

Mark -

Chek seems to like to buddy up folks who seem to disagree with him. Not always with such politesse as just then.
Perhaps to ward off threatening spirits or whatever. He feels they're all against him. Not all are, I'm sure.

anyway he's dodging around a lot, but floundering also comes to mind.

cheers Al..

[Mark Gobell]

Alwun

I have, in the course of the last few posts, become inexplicably attracted to you.

Can we be friends ?

[chek]

[Mark Gobell]

Do you get to set all of the rules Chek ?

Could you find it in yourself to allow others to contribute to your red lines ?

Or, are we to continue with you proclaiming what is acceptable ?

I'm OK with it either way.

[Killtown]

Salter is one of those "9/11 truthers" who only debunks other truther's theories and if you sent someone to his site to try to convinced them that 9/11 was an inside job, you'll be sorely disappointed because nothing at his site I ever saw debunked the official story.

[gruts]

[John White]