somthing a little odd ive just thought about

[zimboy69]

dont know if this has come up b4

but i remember 9/11

i was working nights and was sleeping in the day
when i woke up i put the tv on almost straight away which i normaly did when i woke up
there was a tv show on at the time then a news flash came up

i remember seeing the first tower burning but the second one was still ok
the thing that strikes me now i think about it
why was it on tv
i remember even when i was watching the commentators didnt know what had hit it
so why be a news flash all around the world with live coverage on all channels so everyone can see
i would have expected it if they knew america was under attack but at the time they didnt really know what was going on
other towers have caught fire since and they were not news flashed all over the tv
somthing odd about the way it was on all channels and nothing had happend untill much later
as if they wanted everone to see something

[marky 54]

im not saying you are wrong, i agree with what your saying, its just we don't know certain things for sure.

for example: news comes in the wtc was hit by a plane, a terrible accident. the news service decide to go to it to report it straight away due to the seriousness of the accident and loss of life and location(landmark) to get the latest on the story.

now at this point the news interuption was only going to last 30 mins to get all the latest news before an update at lunchtime.

however during this 30minute interuption of normal programming a second plane came in and hit the second tower to everyones amazement.

realising how much more serious the inccident was than first thought they decided to stay with it throughout as it was obvious there was no accident and what had happened was a delibrate act.

now i don't know if thats the case or not, but even if it was'nt thats what you will be told if the media commented on it or something along those lines at least.

if it happened all around the world at the same time in time for people to the second strike however........

then it would be obvious it was not a single news agency who decided to interupt at that moment but all of them, which is strange. or all news agencies are controlled by one person

you'd think the interuption would of came at differant times around the world if it was thought to of just been an accident and if all news agencies are independant from eachother.

did anyone here watch the attacks in a differant country?

[zimboy69]

i have no idea how long it takes to put a link of live tv in to action but they had only about 10 mins to do so from the moment the first plane hit
from my remembering i think the second plane hit about 5 mins after the news flash had started so they had to know there was a hit and get a link in about 5 mins
i think this is possible but would they of done it in such a short amount of time by the time they asked whats going on and talked to there producers it dont look a long time to me
im just wondering how long it would take for this infomation to get from the street in usa to the uk
also how long did it take for 7/7 to get to usa
and the madrid bombings i dont even remember there ever being a news flash (there may of been one but i never saw it)

[chek]

Hi Zimboy,

I remember 911 too and feeling left out because I didn't know about it until about 4.30 UK time when I heard from my partner about it (they're blowing up the world!).

If you were working nights and sleeping days, at what time did you actually see it?

[zimboy69]

[zimboy69]