FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Tsunami Radiation Sickness!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Other Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Justin
9/11 Truth Organiser
9/11 Truth Organiser


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 500
Location: Cumbria / Yorkshire Dales

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:48 am    Post subject: Tsunami Radiation Sickness! Reply with quote

Thursday, 21 September 2006
TSUNAMI RADIATION SICKNESS RAISES SUSPICIONS

Suddenly, thousands of people in several East African countries and of the Arabian Peninsula have begun to fall sick with what the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) says is radiation sickness brought on by the tsunami.

Men, women, and chilren of all ages are experiencing the horrible woes of nuclear aftermath, including sudden ear, nose, and mouth bleeds, internal hemorrhages and other symptoms of radiation sickness, according to a UNEP report named "After the Tsunami: Rapid Environmental Assessment", released in March. Hundreds of villages and towns in the Horn of Africa dependant on well water are now without a source of potable water due to contamination caused by radioactive material surfacing in water tables. Widespread cancer now threatens millions more in the region. Radioactive clouds drifting westward have already been reported.

Foreign news sources, including several major news agencies, have since covered the ongoing investigation. At the same time, former US President Bill Clinton is the UN United Nations Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery. The US State Department only offered a briefing on a possible nuclear culprit to a Pakistani newspaper in January of this year.

There has been no US media coverage of tsunami radiation sickness.

The US has reason to prevent media coverage of radioactive fallout back home, now that the international community has begun to suspect foul play by the greatest world power, especially after declassified military secrets of the US and British militaries are revived. The declassified reports, offering a detailed chronology of US and Britain 'tsunami bomb' testing conducted off the coast of New Zealand, were intitially released in 2000.

Five days after the tsunami, Jan Egeland, UN Undersecretary General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, emphatically stated his desire "to put a stop to those rumors now" that the Sumatra-Andaman undersea earthquake was caused by nuclear "tests" in the Indian Ocean practiced for many years since World War II by world nuclear powers.

On January 9th, the US State Department then offered its views on the subject through Todd Leventhal, its Chief of Counter-Misinformation in a briefing to the Daily Times of Pakistan, saying that its undersea nuclear tests had never caused any "significant" tsunamis in the region, quoting from a January 6 fact sheet by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). In the same document, NOAA admits that "tsunami waves can also be generated from very large nuclear explosions."

The State Department also chose to downplay the significance of the quake, citing a January 5th change in seismic evaluations of the quake, the Daily wrote.

Leventhal reiterated that the quake stemmed from natural processes "as they have for millions of years."

In the briefing, he did not offer a scientific disclaimer, turning to ridicule instead to defend his government and failed to admit reason for suspision since the US and Britain has been testing 'tsunami bombs' in the area, as cited in the 1945 British mililtary document: the comments amounted to little more than a play on words and denial of scientific data.
In addition, it is evident that scientists at the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) in Hawaii were under obvious pressure by the US Department of Defence when they lowered their calculations of the undersea earthquake from magnitude 9.0 to 8.0, a revision that has since been overturned. A magnitude 8.0 is only one-tenth as severe as a magnitude 9.0 earthquake, according to the US Geological Survey. The US Counter-Misinformation Department has not offered further comment since.

In February, scientists reevaluated the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake as being between magnitude 9.1- 9.3, if not more severe.
In May, they also declared the quake as the longest ever recorded, CNN reported, lasting 10 minutes. Earthquakes are widely known to last only a few seconds on average.

Many who were at first skeptical of an atomic culprit began to suggest that the ocean as well as impacted areas be tested to verify claims of a nuclear explosion, as evidence of an atomic blast is hard to conceal: radioactive fallout would begin to surface undoubtedly.

Radioactive fallout is now surfacing even in unimpacted areas, coming into contact with humans by means of water wells and radioactive clouds. In Yemen, unnamed government sources initially blamed illegal nuclear dumping in the Red Sea "after the December 26, 2004 tsunami" as responsible for the presence of radioactivity now washing up in unlikely places.

Now anger is stirred because the US media is refusing to publicize reports of radiation sickness now widespread and a very serious threat to the rest of the region, notwithstanding repercussions within the already fragile global ecology. Many heath workers are referring to the fallout as an "African Chernobyl."

There can only be one reason why news of such magnitude could be supressed.

_________________
Connect to Infinite Consciousness - enjoy the ride!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jayhawk
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 188

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin - what is the source for this report?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blackcat
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.whale.to/b/tsu12.html

All reports I could find are about 2 years old and refer to the washing up of dumped toxic waste, including nuclear, from the ocean floor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
graphicequaliser
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 111
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
In the late 1980s, European firms dumped wastes such as uranium, lead, cadmium, mercury, industrial, hospital, chemical, leather treatment and other waste in northern Somalia, but the trend picked up rapidly after the violent ousting of strongman Mohammed Siad Barre in 1991, according to the United Nations.

Somalia watchers have said that the country's warlords controlling fiefdoms along the shoreline were paid hefty amounts of cash to allow waste to be dumped there.


Yet again, a few greedy people ...

_________________
Patriotism, religion, tradition and political/corporate alliance are the vehicles they use to fool us passive, peace-loving, family-orientated apes into fighting each other.

Graphic Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Graham
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 350
Location: bucks

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

found a post from the times about a similar problem in Somalia, blamed on dumped Nuclear waste. Confused

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,18690-1509979,00.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jayhawk
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 188

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

These are suggesting just dumped nuclear waste - Justin's article is saying the tsunami was caused by a nuclear test, and that it's causing widespread illness. Where is the source material for this report? I can't find anything...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin
9/11 Truth Organiser
9/11 Truth Organiser


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 500
Location: Cumbria / Yorkshire Dales

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My info came from David Icke's website:

http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/3478/48/

I will try and see if I can get better sources for these allegations.

_________________
Connect to Infinite Consciousness - enjoy the ride!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Justin
9/11 Truth Organiser
9/11 Truth Organiser


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 500
Location: Cumbria / Yorkshire Dales

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try this:

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=78&contentid=176 6

I'm not totally convinced by the article but who knows?

_________________
Connect to Infinite Consciousness - enjoy the ride!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
John White
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reminds me of what the late Joe Vialls was saying shortly before his demise

Obviously its far to soon to place any weight on this information, but if borne out, this would be a scandal of tsunami wave proportions

We shall have to see what else comes to light, and how well sourced

_________________
Free your Self and Free the World
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaniYah
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello, I was really surprised to see my article posted on the web as much as it has been. The article was first published on www.daysaheadnews.com . You can view the original link here http://www.daysaheadnews.com/politics/tsunami_radiation_sickness.html

The sources of the information in the article (quotes, etc) are given there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
karlos
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is this the connected article?
A growing number of people after looking at the evidence have come to the conclusion that the US planted a sub ocean nuke along the faultline, this would tally with reports of radiation sickness.

