Will you resist the fear and discuss the concrete core?
Yes, I understand that the 5 phenomena of 9-11 at the WTC MUST have an explanation and the concrete core looks right.
100%
[ 1 ]
No, I don't know enough about construction to understand why it is important.
0%
[ 0 ]
Total Votes : 1
Author
Message
Christophera Minor Poster
Joined: 04 Sep 2007 Posts: 41 Location: Santa Barbara california
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:13 pm Post subject: Social Fears, Disinformation & 9-11 Truth
As a person with basic witness quality information on the design and construction of WTC 1, and the fact of its steel reinforced, rectangular, tubular, cast concrete core, I can attest to the fact that the 9-11 truth movement is very much controlled by social fears. I witnessed the towers construction by viewing a video documentary produced in 1987 and aired in 1990 on PBS titled "The Engineering and Construction of the Twin Towers". A pre 9-11 disinformation project infiltrated PBS, removed the video and record of it from PBS as well as the few still images which showed the hard to see, shadowed, formed, concrete core inside its surrounding steel framework or inside the dark core itself.
Research has determined that the video existed. A copy was found but efforts to get a copy of it have thrice found it intercepted. Listen to the downloadable .mp3 of Dr. Ron Larsen, Ph.d, physics, Cornell, as he describes his and the search of former Marine Major Drew Malone Raines III for the video, finding it and the subsequent intercepts.
Yes, social fears, not evidence controls the 9-11 truth movement at this time because of the missing video and images of construction. And, it appears as though the post 9-11 psychological operation was very much aware of this and has been which is why it instituted a program of creating the social fears through administering ridicule towards any who supported the information of a concrete core. All this despite the fact there is no raw evidence supporting the steel core columns which FEMA.
There is evidence for the concrete core but because 9-11 truth seekers are mostly computer nerds rather than construction workers, the expertise needed to recognize the concrete, or the absence of steel where it should be, as well as construction techniques is not common in the movement.
The quasi leadership of the movement is most sensitive it appears, or perhaps they are infiltrators via MKultra programming. Whatever or however, they refuse to use evidence and instead believe FEAM without question and will not even ask the public about the documentary, "The Engineering and Construction of the Twin Towers", which the public has stashed in its closets. Probably there are 1,000 copies. Either purchased direct from PBS or recorded from cable broadcasts. the public that has copy has no idea of how important it is. And, the quasi leadership not only will not ask the public about it, they discourage discussion of it.
Why coverup the concrete core?
The reason for the coverup is that if the public knew the towers had a concrete core, the official story of plane impacts and fires would not be credible. Also the public would REALLY wonder why ground zero had no large chunks of concrete. The public knows what collapsed concrete looks like from many images of collapsed bridges.
What happened to the core is that it blew up. It was, along with the floors, an engineered explosive container. There is literally no other way to get the effect seen in this one image.
A person who understands explosives who knows the towers had a concrete core and is aware of the Sand and gravel at ground zero will confirm that near perfect containment is the only way to get concrete to disassociate completely into its particulate components.
through containment pressures are maximized and with that the major shock wave is propagated through the material and the shockwave pulverizes the material.
The engineered explosive container concept also allows enough explosives to be perfectly placed and distributed which is also vital to the effect seen above.
This issue of "built to demolish" is also difficult for people to believe, but the above image is absolute in its perfection of uniformity and totality of pulverization. The technology was developed in the cold war for self destruct sub bases and missile silos.
has a description of all the techniques used, as well as detonation circuits and delays needed to effect the demolition we saw. What we saw was nothing short of the most sophisticated use of high explosives ever done in history.
We are many small groups on the web that communicate through message boards for the most part. Some web radio, email lists, chat rooms and websites. The list below represents all of the places I've been banned fro posting images of concrete, saying it was concrete and demanding that IF posters are going to believe FEMA, THEN they must post images of steel core columns, from 9-11, in the core area at some elevation above the ground. No images of core columns in the described conditions have ever been produced by anyone ever.
