| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jfk
Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 246
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:51 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| marky 54 wrote: |
show me proof that CNN faked the clip and it could not of been faked by someone else or the researchers themselves, ive been waiting lightyears for that and still have not seen evidence. |
go look at the original archive!
Last edited by jfk on Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jfk wrote: | | marky 54 wrote: |
show me proof that CNN faked the clip and it could not of been faked by someone else or the researchers themselves, ive been waiting lightyears for that and still have not seen evidence. |
go look at the original archive! |
and the other clips that are claimed to be fake can they all be proved in the same way?
and what if the clipst have been previously shown not to be fake or the odditys proven not to be the results of fakery but rather video compression? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jfk wrote: | | to imply that the researchers faked their footage (september clues?),is a bit desperate. |
not at all, i could fake a clip if i wanted to, why would i presume nobody else would do it?
is claiming CNN faked their footage being desprate? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jfk
Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 246
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| it depends if you believe cnn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
it also depends if i find tv fakery evidence convincing.
therefore it has nothing to do with believing cnn, just something solid in the form of evidence would be fitting. by solid i mean something that cannot be proven wrong with counter evidence or be put down to other factors to do with video equpiment/compression etc etc.
otherwise it is just an opinon people will hold rather than something provable to all that will challenge even those who disagree.
i don't see anything in what ive seen so far, but it's not up to me to prove what i do not believe, its up to tv fakers to provide something more convincing.
untill then realise the bizarreness in this statement:
"i think ian is right, it would give them a chance to find some actual evidence to refute the tv fakery evidence"
as i or others do not need evidence to refute what has not been proven and certainly would not last long in a court of law. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
