Another breakthrough in the press.........Friday 2-12-05???

Pikey

Hi 911 Truth seekers

I have submitted a letter to the largest and most widely weekly circulated UK National construction magazine "Building" and after two follow up calls appear to have a positive result although I do note the inclusion of the word "probably" next week!

I must confess I got good vibes off Tom the deputy editor when I spoke to him. Unlike my previous experiences with the press! In the absence of the Editor he has written the lead article in this weeks edition and his photo depicts a David Beckham lookalike!

The magazine website is www.building.co.uk.

If my article is published I will endeavour to report how it was published. Alternatively you can purchase the magazine £2-90 or perhaps it may appear on the website.

Justin · Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:53 pm Post subject:

Nice one!

Pikey · Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:47 pm Post subject:

An edited (er butchered!!!!) version of my correspondence has been published with the editors heading "Tall tale" in this weeks "Building" magazine (edition 2-12-05); Here it is exactly as published:-

Pikey · Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject:

Since having my letter published in "Building" early in December last, I have been regularly following the letters pages for a follow up from other construction professionals and academics.

Well its almost two months later but here it is a published in "Building" 27/1/06 and headed "Waiting for some answers" by the editor :-

Andrew Johnson · Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:42 am Post subject:

Send them this:

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/PressRelease27Jan2006.html
SCHOLARS REPUDIATE OFFICIAL VERSION OF 9/11 - Press Release

Claim government's account violates laws of physics and engineering

(PRWEB and Newswire) January 27, 2006

An influential group of prominent experts and scholars have joined together alleging that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11. The members of this new non-partisan association, "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), are convinced their research proves the current administration has been dishonest with the nation about events in New York and Washington, D.C.

These experts contend that books and articles by members and associates have established that the World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the official story about the attack on the Pentagon. They believe that the government not only permitted 9/11 to occur but may even have orchestrated these events to facilitate its political agenda.

The society includes U.S. and international faculty and students of history, science, military affairs, psychology, and even philosophy. According to its spokesmen, S9/11T represents a concerted effort to uphold the standards of truth and justice and to strengthen democracy in this nation, which has taken a terrible hit in the aftermath of 9/11, when "everything changed." Its function is to bring scientific rigor to the study of 9/11 phenomena.

The members of this group are dedicated to exposing falsehoods and to revealing truths behind 9/11, "letting the chips fall where they may." The evidence has become sufficiently strong that they are speaking out. They are actively devoting themselves to reporting the results of their research to the public by means of lectures, articles, and other venues.

The society includes numerous notable professors and scholars, including:

Morgan Reynolds, Texas A & M Professor Emeritus of Economics, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor for President George W. Bush, and former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis

Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, co-chair of S9/11T and the creator of its home page and its forum

Robert M. Bowman, former Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" Space Defense Program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, a former senior Air Force Colonel with 101 combat missions, who is also a Catholic Archbishop

Lloyd DeMause, Director of The Institute for Psychohistory, President of the International Psychohistorical Association and Editor of The Journal of Psychohistory

James H. Fetzer, Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Duluth, author or editor of more than 20 books and co-chair of S9/11T

Daniele Ganser, Senior Researcher at the Center for Security Studies of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

Andreas Von Buelow, former assistant German defense minister, director of the German Secret Service, minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years

The society, founded by Professors Fetzer and Jones, who serve as its co-chairs, is approaching 50 members to date. Fetzer, a philosopher of science, observed that the government's "official account" is not even physically possible, because it violates laws of nature. "What we have been told is fine," he said, "if you are willing to believe impossible things. Serious scholars don't believe in tooth fairies."

Beyond encouraging its members to vigorously express their concerns on this score through lectures, conferences, symposia, articles, and books as well as other access routes that publicize their findings,the society's initial activities, which are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, include the following projects and endeavors:

Professor Jones is refining his influential analysis of the physics of the collapse of buildings at the World Trade Center.

Professor Fetzer is editing a collection of new studies about 9/11 that will include contributions from the members of S9/11T.

A major conference is being planned for this fall to further inform the American public about the group's most recent findings

Studies by the society's founders and by prominent theologian David Ray Griffin, who has taken a leading role in exposing false claims about 9/11, are accessible from the association's home page, scholarsfor911truth.org. Information for those who may want to join S9/11T can also be found there.