I always was very concerned with the Asian Tsunami because the US evacuated Diego Garcia without passing the warning on to anyone else. Wont that mean they clearly had advanced warning. Or could it mean that they actually carried out a detonation of a nuke to triger the whole thing.
The French seen to suggest they did but make up your own opinions.

Quote:
"Others are engaging even in an eco type of terrorism, whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes or volcanos remotely, through the use of electromagnetic waves." American
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 1997.

http://www.jp-petit.com/Divers/Armes_sismiques/indo2004.mov

http://www.jp-petit.com/Presse/tsunami.htm

It is beyond any doubt that a giant tidal wave (tsunami) smashed its way through South and South East Asia, and still had enough legs to continue all the way across the Indian Ocean to Africa, where it killed and injured a few hundred more. So the only question we must ask, is whether this tsunami was a natural or man-made catastrophe? A natural event would be horrifying enough, but if the tsunami was man-made, then we are unquestionably looking at the biggest single war crime in global history.
To make any sense at all of the irregularities, we must start at the very beginning, and then follow the course of events as they unfold, especially events in the immediate vicinity of the real tsunami epicenter, because the latter is quite different from the location being remorselessly peddled by the New York Times and CNN.
At midday local Australian time I faithfully recorded the magnitude and position plotted by the Jakarta Geophysical Office in Indonesia. An earthquake measuring 6.4 on the Richter scale had hit the north of the Indonesian island of Sumatra. The Jakarta Geophysical Office meticulously noted that the epicenter of the event was located 155 miles south-southwest of Aceh Province.
This location is approximately 250 miles south of the position later selected by the American NOAA, which plotted the epicenter to the north-west of Aceh, and initially claimed a Richter reading of 8.0. Alas, even that was not enough to cover the damage caused by this extraordinary event, so NOAA progressively upgraded the reading to 8.5, then to 8.9, and finally to 9.0 - at least for the present.
So, the first proven irregularities were peddled by American officials at the NOAA, who suddenly invented a new 'flexible' peak seismic wave for the event, of far greater magnitude than Jakarta, when the Jakarta office was located much closer at almost point-blank range. Believe me when I tell you there is no such thing as the new 'flexible' peak claimed by NOAA. The first seismic peak you record is the only real peak, unless of course you later manually draw in a few more peaks of your own, to match a contrived agenda. Naturally there is also only one epicenter, which was faithfully recorded by dozens of Indonesian and Indian seismographs.
Quite apart from the huge disparity in Richter values, the Indonesians and Indians were disturbed to find that the normal earthquake 'preamble' was missing from their seismograph charts. All this means is that the normal steadily increasing number of transverse shear "S" waves that always precede an earthquake were missing, as were later aftershocks, which likewise always accompany a naturally occurring or Tesla standing-wave generated earthquake. There were 'warnings' of aftershocks from the NOAA, but none actually eventuated.
To simplify matters for non-technical readers, an earthquake is always triggered by a resonant electromagnetic frequency in the range 0.5 to 12 Hertz, but it is not an instant process, because the resonant frequency must be precise. Thus as true resonance approaches, the fault line starts to tremble like a piece of rope under tension, and sends out warnings to the seismographs in the form of steadily increasing transverse shear waves.
If all you get is a cluster of "P" compression waves, then you are almost certainly looking at an underground or sub sea explosion. These were in fact the only copious seismic signals that the Indonesians and Indians received, and they looked curiously similar to those generated many years ago by large underground nuclear weapons in Nevada. At 00:58 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time on 26 December 2004, a single sharp primary (compression) wave was created at the bottom of the Sumatran Trench, 155 miles to the south-southwest of Aceh Province in Sumatra, Indonesia. Travelling through directly coupled earth and water at 18,000 miles per hour, this puny wave arrived at the town of Banda Aceh thirty-two seconds later, causing a minor earth tremor lasting exactly 13 seconds, rougly the same duration as the seismic compression wave from a large nuclear weapon detonated underground in Nevada.

Note in central Banda Aceh, situated directly on the giant Sumatran Fault line, when the earthquake occured everything is still and intact. During the long silent 22 minutes that followed, there were no injuries, no damage, and no seismic aftershocks. Then suddenly and without any warning, a giant tidal wave rose from hell, razing everything and everyone in its path.

The Indian Government knew full well that this was not a "normal" earthquake. On 27 December India refused to join George Bush's planned exclusive 'club of four', which would have effectively pulled this Asian nuclear power out of its new coalition with Russia, China and Brazil. On 28 December the Indian Government politely warned the American military to stay clear of Indian sovereign territory, and on 29 December the India Daily Editorial publicly questioned the nature of the event: "Was this a showdown by a country to show the region what havoc can be created?" ... "Given the level of devastation and given the fact India is a regional power in South Asia, the Indian Navy has an obligation to investigate and tell the world what they found."

India has a major air force base on the Island of Car Nicobar, which guards the front line of Indian airspace in the Bay of Bengal. This base was being upgraded as 'home' to 25 of the IAF's Russian Sukhoi SU 30 jets, every one of which is capable of firing both the Sunburn and Onyx Mach 2.0+ sea skimming anti-ship missiles. The Sukhoi squadrons were due to arrive in Car Nicobar on 14 December, but had to be delayed because of construction work, which is extremely ironic. Despite the tidal wave roaring over the island and breaking up the runways, India still has its incredibly valuable SU 30 hyper performance planes, now situated on the mainland fully armed, and within striking range of both US Battle Fleets currently in the Indian Ocean.
There could also have been a major catastrophe at Chennai in Tamil Nadu, India's southernmost state and home to its fast breeder nuclear reactor. About another 0.2 on the Richter Scale, and the world (india in Particular) would very likely have been facing a second Chernobyl - yet another catastrophic 'spin-off' from the Sumatran Trench event. Fortunately, as if by fate, the tidal wave damaged only the cooling water inlets, which play no part in the nuclear process.

extracts taken from full article available here
http://www.vialls.com/subliminalsuggestion/tsunami.html

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
DaniYah
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, I had not read that article when I wrote mine. I had been covering leads concerning the use of nuclear weapons to create natural disasters, and took my conjectures public. At that time, I and my colleagues had expected the Us to carry out the nuclear tsunami bomb on the coasts of South America and the Carribean, were stationed at the time. When the Dec 26, 2004 tsunami happened, the scale and behavior of the event spurned me to further investigate evidence available to the public.

So, I researched the radiation sickness and quotes of tsunami bomb. I was taken by the fact that US department officials were already trying to quell the concern of the press with regards to the matter, especially given the fact that the US and Britain had undertaken such activities in the past.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Other recent Boxing Day "events"

Quote:
26.12.2003 - Iran Earthquake Bam

26.12.2004 - Asian Tsunami

26.12.2006 - Edinburgh Earthquake

26.12.2006 - Taiwan Earthquake

26.12.2006 - Nigeria, Abule Egba fuel pipeline explosion


Stand by your beds !

