View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Killtown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 438 Location: That Yankee country the U.S.
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: ian neal: 'Do I care? Not a lot.' |
|
|
Just thought members here should know:
ian neal wrote: | Killtown wrote: | I'm just curious as to why you let the trolls like John White, check, gruts, and Dogsmilk run hog wild here and attack/slander/smear people.
Are you a perp running a shill site?
Or do you just not care?
Btw, closing/deleting this thread will only make you look more guilty. |
To answer directly
Some posters are attacking you. Yes. But there is no rule against 'attacking' / challenging another person views. They call you a liar. You call them trolls and shills. 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.
They are smearing you. Yes. And those attacking you should avoid name calling such as liar and nutter. It is unnecessary.
Are they slandering you? I don't know. I'm no lawyer. It would be an interesting case. I wonder if an anonymous identity can sue for slander?
Is this site a shill site? It depends how you define it. I'm not a shill and I currently have responsibility for the site. Are there shills (agents) posting here? One or two almost certainly. But the challenge is to define and identify who is a 'shill'.
Do I care? Not a lot. At least not about these tedious squabbles
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=92868#92868
|
and that thread is locked so no one can respond to it. _________________ killtown.blogspot.com - 911movement.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:42 pm Post subject: Re: ian neal: 'Do I care? Not a lot.' |
|
|
Killtown wrote: | Just thought members here should know:
ian neal wrote: | Killtown wrote: | I'm just curious as to why you let the trolls like John White, check, gruts, and Dogsmilk run hog wild here and attack/slander/smear people.
Are you a perp running a shill site?
Or do you just not care?
Btw, closing/deleting this thread will only make you look more guilty. |
To answer directly
Some posters are attacking you. Yes. But there is no rule against 'attacking' / challenging another person views. They call you a liar. You call them trolls and shills. 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.
Do I care? Not a lot. At least not about these tedious squabbles |
and that thread is locked so no one can respond to it. |
Oh my God!
That must have been a crippling blow to your self-importance!
However will you survive??? _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Way to go Ian _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 1616
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:32 am Post subject: Re: ian neal: 'Do I care? Not a lot.' |
|
|
Killtown wrote: | Just thought members here should know:
ian neal wrote: | Killtown wrote: | I'm just curious as to why you let the trolls like John White, check, gruts, and Dogsmilk run hog wild here and attack/slander/smear people.
Are you a perp running a shill site?
Or do you just not care?
Btw, closing/deleting this thread will only make you look more guilty. |
To answer directly
Some posters are attacking you. Yes. But there is no rule against 'attacking' / challenging another person views. They call you a liar. You call them trolls and shills. 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.
They are smearing you. Yes. And those attacking you should avoid name calling such as liar and nutter. It is unnecessary.
Are they slandering you? I don't know. I'm no lawyer. It would be an interesting case. I wonder if an anonymous identity can sue for slander?
Is this site a shill site? It depends how you define it. I'm not a shill and I currently have responsibility for the site. Are there shills (agents) posting here? One or two almost certainly. But the challenge is to define and identify who is a 'shill'.
Do I care? Not a lot. At least not about these tedious squabbles
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=92868#92868
|
and that thread is locked so no one can respond to it. |
Thanks for starting a thread on the matter that isn't locked so we have the opportunity to pass on our respect to Ian for being balanced and sensible. _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gruts Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 1050
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see how anyone could object to moderation being based on treating everybody equally regardless of their beliefs. and killtown is lucky that the moderation here is so low-key and tolerant of his infantile behaviour, which has resulted in him being banned from so many other forums.
I wonder how long a poster would last on killtown's forum if he or she spent so much of their time calling him a moron, perp, shill etc.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:20 pm Post subject: Re: ian neal: 'Do I care? Not a lot.' |
|
|
Killtown wrote: | Just thought members here should know:
ian neal wrote: | Killtown wrote: | I'm just curious as to why you let the trolls like John White, check, gruts, and Dogsmilk run hog wild here and attack/slander/smear people.
Are you a perp running a shill site?
Or do you just not care?
Btw, closing/deleting this thread will only make you look more guilty. |
To answer directly
Some posters are attacking you. Yes. But there is no rule against 'attacking' / challenging another person views. They call you a liar. You call them trolls and shills. 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.
They are smearing you. Yes. And those attacking you should avoid name calling such as liar and nutter. It is unnecessary.
Are they slandering you? I don't know. I'm no lawyer. It would be an interesting case. I wonder if an anonymous identity can sue for slander?
Is this site a shill site? It depends how you define it. I'm not a shill and I currently have responsibility for the site. Are there shills (agents) posting here? One or two almost certainly. But the challenge is to define and identify who is a 'shill'.
Do I care? Not a lot. At least not about these tedious squabbles
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=92868#92868
|
and that thread is locked so no one can respond to it. |
why not just debate the evidence or counter evidence against what ever your claims may be?
as soon as someone offers a case to prove you wrong you run around spamming the forum with shill/troll talk and your followers do the same.
why not just counter any evidence against you or your theorys if other people are so wrong?
it cannot be hard surely, especially if you hold the truth like you claim. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|