I'd like to volunteer as a mod here

[Dogsmilk]

Show me once instance where you labelled someone a troll who wasn't in direct disagreement with you. Shouldn't be difficult for someone as impartial as you should it?

[Killtown]

[Stefan]

Sorry, my mistake Killtown, that was your left bollock who said that.

Although I trust from your reaction you think this is bad form - clearly you will be calling for bollock to be banned as a "troll" now?

So at least we've established that while bollock's criteria for calling someone a troll is that they admit thinking a plane hit the WTC - you have quite a different definition.

Since you are so closely asociated with the bollock I assume you will rush now to explain what your criteria is?

For instance - you did call me a troll the other day - in fact for supporting your call for your own little board where "trolls" couldn't post.

What was troll like in my posting then?

[Killtown]

Me thinks you are afraid to guess my definition of a troll because it will describe you.

[Stefan]

Before you say - I know it was bollock who called for the forum board - I was using "you" as a plural.

[Killtown]

Come on "champ", guess my definition of a "troll". Don't know why it's so hard for you.

[Stefan]

We're playing a guessing game now?

Can it wait till after we've finished with hop scotch and braiding each others hair?

Come on mate - stop dodging the bullet it's undignified - just explain to us - in detail so no one can misunderstand you in future -

What makes me a "troll" and bollock a hero you're "rooting for"?

Obviously it has nothing to do with him agreeing with your hypothoses and me not doing so - so what is it?

[Killtown]

No, we've been playing for a while since I asked you to guess my definition a while ago. Glad to see you're finally paying attention.

[Stefan]

I guessed your criteria pretty for using the term pretty clearly I'll elaborate if you like -

1) For use when you can't answer a question "I don't answer trolls questions"

2) Your use as an ad hominem response "that's what I'd expect from a troll"

3) Your use as a whining divise "Ian Neal make the nasty trolls go away"

4) Your use to dismiss all articulate dissent to your views.

Am I warm?

We know it can't be someone who uses ad hominem responses - because bollock is a hero you are rooting for, and you have supported Fred - the king of ad hominem.

We know it can't be repeat posting the same points over and over - you and others do this.

We know it can't be evading questions - again typical MO for your gang.

In short - since the sun shines out of your own beam weapon it can't be any bad behaviour either you or your gang partake of - which in fact leaves very few options - scracth that - it leaves none.

Hold on... I'm scared it might describe me?

I've got it - a troll is a 6ft1 English Greek Cypriot man with curly hair?

I've got it haven't I???

No it can't be right, as you call everyone else who doesn't endorse Fakery/NPT "trolls" as well.

Well you can't say I haven't had a good stab at guessing - I give up - what is it?

[Killtown]

[Stefan]

Oh good!

Time for bed now, watch this space - for my next trick - a dossier of all the ad hominem responses the people you support - obviously you're not a hypocrite so you'll be adding a demand for their banning to your next whine to Ian.

I'll look forward to that.

[Killtown]

Notice how trolls try to take the heat off themselves by deflecting it back on the complainants.

[Stefan]

Killtown,
You might want to use the search tool to look up Fred and how he treated everyone on this forum, or even look at prole's many incarnations up to present date, for a little insight to why posters like John and Chek have lost all patience and tollerance for the "9/11 Researchers" lot.

You'll note that after many weeks of trying to rationaly debate them and getting endless insults and threats eventually that became the tone of this debate.

They are short tempered because they are sick of being attacked with ad hominem from the constantly re-spawning stream of fakery posters from the us who walk through the door and immediatley petition Ian Neal to ban everyone who disagrees with them - and then going immediatley on the attack against us and the forum at large - John and I have had fakery videos titled with slurs towards us. The stream of ad hominem from your lot is continuous - and a lot of people have given up trying to be composed in response to it.

Looking through some of the posts on search while I was looking for the tcm incident it occured to me you actually use ad hominem a lot less than the others - but by your continual support and turning of a blind eye of the ad hominem of those who agree with you while campaigning for the sanction of all those who use it who don't - you have implicated yourself for the same treatment.

For myself, I'm not perfect - I loose my temper sometimes, but I always try to approach with questions and debate - which are pretty much uniformly ignored. Yet I was a "troll" the second you saw me - you go looking for a fight Killtown you'll always find one.

You can't walk straight into a forum on the attack and be hurt when people respond in kind.

[Killtown]

[Killtown]

Curious, why did I get passed over as mod for proven hater/liar/troll/divider John White?

[chek]

[Killtown]

[chek]

[gruts]

you just couldn't make it up could you?

john - please could you implement the sandbox idea ASAP?

[Killtown]

I'll make this forum a deal if you make a Sandbox, you can put me in there for life *if* you agree to put all the attackers I've been complaining about here in there too for life and everybody who comes here in the future who constantly attacks people.

Deal?

[gruts]

alternatively - as you and your sockpuppets are the only people on this site who actually need moderating - why don't you just grow up and stop spamming the forum with nonsense?

deal?

[Killtown]

[chek]

[Killtown]

Gosh, the trolls are REALLY scared for my deal to sacrifice myself!

[chek]

[Killtown]

Come trolls, what are you afraid of? Care to accept my deal? Oh wait, yes you are because that would mean you'd end up in the Sandbox forever with me!

[paul wright]

Isn't this the most pathetic thread you've ever read.
There is no point to killtown's or his opponents' knocking back and forth.
Please Ian, make killtown a mod
He's ok and probably deranged like the rest of us
In fact being in range is the worst place you could be, so put an end to this time and energy wasting.
killtown for mod!

[chek]

[Killtown]

Don't worry dh, shek is just scared because if I'm mod, him and the rest of his merry bunch of attacking trolls are done for.

But people who want to debate and be civil have NOTHING to worry about.

[paul wright]

I'd be extremely stupid to answer either of the above.
Killtown for Mod