_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
karlos
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The radiation sickness is a very strong smoking gun, do you know if the Indonesians or Indians have conducted under water radiation tests?

The fact that they detonated a nuke, which was a warhead that had probably been listed as decomissioned, and appear to have got away with the mass murder of over 100,000 mainly muslims - means they will certainly do it again.
Maybe in the carribean, maybe targeted at the left wing democracies in South America, maybe the Persian Gulf knock out all those oil installations and send the price of crude skyrocketing.
So the sooner and louder people start talking about this issue the better and safer.

The biggest indicator of the nuke tsunami is the siesmic readings show no aftershocks and no indicators prior to the detonation.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Emmanuel
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 434

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, we were discussing this years ago. I was wondering if it was a nuclear test, set off underwater. There are a few articles that testify this possibility.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/01/307115.shtml

"Could it be possible that a nuclear blast, underwater, caused the Tsunami? I mean it did take place within one day of the warning. Even if you are a complete sceptic you must admit that is one hell of a coincidence. So, I did some checking, and according to a religiously affiliated (they sell bibles and stuff on their website www.higherpraise.com/tsunami.htm) webpage, yes it is possible. In fact, a bomb blast has caused a Tsunami before. "Huge Explosion Generated A Tsunami During World War I." The website goes on to state, "Could Nuclear testing create a tsunami? This is a difficult topic to research, because much of the information surrounding nuclear testing is classified. During the Cold War there was fear of tsunamis produced by the detonation of nuclear bombs on the continental shelf off the East Coast of the US. A nuclear bomb was never detonated on the shelf, however a huge explosion did generate a tsunami during World War I. Any large disturbance that displaces a large volume of water can be a potential cause of a tsunami."

_________________
www.freecycle.org
www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com
http://www.viking-z.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paul wright
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

John White wrote:
Reminds me of what the late Joe Vialls was saying shortly before his demise

Obviously its far to soon to place any weight on this information, but if borne out, this would be a scandal of tsunami wave proportions

We shall have to see what else comes to light, and how well sourced


Certainly it reinforces Joe Vialls' proposition. Please click the links rather than reading the following text
http://www.vialls.com/subliminalsuggestion/tsunami.html
http://www.vialls.com/subliminalsuggestion/tsunami2.html

Did New York Orchestrate The Asian Tsunami?
With Afghanistan and Iraq already lost, the Wall Street bankers were all desperately looking for other ways to control our world, when suddenly and very conveniently, the Sumatran Trench exploded. Trick or Treat?

Copyright Joe Vialls, 5 January 2005, Updated 4 February 2005

Click here for: "Secret OSS Plans to Trigger Earthquakes in Japan"

We gratefully accept credit cards!USS Abraham Lincoln CVN72Real Blast Epicenter in Sumatran TrenchMosque near Ground Zero, Aceh"Others are engaging even in an eco type of terrorism, whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes or volcanos remotely, through the use of electromagnetic waves." American
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 1997. Big surprise! Presumably Cohen already knew that a nuclear weapon generates what he refers to obliquely as "electromagnetic waves". Despite having a huge number of tsunami victims in its own State of Tamil Nadu, India completely converted the survey ship INS Nirupak into a 50-bed floating hospital in less than 72 hours, then sent it unarmed to help the desperate people of Aceh in Indonesia. . By direct comparison, America sent combat ships and armed Marines. The US Navy has two 1,000 bed hospital ships, the 'Comfort' and the 'Mercy', but neither one was dispatched. Though the USNS Comfort was deployed to New York when 3,000 Americans died in September 2001, this current lack of action sends a strong signal that 150,000 (mostly Muslim) dead in South East Asia, and half a million injured, are of no concern whatever to the power brokers in New York. The Indian Government knew full well that this was not a "normal" earthquake. On 27 December India refused to join George Bush's planned exclusive 'club of four', which would have effectively pulled this Asian nuclear power out of its new coalition with Russia, China and Brazil. On 28 December the Indian Government politely warned the American military to stay clear of Indian sovereign territory, and on 29 December the India Daily Editorial publicly questioned the nature of the event: "Was this a showdown by a country to show the region what havoc can be created?" ... "Given the level of devastation and given the fact India is a regional power in South Asia, [the] Indian Navy has an obligation to investigate and tell the world what they found."
Theoretically, the American 9 megaton W-53 thermonuclear warhead shown on the left, could easily be encased in a small 'lookalike' saturation diving chamber similar to that on the right, to protect it from the massive 10,000 pounds per square inch pressures at the bottom of the Sumatran Trench. The whole armored package would weigh less than five tons, allowing it to be slipped over the stern of any oil rig supply vessel, of which there are more than 300 in Asia alone. Who would even notice? Despite a natural human tendency to be shocked into silence by the sheer number of dead and injured across Asia on 26 December 2004, and despite also being slightly fearful of losing personal credibility because of the magnitude of the apparent crime, there are many provable irregularities in the official American tsunami story that simply have to be recorded now, or forever be lost in the sands of time.
It is beyond any doubt that a giant tidal wave (tsunami) smashed its way through South and South East Asia, and still had enough legs to continue all the way across the Indian Ocean to Africa, where it killed and injured a few hundred more. So the only question we must ask, is whether this tsunami was a natural or man-made catastrophe? A natural event would be horrifying enough, but if the tsunami was man-made, then we are unquestionably looking at the biggest single war crime in global history.
To make any sense at all of the irregularities, we must start at the very beginning, and then follow the course of events as they unfold, especially events in the immediate vicinity of the real tsunami epicenter, because the latter is quite different from the location being remorselessly peddled by the New York Times and CNN.
At midday local Australian time I faithfully recorded the magnitude and position plotted by the Jakarta Geophysical Office in Indonesia. An earthquake measuring 6.4 on the Richter scale had hit the north of the Indonesian island of Sumatra. The Jakarta Geophysical Office meticulously noted that the epicenter of the event was located 155 miles south-southwest of Aceh Province.
This location is approximately 250 miles south of the position later selected by the American NOAA, which plotted the epicenter to the north-west of Aceh, and initially claimed a Richter reading of 8.0. Alas, even that was not enough to cover the damage caused by this extraordinary event, so NOAA progressively upgraded the reading to 8.5, then to 8.9, and finally to 9.0 - at least for the present.
So, the first proven irregularities were peddled by American officials at the NOAA, who suddenly invented a new 'flexible' peak seismic wave for the event, of far greater magnitude than Jakarta, when the Jakarta office was located much closer at almost point-blank range. Believe me when I tell you there is no such thing as the new 'flexible' peak claimed by NOAA. The first seismic peak you record is the only real peak, unless of course you later manually draw in a few more peaks of your own, to match a contrived agenda. Naturally there is also only one epicenter, which was faithfully recorded by dozens of Indonesian and Indian seismographs.
Quite apart from the huge disparity in Richter values, the Indonesians and Indians were disturbed to find that the normal earthquake 'preamble' was missing from their seismograph charts. All this means is that the normal steadily increasing number of transverse shear "S" waves that always precede an earthquake were missing, as were later aftershocks, which likewise always accompany a naturally occurring or Tesla standing-wave generated earthquake. There were 'warnings' of aftershocks from the NOAA, but none actually eventuated.
To simplify matters for non-technical readers, an earthquake is always triggered by a resonant electromagnetic frequency in the range 0.5 to 12 Hertz, but it is not an instant process, because the resonant frequency must be precise. Thus as true resonance approaches, the fault line starts to tremble like a piece of rope under tension, and sends out warnings to the seismographs in the form of steadily increasing transverse shear waves.
If all you get is a cluster of "P" compression waves, then you are almost certainly looking at an underground or sub sea explosion. These were in fact the only copious seismic signals that the Indonesians and Indians received, and they looked curiously similar to those generated many years ago by large underground nuclear weapons in Nevada.

