74 Seconds Of Infamy

[Indubitably]

74 SECONDS OF INFAMY REVEALED

1. Missile strikes WTC South at 09:04:14 seconds New York local time causing live broadcast of NBC to suffer from electronic interference.

2. Fireball at WTC South had been created 74 seconds EARLIER (seismic data) at 09.02.54 seconds New York local time

These 74 seconds are ALL covered LIVE on NBC 4. (Almost all of them by LIVE visual footage). Verbal conversations between NBC and supposed 'eyewitnesses' continue during the whole of this 74 seconds.

Thus, WTC South is attacked first by an explosion at 0904 14 seconds - this consisting of an explosion that creates a fireball.

WTC South is next attacked by missile 74 seconds later - the effects of which interfere with the continued live broadcast of NBC 4.

After the second incident NBC 4 broadcast video tape - a repeat of the original fireball. Nothing is said by NBC of the second incident that has just occurred at WTC South.

[telecasterisation]

[Indubitably]

That the live coverage of NBC 4 is disrupted at the very moment that the flying object disappears from view at the WTC (this occurring 74 seconds after the fireball bursts from the South Tower) indicates (as John White himself says) that the interference was due to the flying object impacting with the WTC. The tremor caused to the towers was great enough to affect the signal being relayed from the North Tower. Notice that when this second event occurs NBC 4 suddenly decide to start playing the already recorded fireball - an event that occurred more than a minute before.

The question of why no other footage exists of this event is very interesting. Is there live footage of any helicopter at the towers during these same seconds ???? I think you know the answer. NBC 4 did their best to obscure the 'helicopter'. But you see its effects on live television.

[gruts]

when will you stop clutching at straws and admit that:

1. it's not a missile, it's a helicopter

2. it doesn't impact the wtc, it flies past (hence the fact that there is no explosion or impact damage)

[chek]

I take it the "74 seconds of infamy" refers to how much actual thought you gave this particular make-it-up-as-you-go-along theory of yours?

As gruts has already pointed out, you're a joke that ceased to be funny some time ago.

[Indubitably]

But there were reports on 9/11 that an object like a 'helicopter' had crashed in to the WTC. Aren't you aware of them ? In fact, on Killtown and other sites are interviews with rescue workers who refer to such reports.

Secondly, you still have not dealt with the signal interference on LIVE television - which occurs as the 'helicopter' disappears at the twin towers.
This you can see endlessly on live television and it's never going to go away. The object that approached the WTC caused the interference in transmission. That's a fact recognised already by John White. It affected the antenna being used for that live transmission.

And, surprise, surprise, the television station immediately goes to a replay of the fireball. They cut live transmission to do so.

[gruts]

and surprise surprise - you are still repeating the same old heli-missile nonsense long after it has been shown to be bogus.

a quick recap:
it's not a missile it's a helicopter.
it doesn't hit the tower, it flies past.
if it did hit the tower there would be an explosion but there isn't one.
if it did hit the tower there would be some impact damage but there isn't any.
the tv interference is not evidence that the object is a missile rather than a helicopter.

this is the truth.

if you have any interest in the truth whatsoever, accept it and move on.

[Indubitably]

I accept your right to disagree. Please accept mine.

I will move on.

[gruts]