Met. racists must prove 'suicide bomber' theory

[TonyGosling]

The notoriously corrupt and secretive Metropolitan police's top detectives must now make all - unedited - CCTV images of the 7/7 'suicide bombers' and clear & comprehensive photographs of the three tube trains available to the press and public to prove they are not lying racists.
Right now it appears the Met. police press office is part of a wide and orchestrated campaign to demonise Britain's Moslem community much like the demonisation of the Jews by Adolf Hitler and friends in the 1930's.
Britons and Londoners know the Met. is a racist-led force and will not stand for racism in their city so they demand real evidence of these persons' criminal intent not CCTV images of them joking around which is not evidence of them being suicide bombers.
Those 'alleged terrorists' currently grossly humiliated and in custody will in all probability be being worked over and lied to to extract forced confessions from them as you read this.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4133564.stm
Just today we hear the racist Met. and the far-right Home Office want to set up secret courts with top masonic judges to decide to hold these people for up to three months without having any proper evidence against them. And all with NO HARD EVIDENCE that any Moslems were involved in the London bombings. Maybe the racist Met. have realised that you cannot force a confession out of someone in only 48 hours?


Are terror suspects bomb victims too?

Western Daily Press - letters
http://www.westpress.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=146240&command=displ ayContent&sourceNode=145921&contentPK=12865249
Sir - The rush to pass judgment on the Muslim community continues apace.
At the same time the awkward questions are on the increase.
Why, with no previous connections to any militant groups, did the four choose to die and kill for Islam?
Why did they pose for the CCTV cameras and carry wallets full of ID when they knew that their families, friends and the Muslim community would be abused, ostracised and punished?
Why did they hire a car instead of using one of the men's new red Mercedes?
Who warned Israeli minister Binyamin Netanyahu not to leave his hotel room adjacent to Liverpool Street Station?
Why, if they knew that they were carrying bombs, did they buy return rail tickets?
Why did they buy pay-and-display parking tickets?
Why were the explosives not strapped around their midriffs?
How were the three bombs detonated at precisely the same time without timers?
Who decided that timers and military explosives should be dropped and replaced with no timers and "home-made explosives"?
Did the police use extra-sensory perception to find out so much so quickly?
Why did the suicide bus bomber go to the top deck where the damage would have been much less?
As all the available evidence points to the four being murdered along with the rest, what did they believe that they had been given when they picked up their knapsacks?
If they were couriers what were supposed to be the goods?
Pat Rattigan Chesterfield Derbyshire
http://www.westpress.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=146240&command=displ ayContent&sourceNode=145921&contentPK=12865249

[Keith Mothersson]

Note that that the dynamic Menezes campaign has now come up against the strange malfunction of tube station and train CCTV - despite the fact that after 7-7 and the No 30 bus CCTV 'failure' the police said that the whole surveillance system had to be in geared up to prevent such a failure in future.
So we now have a chance to link the demand for the evidence to be retained in both cases - and of course keep building links to other campaigns such as No2ID and of course the 9-11 Inquiry demand.

Please see also the Politics of Inquiry appeal on www.julyseventh.co.uk or www.officialconfusion.com

We should also be hassling the authorities and Tubelines whose Trans Plant section removed the carriages 'for further forensic testing' - will the evidence be kept intact?? Why won't they show people round?

As for the CCTV cameras, I well remember the appeals by the police to all those who operate cameras on motorway all the way down form Leeds, London tube stations, streets near Kings Cross, etc so that from these many thousands of cameras they could fully establish what the bombers were doing.... Struck me as strange if they already had such vital evidence at kings Cross as they say they have - BUT WON'T SHOW! Maybe some want to get the evidence for good reasons, but some others want to get hold of it to destroy all rival footage which can show that the four bombers weren't anywhere near London that day ...
I fully admit that this suspicion could be unworthy and mistaken - but nobody must be allowed to sneer at any of us as 'conspiracy theorists' if they are not prepared to SIGN UP to our appeal for the evidence to be kept and made accessible so that trust can be re-established and all false 'conspiracy theories' be well and truly scotched!!

[Alan Firminger]

The same argument allways appears : "We cannot work with one hand tied behind our backs".
This is nonsense. In any civilised society there have to be rules under which the lambs dressed as shepheards operate. So when they get three months the same quote will be used asking for two years.