View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daz Minor Poster
Joined: 23 Sep 2005 Posts: 20 Location: Wirral
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:24 am Post subject: Occam's Razor |
|
|
Can the principle of Occam's Razor be applied to 9/11 theories such as pod and flash and Pentagon? And how does it affect them? _________________ MerseyTruth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ally Moderate Poster
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 909 Location: banned
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:30 am Post subject: Re: Occam's Razor |
|
|
daz wrote: | Can the principle of Occam's Razor be applied to 9/11 theories such as pod and flash and Pentagon? And how does it affect them? |
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alan Firminger Minor Poster
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 54 Location: South London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Remind others that Occam's Razor states that the hypothesis that explains all the evidence and requires fewest assumptions is probably correct.
I often quote Occam's Razor when discussing 9-11. For assumptions read conspirators.
Last edited by Alan Firminger on Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:36 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daz Minor Poster
Joined: 23 Sep 2005 Posts: 20 Location: Wirral
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just found a link on Occam's Razor and Conspiracy Theories. Occam's Razor is very important to the 9/11 truth movement. Ignore it at your peril. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ally Moderate Poster
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 909 Location: banned
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does Occam's Razor make FLIGHT 77 appear at the Pentagon or cause the WTC to implode uniformaly, or make WTC7 commit suicide seven hours later because it missed the rest of its family? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xmasdale Angel - now passed away
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1959 Location: South London
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:35 pm Post subject: Even George Bush admits there was a conspiracy |
|
|
The problem with the article on this link is that it assumes that there are people who advocate a conspiracy theory and others who don't. But in the case of 9/11 everyone advocates a conspiracy theory: the government that it was an Al Qaeda conspiracy, others that the US government was in some way involved in the conspiracy whether Al Qaeda was or not.
So the question is not whether or not there was a conspiracy (when two or more people plan together to commit a crime there is by definition a conspiracy) but for which conspiracy theory do we find the evidence most compelling. Did Al Qaeda act alone without any foreknowledge of the US government, or does that theory just not fit observable facts?
Noel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Occams razor only operates because the media and government story is created with intent of its appearance and sequelae and thus appears the simplest explanation
Other interpretations thereafter appear to complicate the constructed illusion and are therefore disposable
It's philisophical bs to tell the truth and is never an answer or a rebuttal |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1919 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:46 am Post subject: Roger's Hacksaw |
|
|
My approach is to use basic physics (indisputable) to prove essential elements of the official story wrong. This can be done in about 5 minutes.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Collapse%20of%20Towers.swf
Everything else can flow from that - e.g. there can be no motivation for a full investigation unless it is totally clear that the official story is provably a lie. The above is my attempt to do this. I invite everyone and anyone to apply Occam's Razor, Cockham's Chisel and Roger's Hacksaw to the above and see if they "take it down".
In fact, I think I am going to e-mail to some academics... _________________ Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|