We will return later to the relatively simple task of delivering a multi-megaton thermonuclear weapon to the bottom of the Sumatran Trench, and then detonating it with awesome effect, but right now we need to return to our initial task of following the trail of events and inexplicable irregularities. First we must travel south to the distant desert island of Australia, currently ruled by an obsequious Wall Street toady known as Little Johnny Howard. To the intense displeasure of many of his Australian "subjects", Little Johnny never makes a move outside Australia unless he first receives explicit instructions from one of his New York minders. Remember this reality, because it is extremely important in terms of what Australia did next.
On the morning of 27 December, the Australian (New York owned) media was making it very clear that the most badly hit nation in the region was Sri Lanka, an island at the southern tip of India, which like Australia is a member nation of the British Commonwealth. Accordingly, Tim Costello, head of one of Australia's largest charities, made immediate plans to fly to the area and assess the need for aid. But that same morning, Little Johnny was dancing to a very different tune, which, based on his known subservience, must have been playing down his secure telephone line from Wall Street.
In true covert manner, Little Johnny secretly dispatched two RAAF Hercules transport planes packed with supplies to Malaysia on "Stand By", and directed two more to Darwin in Australia's north. Please note that if Little Johnny had any humanitarian concerns at all, all four Hercules could have flown directly to Commonwealth partner Sri Lanka, where every other Australian had already been told by the media that aid was needed. But no, it wasn't to be, and Little Johnny waited patiently for orders from New York.
The waiting period was short, and after a high-flying reconnaissance jet confirmed that the runway was clear at Medan in eastern Sumatra, all four Australian Hercules complete with troops, guns and other tackle, invaded Sumatra just south of the devastated province of Aceh. In turn, with 90% of its population killed by the tsunami, Aceh might perhaps one day soon become Indonesia's very own Guantanamo Bay, crawling with hundreds of heavily armed Australians and Americans.
Remember carefully though, at the time these four Hercules touched down in Medan, the ordinary Australian public still had no idea that Sumatra was badly hit. Only Little Johnny knew, and of course his trusty crystal ball in New York. To hell with Sri Lanka, his bosses wanted a main base for the huge reconstruction contracts in Asia, designed to replace the failed oil theft and reconstruction in Iraq, and keep poor old Zion on its tottering New York legs for a few more weeks or months.
In the end, what the hell did it matter how many Goyim had to die? And, hey, on the credit side they'd already managed to kill more than 100,00 Muslims in Sumatra with a single tidal wave, which was partial payback for their own resounding defeats in Afghanistan and Iraq. Needless to say the Australians were merely the advance party, soon to be joined by a curiously well prepared and equipped U.S. Military, though it is doubtful that any of the officers and men involved really comprehend what is going on. Only a handful thought to question why they had been spending a whole year training for a "Humanitarian Mission", when the whole point of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps is normally to kill people in very large numbers. Just look at Fallujah, people, look at Fallujah.
As if by magic, the Pentagon managed to have two battle groups ready to sail at an instant's notice from Hong Kong and Guam during the normally chaotic Christmas to New Year period. Crikey! Military discipline has come a hell of a long way since my day, when everyone including the ship's cat was sleeping it off at some highly questionably hostelry or another. Not these 10,000+ Americans though, who must have been standing rigidly to attention beside their hammocks day and night, tugging furiously at their forelocks whenever an officer of NCO came in sight.
The next bit was superbly orchestrated, because it took place at sea, far away from the prying eyes of dock spies or imaginary KGB agents. But oops, first you have to know who was involved. Out of Hong Kong rushed team one, comprised of the nuclear-powered USS Abraham Lincoln and her escort vessels, while the far more interesting team two rushed out of Guam, led by the USS Bonhomme Richard, a marine amphibious assault carrier crammed to the gunwales with gun-toting wooden tops. And that is not all, believe me, because the Bonhomme Richard is in fact leading a veritable armada known as "Expeditionary Strike Group 5".
Flagship USS Bonhomme Richard is accompanied by the U.S.S. Duluth, an amphibious transport dock vessel; the USS Rushmore, a landing ship dock; the guided missile cruiser USS Bunker Hill, guided missile destroyer USS Milius, and the guided missile frigate USS Thach. To take care of the underwater side of things they are joined by the nuclear hunter-killer submarine USS Pasadena, while the U.S. Coast Guard's high-endurance cutter Munro is also tagging along, presumably to deal with Asian Customs and Excise.
Now then, though 'Strike Group 5' may be toting enough nuclear weapons to destroy half of the known world, and the title is perhaps lacking when viewed from a strictly humanitarian perspective, engineer chief Staff Sgt. Julio C. Dominguez says otherwise: "The Marine Service Support Group has been preparing for a humanitarian mission of this type for about 12 months now, and is more prepared for an actual mission". Well, OK chief, but didn't you ask why you were being trained for a mysterious humanitarian mission a year before it actually happened, especially when your day job is normally shooting Muslims full of holes?
The really sneaky (inexplicable) bit came as both battle groups entered the Indian Ocean. The USS Abraham Lincoln looked about as innocent as a carrier with 70 attack planes can look, but was already carrying 2,000 marines instead of her normal complement of around 500. That is a huge amount of grunt firepower to put on the deserted streets of Banda Aceh, especially when Wall Street normally expects these marines to die quietly for Zion in Iraq. Now then, how did they know the extra marines would be needed before team one left Hong Kong, because the surplus 1,500 marines were certainly not just standing around on Kowloon dock waiting to hitch a ride.
Then while the two battle groups (apparently) headed in two different directions across the deserted Indian Ocean, an even stranger event took place. Though Expeditionary Strike Group 5 (Humanitarian) was supposed to help the folks in Sri Lanka, the combat marines aboard the USS Bonhomme Richard transferred to amphibious transport dock vessel U.S.S. Duluth, which then split from ESG-5 and headed towards team one. So without the Indonesians really being aware of it, the (relatively) harmless and Bulky aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln has been used to screen the arrival of at least 3,500 heavily-armed US Marines in tiny Aceh Province.
That more or less brings us up to date on known military activity, though yesterday an Australian television cameraman did accidentally film some of these heavily-armed US Marines (who tried to shoo him away), searching a devastated Indonesian military base for any remaining weapons. Now call me old-fashioned, but if these guys and their bosses are straight, that particular job should be left to the Indonesian Army…
I will be circumspect as to exactly how a large American thermonuclear weapon managed to arrive at the bottom of the Sumatran Trench, though all of the seismic evidence and preparedness for the resulting mission indicates strongly that this is the case. After all, we are back to the age-old question of "who benefits?", and in this particular case, "Who is insane enough to kill more than 150,000 civilians just to hang on to power?' Based on their past performance in Iraq and other luckless countries, it would seem that the only realistic candidates are Wolfowitz and company, striving as always to create a "One World Government".
Certainly no other nuclear powers including Russia and China stand to gain anything at all from such an outrageous mass murder, so, as always in the end, we come back to Sherlock Holmes via the pen of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: "When you have ruled out the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, is the truth."
For the Zionist Cabal, obtaining a thermonuclear weapon in America is no great trick, especially when we have the precedent of 100 small 'decommissioned' air-to-air atomic warheads being smuggled out the Pentagon's (civilian) back door, to form the core of the Jewish State's current nuclear arsenal. Once a weapon system is out date and out of service, loyal uniformed US military personnel can no longer track it.
Those who wish to understand how such a seemingly small weapon could rattle a 20,000 feet-deep oceanic trench, and then force a giant tsunami right across the Indian Ocean, would do well to look at the diagram of the famous 'Dambusters' attacking the German dam below, most of which is self-explanatory.
The designer of the RAF's bouncing bomb (actually called "Highball") was a scientist called Barnes Wallace, who had already gained a formidable reputation with his Wellington bomber, which he constructed geodetically, thus enabling it to absorb enormous punishment before actually being shot out of the sky. Many Wellington returned to base literally in tatters, while many luckless cousins like the Stirling and Halifax were all too often consigned to the murky deep of the North Sea.
Wallace knew that bombing the dams vertically was a complete waste of time, and the only possibility of success lay in placing a mine hard up against the dam wall at its base. You see, water cannot be compressed, meaning that if the mine was pressed against the dam wall at the moment of detonation, part of its energy would automatically be expended on the wall itself. Too far away in the relatively shallow water, and most of the blast energy would be lost to atmosphere, in a huge exploding cloud of water of course.
Though it was obvious that the dam wall could not be destroyed by a single bomb from a single Lancaster bomber (it would weight far too much for the aircraft to get off the ground), Wallace pinned his hopes on the scientific fact that cumulative stress should do the job, and he was proved right. Though officially three of the bombs, each containing 6,500 pounds of TNT, were considered to be direct hits, one of these veered off slightly, meaning that the giant Mohne Dam was completely breached by a total of 13,000 pounds of tri-nitro toluene.
It is the incompressibility of water in particular that matters deep down in the Sumatran Trench. At the bottom you already have 10,000 pounds of pressure per square inch pressing down on your weapon of choice, and above that weapon there is a column of water 20,000 feet tall, which is what caused the pressure in the first place. Not only that. The trench narrows at the bottom, meaning that the weapon is 'hemmed-in', with a very real chance of moving a tectonic plate if sufficient tonnage is used.
In this particular case there was no real need to shift a tectonic plate, and science suggests that if this blast had caused such an effect, several very powerful aftershocks would have occurred, as has happened with every other major earthquake in the past. But, as previously stated, and setting aside the seemingly deliberate provocative though false warnings from the American NOAA, there has not been a single aftershock which can be directly & scientifically linked to the 'event' in the Sumatran Trench at 0758 hours local on 26 December 2004. Later tremors might or might not be connected to the weapon.
To force subservience on Asia, and ensure the lion's share of incredibly lucrative reconstruction contracts, all that was needed was a very large tsunami targeted on the selected nations, which was easily within the capabilities of a large thermonuke. There is nothing new about "Sea Bursts" as they are called, and more than 30 years ago plans existed in both America and Russia to wipe out each other's coastal cities using exactly this technique. The tidal wave from a deep sea burst is relatively clean, allowing the aggressor to take over both land and remaining buildings etc. with the minimum of delay.
If everything had gone to plan, then Indonesia, Sri Lanka and India would have been in hock to the IMF and World Bank for thirty or more years - time enough to wait for the price of oil to come down again after the lethal fiasco in Iraq. At the same time, if the Indian Government had taken the bait, the deadly Russian-Chinese-Indian-Brazilian coalition would have been dead in the water. Not a bad day's work for a single thermonuclear weapon discreetly removed from the decommissioning process.
There are those who may claim that I have 'left out' the giant ExxonMobil gas fields in Aceh, but that is not the case. Certainly they are very productive sub-surface fields, and will unquestionably produce lots of gas again once the surface equipment has been repaired, but in isolation they are completely incapable of saving the New Zion from collapse. Wall Street needs giant reconstruction contracts, and plenty of them.
If I remember correctly, shortly before Christmas I received a large number of emails from various people about some "German Guy", who apparently claimed that Wolfowitz had got hold of a critical weapon and was going to nuke Houston on either the 26 or 27 of December. I never did read the whole email, but it seems very likely that it was initially circulated by Wolfowitz or one of his ilk, as a classic disinformation distraction. Try something along the lines of "You suckers all watch Houston very carefully on 26 December, while I nuke Asia behind your backs… "

