Missiles fired from Woolworth building...evidence?

[mason-free party]

Missiles 16.Nov.2004 16:11

---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
Tom link


There were other explosions around the WTC on 9-11. One was covered by live local news radio here. After news blurbs about POLICE officers screaming into their radios about bombs on Vesey Street and reports of missiles fired from the Woolworth Building, I decided to get involved. What I found is that it probably "did" occur. Photo evidence backs it up as well as the security company for the W.B. being suspicious. Problem is, the feds got to the EuroNews video online before anyone had the chance to save it (I guess). Yet, the suspect explosion is authenticated by three different angles. So stick your Photoshop.

www.angelfire.com/ny5/bigfoot

[mason-free party]

Does This Man Look Like The Type Who Would Go Along With A
Nefarious 9-11 Plot???
Executive Profile
Bo Dietl, Chairman

Never having been someone who could be content to just take it easy, when Richard "Bo" Dietl retired from the NYPD in March 1985, he founded Beau Dietl & Associates. Specializing in corporate investigations for major international companies, BDA has grown to become one of the largest international agencies with its worldwide headquarters located in the historic Daily News Building at 220 E. 42nd Street in New York City.

Mr. Dietl currently serves as Chairman of the New York State Security Guard Advisory Council, appointed by Governor George Pataki in 1995. In that position he actively strives to raise awareness of client issues within the Security Guard industry and to promote high standards that ensure properly qualified security guard personnel.

As an internationally recognized private investigator and security consultant, Mr. Dietl has over 25 years of investigative and security experience. He has served as a consultant to the Director of Security for the 1996 National Republic Convention in San Diego, California and as the Director of Security for the 1992 National Republican Convention in Houston, Texas. Additionally, Mr. Dietl has advised the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia on issues of personal and physical site security and supervised security services provided for high-ranking officials from the Peoples Republic of China.

The Republican and Conservative Parties of New York State for the 6th Congressional District nominated Mr. Dietl for the U.S. Congress in 1986. Then President Ronald Reagan, then Vice President George Bush and Senator Alfonse D'Amato, as well as The New York Times and The New York Post endorsed his election bid.

As a former member of the New York City Police Department (NYPD), Mr. Dietl is one of the most highly decorated detectives in the history of the department. As a detective with the NYPD, Mr. Dietl investigated numerous homicides and other serious felonies, successfully obtaining evidence through research, interviews and various investigative techniques. During his career with the NYPD he was responsible for over 1500 felony arrests with a remarkable 95% conviction rate. The following cases represent his most notable NYPD career highlights.
* In what former New York City Mayor Edward I. Koch labeled "… The Most Vicious Crime in New York City History", this case involved the rape and mutilation of a Roman Catholic nun in the Convent of Our Lady of Mount Carmel Parish Working 24 hours a day, Mr. Dietl's efforts led to the ---arrest and conviction of the suspects in Chicago and New York City.
·1 The Palm Sunday Massacre reported to be "The Most Heinous Homicide in New York City History", was investigated by the Special Homicide Task Force. Eight children ages three through twelve years and two adults were fatally shot in the head. Detective "Bo" Dietl was a member of this task force that was credited with the arrest and conviction of Christopher Thomas.
Mr. Dietl has been a guest lecturer on Criminal Justice topics at Syracuse University and Central Connecticut State University. He is the author of One Tough Cop: The Bo Dietl Story, published by Pocket Books. Mr. Dietl is also the Executive Producer of One Tough Cop: The Bo Dietl Story, the movie to be released in the Fall of 1998.

While consulting on various motion picture projects, Bo developed a love for the movie business. When One Tough Cop was made into a major motion picture, Bo served in the capacity of Executive Producer. That's when he realized he also had an affinity for the business aspects of the industry (what else is he gonna’ say?). Bo has returned to the film industry, starting his own production company, How Good Is This Production Company, with his partner Steven Witkoff, the mega-developer of The Witkoff Group. The Production Company is currently working on several projects. (the Witkoff Group is the building management for the Woolworth Building---busted guys! )

As a father, Bo has always been deeply concerned about children's issues, especially their protection. Accordingly, Bo has been the driving force behind the computer software product, One Tough Computer Cop, developed in conjunction with Computer Concepts, Inc. of Bohemia, N.Y. In the same manner as parents monitor their children's activities, this software allows parents to monitor their children's activities on the Internet, which, for all of its benefits, also provides predators unfettered access to our homes and our children.

