Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 410 Location: Sheffield
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 12:44 pm Post subject: Analyzing Larry Silverstein's "Pull It" Comment
"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said you know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is "Pull It", ahhh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse" ---Larry Silverstein
We all know that he meant WTC Building #7 when he said that demolition term "Pull It", but let's look at this even deeper.
In June of 2005, almost three and one half years after 9/11, after repeated questioning by a concerned public, Mr. McQuillan, Larry Silverstein's spokesperson finally stated that "by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building."
Let's play devil's advocate for this instance and give him the benefit of the doubt and for research purposes let's just say he really meant the firefighters that were in WTC #7. Even though there were no firefighters in the building at the time, let's even give him that benefit also.
Now here is the $10,000 Question;
Why would the fire commander call Larry Silverstein and ask Mr. Silverstein what the fire department should do with their own firefighters?
The fire department does not answer to a property owner. The fire commander makes his own decisions on how to protect his own men. He does not call the property owner and ask him "Hey Larry, what should I do with my men?"
The ONLY person who a fire commander would answer to is a Fire Chief, not some greedy property owner who has no insight into firefighting.
If this was the case, then firefighters everywhere would be putting themselves at risk every time the go to a fire call by being at the mercy of the property owner.
Does Larry think we are that stupid that we would believe that the New York City fire department answers to him?
Is Larry Silverstein a Fire Chief? I think not.
Larry Silverstein, your rebuttal to the "Pull It" comment has officially been debunked!
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 370 Location: Phuket, Thailand
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:56 pm Post subject: An excellent Analysis
An Excellent Analysis
It is really great when someone comes along and is able to unscramble the thoughts about 'what the hell is wrong with that? which have been running around in your brain for ages.
Ravenmoon, you have broken that down very cleverly, totally debunking Silverstein and his spokesman. Terrific!
Pull the other one, Larry. Sorry, I forgot for a moment: Someone had already pulled the other two. _________________ The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
I don't want to be a pedantic party pooper, but the sort of thing people will very quickly sieze upon in trying to attack this argument:
Quote:
Why would the fire commander call Larry Silverstein and ask Mr. Silverstein what the fire department should do with their own firefighters?
The fire department does not answer to a property owner. The fire commander makes his own decisions on how to protect his own men. He does not call the property owner and ask him "Hey Larry, what should I do with my men?"
Quote:
and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse"
The reason Silverstein said the pull it quote was to divert attention away from exotic weaponry like directed energy beam weapons in the same way that Steven Jones is using thermate and molten steel to divert us from DEWs..remember the buildings turned into dust with the twin towers only leaving behind 3 stories high of rubble...thats why they said they shipped the steel columns off to China...this is bs because the steel columns had been turned into dust themselves
they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse
Why seek his council at all then
I think that's a really interesting point.
If I was to play devil's advocate, I'd say maybe they called him to tell him they were going to abandon the building to the 'raging fires' and as a bigshot owner they thought they'd better let him know.
But that's a highly speculative argument.
I'm not trying to pick holes in your post for the sake of it...it just seems important to make sure arguments can stand up. _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 370 Location: Phuket, Thailand
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:08 am Post subject: Makes No Sense
Makes No Sense
mason-free party wrote:
The reason Silverstein said the pull it quote was to divert attention away from exotic weaponry like directed energy beam weapons in the same way that Steven Jones is using thermate and molten steel to divert us from DEWs...
That makes no sense. Why would Steven Jones get involved in debunking the official fairly tale, in the first place, if he knew it was some new, unconventional weapon that he'd worked on?
To suggest the scenario is that Jones is spreading false information on how the towers were destroyed--by a conventional controlled demolition using thermate--in order to direct people's attention away from the 'fact' that they were destroyed using exotic weaponry seems far-fetched, to say the least. _________________ The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: Re: Makes No Sense
Anthony Lawson wrote:
Makes No Sense
mason-free party wrote:
The reason Silverstein said the pull it quote was to divert attention away from exotic weaponry like directed energy beam weapons in the same way that Steven Jones is using thermate and molten steel to divert us from DEWs...
That makes no sense. Why would Steven Jones get involved in debunking the official fairly tale, in the first place, if he knew it was some new, unconventional weapon that he'd worked on?
To suggest the scenario is that Jones is spreading false information on how the towers were destroyed--by a conventional controlled demolition using thermate--in order to direct people's attention away from the 'fact' that they were destroyed using exotic weaponry seems far-fetched, to
say the least.
Its obvious you don't know how higher level freemasonry works then...remember the goyim are inferior beings fed on bs and kept in the dark..and thats how they want to keep it. _________________ http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_6.html
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 370 Location: Phuket, Thailand
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:41 am Post subject: No explanation
No explanation
mason-free party wrote:
Its obvious you don't know how higher level freemasonry works then...remember the goyim are inferior beings fed on bs and kept in the dark..and thats how they want to keep it.
Correct, I know very little about how freemasonary works, at any level, so, if it is relevant to this issue, why don't you explain why Steven Jones blew the whistle on the official story, in the first place.
Or don't you consider that your accusations require explanations? _________________ The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
The reason Silverstein said the pull it quote was to divert attention away from exotic weaponry like directed energy beam weapons in the same way that Steven Jones is using thermate and molten steel to divert us from DEWs..remember the buildings turned into dust with the twin towers only leaving behind 3 stories high of rubble...thats why they said they shipped the steel columns off to China...this is bs because the steel columns had been turned into dust themselves
REMEMBER STEVEN JONES WORKED FOR THE DIRECTED ENERGY RESEARCH LAB. IN LOS ALOMOS..CONNECT THE DOTS
The reason Silverstein said the pull it quote was to divert attention away from exotic weaponry like directed energy beam weapons in the same way that Steven Jones is using thermate and molten steel to divert us from DEWs..remember the buildings turned into dust with the twin towers only leaving behind 3 stories high of rubble...thats why they said they shipped the steel columns off to China...this is bs because the steel columns had been turned into dust themselves
REMEMBER STEVEN JONES WORKED FOR THE DIRECTED ENERGY RESEARCH LAB. IN LOS ALOMOS..CONNECT THE DOTS
MFP is very wise IMHO
Yet he subtly masks it by pretending to be a 17 year old who skipped school for 6 years - now that is wise.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