Update 6 Jan 2005
Tsunami 'Just Missed' India's Top Fighter Jets & Nuclear Power StationIndia's nuclear reactor at Chennai in Tamil Nadu State, flanked on either side by state-of-the-art hyper performance Sukhoi SU 30 jets, which should have been vulnerably situated in the Nicobar Islands front-line when the tsunami roared north from the Sumatran Trench. India has a major air force base on the Island of Car Nicobar, which guards the front line of Indian airspace in the Bay of Bengal. This base was being upgraded as 'home' to 25 of the IAF's Russian Sukhoi SU 30 jets, every one of which is capable of firing both the Sunburn and Onyx Mach 2.0+ sea skimming anti-ship missiles.
The Sukhoi squadrons were due to arrive in Car Nicobar on 14 December, but had to be delayed because of construction work, which is extremely ironic. Despite the tidal wave roaring over the island and breaking up the runways, India still has its incredibly valuable SU 30 hyper performance planes, now situated on the mainland fully armed, and within striking range of both US Battle Fleets currently in the Indian Ocean.
"We will have the fighters operating from the base within six months," a determined Air Chief Marshal S Krishnaswamy said as he assessed the damage caused to the [Car Nicobar] base. "In a year's time we will make the base fully operational. The problem is of transporting each and every construction material by ships and planes again to this place. The material include even the concrete which we have to lay on the runway."
There could also have been a major catastrophe at Chennai in Tamil Nadu, India's southernmost state and home to its fast breeder nuclear reactor. About another 0.2 on the Richter Scale, and the world (india in Particular) would very likely have been facing a second Chernobyl - yet another catastrophic 'spin-off' from the Sumatran Trench event. Fortunately, as if by fate, the tidal wave damaged only the cooling water inlets, which play no part in the nuclear process.
As I post this update in the early hours of 6 January, Bloomberg has very kindly just confirmed the transfer of power from Expeditionary Strike Group 5 (humanitarian duties only), to the USS Abraham Lincoln battle group off Aceh. Now not one but both massive assault landing carriers are bound for poor old Indonesia and its 110,000,000 Muslim citizens...
"The USS Bonhomme Richard and USS Duluth today arrived in Sumatran waters and airlifted more than 200,000 pounds (90,000 kilograms) from two warehouses for distribution to areas unreachable by road, the U.S. embassy in Jakarta said in an e- mailed statement. The ships carry 25 helicopters each and more than doubled the number of U.S. aircraft to carry aid. "


