FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Clear Evidence of Video Fakery on 9.11 - Chopper 5

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Indubitably
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:08 am    Post subject: Clear Evidence of Video Fakery on 9.11 - Chopper 5 Reply with quote

Further clear evidence of video fakery on 9/11. Analysis of footage broadcast 'live' on television.

http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/PinocchioStudy/Chopper5Velocity.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:27 am    Post subject: Re: Clear Evidence of Video Fakery on 9.11 - Chopper 5 Reply with quote

Indubitably wrote:
Further clear evidence of video fakery on 9/11. Analysis of footage broadcast 'live' on television.

http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/PinocchioStudy/Chopper5Velocity.html


This had already been dealt with and shown up for the junk science it is by a professional video technician, not a pretend wannabee like Arse Baker.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/h/NPTrebuttal.pdf

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Indubitably
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And what is your factual response to this material ? That the Chopper 5 footage, broadcast 'live' on television, is a composite, a fake ?

Clock still ticking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indubitably wrote:
And what is your factual response to this material ? That the Chopper 5 footage, broadcast 'live' on television, is a composite, a fake ?


?

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Indubitably
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chek, instead of proving yourself each day to be a struggling agent of disinformation, why not answer the questions ?

What evidence can you present to counter claims of those who HAVE analysed this material that these broadcasts made 'live' on television of the Twin Towers are faked ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Indubitably
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Evidence has been presented that only every second frame of video material from Chopper 5 shows smoke rising from the North Tower - this, seconds before a 'plane' appears to hit the South Tower !!!!

What response is offered to such evidence from those who deny that here, in this material, (broadcast 'live' on 9.11.2001 to television viewers) is clear, indisputable evidence of media fakery ?

Eric Salter's article, which I have read in detail and which i recommend everyone to read does NOT even refer to this issue of every second frame showing smoke rising from the North Tower.

Is it not time that we stopped lying to people ? Let's deal with the actual issue. This footage is faked. It shows only every second video frame with smoke rising from the North Tower. Any reply to this FACT ?


The silence is deafening.


Last edited by Indubitably on Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indubitably wrote:
Evidence has been presented that only every second frame of video material from Chopper 5 shows smoke rising from the North Tower - this, seconds before a 'plane' appears to hit the South Tower !!!!

What response is offered to such evidence from those who deny that here, in this material, (broadcast 'live' on 9.11.2001 to television viewers) is clear, indisputable evidence of media fakery ?

The silence is deafening.


It is only deafening to those without the wherewithall to read the .pdf referenced several posts ago. If you need help with that just ask.

But a hint might be to not rely on pretend 'technicians' for your pretend 'evidence'.

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Indubitably
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, we need help from you. Thanks for the offer.

Where does Eric Salter's article address the subject of SMOKE RISING FROM THE NORTH TOWER ONLY EVERY SECOND FRAME AT THE TIME WHEN THE 'PLANE' IS APPROACHING THE SOUTH TOWER ?????????

I've read the article. But it isn't discussed there.

Perhaps you can show us where this subject is discussed in that article by Salter ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indubitably wrote:
Yes, we need help from you. Thanks for the offer.

Where does Eric Salter's article address the subject of SMOKE RISING FROM THE NORTH TOWER ONLY EVERY SECOND FRAME AT THE TIME WHEN THE 'PLANE' IS APPROACHING THE SOUTH TOWER ?????????

I've read the article. But it isn't discussed there.

Perhaps you can show us where this subject is discussed in that article by Salter ?


Your pretend 'technicians' have no doubt all the required information to explain that "the most important factor in stabilizing or tracking
motion is the clarity of detail of the tracked object".
http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/h/NPTrebuttal.pdf

The smoke pixels, inherently lacking detail and moving more slowly, do not change sufficiently fast enough to warrant updating on each frame.

You can test this yourself - you're all Virtualdub virtuosos aren't you? - by resampling a piece of video at half or quarter resolution (depending on what you start with) to witness the moving parts of the image being 'haloed' as they update, while the still parts of the image do not.

As I said earlier - on one of those threads you are still avoiding -
"the no planes issue is what defines whether a site is interested in moving people politically or just being a conspiraloon's hobby site where amatuers prod and tweak away at technical processes they don't understand and draw subsequently wild and ludicrous conclusions from.

Now I've answered your question - please answer these:
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11608

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11695

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11664

and I will continue to request ad infinitum that you deal with these until you do.

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Indubitably
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But that's not true. Frame by frame analysis of the video material from Chopper 5 is freely available as I've already shown. It shows every second frame shows smoke rising. It shows an impossible situation in practice if the video is genuine. An 8 frame sequence is provided for you to see. If you don't want to look at it, fine. But don't spread the lie that such things are not established facts. Don't tell us Salter answered them when, in fact, he did not do so. In fact, as we see, Salter did not even tackle these facts. Did he ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indubitably wrote:
But that's not true. Frame by frame analysis of the video material from Chopper 5 is freely available as I've already shown. It shows every second frame shows smoke rising. It shows an impossible situation in practice if the video is genuine.


It shows that your (and others) understanding of how video codecs work is flawed and no more. Try the experiment suggested above to verify.

And when you're done there - these threads you have been studiously avoiding are long overdue for your response.
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11608

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11695

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11664

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthseeker john
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 577
Location: Yorkshire

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:46 pm    Post subject: A clue here? Reply with quote

"Slight motion spoiled"


Slight_motion_spoiled.gif
 Description:
 Filesize:  85.1 KB
 Viewed:  137 Time(s)

Slight_motion_spoiled.gif



_________________
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish." - Euripides
"No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." - Albert Einstein
"To find yourself, think for yourself" - Socrates
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gruts
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sure what's more unbelievable - the fact that indubutably dredged this nonsense up, or the fact that he didn't spot a heli-missile somewhere in the footage. ace baker is another proven fraud whose "research" has been well and truly busted.

http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/reviewfox5.html

http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/Fox5analysis.html#addendum
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthseeker john
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 577
Location: Yorkshire

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gruts wrote:
I'm not sure what's more unbelievable - the fact that indubutably dredged this nonsense up, or the fact that he didn't spot a heli-missile somewhere in the footage. ace baker is another proven fraud whose "research" has been well and truly busted.

http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/reviewfox5.html

http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/Fox5analysis.html#addendum

Those are excellent articles!

_________________
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish." - Euripides
"No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." - Albert Einstein
"To find yourself, think for yourself" - Socrates
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group