The Untold Story of the Woolworth Building Incidents on 9-11

[Stephen]

I reckon the seconed tower was hit by a missile.

http://www.orbwar.com/woolworth/

[chek]

I've yet to see a photo of the distinctive and persistent smoke trail(s) left by one or multiple missiles out of the many pictures taken on 911, and the selective context free quotes on your orbs page aren't very convincing either.

So are you this weeks spammer from 911 Movement?

[marky 54]

[Stephen]

[gruts]

[marky 54]

[chek]

[Stephen]

[Stephen]

[Stephen]

[chek]

[mason-free party]

By CB_Brooklyn


Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."


There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:


1. OGCT. This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.

2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.

3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.



Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.

Is it possible the “truth movement” has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?

Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the “truth movement” away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?

Is it even possible that some of these plants are “in on it” while others got suckered in? You be the judge.

[gruts]

hey - cheers for the spam, but I've already seen it. I also think that the following scenario is more realistic....

let's say that we divide people into 5 groups depending on how they perceive the events of 9/11.

Group A - people who either believe in the OCT or can't be arsed thinking about it.

Group B - people who ask logical and rational questions about various gaps or inconsistencies in the OCT.

Group C - people who swamp the internet with illogical and irrational claims about the OCT which are repeatedly shown to be bogus, while simultaneously attacking Group B at every possible opportunity (and portraying any attempt by Group B to disagree with them as a sign that they're "working for the perps", "shills", "truthlings", "planehuggers" etc).

Group D - the gullible, sheep-like useful idiots, pawns, sockpuppets, cheerleaders and repeaters who believe and spread the disinfo created by Group C.

Group E - people who spend an inordinate amount of time on the internet trying to defend the OCT and discredit people who question it.

tbh it wouldn't surprise me if people in group E and those in groups C & D were actually part of the same team.

on the face of it they would appear to be very different, but are they really?

Group E spend the vast quantities of spare time they seem to have trying to discredit people who question the official story of 9/11. Groups C & D spend the vast quantities of spare time they seem to have trying to discredit the 99% of people who question the official story of 9/11 but who don't believe their npt/tvf/dew fairy tales.

the evidence shows that they attack the same people and the intended result is also the same.

[marky 54]

[gruts]

I wonder what this is all about?

http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=2070&hl=

(c&p of indubitably/philadelphia/roadrunner's OP in case it gets removed by the champ)

What if the 9/11 'truth movement' really has largely been organised by the perps of 9/11/2001 virtually since 2001 ? Organised into a Killtown, in which innocent members are steered away from establishing the real truth.

What evidence exists for the existence of such a Killtown ? Such a Killtown ? Such a
S
H
I
L
L
T
O
W
N

Have you ever tried posting the following word on this forum ?

S
H
I
L
L
T
O
W
N


Well, consider the following -

1. Bans and propaganda against members who want to discuss certain 'taboo' subjects.
2. The survival of members on forums whose documented track record is to smear other members. These privileged 'elites' get spectacular footage and they steer the rest. This despite the fact, of course, that 9/11 was a giant psychops in which the media and its images are basically corrupt. (A lesson we learned from 'planes' already, right ?)
3. The grouping together of forum 'experts' to personally discredit individual members whose ideas differ from the carefully presented consensus view.
4. Situations where written complaints are made to forum administrators on breaches of membership but where no action is taken.
5. Access to parts of the forum forbidden for most members.

A map of Killtown, really an 'atlas', - since there are global administrators who 'take care' of Killtown) would put me and most others in the suburbs.

Which is just about as Orwellian a situation as, well, '1984'. We, as individual human beings, are NOT in Killtown. We are as truth seekers in its suburbs. We are undefeated, undeceived individuals. Precisely the situation we find in 1984. Precisely what cannot be defeated. By anyone. For we are not in Killtown and we don't want to be. Ever.

[chek]

[chek]

[gruts]

looks like the champ pulled the thread pretty quickly!

if that happened over here to one of his threads in which he was basically just throwing his toys out of the pram while calling everybody shills, trolls and perps - I reckon he'd probably start whining about censorship....

[John White]

[Stephen]

Interesting links here.

http://www.angelsfortruth.com/WTC%202%20The%20Missile.html

http://www.angelsfortruth.com/WTC%202%20Missiles%20%26%20Plane.html

http://www.angelsfortruth.com/Missile%20Smoke%20Trails.html

http://angelsfortruth.com/WTC%202%20Missile%20Equipped%20Plane.html

http://angelsfortruth.com/WTChttp://angelsfortruth.com/WTC%202%

http://angelsfortruth.com/Military%20Orbs.html

http://angelsfortruth.com/WTC%202%20Ghost%20Plane.html

If the New World Order were to plan an attack like 911 then it's logical that they would use hidden secret technology, so that it would be hard to expose the crime because most people don't want to be seen as a FRUIT LOOP!

[Stefan]

So Stephen, are you going to answer the question chek asked about why the missile gave no no smoke trail?

No?

How about the question about how a missile managed to make precise slices in the aluminium cladding where the wing tips and til fin tip of a Boeing would have been?

No?

Any mediafakery type ever going to answer a single question raised by their hairbrained claims?

Nope. Of course not.

[Stephen]

[Stephen]

Stefan Wrote

[chek]

[Stefan]

Those pictures are about as tenuous as any claim can be to be "evidence" of a smoke trail - what about on one of your shiney you tube videos?

Presumably the "cartoon plane" was covering the missile - isn't that the idea? So why didn't a trail follow it?

Because it was fired from an "orb"?????????

Come on mate - snap out of it! Try to remember the day when you required some evidence of something to consider it might be true - did that day ever exist?

You make up a piece of technology (the invisible pixel orb) and then make up some magical powers for it (it makes missiles leave no smoke trail!).

Where does this end? Why not just go the whole hog? If you want to make up new technology ad hoc and from thin air - at least try to be creative:

"Why wasn't there any missile trail"

"There wasn't a missile - the orbs are phsyically controlled directed energy singularities, forged from elves ears and pixie wings and dipped in the magical tears of Elvis (collected by the CIA when they assasinated him by way of depleted uranium burger), reporters at ABC and CNN (THE PERPS!) had them connected to their brain waves via their rectal passages and all they had to do was imagine the shape of a plane and then they destroyed the same shape out of the side of the building. The fire ball? What fire ball? Did you see a fire ball? Fakery! Why did the building disintergrate? Did you see it disintegrate? I have some youtube footage which shows it flicker slightly on one frame - PROOF if proof need be it was infact teleported from the top down to a secret government base on a moon of Saturn so when the world is sold to the venusians in exchange for magic beans (2012!) our powerful overlords (the reporters at ABC and CNN - PERPS!) can live there in luxury - they already have seats reserved on the orbital beam weapon the government has hovering over my bed sit. Got some questions to ask me about my theory? How do you know I exist? I could be fakery too! And while your pondering that one I'm going to run away. But don't forget if you rearrange the letters of the word PERP it spells PEPR, if you then remove the two 'P's and add the letters F-A-K and Y and you get FAKERY! Coincidence? If you want to ignore the PROOF in front of your eyes then YES. Shill."

*ahem*

[Stephen]

[chek]

[Stephen]

[chek]

[marky 54]