| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sam
Wrecker
Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 343
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:48 am Post subject: |
 |
|
To return to this photo you posted...
Is this from somewhere on the official flight path?
I'd be grateful if you could quote the source of the shot and give some clue as to context. Ta.
_________________
Cryin' won't help you, prayin' won't do you no good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KP50
Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 526
Location: NZ
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pepik wrote: | | Quote: | | You're hilarious. I already posted a photo that showed the view from along the flightpath, are you not paying attention? |
But you have yet to show a photo that proves the Pentagon is "well hidden, in a built up area".
Do you understand the concept of backing up what you say?
Does "well hidden" mean "plainly visible"?
Does "built up area" mean a tree? |
Let's start from the beginning shall we.
The plane hit the lower part of the Pentagon, horizontal so that it didn't hit the ground before entering the Pentagon. Thus we are concerned with the ability of just a large plane, travelling at such a speed to accomplish such a feat. While the area immediately around the Pentagon is of interest, the speed of the plane means we must look further back along the flightpath to look at the height of the land, and possible obstructions.
All clear now? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sam
Wrecker
Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 343
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| KP50 wrote: | | pepik wrote: | | Quote: | | You're hilarious. I already posted a photo that showed the view from along the flightpath, are you not paying attention? |
But you have yet to show a photo that proves the Pentagon is "well hidden, in a built up area".
Do you understand the concept of backing up what you say?
Does "well hidden" mean "plainly visible"?
Does "built up area" mean a tree? |
Let's start from the beginning shall we.
The plane hit the lower part of the Pentagon, horizontal so that it didn't hit the ground before entering the Pentagon. Thus we are concerned with the ability of just a large plane, travelling at such a speed to accomplish such a feat. While the area immediately around the Pentagon is of interest, the speed of the plane means we must look further back along the flightpath to look at the height of the land, and possible obstructions.
All clear now? |
And why couldn't it be - acccording to your analysis - in a descent just prior to the point it hit the Pentagon??
If it were ascending at impact then you would have cause for complaint, because the ground would have got in the way earlier.
For my own part I'd be grateful if you could explain whether the photo you posted (above) is supposedly on the flightpath or not. You seem to be avoiding this question like the plague.
Cheers.
_________________
Cryin' won't help you, prayin' won't do you no good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KP50
Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 526
Location: NZ
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sam wrote: | To return to this photo you posted...
Is this from somewhere on the official flight path?
I'd be grateful if you could quote the source of the shot and give some clue as to context. Ta. |
It is roughly in the area - it is not provided as proof of anything other than to show that the base of the Pentagon is not an easy target to hit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KP50
Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 526
Location: NZ
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sam wrote: | And why couldn't it be - acccording to your analysis - in a descent just prior to the point it hit the Pentagon??
If it were ascending at impact then you would have cause for complaint, because the ground would have got in the way earlier.
|
Yes it would have to be in a descent, what's yr point? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alex_V
Wrecker
Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 515
Location: London, England
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:55 pm Post subject: Re: The Truther Challenge |
|
|
| Alex_V wrote: | | I would certainly be interested to see the accounts of these 20 witnesses to pre-impact explosions in the basement, if such information is readily available. |
I have looked around the net, and still cannot find accurate quotes from witnesses to pre-plane explosions at the Twin Towers. Does anybody have a link, or direct quotes confirming that these witnesses actually exist? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
