| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DarrenUK
Minor Poster
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: England
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:33 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Planes hit the WTC... id say they used USAF planes.
The planes had been switched.
Commercial planes > USAF planes > Hits WTC.
Think of Northwoods. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why would they use USAF planes? - if they did the wreckage would be USAF planes - how on earth would this help the perps? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DarrenUK
Minor Poster
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: England
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | | Why would they use USAF planes? - if they did the wreckage would be USAF planes - how on earth would this help the perps? |
Has any wreckage been re-constructed or even recovered?
Wasn't all the evidence from Ground Zero destroyed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
utopiated
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Location: UK Midlands
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Part of the research in all this should include wider evidence.
I think the missing wing is just pixel drop - but the footage of the "nosecone" going thru and out the other side of the towers is pretty bizzare for "aluminium" based materials. It's like throwing a plane made of tin foil into a model of the WTC - it'd just crumple no matter what speed.
So... wider evidence? Anyone found any boasting web/media by the likes of
Northrop / Northropgrumman
Honeywell
Halliburton
Lockheed
E-Systems
SAIC
etc. which hints at or even demonstrates use of holographic technology. We know it's there? I think we're way off with what we can contemplate that the likes of the MIC has access to - but this doesn't mean they'l always use it for the sake of using it.
<EDIT>
Wescam on HU-25s
| Quote: | Wescam has received an order for the first Model 16 multisensor system to be installed on a jet airplane. In an $8.6-million contract, Northrop Grumman ordered the maritime surveillance system for installation on the U.S. Coast Guard’s HU-25 Falcon Jet as part of the aircraft’s upgrade. Deliveries are to run from second quarter 2001 to third quarter 2002. Wescam has options for additional units, worth $11.5 million over the next four years.
|
Good old Northrop...
http://www.aviationtoday.com/cgi/av/show_mag.cgi?pub=av&mon=0600&file= 06scan.htm
But the issue is [for me as a thought experiment] whether this true holographic transmission EXTERNALLY or far easier imposition of images onto a screen to the TV... if you see what i mean.
WESCAM doesn't appear to be able to do the former. But as we know in a CGI-TV driven world this is irrelevent. We are just left with the 'witnesses' at ground level plus the guy who "hid under his desk" as the plane approached his floor of the WTC! Maybe he hid from a hologram - this would make total sense given his testimony as he survived the unsurvivable IMO.
_________________
http://exopolitics.org.uk
http://chemtrailsUK.net
http://alienfalseflagagenda.net
-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bicnarok
Moderate Poster
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 334
Location: Cydonia
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Simple.
There were planes or other flying machines involved.
_________________
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind..." Bod Marley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stefan
Banned
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chek wrote: | | Koheleth wrote: | Chek,
Could I be a pain in the arse and ask if you know what hour/minute that bit is at? |
Hi Koheleth, no problem.
It's about 44mins into the Directors Cut version - but I'm afraid I lied.
The 4 angle on screen comparison is an extra that comes with it.
It's available on bittorrent, or that extra segment is only about
4.3 MB - if your email will handle an attachment that size,
PM me and I'll send it to you. |
OK having seen the four angle comparrison, it's still very hard to tell- the left wings on the top two do both seem to flicker, the bottom two the are less visable.
What gets me is the way the plane disappears without any progressive damage into the building- like it was a ghost. On one of the angles, it looks like you can see no damage at all between the body of the plane and the tip of the wing when the rest of the wing has already gone in.
It's hard to discount striaght off, but it is still possible that video compression is the culprit? Has anyone done these freeze frame tests with dvds- or was the live footage taken in a compressed form anyway? IS there any footage out there that would be reliable to freeze frame and see for good if these strange phenomona still occur? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
