Who Killed John O'Neill?

[outsider]

I got this via Barrie Zwicker - he wants it replicated as much as possible:

http://www.banditobooks.com/

Watch the trailer, but the main stuff is in the essay - click 'Read the Essay' on above link.

Barrie is very impressed with this guys work, and though I haven't watched it all, so am I.
Alan Weisbecker gives short shrift to Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Greg Palast, Christopher Hitchins, Woodward (Contragate) and many others.

There is a great deal of material here, but from what I've seen (about two hours worth) it is well worth watching.

[TonyGosling]

WKJO: Who Killed John O'Neill?

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSyFD51vN_4
One Actor, One Room, Seven Characters: 9/11.

Traumatized by the September 11th attacks, one man struggles to dismantle official history, at the expense of his sanity and even his life. Grappling with multiple realities - and multiple personalities - he must retreat into his mind in pursuit of the truth. In a fictional film about non-fictional events, there is a place where belief and faith will blind you, where nothing is sacred, and to get there all you have to do is ask:

"Who Killed John O'Neill?"

a dead art film by ty rauber and ryan thurston

a dead art film
Producer & Director: Ty Rauber
Writer & Performer: Ryan Thurston

[TonyGosling]

Why the Federal Bureau of Investigation does not investigate anymore?
Published on October 31, 2017
Tom McGregor
CNTV Commentator and Editor at CNTV (China Network Television)
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-federal-bureau-investigation-does-i nvestigate-anymore-mcgregor/?published=t

Editor's Note I have not verified the draft sent to me and cannot vouch for its authenticity, but since the person who sent the report claims that it was Mueller who halted a deeper FBI investigation on Osama Bin Laden, I believe it's worth taking a closer look at the moment. I want to emphasize that I'm not certain if claims in this report are true, but it's worth a read since the person said all other MSM media outlets have ignored him and I'm just giving him an opportunity to voice his opinion to demonstrate my tolerance for different viewpoints ...



Why the Federal Bureau of Investigation does not investigate anymore?

By Barry Lanza July 9, 2017

Before 911, I had problems with the F.B.I. because I married a family heavily involved in Iranian politics. My father-in-law moved to Paris in December 1977 to install the Islamic regime that was to be formed in Paris. He was 73, rich, well-connected and really did not want to get involved. He went to Chase Manhattan bank in the summer of 1977 to meet with officials there who opened up a trust for him and moved money there from Tehran for his security if he received retaliation. Mehdi Hessabi lived in Paris from 1920 to 1940, spoke French fluently and could live out his life in comfortable exile if it failed. Who would not mind retiring in Paris with a fortune? Where do I sign?

The Council of Foreign Relations had developed a policy to create Islamic fundamentalism to stop communism from spreading in the Middle East. Everyone remembers the US overtly backing the Taliban to beat the Russians and even Rambo had a film dedicated to the Taliban efforts to fight the evil invading Russians. Iran was next target to fight communism. Both Afghanistan and Iran would be remembered for ‘getting what America wanted but causing the biggest problem ever for American foreign policy because they succeeded’. Hitler was financed to stop communism and we remember what a humanitarian he was.

The French freemasons helped to gather the cast of characters who would be the next Iranian government. Different factions would fight for pole positions and put aside their differences to oust the Shah. In 1979, the new government started and the earlier deals also began to unwind. My wife’s relative General Pakravan was executed and my father-in-law Mehdi Hessabi had a death sentence in absentia. He was given amnesty in 1984 and decided to get a ‘new protector’ when he returned to Iran. His ‘old’ Jewish protector was mad and my father-in-law always hated the Jewish groups he dealt with earlier. They treated him like a slave. The U.S. wanted him to finance the Shah’s son. The U.S. had to find out who his new ‘protector’ was to make sure retaliation would not happen to his ‘old’ friends. I later said why bother me or my wife. I did nothing wrong. I was told ‘You can kill an old man but can you kill the power behind the old man.’ I was alone.



F.B.I. investigates me by turning my world upside down to see if I am working for someone that does not tell them what to do

As they could not get to the ‘old man’ in Iran, they went after my wife in the U.S. to get him ‘back in the fold’. I thought it was her imagination as she claimed her work was being tampered with and she was being followed everywhere. It then happened to me. I talked to my cousin who was big in the state department (U.S. Aid). He asked for a list of names involved and he asked me what I wanted for it. I told him it was gift for Uncle Sam. What I ended up doing was turning in the C.I.A./Mossad to the C.I.A. I WAS TRULY A MORON. They ended playing with my work at Mobil oil. I confronted my boss as I proved my work was tampered with. He admitted it and said he would pay me for 2 months if I submitted to an exit interview. The exit interview was with the head of security Wilson in their worldwide headquarters and two people who acted like their bodyguards (they were F.B.I. or ex-F.B.I., I found out later). The interview ended when he asked ‘How did I have all this information without leaving the country?’ I asked ‘what information?’ He waived his hands and the two guys behind grabbed my arms in a way I could not move and they took my out of the building without a word said.

After a couple of months my problems increased, I went to Lawrence Walsh’s office. I said my father-in-law was a high up Iranian Freemasons. Two F.B.I. agents came out and grabbed my arms in the same way the F.B.I. agents did at Mobil. They asked me rapid fire questions. I said I did not know about their arms deal directly but knew about a three way arms deal through China. I give them information and a timeline since the revolution. Naturally, the F.B.I. lied on the Freedom of information Act(F.O.I.A.) they created and the F.B.I. headquarters in Washington, D.C. had papers on me at Lawrence Walsh office file while they lied they had no file on me at all. The C.I.A. also denied they had a file on me.