Bo, being an entrepreneur at heart, has now expanded into the real estate industry. Also in partnership with Steven Witkoff, Bo has an ownership interest is several major buildings located in metropolitan areas around the United States. Bo was in a hospitable one day when he suddenly realized that he had the business acumen to become a brain surgeon! And so he relieved a Doctor who was in the middle of surgery---the patient lived but is a retard.
Be advised that a BDA Consultant, Colonel Michael Roque (ex-Delta Force) was listed as being an active player in BDA in 2003. There was also a suspicious “Colonel” barking evacuation orders to parties unknown at the Trade Center before any official evacuations of any emergency personnel were ordered. This was in the 9-11 Transcripts.

[mason-free party]

NO AIRLINERS INVOLVED IN 9/11 HITS
MAINSTREAM MEDIA HOAX
By Dave Bunford

THE FAKED VIDEOS

Play any DVD or video of the South Tower impact and when the alleged Boeing 767 comes into view hit the pause on your remote and then single step until the "plane" is completely absorbed - enfolded - into the tower. You will - or certainly should - be absolutely positive that the video is a fake. See the animated, cartoon 767 MELT - there is no other word for it - into the building like a hot wire through butter. You will see no shuddering, vibration or crunching of the lightweight aluminium airframe as it slams into the exterior aluminium cladding, the many windows, the many high-grade-steel perimeter columns (one meter apart on center), the many cross-trussed-steel-and-concrete floors and the massive steel box-column core; no crater-like indentation formed into the side of the tower; no breaking off or shearing of the wings or tail-fin - even the thin wing-tips slice through floors; no deceleration from cockpit to tail; and hear very little sound on impact, etc...etc. And you will certainly NOT see any "confetti" cascading down. (This confetti and vaporize nonsense comes from a fighter jet being slammed head-on into a rigid three-meter-thick block of solid concrete - not a 155ft-long 65+ ton airliner slamming into a building with many windows and designed to "give" slightly in high winds). As for the "official" version - puhleeze, don´t make me laugh.

Or go visit http://www.911hoax.com

Then, to see how the floors and exterior of the tower were constructed, go here: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/wtc_ch2.htm .

Then read: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=we_have_holes

If anyone still isn't convinced of its fakery, then they are truly brain-dead.

THE "LIVE" SOUTH TOWER HIT

Consider the LIVE footage where we see the SAME CNN (or CBS) feed - on ALL channels (don't forget these Zionist Bozos have already got together on "how to cover the next terrorist attack", and no doubt did so before 9/11). All we see for about TWO seconds is a silhouette - with no depth perception and reflected light, whatsoever - resembling an aircraft, travelling from west to east into the blazing sun, before it conveniently disappears behind the North Tower. The entire South Tower IS NOT SEEN. This live feed could easily have been delayed for x seconds before transmission - enough time for the techno-spooks to insert the artifact/animation, when they knew the rough location of the fireball. The artifact can, of course, be inserted in real time, anyway. This is BY FAR the VERY BEST angle - side on to the artifact at optimum distance (no detail) and a totally hidden South Tower - to deceive us. (And all set up in a choatic New York in less than 17 minutes! Miracles will never cease). But it comes at a price: the artifact in later doctored VIDEO transmissions has to execute a near-impossible (some pilots say impossible) banking maneuver for such a giant airliner, so that the angles, the artifact's "flight path", the explosion and the damage to the building, correlate.

After this "live" footage, OBVIOUSLY, ALL SUBSEQUENT TRANSMISSIONS ARE FROM VIDEO, some from different angles, which were, and are, continually being refined with each transmission (eg. the widening of the artifact's arc of approach and angle of attack from 2-3 o'clock to 1-2 o'clock as viewed from the north). All this can easily be done. When was a different "angle of attack" televised after that brief "live" hit? Not for many hours later. MINUTES are enough to accomplish the doctoring of all videos, from all angles.

