Former Congressional Office Calls for New 911 Investigation

[mason-free party]

Former Congressional Office of Technology Calls for New Investigation of 9/11 (WOOD) Add Favourite

Click here for related discussions
drjudywood - 07 Sep'07 - 21:33 edit


September 6, 2007 at 20:48:25

Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member Calls for New Investigation of 9/11

by Alan Miller Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com






Joel S. Hirschhorn, PhD

Sept. 5, 2007 – In an online editorial yesterday, Joel S. Hirschhorn, PhD, former Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), called for a new investigation of 9/11. “First, let the technical truth emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political, conspiracy and other questions. But let us not allow a possible painful truth block the primary task of determining once and for all what caused the collapse of the WTC towers and building no. 7.”


Dr. Hirschhorn is a nationally recognized engineer who has testified before Congress more than 50 times on technology, science, and environmental issues. In addition to his work for the OTA, Dr. Hirschhorn also served as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural Resources for the National Governors Association.

Dr. Hirschhorn admitted to his own personal “growing skepticism about the official WTC story”. He wrote “analyses by many experts reveal the collapse of the three WTC buildings was not caused by the two airplanes exploding into the twin towers.” He noted “the general view is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.”

Dr. Hirschhorn endorsed the efforts of a new group, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, to launch a new, honest and comprehensive investigation that considers all the evidence and which examines the possibility of controlled demolition.

Dr. Hirschhorn issued a challenge to supporters of the official account of 9/11, “If those that believe the official 9/11 story - especially elected officials - trust their views, then let them support a serious effort to test the validity of the controlled demolition hypothesis. If they fear and reject doing so, then let us see that as suspicious and unacceptable.”

He concluded, “Horrific possible answers can cause us to shun a question. But clearing our minds of the fear of painful truths is essential to clearing our nation of destructive lies. Otherwise, we stay stuck in a delusional democracy."

The full text of Dr. Hirschhorn’s statement can be found at http://blogcritics.org

Prior to his 13 years of service at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, Dr. Hirschhorn was Professor of Metallurgical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin, Madison from 1965 - 1978. He has a Bachelors and Masters degree in Metallurgical Engineering and a PhD in Materials Engineering. He has been a consultant to industrial and chemical companies, DOE laboratories, state governments, and public interest organizations. He currently is a Member of the Board of Directors of the National Foundation for Environmental Education and a Member of the Board of Directors of Sustainability Now! He is the author of more than 150 papers, articles, guest editorials, and book chapters on environmental science and technology.

Dr. Hirschhorn is one of 200 engineers and architects who have publicly criticized the official account of 9/11. Statements and short bios of many of the others can be found at PatriotsQuestion911.com .




Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Initiate New, Thorough Investigation into 9/11

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

www.PatriotsQuestion911.com

Alan Miller is author of the website http://www.PatriotsQuestion911.com

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Other Articles by Author



Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

(More...)
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide
2 comments


---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
CB Brooklyn
Not Necessarily Good News


Why is Hirschhorn siding with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization that pushes hoaxes?



Quote from AE911Truth:

"Tons of molten Metal found by FDNY under all 3 high-rise"



The above is a completely unfounded statement. If there were "tons of molten metal" at Ground Zero, there would have been multiple steam explosions with all that firehose and rain water. Firefighters do not spray water anywhere near molten metal, because they know water contacting molten metal causes steam explosions. There was no molten metal at Ground Zero. All the molten metal evidence, in fact, has been shown to be fabricated.



Hirschhorn quote from article:

"“analyses by many experts reveal the collapse of the three WTC buildings was not caused by the two airplanes exploding into the twin towers.” He noted “the general view is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.” "



A very interesting quote indeed, filled with deceptions:

1. The towers did not "collapse", they were pulverized.

2. The towers and WTC 7 were NOT the only buildings destroyed. There was also WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5, and WTC 6.

3. Planes did not hit the towers. Every video shows an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone gliding into a steel/concrete building. Since this shows a physical impossibility, the videos are therefore fake. Aluminum won't make a cartoon cutout of itself in steel and concrete. The plane-shaped holes were not made by planes. There is no verified plane wreckage at Ground Zero. There were no planes crashes at the WTC.

The "truth movement" needs to start questioning the motives of these so-called "scientific" organizations that promote such unscientific thinking.



For the real deal on 9/11, see Dr Judy Wood's directed energy weapon evidence, and Dr Morgan Reynolds recently unsealed court case about no-planes.



Quote from trial attorney Jerry Leaphart, from recent interview with Kevin Barrett:

"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."

MP3 clip of above quote



by CB_Brooklyn (0 articles, 88 comments) on Friday, September 7, 2007 at 6:24:05 AM

[mason-free party]

how long will it take you john boy?