Also Mike Chambers of the TruthNetworkRadio.com web radio site link below believes an agency positioned in New York 2 days before 9-11 for an emergency exercise 2.5 miles from the WTC before he will examine evidence. An agency that made NIST generate their study WITHOUT any plans for the Twin Towers. This is after Guiliani took the WTC documents from the city offices, (against the law) and the courts will not observe the Freedom of Information Laws and compel their return.
Where images were assembled to deal with the issue in discussion on GCn radio with Jim Fetzer, who falsely claims he has debunked the concrete core while he cannot feasibly explain these phenomena from 9-11 at the WTC.
With the concrete core ALL of the above have feasible explanations.
I ask for images of core columns in the 9-11 conditions because helicopter photos of construction of the towers are misrepresented as showing "core columns". What they actually show are elevator guide rail support steel which is easily identified by the butt plates at the tops
seen in the above closer-up image of WTC2 during construction. Butt plates can take compression loads but no lateral load. Core columns must be deep fillet welded, butted, to have the strength required.
The elevator guide rail support steel broke apart at its connections and fell into the core immediately when the demolition initiated so nothing is seen in the core area in images from 9-11.
If you really need the truth of 9-11, join the above listed message boards and make the concrete core an issue, ask for images of steel core columns. Call TruthNetworkRadio.com and ask why such well evidenced, logical information is not used in analysis of the events of 9-11 at the WTC, get involved with something that will work.
All we need is one set of 2, 1 hour VHS tapes copied to digital and uploaded to google and youtube and the beginning of the end of this global war, dominance is begun.
Last edited by Christophera on Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:27 am; edited 1 time in total
Everyone else take note how this must have been demolition to shake free of the Bedrock (there is even a video out there showing the damage to the huge concrete retaining walls) Also the floor pans are full of reinforcing bars why no concrete rubble found on site? Again pretty explosive to say the least (excuse the pun). Everyone should copy this Vid and help preserve it!! _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Everyone else take note how this must have been demolition to shake free of the Bedrock (there is even a video out there showing the damage to the huge concrete retaining walls) Also the floor pans are full of reinforcing bars why no concrete rubble found on site? Again pretty explosive to say the least (excuse the pun). Everyone should copy this Vid and help preserve it!!
Not one. You must believe FEMA and the steel core column lie. Nothing can be explained with that as a structure.
Support for the steel core columns is support for the impossible to obscure the possible.
Better than a demolition, BUILT TO DEMOLISH.
Watch this. I will explain all five of the above phenomena that NONE of those who believe in the FEMA lie can even approach.
free fall
Concrete can be fractured instantly to fall freely by a small amount of properly placed explosives. With C4 coated rebar and C4 poured into the floor corrugations that also acted as cutting charges for the interior box columns, the only full height columns that existed, free fall was assured. The security phone lines were used to distribute an audio tone to digital counters on every floor and every 40 foot of core. Floors were timed with 75 millisecond delays and core sections of 40 foot at 300 milliseconds.
total pulverization
The above free fall explanation takes care of the building but it needs to be said that when the floors blow and the 300 milliseconds delay of the core blast occurs, the contents of the building are subjected to an outward blast of hard stone aggregates that shred everything and blow it out the windows explaining the 3-5cm bone fragments on roofs 400 feet away.
superfine, heated particulate
With an engineered explosive container made from concrete having the explosive coating on the centralized rebar, the pressures from optimum containment are absolutely maximized. Optimized pressures create a maximum shock wave lending to the total pulverization described in the above paragraph but also creating the 10-100 micron sized particles that are super heated to rise and form the distinctive pyroclastic flow. This also causes some of the iron of the rebar to be bonded to molecules of silica and calcium as seen in the dust analysis.
heavy steel assemblies heaved hundreds of feet
Some of the cutting charges failed due to exposure to bad weather during construction. When this happened, large assemblies were intact and the webs of floor "I" beams against the core; still connected to floor beams going out to the perimeter columns, still connected by spandrel plates in the 3 story panels delivered for assembly; were subected to the expanding debris wave of the concrete core detonating which cause a billowing of the web of an "I" beam showing huge pressure applied horizontally
Every phenomena explained in detail. All it depends upon is the infiltration of the US government before 1966 by a faction capable and secrecy adequate to design and construct such building for the purpose of eventual demolition.