All the "amateur" (my ass) videos have been thoroughly - and brilliantly - debunked by many specialists.

(As for the "WTC impact footage from WNYW" proclaimed by some, boy-o-boy, that sure is a Boeing 767 now ain't it? Well, robertsyourmothersbrother! Nosireebob.That could quite easily be a cruise missile or a flying turd just about to hit the device that consists of a series of vanes radiating from a hub rotated on its axle by a motor. Scores of technicians needed to pull off the caper? bs. Just one outside broadcast van and crew will do.)

EYEWITNESSES/PHOTOGRAPHERS/TOURISTS/INDEPENDENT TV STATIONS, etc:

Assuming they didn't know from what direction the hit was coming, they had only SEVENTEEN MINUTES MAXIMUM to set up their gear in a chaotic NYC; and why would they be focusing on the SOUTH side of the SOUTH Tower? All the action was on the NORTH side of the NORTH Tower. 450mph = 220 meters per second, so they would have had very little time - SECONDS - to see, never mind locate and focus on, the missile from ANY southerly vantage point. What a miraculous CNN video that was! And good 'eavens Evan's! Et les "Naudet Freres"! C'est Impossible! You won the lottery thrice-over there, boyos. QUICK, TAKE A CAMERA SHOT OF THAT MISSILE, Y'ALL ! TOO LATE. YOU MISSED IT, BOYS.

As any psychologist will tell you, eyewitness testimony must always be taken with a dollop of salt, especially when - in shock and well after the event they are recalling - the meme of planes-planes-planes has been thoroughly implanted. And where were the 100+ Israeli spooks and FEMA that morning? I would bet my bottom dollar they were playing their roles as false-eyewitnesses (and fake-evidence planters) at the WTC - just like the ubiquitous, impossibly-located "Naudet brothers" - and at the Pentagon. Assume the missile (or no missile at all, just explosives in the building itself) comes in from the south. Most people are looking, if they are looking at all, directly at the gaping hole and smoke on the north side of the North Tower. So, like us watching the live transmission, they cannot possibly see it. Witnesses at ground level have hardly any chance of seeing it, even from the south, east, or west, what with all the obscured views and so little time; and they don't have the deafening roar a giant airliner, 250 meters away, flying at 450+ mph, would make in the thick air of Manhattan to aid their senses. This is a very fast moving air-to-surface (White jet, anyone?) or surface-to-surface missile (Woolworth Building anyone?) we're talking about; maybe one of these "small planes" : http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html

See also: http://www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=84 and http://www.911closeup.com/inshtml?ID=71dex


ISRAELIS/ZIONISTS WERE UP TO THEIR NECKS IN 9/11

Let us count the ways:

1. PNAC; Major Neo-cons; Spy rings, Organizations etc: http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j030802.html

2. - The Mossad (ie. al-Qaeda) "hijackers" - art students - and their inappropriate (for devout Muslims) exploits and easily traced meanderings; Attaboy and his gang aboard super-Zionist Abramoff's casino ship; and the Zionist controlled FBI ensuring the "hijackers" safe-passage..

3. Israeli security company in charge at Boston, Newark and Dulles airports. (Same company in charge at London Underground on 7/7).

4. Cheney and his Zionist-team war-games; back-door hacking of the FAA's Air Traffic Control (ATC) Israeli-written computer software; Israeli owned and controlled electronic communication networks; ATC frequencies for voice; fake cell-phone calls.

5. Zionist owned and controlled MSM for the WTC-hit hoax; TV and video deception - airliner animations overlaying missiles; Or no missiles - just explosions in the buildings; Zionist owned and controlled press for fake passenger lists; etc....

6. Three Zionist/Israeli owned/leased WTC buildings brought down by controlled demolitions; Zionist Ghouliani's WTC7 bunker - operations and control center; stupendous insurance payouts; nothing politically big happens in NYC without Zionist approval

7. Israeli companies warned of WTC attacks hours beforehand; Zim-Israeli Shipping moved out of Twin Towers weeks before 9/11; ZERO Israelis killed in the WTC hits and demolitions; Urban Moving Systems; the dancing Israelis.