Update 4 February 2005
Condoleeza Rice's Unbelievably Arrogant "Profitable" Tsunami

At a recent Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on her appointment by Bush to the post of Secretary of State, Condoleeza Rice declared that the tsunami constituted "a wonderful opportunity to show not just the US government, but the heart of the American people." "And I think it has paid great dividends for us," she added.
The French Government has shown an interest in this unbelievably arrogant gaffe, with a former director of the French Government "Centre National de la recherche Scientifique" putting to bed any notion that the tsunami was a 'natural event'. THe author, physicist Dr Jean Pierre Petit, provides some excellent photographs of American-occupied Diego Garcia, and predicts a very chilling future for America, if a similar 'natural event' should accidentally happen in the Canary Islands.




Asia Tsunami Proved Biggest War Crime in History
While the western media desperately tries to deflects public interest with ever-increasing Richter figures now up to an hysterical 9.3, the BBC, HMS Scott and others inadvertently prove conclusively that the horrific event of
26 December 2004 was the biggest single war crime in recorded history.

Tsunami Part Two. Copyright Joe Vialls, 24 February 2005,

Click Here for "Secret OSS Plans to Trigger Earthquakes in Japan"

Dialup users please be patient while center Shock Wave Flash movie loads
Click Here to view original BBC film and Indonesian Padang SeismographAt 00:58 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time on 26 December 2004, a single sharp primary (compression) wave was created at the bottom of the Sumatran Trench, 155 miles to the south-southwest of Aceh Province in Sumatra, Indonesia. Travelling through directly coupled earth and water at 18,000 miles per hour, this puny wave arrived at the town of Banda Aceh thirty-two seconds later, causing a minor earth tremor lasting exactly 13 seconds, rougly the same duration as the seismic compression wave from a large nuclear weapon detonated underground in Nevada. Note in the right-hand 'after' photograph that everything in central Banda Aceh, situated directly on the giant Sumatran Fault line, is intact. During the long silent 22 minutes that followed, there were no injuries, no damage, and no seismic aftershocks. Then suddenly and without any warning, a giant tidal wave rose from hell, razing everything and everyone in its path. "Death and destruction have been the fate of San Francisco. Shaken by a temblor at 5:13 o'clock yesterday morning, the shock lasting 48 seconds, and scourged by flames that raged diametrically in all directions, the city is a mass of smouldering ruins. At six o'clock last evening the flames seemingly playing with increased vigor, threatened to destroy such sections as their fury had spared during the earlier portion of the day. Building their path in a triangular circuit from the start in the early morning, they jockeyed as the day waned, left the business section, which they had entirely devastated, and skipped in a dozen directions to the residence portions. As night fell they had made their way over into the North Beach section and springing anew to the south they reached out along the shipping section down the bay shore, over the hills and across toward Third and Townsend streets.
"Warehouses, wholesale houses and manufacturing concerns fell in their path. This completed the destruction of the entire district known as the 'South of Market Street.' How far they are reaching to the south across the channel cannot be told as this part of the city is shut off from San Francisco papers. After darkness, thousands of the homeless were making their way with their blankets and scant provisions to Golden Gate Park and the beach to find shelter.
"Those in the homes on the hills just north of the Hayes Valley wrecked section piled their belongings in the streets and express wagons and automobiles were hauling the things away to the sparsely settled sections. Everybody in San Francisco is prepared to leave the city, for the belief is firm that San Francisco will be totally destroyed. Downtown everything is ruin. Not a business house stands. Theaters are crumbled into heaps. Factories and commission houses lie smouldering on their former sites."
So spoke the front page of the San Francisco 'Call Chronicle Examiner" on the morning of April 19,1906, though of course the newspaper had to be printed on still intact presses far away from the city. This was a real earthquake, ladies and gentlemen, a real earthquake. And though it measured a relatively puny 7.9 on the Richter Scale, the savage transverse shear waves generated by the quake whipped through the ground like a monstrous snake, causing severe damage to buildings in Portland, Oregon, more than 530 miles away from its epicenter in San Francisco. Six minutes later there was a severe aftershock, and then another severe aftershock five minutes after that.
San Francisco was shattered, and awestruck scientists from all over America gathered to gawk helplessly at the geological damage. The ground had broken open for more than 270 miles along the San Andreas rift, a major fault line. The country on the east side of the rift had moved southward relative to the country on the west side of the rift. The greatest movement was about 21 feet, some 30 miles northwest of San Francisco. Were it not for a handful of amateur cameramen in Banda Aceh on Boxing Day 2004, we might easily have been fooled into believing that Sumatra, like San Francisco, had been subjected to a naturally-occurring nightmare earthquake, first peddled by the American NOAA at 8.0 on the Richter Scale. Then of course the NOAA realized that 8.0 was simply not enough to cover this thermonuclear sabotage, and developed a new exciting "flexible" Richter Scale to take care of the public relations problem.
Onwards and upwards the NOAA went, from 8.5 to 8.9, and then from 9.0 to 9.1. Finally they managed to convert the single Padang seismic compression spike (shown for the first time on the next page) into a whopping great Richter 9.3, sufficient they thought to cover the destruction of the cooling pipes of India's Chennai nuclear reactor in the southern state of Tamil Nadu. The reactor should have been perfectly safe of course, because the Bay of Bengal has never before experienced a tsunami in recorded history.
Possible motives for this massive war crime were touched on briefly in Part One of this report, with the nuclear reactor at Kalpakkam, 80 kilometers from Chenna, the most likely target. If this particular reactor had cracked open like Chernobyl, the results would have been so catastrophic that the new Russia-China-India-Brazil coalition, a clear and present danger to Wall Street, would have been neutered. It is not hard to imagine the glee on the faces of members of the World Bank and IMF, as India crawled in humbly on its belly asking for a huge loan.
Although the Kalpakkam facility escaped major damage, it was a very close call, with 30 atomic scientists and technicians killed at the plant's nearby residential complex. And if the thermonuclear weapon placed in the Sumatran Trench had been more powerful, Wall Street might easily have scored a double whammy. A bigger Russian-aided nuclear power complex that uses sea water for cooling is coming up fast at Koodankulam, 900 km south of Chennai and close to Kanyakumari, the southernmost tip of the Indian peninsula that was severely devastated by the (unique artificial) tsunami, that in some places reached 35 feet in height.
Now try to imagine South Asia if both nuclear plants had (1) gone critical or (2) cracked, or (3) a horrific combination of both. All of this nuclear hardware comes from Russia, the same country that (accidentally) brought us Chernobyl, then sold lethal unstoppable 'Sunburn' missiles to China, Iran, Syria and Venezuela, and probably played a major role in the attack on the World Trade Center during 2001.
The possibilities for Wall Street would have been endless. While India was beating down the door of the IMF frantically begging for a giant loan, Wall Street's faithful servants at the UN and IAEA would be tasked with badmouthing and banning Russian nuclear technology around the world - including Iran and North Korea of course. Thus from a position of bankrupcy brought about by the insane invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, Wall Street would be up and running again, and 'One World Government' would still be within reach. Hurrah!
Of course, all of these claims are speculative conspiracies at this stage, despite the fact that today the price of oil scratched US$52 per barrel, and the American dollar fell like a stone against the Euro, neither of which would have happened if the tsunami war crime had been successful. Theoretically, all we need do now in order to force the FBI to investigate and execute the perpetrators on Wall Street, is prove scientifically that the tsunami was NOT a natural event, which is what this report is really all about.
Single frames extracted from the 'creative' BBC film constructed from amateur Banda Aceh video clips are blurred, but quite good enough to use as proof. This frame was taken "outside the hospital" in Banda Aceh after the tremor, but so what? Note carefully that people are sitting and walking normally, and do not appear alarmed. There is no visible damage to any structure, nor any glass on the street. Readers not familiar with Indonesia should note that sitting at the side of the road is acceptable behavior, which happens every day of the year. The biggest danger to the wannabee 'New World Order' was unquestionably those wretched amateur video tapes from Banda Aceh, which simply could not be explained away by captive media 'experts', because no one was sure how many amateur tapes existed in total. Put another way, if they tried to suppress the video clips, what would happen if an unknown 'flyer' suddenly appeared months later and completely trashed the western world's most eminent 'earthquake experts'?
Predictably the media did the next best thing and 'blended' the different clips together, in an attempt to create the false illusion of an extended (and thus 'real') earthquake like San Francisco, or other real earthquakes, like the incredibly puny 5.5 quake near Japan's Bonin Islands on September 20, 2003. Puny though this real earthquake was, its magnitude 5.5 transverse shear shock waves were still strong enough to bring down temple walls in Tokyo, more than 540 miles away from the Bonin epicenter.
In basic terms the BBC editors "mixed 'n matched" different frames from different clips, placed them out of sequence, and also ran two clips from two different cameras filming the same tremor - one after the other. This particular trick made the 'earthquake' appear to last twice as long, i.e. 26 seconds. In the silky words of the smooth BBC narrator, "and the quake rumbles on..." though of course it did not.
Those readers who choose to play the entire 2.2 minute BBC propaganda piece on the next page, will also notice that shots filmed after the tsunami started to come ashore, have been shifted further forward (towards the beginning) of the film sequence, thereby creating the twin illusions of aftershocks and property damage caused by the 'earthquake', when in reality there were no aftershocks and no property damage until D + 22.1 minutes, at which point in time the orchestrated tsunami wiped them off the face of the earth.

ca



that in Banda Aceh's four-star 'Kuala Tripa Hotel' filmed in the 22.1 minute lull period between the the 13 second tremor and the arrival of the tsunami. The building is completely undamaged, with every pane of glass intact. Some guests jumped out of the windows to see what was going on, because the hotel generators driving the elevators, and the hotel telephone exchange, suddenly became terminally defective when the tremor passed through the town. Readers should note here that the electromagnetic pulse from a large thermonuclear weapon knocks out all electrical appliances and switchboards in microseconds. Next up was the problem of making the world believe that two of the world's great tectonic plates had collided and "reared up", thereby displacing the water required to make up the giant tidal wave that raced across the Indian Ocean, bowling over everything that got in its path. Believe me, this was and is an impossible task, because there is no way geologically that they could do so. The only fault line capable of enormous spontaneous upthrust (and therefore water displacement) is known as a "Divergent Faultline", shown on the Rutger's map below in red. Basically this means that the tectonic plates pull apart (diverge) from each other to enable new magna to thrust up through the middle. Fine, heaps of displaced water and really big bouncy tsunamis. The giant Alaskan earthquake caused an equally giant tsunami because of the divergent fault you can see on the map.
The San Andreas fault falls into a second class called a "Transform Fault", where the two tectonic plates simply grind alongside each other, colored pink on the map. This causes massive property damage from the vibrations (as in the San Francisco Earthquake), but no water displacement. Remember, to generate a tsunami, or even a mere ripple, the water must first be displaced by other matter. This is basic stuff outlined in Archimedes Principle, so no need to delve any deeper here.
Lastly we come back to the 'fake quake' of 26 December 2004, which allegedly occurred on the third class of fault known as a "Convergent Faultline", colored black on the map, where one tectonic plate slides (converges) very slowly under another, which in this case means the Indo-Australian plate sliding steadily eastwards underneath the Eurasian plate. But as in the case of the Transforn Fault, movement is horizontal, displacing no appreciable quantities of water.Transform
(San Francisco)Divergent
(Mid Oceanic)Convergent
(Sumatra)Animated Gifs courtesy of http://www.thetech.org

We need to get this technical stuff out of the way as quickly as possible, because it has the unfortunate tendency of sending readers to sleep. Boring! Fear not, there is not much more of it, though we cannot let the government and media 'scientists' off the hook without covering the biggest impossibility of all. Once again my thanks to Archimedes, wherever he may be nowadays.
It is a fact that when a huge event like this happens, all kinds of different people want 'IN' on the action, and not always because they are corrupt bankers trying to lie to the western world. But what most of the 'in crowd' have in common, is the desire to help prove the official line of the day, i.e. that a huge naturally-occurring underground earthquake offshore Sumatra, killed nearly half a million people by generating a whopping great tsunami.
Such was the case with the British survey ship "HMS Scott", which approached the Sumatran Trench after the disastrous event, loaded down to the gunwales with bearded scientists wearing rubber boots and duffle coats. All very romatic and even slightly polar in flavor, but these men started out on the wrong foot, because they had already swallowed the "earthquake" line. So rather than starting out by investigating whether an earthquake had happened at all, these earnest gentlemen too a fatal leap of faith into the unknown, and started out by investigating how the alleged but unproved quake had happened.
This got the hearty crew of HMS Scott into trouble immediately, because there was no hard evidence of anything, in an area they freely admitted had never been properly seismically surveyed before. Oops! So from the outset these scientists publicly admitted they were guessing, or more correctly were allowing their seismic instruments to guess for them.
The best they could manage came from a Dr Wynn, who said: "An area the size of a small town fell away from the slope and broke up into bits. Slabs of material travelled about 10km down the slope on to that flat bit of Indian plate and are just lying there. We don't know for definite that was caused by the recent earthquake but it's a very fresh looking feature."
Fresh, Dr Wynn, fresh? How on earth do you know? The inference surrounding this seminal quote was that the 'small town which fell to the bottom of the trench', was the culprit responsible for the massive tsunami that killed more than a quarter of a million people in Sumatra alone. But poor Dr Wynn had forgotten Archimedes Principle.
Sadly for the good ship HMS Scott, Archimedes Principle proves that the 'small town' could not possibly be the culprit, because it was already under water when it allegedly broke away and fell to the bottom of the 10,000 ps.i. trench. This means that the water displaced at the bottom of the trench immediately filled the void space from where the 'small town' had fallen further up, in precise matched volumes. So, terribly sorry Dr Wynn, no additional water dispacement for a tsunami, not even a baby tsunami.
If any reader wishes to prove this independently, it really is quite easy. Bearing in mind the mind-boggling scale of the Sumatra Trench, proceed as follows: take two 4 ounce pebbles and balance one on top of the other, at the bottom of a 2 gallon bucket. Now very slowly fill the bucket with water and mark the full level with an indelible marker. Next, take a very long thin knitting needle (or similar) and gently dislodge the top pebble so that it falls alongside the bottom pebble on the bottom of the bucket. Now note that the water level at the top of your bucket had not changed at all. So, sadly, no tsunami in the kitchen either.....

Now we come to the geophysical grand slam, which might one day hopefully be used to help swing Wolfowitz et al from the end of very rough hessian ropes. In the picture above, the Indo-Australian tectonic plate (blue), is slowly sliding under the Eurasion tectonic plate (pale blue) at a rate of about 60 millimeters per year.
Waxing technical again for a moment, "Sumatra is situated at an active continental margin and has been the site of subduction since the Early Mesozoic Age. At present, subduction beneath the margin is strongly oblique, and this motion is partitioned into orthogonal subduction of Indian Oceanic crust at the Sunda (Sumatran) trench and right-lateral strike-slip along the onshore Sumatran Fault System (SFS)."
What we must remember here is the critical information that the 1900-km-long Sumatran fault belong to a class of trench-parallel strike-slip fault systems that work in concert with subduction zones to accommodate obliquely convergent plate motion. At the subduction zone, where one plate moves beneath the other, the subducted plate is dragged downwards into the earth's mantle until it reaches a depth where high temperatures partially melt the rock. The resulting magma then rises along vertical fissures and reaches the surface through volcanic vents in the onshore fault line.
Put in terrifyingly simple layman terms, what this all means is that the Sumatran Trench and Sumatran Fault shown in the picture above always work together. If one moves, so does the other, and the Sumatran Fault runs right down the high street in the town of Banda Aceh, which didn't move at all when the "earthquake" tremor disturbed the town on 26 December 2004.
The harsh reality is that a naturally-occurring earthquake big enough to have generated that enormous tsunami would require a massive jolt below the Eurasian plate (quite probably around 9.3 on the Richter Scale), which would have liquified the rock and automatically hurled white-hot magma out of the chain of dormant volcanoes along the onshore Sumatran Fault. Remember, the trench and fault systems are are directly connected, and always work together.





This rather blurred frame was shot in Banda Aceh about thirty seconds before the tsunami roared into town, i.e. 22 minutes after the single 13-second tremor. You can see people looking over their shoulders because of the oncoming noise, but it is equally clear (and utterly damning) that people are just walking around normally without any obvious fear. There are no visible injuries, or property or infrastructure damage whatsoever. So you, the global public, have been subjected to the biggest television and newspaper illusion in human history, and for the most part you have believed it. For weeks now I have watched the never ending chain of 'important' politicians visiting tsumani ravaged areas on television, and have found myself cynically wondering which ones are there for the photo opportunities, which ones are there grab a sack of free aid cash for their Swiss bank accounts, and more importantly, which ones are there to gloat over their insane nuclear handiwork.
More than a half of the dead are Muslims, which will no doubt bring a smile to the faces of the perpetrators in New York, because this is a perpetual one-way war against Muslims, Hindus, and even ordinary Christians. I do not represent anybody apart from myself and my immediate family, who all wish to pass on their condolences to the families of the dead half million global citizens, with the sincere hope that one day soon we will be able to track down, and terminate, the war criminals responsible for this terrible outrage.


Certainly Don Croft and others allegedly tuning to the Cetacean wavelength found Vialls nuke theory to be true.
Appears to be confirmed by radiation sickness

_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
karlos
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

copied from the Washington Times
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/02/AR2007 110202165.html

Blackwater became a brand name in security for its murders/work in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now it's taking on intelligence.

Blackwater Worldwide, has been building an operation that will seek/create natural disasters. That is what this article reads like to me?

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
DaniYah
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stelios wrote:
copied from the Washington Times
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/02/AR2007 110202165.html

Blackwater became a brand name in security for its murders/work in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now it's taking on intelligence.

Blackwater Worldwide, has been building an operation that will seek/create natural disasters. That is what this article reads like to me?


These are the guys that intimidated my brother and I when we were warning about the nuclear tsunami bomb in the early part of 2004. This commercial intelligence crew has been operating for a long time already.

The public can now see. This is the stuff US threats and intimidation to world leaders are made of.
However, the men that make these threats are just as vulnerable to fear themselves. They will run when the time comes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
karlos
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Link


any footage from the day shows people walking around and behaving normally prior to the tsunami hitting.
surely if there had been a massive earthquake people would have been behaving differently and also no buildings fell prior to the waves hitting.
There are also reports that hotels lost all their electric and phone service prior to the tsunami hitting - a clear indicator of the EMP affects


_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Other Controversies All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group