For Press Inquiries:

Alex Floum, Esquire
S9/11T Associate
(925) 818-1702 (cell)
911@email.com

About the Society:

James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
S9/11T Co-Chair
(218) 726-7269 (office)
(218) 724-2706 (home)
http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/

Resource Questions:

Eric Hufschmid
S9/11T Associate
(805) 968-5351
PainfulQuestions@aol.com

ian neal · Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:59 am Post subject:

Well **** me sideways Pikey

This is no small feat. It is one thing to get a letter published but to get the questions raised by the editor is another level

Is this available electronically? Can you scan the copy/page into a file and post it here? Are you sure it is from the editor? Assuming this is the correct publication, the editor is not A Couper?

Pikey · Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:52 am Post subject:

Ian Neal states:-

Pikey · Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:36 am Post subject:

I have e mailed the following message to the Assistant Editor, Tom Broughton of Building, together with Andrews links:-

ian neal · Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:09 pm Post subject:

Ah sorry I misunderstood. I thought the 'letter' was from the editor. Even so, this is an excellent opportunity

Pikey · Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:09 pm Post subject:

Hi 911 Truth campaigners,

I have contacted Tom Broughton, the Assistant Ed of Building today and requested feedback on the links I had sent (re: scholars for truth, Loose change, and the Steven E Jones scientific analysis of the building collapse)

Tom advised, as a publication they have no intention of following or publicising the issue any further. No explanantion of why not was offered.

He also referred to this website forum and my article on reporting here factually on communicating with Building. I asked him if there was a problem with that and he advised there was not. As the magazine is following this forum maybe they would like to take up my invitation to offer an explanation of their negative action here?

Due to, IMO, the unreasonable response I have no intentions of renewing my subscription with the magazine because I feel that having been provided with the compelling evidence and with their negative action as far as I am concerned they are complicit with the crime of 911!

As money appears to be the key motivator in the matrix maybe its time we started using our customer power ethically to make a change for the better and bring those responsible for 911 to account for thier crime.

Peace & truth

Andrew Johnson · Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:23 pm Post subject:

Pikey,

Solid reasoning - both ethical and commercial.

Well done.

mason-free party · Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject:

hmmm...master builders eh...we know where their allegiance lies..wouldn't want to upset the fraternity would we?

Pikey · Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:03 pm Post subject:

Letter submitted to the Building magazine and my contribution to the campaign this weekend.

gericom · Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:27 am Post subject:

Very interesting thread. Noone seems to like the truth, do they? Well Done, Pikey.

Andrew Johnson · Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:51 pm Post subject:

Good man Pikey - keep plugging away!

xmasdale · Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:19 pm Post subject:

At my suggestion, retired civil engineer Jasper Tomlinson has sent them this:

jasper@newkent.freeserve.co.uk

For the Editor 31st July 2007

Apart from great surprise that two iconic towers ‘collapsed’ shortly after being struck by aircraft - events the towers were designed and constructed to withstand - the ‘collapse’ of WTC 7 brought me, with many years of science and engineering related professional experience, in to the magical world of Harry Potter.

The three buildings disintegrated rather than collapsed with readily observed characteristics:
- Sudden Onset; no preliminary sagging or bending
- Straight Down; symmetrical collapse in to own footprint
- Almost Free-fall Speed; massive structures offered no resistance to descent
- Complete Collapse; of the vertical central steel box columns comprising the core, none were left standing
- Sliced Steel; structural steel elements neatly sliced in to short sections
- Pulverisation of Concrete and Other Materials; building materials were pulverized not broken in to lumps
- Billowing Dust Clouds; rapidly expanding dust clouds
- Horizontal Ejections; individual steel sections and some other materials thrown 100 m horizontally
- Molten Steel; after collapse, for several weeks, pools of molten ferrous metal were observed beneath each building
- Sounds Attributed to Explosions; abundant testimony, on record, including fire service and WTC staff

Readers wanting to verify these facts may try downloading, say, from Google Video one of the many films such as 911 Mysteries. If already familiar with much of this, take a look at www.gordonssite.com and click on Tower Demolition. There is also very good material in the online Journal of 911 Studies.

Tall Tales indeed…

J. Tomlinson MA(Oxon) CEnv MCIWEM
London SE1

	9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News	All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1