8. Many put options traced to Israeli banks

9. Israel - prime benificiary of 9/11.

10. The Pentagon hit with Rumsfeld and Israeli-Zionists Wolfowitz, Zakheim et al.

Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli Spy Ring : http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spyring.html

CONCLUSION

No airliner hit the North Tower; no airliner hit the South Tower, no airliner hit the Pentagon. There were no airliners involved in the 9/11 hits. Try missiles. Or just explosions in the buildings themselves. And a media (mostly TV and video) deception.

The three WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolitions: The Twin Towers EXPLODED; WTC7 IMPLODED. The Twin Towers were immensely strong and needed a very energetic agent - high explosives from near-top to bottom and in the basements near the bedrock - to bring them down. This has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt: see "Waking up from our Nightmare" by Don Paul and Jim Hoffman, as one proof among many.

Whatever happened to the passengers (did all of them actually exist? http://www.wingtv.net/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html) and crews of the pseudo-hijacked flights AA11 & 77 and UA93 & 175 - how, where, when (and IF) they were killed - is anybody´s guess. The FAA uses Israeli-written software for its ATC and it is my guess that the only flight-paths those four "hijacked" airliners took (if they took any at all) on 9/11 were in computer memory. Why use real planes when simulated ones can fool ATC far more easily and efficiently? No wonder NORAD couldn't find the runaway airliners on its radar; and any fighter jets scrambled, based on ATC data, would have been chasing their own tails trying to intercept thin air.

This is indeed Occam's Razor at its sharpest. No longer do we need the infamous stand-down, FAA incompetence, NORAD complicity (except in the high-level coverup) and incomprehensible flight-paths - although maybe we still need the war-games for maximum confusion and for the pseudo-hijackings. Thus is a massive amount of deadwood and personnel eliminated from the caper. In fact, the no-planes explanation is the ONLY rational, completely logical explanation there is; all the other theories have far too many potential pitfalls (eg. remote control; real planes flying hundreds of miles can miss their targets or be shot down) and far too many people to have successfully kept a lid on it.

9/11 was a near-as-dammit Israeli false-flag atrocity with (real but traitorous) Americans frantically engaged in a headless-chickenesque coverup. It was ordered by the International Zionist Bankers headquartered in the square-mile City of London (the real British Crown) with their satraps in Wall Street, Basle and Tel Aviv, and via their Royal Institute of International Affairs (Round Table), Council on Foreign Relations and Bilderbergers. Their main terrorist-attack-dog is Israel; their brawn, America; their whore, Britain. Their fraudulent global fiat money - created out of thin air, usury-bearing, tax-imposing, debt-based - system is bankrupt and their only way to perpetuate the scam (and their obscene wealth and power) is Imperialism leading to Totalitarian One World Government.

That's all, folks. Last man alive, please switch off the lights.

[James C]

Actually, serendipity is wrong about the structure of the twin towers. This isn't their fault, it's down to poor source material (one article).

The simple fact is, the floors were constructed of shallow, lightweight trusses which spanned between the core and the outer wall structure. Since these trusses were not cantilevered from the core, the outer walls must have supported half the weight of each floor. I have found no proof which contradicts this and therefore conclude that the core did not support all of the weight. The core supported itself and half the weight of the floors. Wind loading was then counteracted by a combination of facade design and the spreading of lateral loads from facade to core via the floor trusses.

Reynold's analysis of the outer wall is also deeply flawed. He fails completely to discuss the relative sizes and masses (of aircraft versus steel) or appreciate how weak the joins were between the sections of steel which made up the facade. It doesn't take a genius to look at the holes in each tower and see that the aircraft didn't cut through the steel but broke the original sections apart at the joins, pushing them inward. The wind-tip marks are not even cuts in the steel but are are cuts in the aluminium cladding giving the impression of much deeper holes. The lightweight floor trusses would have offered little resistance to the aircraft but the dense steel core would have stopped it dead, as witnessed.