Iran war - danger of impending false flag

[TonyGosling]

If we get October out of the way without a major incident I, for one, will be extremely relieved.

Justin

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=90439#90439
I've just seen David Cameron's impressive speech - impressive not by the content but by the way he delivered it. However, we will know next week if Cameron has bought himself extra time and prevented a General Election campaign from being called.



But if an election is called, the chances of a false flag operation the size of 9/11 will have gone up dramatically because Gordon Brown, being a NWO/Illuminati stooge with knowledge of the much bigger game plan, will know that if such an attack were to take place during the election campaign, his 'Churchillian' presbyterian no nonsense gravitas approach (as he has already displayed with the Foot and Mouth and the 'botched' London/Glasgow 'terrorist' attacks) would ensure him a sizeable majority, given to him by the gullible electorate in need of 'leadership'. With such a majority, and with the prevailing climate of fear, he will force through ID Cards and other draconian security measures as well as Britain's surrender to the EU and the Euro.

It is looking increasingly likely that by the end of this month some sort of false flag op will occur that will justify an immediate attack on Iran. Over the past few days we have had neocons like John Bolton talking up the need of a regime change in Iran and we know that a 'cover' anti terrorism exercise, Vigilant Shield '08 is taking place between October 15th and the 20th, involving not only the US but Britain, Canada and Australia as well. We also know that the US, NATO and Israel have deployed nukes which can be used against Iran if necessary.

US, NATO and Israel Deploy Nukes directed against Iran
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6918

Neocon 'godfather' Norman Podhoretz tells Bush: bomb Iran
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article255 8296.ece

Neocons seek to justify action against Teheran
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/30/wiran2 30.xml


What may happen could be an 'attack' on a 'vulnerable' US carrier in the Persian Gulf area, a 'dirty' bomb or even a small nuclear device in an American city, or a 'clever' attack on a major but vulnerable piece of infrastructure which will fill the civilian population with fear (water resevoirs etc.). It could even be a surprise attack by Israel, which has been mooted for some time, on Iran's nuclear installations. It is certainly worrying that the Russians have suddenly pulled out their staff from the Bushehr nuclear reactor in the last week. They obviously know something.

Of course, a sudden war with Iran would also probably speed up the demise of the US Dollar as oil producing countries, disgusted by America's bully boy behaviour, switch to other currencies to buy and sell oil. The 'Amero' is waiting in the wings as is the proposed North American Union. The Hidden Hand is behind with its agenda and 'Problem, Reaction, Solution' events must happen soon if their schedule towards world domination is to be maintained.

We will find out next week if Mr Brown will be playing his part. I just hope I'm wrong again!

[TonyGosling]

A B-52 bomber taking off
Report: Cheney ordered nuking Iran
Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:52:12
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=26076&sectionid=3510203

A new report has linked the mysterious flight of a nuclear armed B-52 bomber to the US Vice President's secret plan to attack Iran.

Earlier, news outlets revealed that, on August 30, a B-52 bomber loaded with six nuclear armed cruise missiles had flown for more than three hours over several states. The incident prompted an Air Force investigation and the firing of one commander.

The report by Webster Tarpley published on Rense website on Saturday claimed that many analysts believed those weapons were destined to be used in a nuclear blitz on Iran, which may have been scheduled for September 6, the day that Israel launched its own aerial attack on Syria.

The report adds " Even more heinous uses of these cruise missiles here inside the United States can also not be excluded, given the insistence of the Cheney Doctrine on a terrorist act in the US to be blamed on Iran as the immediate pretext for the Iran war ­ as Zbigniew Brzezinski told the Senate Foreign relations Committee on Feb. 1, 2007.”

Many sources (see Wayne Madsen Report, September 24) agree that the transfer of these nuclear weapons to Iran was blocked by US Air Force personnel, backed up by anti-Cheney factions in the intelligence community, who refused to obey an illegal order.

It is also important to note that some half dozen personnel linked to the Minot and Barksdale air bases have reportedly died under mysterious circumstances since July.

Elsewhere in his report, Terpley quotes his sources as saying that "It is unlikely that a sneak attack on Iran could get through the normal channels of the US national security interagency process. The realization of Cheney's war plan depends upon an outside manufactured event, along the lines of 9/11, which could be used to engineer the typical neocon end run around the standard operating procedures and launch the wider war. "

Webster Griffin Tarpley is an author, lecturer, and critic of US foreign and domestic policy. He maintains that the events of 9/11 were engineered by the military and arms industries. He envisions a model of false flag terror operated by a rogue network of independent operatives in the privatized military intelligence sector and corporate media.