In 1992, C.I.A. Douglas Barbie on me at my work said the F.B.I. was extremely corrupt and even gave me details on J. Edgar Hoover. Later, I saw a National Geographic show on Hoover that confirmed what he said. The F.B.I. is a political organization who protect certain people and/or corporate interests. They do not investigate; they find out what conclusion is wanted and uses anything that points that way.





911 and the F.B.I.



In all fairness, there is tremendous pressure to name the guilty in such a tragedy. The problem is if they knew all the details earlier, it could have easily stopped 911. Who decided the official bogey man? High-priced lawyers, who represent and protect interests of those who are on retainer like various governments, and interests, make the call. The lawyers have networks in law enforcement, the press, the courts, etc. The Bin Laden family had connections in the U.S. and Saudi family. However, nobody liked this ‘black sheep’ of the family and Afghanistan had been in the midst of a civil war since the Mid-1990’s. The Afghans had no lawyers. At that time, only the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan had relations with the Taliban officially. The Iranians and the English financed the opposition. Bin Laden was blamed and naturally took credit to make this caveman feel important. The guy did 911 all from a cave in Tora Bora it is claimed. The war has not really ended. But then, the W.M.D. was confirmed by the U.S. and U.K. intelligence.



Here was where the F.B.I. failed on 911

1) They had their man, why look further, plus the powers-that-be would start firing people at the F.B.I. ‘who muddied the water’. Nobody at the FBI was fired on 911. ‘This is our story and we will stick to it.’ There were so many holes in the official story that nobody believes it even today.

2) It was reported that there was a high level of absenteeism at the twin towers. The F.B.I. should have interviewed them all.

3) There was a massive amount of short stock/future positions, especially on the airlines. Those positions should have been frozen and all involved should have been detained and questioned. The I.R.S. took my assets via docking my wife’s handicapped social security and my son’s assets via fake audits because I talked. If my information was considered bogus, how come I was invited and attended the 911 hearings. Even the victims were not invited. They had plenty of lawyers and bureaucrats invited that spoke at the 911 hearings who had no first or second knowledge of the event. No doubt the F.B.I. talked to them. BEFORE THE HEARINGS, THEY HANDED OUT LEAFLETS TO THE PRESS ON WHAT THEY WERE GOING TO SAY. They even blacked out the sections they did not want read. 1984 in 2003?

4) There were four separate terrorist cells at least. Each one operated independently in case if one guy got caught, he could not bring down the whole operation. Someone in the U.S. had to give the ‘GO’ signal to these cells. That person was never found or nor even mentioned. The terrorists on those planes were grunts and I doubt most of them knew it was a one way ticket or someone would chicken out. WHO IS THAT PERSON WHO SAID ‘GO’ AND WHY DID THE F.B.I. IGNORE HIM? The ‘GO’ MAN WAS THE KEY.

5) An Israeli crew operated out of van was filming the twin towers. The van was reported by a local person and the F.B.I. did grab them. They basically admitted they were there to film the tragedy. The F.B.I. bowed to political pressure and set them free clearing them of any charges. The next week, they went back to Israeli and admitted they were there to film 911 on Israeli TV. Did they short stocks?

6) Fox news, who is friendly with Israel, did a four part 4 hours expose on how Israeli had to know about 911 beforehand. The Jewish groups protected anyone who associated with them. Everyone else had to get power lawyers or make deals with those powers ‘who can make it go away’.

7) The Saudi had ‘ins’ with the Bush administration and the Bush administration controlled the F.B.I. at that time. The Jewish groups controlled Congress and the Saudis made deals the Jewish groups like bringing in SHELL oil to Saudi Arabia one month before the 911 hearings. Since 2003, the Saudis and Israel are best buddies. Now, in 2017, their 911 deal fell apart. The Saudis are still partners with the Israelis. Qatar?

I tipped on 911 and called Legit (F.B.I. in Germany). They refused to talk to me. Even the agent would not even give me her name to me over the phone. Colin Powell admitted they got tips from Germany and I am sure he was not talking about me. I forgot to grow a beard and beat my chest to get an interview. My bad.

9) Fifteen years later, the Saudis face massive lawsuits on 911 and Iran was convicted on a 911 related law suits in June 2017. Why didn’t they just say Bin Laden did it? The F.B.I. officially cleared Bin Laden in 2006 and the only major publication that pushed that news at that time was TIME magazine. When Bin Laden was killed, everyone seemed to forget that fact he was cleared. In 2016, the lawyers seem to recollect Bin Laden was cleared. I have talked to the 911 Iranian legal team trying to seize the building. The information to win the trial came from the F.B.I. JASTA is reviving the information the U.S. government hid from public view about Saudi Arabia. The JASTA people also got additional information that was overlooked as well by the 911 commission.



LOOKING BACK

The FBI's "Most Wanted Terrorists" web page does not state that Bin Laden is wanted for the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Rex Tomb, the FBI's Chief of Investigative Publicity, is reported to have said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."

"On September 20, 2001," according to the Guardian, "the Taliban offered to hand Osama bin Laden to a neutral Islamic country for trial if the US presented them with evidence that he was responsible for the attacks on New York and Washington. The US rejected the offer."

On September 23, 2001 the BBC reported that four of the hijack "suspects" - Waleed Al Shehri, Abdulaziz Al Omari, Saeed Alghamdi, and possibly Khalid Al Midhar - were alive, and that FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged "the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt."

FBI Director Robert Mueller, in a speech at the Commonwealth Club on April 19, 2002, said: "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot."

LOOKING FORWARD

FBI Director Robert Mueller is now investigating Trump and Russia. The questions will be will he present evidence, bury evidence or create evidence. Naturally, the lawyers will decide the truth. AND YOU WONDER WHY TERRORISM IS GROWING..