The 7/7 Bus Bomb

[karlos]

This is copied and pasted from:

http://jforjustice.co.uk/77/#6

We are told that Hasib Hussain started from King’s Cross Thameslink station, and was seen on a number 91 bus travelling West along Euston Road to Euston Station, where he caught the number 30 bus, that would have then travelled East, back along Euston Road retracing his steps, back to where he started from at King’s Cross, if it had not been diverted into Tavistock Square. Why would someone carrying a large, heavy backpack do that, unless he was following a script, written by someone who knew, in advance, that that particular number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, would be diverted into Tavistock Square, and that Hasib Hussain would therefore not be able to get on it at King’s Cross Thameslink, which is where he had arrived at, on the train from Luton? Only someone who is a stranger to London would do that without asking why, because it is a totally illogical thing to do, for someone who knows London, and knows that the number 30 bus goes past King’s Cross Thameslink station, so that they could have caught it there, instead. It would be a complete waste, of time, energy, money, and an unnecessary risk to take, and thus a totally illogical thing for a real terrorist to do.


It now gets unbelievably weird, because the number 91 bus, that Hasib Hussain is reported to have taken from King’s Cross, along Euston Road to Euston Station; to board the number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, that got diverted into Tavistock Square; actually goes to Tavistock Square. So, if he wanted to get to Tavistock Square, he could just have stayed on the number 91 bus, and been sure of getting directly to Tavistock Square. The number 91 bus route goes from King’s Cross to Tavistock Square.


That is conclusive proof that that particular number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, was part of Peter Power and his customer’s mock-terrorist drill, pre-rigged with explosives, like the three tube-trains, and was pre-planned to be diverted into, and blown up in, Tavistock Square, rather than blown up by a backpack bomb. Whoever planned this, obviously planned to kill Hasib Hussain with that bus explosion, so he could not tell anyone what had happened, just as they had planned to kill the other three Muslim actors with the explosions on the three tube-trains.


At 09.00 AM a number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, left Marble Arch on its return journey to Hackney Wick. It arrived at Euston Bus Station at 09.35 AM, but was then diverted from its normal route, into Tavistock Square, and stopped outside the medical offices of the BMA, where it was blown up, at 09.47 AM, as part of the terrorist exercise gone live. This also fits with the BBC Panorama mock-terrorist programme of May 2004, where the explosion of a road vehicle was scheduled to take place AFTER the three tube-train explosions.

This BBC mock terror programme featured Peter Power and was based around the bombing of 3 tube stations and a chlorine tanker
Surely not another prophetic coincidence?

[Muncher]

[Nick Cooper]

[The Watcher]

Staraker asked:

[guzman]

[Nick Cooper]

[numeral]

[karlos]

Staraker, that passage was copied from the weblink attached.

The point is, why would the 18 year old alleged bomber get the bus 91 and then the bus 30 when he could have got the bus 30 directly from Kings Cross Thameslink?
It makes no sense.
Myself i believe the whole 7/7 story is a cooked up rehash of the BBC programme from 2004.
ICTS/Fortress GB was probably the'client' of the drills.
The same day as the 7/7 London drills according to Webster Tarpley there were simultaneous drills in the usa and canada.

Reports from people like the accountant Mr Lee suggests that his office was being evacuated BEFORE the bomb went off

[Nick Cooper]

[karlos]

Excuse me stating the obvious, why wouldnt a suicide bomber simply blow himself up on the number 91?
Why not?

[Prole]

[Nick Cooper]

[Prole]

[karlos]

28/6 was a dummy run ofcourse, but not in the literal sense.
These guys were told by their handlers to make the trip. 3 of them did 28/6. But this was either a drill or a trial or a recruitment exercise. They were duped by somebody.

On 7/7 we would expect to see the same type of footage but either as the researcher claims they were too late because the train was cancelled and so the cctv was useless because it was timestamped or they were not there in London at all and were killed elsewhere. Such as the two shot in Docklands.

[blackcat]

[The Watcher]

Stelios asked:

[conspiracy analyst]

[Nick Cooper]

[Nick Cooper]

[The Watcher]

What are the chances of:

1). Outright Terror ... Bold & Brilliant

2). The date of the event being encapsulated in the bus serial # 17758

3). The driver casually walking away from the incident (as caught on camera).

4). The driver disappearing for approx 90mins before turning up at a West London hospital, seven miles from Tavistock Square.

5). At least one witness to the event (Richard Jones) being proven to be a 'plant'.

6). None of the upper deck 'survivors' coming forward (despite large sums of money being offered by at least one tabloid).

7). No evidence for Hasib Hussain being on the bus.

. Random posters turning up on this forum, relieving RN fron her lonely task, to fight a rear guard (Rear Task?) action in defence of the OCT!

It is very apparent that there are two parallel versions of concensus reality emerging in the world today. The version that we sign up to may well determine the next stage of the evolutionary process.

The Watcher

[guzman]

[guzman]

[Nick Cooper]

[Prole]

[Nick Cooper]

[Prole]

[karlos]

I dont think the issue of BEST place or best bombs should be worried about.
None of the bombs were set off or placed in the most 'optimum' locations.

More the point is according to the official narative why would a person get onto one bus then change to another and not set off the bomb on the first one?
The official story makes no sense it is simply being cooked up to fit the reality. The number 30 runs past Kings X Thameslink and anyone getting on would not have known the bus was being diverted. His alleged journey involved him going westwards on the number 91 the getting on a number 30 and heading straight back in the exact opposite direction EAST. does that sound at all plausible or logical?

[Nick Cooper]

[conspiracy analyst]

[Nick Cooper]