I've proven that the post 9-11 psychological operation is very well designed. Comprehensively executed in a way which leaves the people in the truth movement with a helpless abondon to the path of dysfunction carved out by social fears etched in to their DNA or genetic memory controlling social interactions.
That path is occupied by millions and is like a freight train. There is only one way to stop it, jump off.
I'm going to explain how to do it without suffering.
To be safe, do not activate the link. The webmaster there can trace it back to here then watch you and ban you. Copy and paste the link into a browser window and register instead.
DO NOT post asking about the concrete core. Well, you can if you want but it might get you banned immediately.
The following is better.
When you post, choose ONE of the below issues which the steel core column core CANNOT EXPLAIN, and ask in your post for members opinions or some link or something which explains the phenomena. You do it this way because if you don't they will know you are on a mission and that is to determine IF the steel core column belief has any function whatsoever.
After a while, if truth seekers are actually seeking truth rather than conducting a cozy society, others will show up asking similar questions or having similar concerns. You will recognize them. At some point, after there are 3 or 4 asking Hey, how can free fall be created in the tower with explosives?" (one thing that will give you away is when you ask how and where the charges were set that cut the steel core columns, but you have to ask); then one poster must say. Then another poster can usggest "Hey, what if there was a steel reinforced cast concrete tube for a core?"
Try discussing it, see what happens. All you can do is learn.
BTW, Bazant et al have revised their report that originaly went to NIST and now it indicates a concrete core wall in TWO places, in bold below.
Collapse of World Trade Center Towers: wrote:
What Did and Did Not Cause It?
Zdenek P. Bazant
1
, Hon.M. ASCE, Jia-Liang Le
2
, Frank R. Greening
3
, and David B. Benson
4
Abstract: Previous analysis of progressive collapse showed that gravity alone suffices to explain
the overall collapse of the World Trade Center towers. However, it has not been checked whether
the allegations of controlled demolition by planted explosives have any scientific merit. The present
analysis proves that they do not. The video record available for the first few seconds of collapse
agrees with the motion history calculated from the differential equation of progressive collapse but
disproves the free fall hypothesis (on which the aforementioned allegations rest). Although, due to
absence of experimental crushing data for the lightweight concrete used, the theory of comminution
cannot predict the size range of pulverized concrete particles, it is shown that the observed size
range (0.01 mm – 0.1 mm) is fully consistent with this theory and is achievable by collapse driven
gravity alone, and that only about 7% of the total gravitational energy converted to kinetic energy
of impacts would have sufficed to pulverize all the concrete slabs and core walls (while at least 158
tons of TNT per tower, installed into many small holes drilled into each concrete floor slab and core
wall, would have been needed to produce the same degree of pulverization). The exit speed of air
ejected from the building by the crushing front of gravitational collapse must have attained, near
the ground, 465 mph (208 m/s) on the average, and fluctuations must have reached the speed of
sound. This explains loud booms and wide spreading of pulverized concrete and glass fragments,
and shows that the lower margin of dust cloud could not have coincided with the crushing front.
The resisting upward forces due to pulverization and air ejection, neglected in previous studies, are
found to be negligible during the first few seconds of collapse but not insignificant near the end
of crush-down (these forces extended the crush-down duration by about 4%; they augmented, by
about 25%, the resisting force due to column buckling at the end of crush-down, and doubled that
force at the beginning of crush-up). The calculated crush-down duration is found to match a logical
interpretation of seismic record, while the free fall duration is found to be in conflict.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum