Open Letter to the Administrator of this Forum

[Roadrunner]

How long will it be before the disruption to threads on this forum ends by the banning of those who are deliberately causing it ?

I realise, of course, that the strategy of concealing facts from the public about the crimes of 9/11/2001 includes fake forums whose real aim is simply to confuse readers. I also realise that the myth of 'planes' at the WTC is being put under great pressure by those who wish to present evidence on a scientific basis. The perps are rather worried by the success that the scientific method is having in exposing media fakery, for example.

But I trust you have enough integrity and respect for the 3,000 or so victims of that terrible tragedy in 2001 to boot these fools off this site who are so clearly disrupting the entire ethos of this forum by posting today on issues which have no relevance whatsoever.

Thank You

[ian neal]

Hi

Can you give me specific examples of posts that break the forum rules?

Thanks

[Roadrunner]

Dear Ian Neal.

The threads made this evening here on 9/11 Truth Controversies contain lots of evidence of members posting on issues which have nothing to do with the actual subject of the threads.

If no ban results from such nonsense then, I regret, your failure, will be known worldwide as an example of you, yet again, failing to uphold fair and reasonable standards in these areas of research.

That such fools should be banned is surely obvious.

[Dogsmilk]

[Killtown]

Good luck in getting a straight answer Roadrunner. We'll be rooting for you.

[chek]

[Killtown]

[marky 54]

now now killtown lets not be hypocritical.

marky 54 wrote:

[chek]

[Killtown]

What's hypocritical with that? You asked a question, I answered it, then you asked it again as if you were blind or mentally retarded for not seeing/understanding what I just answered for you, so I asked if you were retarded. No hypocrisy there.

[Killtown]

[marky 54]

[Dogsmilk]

Champ - are you actually aware that a lot of people in this country find the term "retard" quite offensive? Particularly as using a term to describe people with learning disabilities as an insult implies you have contempt for such people.

[Killtown]

Funny how the trolls who personally attack, smear, ridicule, mock, intimidate, others all of a sudden get so "offended" when the people they constantly attack start fighting back. But then again, that's just the typical behavior of a troll.

[Dogsmilk]

If you can't see past the distinction between arguments between individuals and using terms that display prejudice towards social groups then I pity you.
If myself, Chek or Gruts etc started using e.g. homophobic or racist terms as insults, we should be roundly castigated. Your use of language to Marky is really no different to using such terms. If you cannot see that...well, what can I say?
It's not about me being offended. You may instead wish to consider how many posters here may have friends or relatives who are "retards".

[marky 54]

[Killtown]

[Dogsmilk]

I see you continue your standard policy of deflection.
I didn't "defend" him. I explicitly stated any threat is out of order. I said I wouldn't take it that seriously. Did you?
Now - what do you think those posters who have "retarded" friends or family members (or who may even themselves have MLD and thus themselves be "retarded") may think of your choice of words?

[Dogsmilk]

[ian neal]

[Roadrunner]

Ian Neal,

You've given us yet another example of your bogus 9/11 forum in operation. The actions of John White, Gruts, Check, and others in discussing commercial films on threads made by others that clearly relate to 9/11 evidence of media fakery is a flagrant violation of fair and reasonable standards. Their actions are wholesale desecration and everyone who reads them would agree.

You should be ashamed of yourself at your yellow livered decision. This forum, posturing as a UK attempt to search for truth on the tragedy on 9/11/2001 but already known worldwide as having little more than a nest of liars, has, through you, allowed their actions to go completely unbannned, yet again. You and the members concerned are nothing more than a demonstrated disgrace to humanity.

I advise all who read this notice to quit this forum in disgust that evil men are being allowed to posture as agents of 9/11 truth.

In your own letter posted here of 1st November you wrote -

Tony and he assures me that he has taken these on board and will seek to moderate the forum fairly and to the best of his ability.

Not only is this blatantly contradicted by the above, but you prove yourself to be ultimately responsible.

Case Closed

[chek]

[gruts]

I'd like to ask the administrator of this forum to implement killtown's brilliant idea to have a "sandbox", as follows....

everytime somebody calls somebody else a "troll" or a "shill" or tries to suggest that this site is "controlled by the perps" (or even the "jesuit order") - they should spend 7 days in the sandbox.

please also make this retroactive, thus preventing killtown from posting again for approximately 100 years....

[Killtown]

Roadrunner remember, Ian Neal is on recorded saying he doesn't care about the trolls reeking havoc at this forum:

Ian Neal: 'Do I care? Not a lot.'

[gruts]

that's 100 years and 7 days now....

[KP50]

[chek]

[TmcMistress]

*sigh* How come Killtown and Roadrunner never mention me by name in their troll rundowns? I feel so left out...

[gruts]

I know how you feel TMC.

for a long time they left me off their hate list, but now I get the feeling that they're starting to hate me too - maybe not as much as they hate chek or john white, but I do often get a mention when they're making lists of evil-doers these days.

so I guess you've just got to hang in there....

[chek]

Yep, as gruts says, once killtown and his klingons truly appreciate the full depth of your loathing for him and his kind, you too shall one day appear on his troll list.

Mind you going by his reputation and other forum bannings, it must be a long, long list he has there.