The mystery of the carbon monoxide in Henri Paul's blood

[Micpsi]

So, Lord Justice Scott Baker, you still have not explained how Henri Paul, the driver of Princess Diana's car whom you want your jury to blame for her death, came to have an abnormally large concentration of carbon monoxide in his blood? You called it still a "mystery" in your pathetically biassed summary of the case.

Well, leaving questions unexplained might be good enough for the likes of you, who had already made up your mind before the inquest started that Diana had died in a simple car accident. But it is not good enough for many of us, because we see the mystery as the key to the whole case and not something to be dismissed as insignificant, as you apparently judge.

You have been fobbed off yet again by the French authorities, whose lies about missing 6000-page dossiers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_ article_id=480112&in_page_id=1811&ct=5
you accept without a bat of the eyelid because your Lordship cannot bring himself to believe in 'conspiracies'. During that expensive charade you call a coroner's inquest, you ought to have called to the witness box Noel Botham, a former royal correspondent. HE could have told you whose blood was taken and given to the Paris forensic laboratory to be analyses. But of course you didn't, because, as the author of the book "The Murder of Princess Diana," he believes the crash that killed Diana was no accident, which is NOT the conclusion you want the jury to reach, is it?

Listen to what a French policeman told Noel Botham:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news/video/69000/nb/69403_16x9_nb.ram
The three samples supposedly taken from Henri Paul's blood contained a medicine called albendazole, which the driver's doctor said he was never prescribed. It is a drug taken to get rid of tapeworms and given to downandouts on the streets.

Could they have come from a dead Paris tramp lying in the public mortuary alongside Henri Paul? Yes, according to Noel Botham.

Equally puzzling is that the same clutch of blood samples revealed no sign of another medicine named acamprosate, which Paul had been prescribed. It is the only solid piece of evidence that he was a heavy drinker.

The driver was worried about his love of Ricard and had begged his doctor to give him the drug, designed to help alcoholics reduce their intake without cravings.

Pertinently, his doctor has since said that he felt Paul was worrying unnecessarily, as his drinking was moderate.

There is another dilemma, too.

The Henri Paul blood samples at the very heart of the Diana controversy reveal something else quite bizarre - that he had breathed in a very high quantity of carbon monoxide before his death: the same amount as a person committing suicide by putting a rubber hose from the exhaust through the window of his car.

Such a level would have left Paul visibly disorientated and almost certainly comatose. Yet at the Ritz that evening, minutes before he drove Diana, the CCTV cameras show him walking normally and even kneeling down to retie his shoe laces and gracefully standing up again.

It is now accepted that he never drew breath after the crash, ruling out the possibility that he inhaled poisonous exhaust fumes. Significantly, Dodi's blood was tested and was shown to contain no carbon monoxide.

The tainted blood samples remain - as Lord Stevens and toxicology experts say in the Operation Paget report - a complete mystery. One possible explanation is that they are not the driver's blood at all but come from someone else in the public mortuary who had committed suicide that weekend.

So were the samples tampered with? Were they mistakenly, or deliberately, swapped with those from another corpse?

The first samples of blood taken from the driver's body were left unattended and unlabelled in a fridge at the mortuary for more than a day until Monday, September 1. Did that give an opportunity for the two MI6 agents who, according to ex-MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson,
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/r_tomlinson.html
were at the British Embassy in Paris at the time, to switch the samples with the suicide's blood by means of a simple break-in? Given, Lord Justice Scott Baker, that you don't intend to get to the bottom of this mystery, we shall never know, shall we - at least not from your charade of an inquest?