The FEMA Lie About the Core of the Twins

[Christophera]

Did you know that FEMA misrepresented the design and construction of the Twin Towers? Then, the 9-11 Commission and NIST used all of that data in their determinations?

No real 9-11 truth activism can be meaningfully addressed without establishing this fundamental condition of the buildings that stood.

FEMA presents ONLY this diagram as official documentation for the core structure of 2, 1,300 foot towers.



But below is what WTC 2 core looks like with all of the steel supporting the floors GONE. That is the core. Where are the vertical steel columns?.



A missing 2 hour 1990 documentary from PBS titled "The Engineering and Construction of the Twin Towers" detailed a steel reinforced cast concrete tubular core that resisted the flex which steel strcutures of the proportions of the towers have. Recall the Tacoma narrows bridge, a span of only 600 feet unsupported that began oscillations in a 42 mph wind and fell.

Again, here is a view over the core. The spire comprised of a column which did exist in a position surrounding the core, outside of it, is to the right of a portion of the west cast concrete core wall of WTC 1 some 400 + feet off of the ground.



Watch the video I have produced which overlays images of the towers and proves that the core was steel reinforced concrete as well as explaining how the towers were built to demolish and 5 of the unexplained phenomena at the WTC.

free fall
total pulverization
superfine, heated particulate
smooth, square cut steel columns
heavy steel assemblies tossed hundreds of feet

Twin Tower Deception and Demolition I

Twin Tower Deception and Demolition II

[Rowan Berkeley]

Have you managed to bring these thoughts to the attention of Gordon Ross, Chris? Given his rather broad lowland Scots sense of humour, the results could be interesting.

[Christophera]

[John White]

I've seen the Gordon Ross presentation, and I agree his interpretation is very promising

I'm also intregued by your hypothesis so far christophera, and can see you have been sincerely campaigning on the stregth of your theory

My question is this:

This image was used by Ross in that presentation: how do you interpret it relating to the concrete core theory? Should we not see a solid centre in the core? But we appear to see columns and light passing through the centre, at least as far as WTC1 in concerned



This would appear to me to be a question concrete core theory must succesfully answer if we are to invest energy and reasarch time into the hypothesis that a widescale decepetion regarding the construction of the towers has been succesfully perpetrated