AUDIO - Tarpley on Kennebunkport & Beam Weapons

[TonyGosling]

AUDIO - Kennebunkport Warning, Disinformation and Beam Weapons



Fifteen minutes or so of Webster trying to make sense of the recent controversies around the Kennebunkport Warning and giving some sound advice about working with foundation funding and trusting internet screen names

Webster Tarpley talks about all this and more while quite literally on the road during his UK tour. You can hear the rumble of the motorway underneath! Have a listen to him here and let's have everyone's comments on what the man has to say as he departs this fair isle for his Italian book launch.

http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=25557

[IanFantom]

Does anyone have a transcript of this?

It's really good stuff. I've done the first 1min 30 secs.

It needs translating and distributing, for its practical advice on coping with infiltration.

[John White]

[James C]

I wonder how many people on this forum follow these concepts to the max?

We'd have to remove most of the content on here if we did as most of it is non 9/11 related and there's little toleration of views outside of Tarpley's vision. In fact there'd be no need for this forum at all, just the requirement to notify people of the next direct action campaign meeting since this is the only thing that counts if you listen to what Tarpley is saying.

There is something strange about someone who tells activists to reveal everything about themselves, forget about the details and ignore other people's views. This coming from someone who can't even disclose the sources of reference in his books properly.

[John White]

[TonyGosling]

No response so far from Gareth others of the London posse who merrily attacked Webster on the tour thread over Kennebunkport, in support of Colonel Jenny Sparks et al.. Is that all forgotten now? I would have thought some sort of response is in order.

I have a longer version which I'll upload soon which includes comments on Dave Shayler's messianic spin out.

[kbo234]

It was only possible, after many tries, to listen to about half of this talk on my computer.....don't know why this has been happening.

It is an excellent talk, great on strategy, 9/11 self-defence, the need for personal openness and the necessity to move on to pro-active campaigning.

I'd like to hear the rest of it if you've got a better file Tony.

[truthseeker john]

[kbo234]

Thanks. I was using Firefox.

[andyb]

sorry tony, the London Posse were out on the streets yesterday. Good interview, but slightly hypocritical saying not to attack people. Tarpley is on record attacking Cynthia McKinney and Cindy Sheehan, calling them crazy and liars. This is just the sort of behaviour he says isn't acceptable in the first couple of minutes?? He has removed off the internet all his shows where this is done. There was deception to get sheehan and Mckinney to sign the Kenenbunkport document, this is not acceptable behaviour either.

[gareth]

[Frazzel]

i urge you all to keep an open mind, remain mindful of the sources, ie anonymous screen names ? dont rush to any hasty conclusions and remember none of us are perfect, we all make mistakes.
we do need to be very cautious about believing slurs on anyone as the black panthers experiences show. the fbi placed agents within the east coast and west coast branch of the black panther party, and proceeded to use these agents to sow seeds of distrust between the two sections of the black panther party. they used very convincing fake documents to "proove" slurs upon key members. this went on for sometime resulting in threats of violence and very heated exchanges between key members, until eventually the two sections realised what was going on. please people be very very aware that this sort of thing can go on. a healthy dose of scepticism with everything is a good thing. i am now going to read gareth and tonys links.
gareth - i cant access the michael wolsey link. any other way of hearing/reading it?

[gareth]

[John White]

I'm pretty sure Tony didnt draw that Gareth. Calling commenting on a cartoon "slander" is a bit strong, don't you think?

[gareth]

[John White]

[blackbear]

Hello Gareth..

You posted ...9/11 Synthetic Error...by MichaelWolsey...

who states.....

"I believe it is essential that we only present to the public the best information that we have in our attempts to awaken the sleeping masses. If we are to convince the average skeptic that “9-11 was an inside job”, then we had better be able to provide convincing proof if we hope to get that person on board with the movement. .......... While you are at it, tell them a missile hit the Pentagon "

Do you believe a plane hit the Pentagon.?

Thanks Blackbear....

[TonyGosling]

Do you have any points to make about what Webster has to say here, particularly about the use of screen names?
Do you have any evidence that 'there was a deception to con anyone in to signing this?
As far as I can see it is clear that Cynthia didn't sign.

[John White]

Controversies is the right place for any dispute about 9/11 personalities no matter their opinions Tony: It by defination a 9/11 truth controversy

I'll shift it now

[TonyGosling]

All I have to do then is to attack a key thread on here and it'll get moved - - errrum.

I think his advice on this recording is absolutely 100% sound. How can we allow anonymous web posters to bring down a man who has probably done more than any of us to promote the cause of 9/11 truth through his long standing international profile and books?

I smelt a rat when people started dragging up his LaRouche connections - listen - he fell out with Larouche over a decade ago. The same people who hounded David Icke out of the Green Party after our biggest election victory ever bang on about how dangerous LaRouche is.

If the free speech of Lyndon LaRouche is dangerous I'm the queen of Siam!

[John White]

[andyb]

[John White]

Who said you cant mention it? You just did!

See the words disappearing off the screen?

But that doesnt mean we have to hang our arguments out the front of the site: and whenever we have a situation regarding any 9/11 "personality" (as created by virtue of people paying attention to them) we always get an arguement

Controversies can handle that fine

But the 15 minutes of audio with Tarpley is seperate, it is an interview obtained by a member of the campaign, that is deserving news, we are adults, we can listen to it, take what we like, and discard the rest: same as every other peice of information: it doesnt need the anchor of a whole bunch of opinion about Tarpley's character

Besides which, this is one of the most viewed sections on the site

Forums are fueled on DRAMA