FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

September Clues - Busted!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> About this website
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Anthony Lawson
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Location: Phuket, Thailand

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:42 am    Post subject: September Clues - Busted! Reply with quote

September Clues - Busted!

A video by the auther of "WTC7 - This is an Orange", Anthony Lawson.

Exposing the deception, insidious innuendo, misdirection and lies in the “September Clues” series of videos, which many scholars and others have mistaken for the truth about some of the events that happened on that terrible day: September 11, 2001.

Perhaps this video will make them realise that they have been deliberately mislead.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=823734902101057550

Note: The streaming quality is not great, but the download MPEG-4 is pretty good, given the file size limitations on Google.

Anthony

_________________
The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mason-free party
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 765
Location: Staffordshire

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

reveal yourself mr. lawson...who are you working for?...establishment accent always worries me
_________________
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_6.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Anthony Lawson
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Location: Phuket, Thailand

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:39 am    Post subject: Revealing Reply with quote

September Clues - Busted! Part 1 , U-Tube version

can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6jS2Ah22us

mason-free party wrote:
reveal yourself mr. lawson...who are you working for?...establishment accent always worries me


It always amuses me when someone who hides behind a pseudonym accuses someone else of hiding something about themselves.

I am 72 years old; a retired commercials film director, editor and voice over. My voice is a gift (perhaps a curse, according to you) from my mother who never wanted me to speak with an Australian accent. I work for no one, although some no-planers offered me payment for promoting their theories. Ironically, this is why I looked deeper into something which I thought would die its own natural death because of its obvious stupidity.

If you want to know my position, regarding what I believe about 9/11, do your homework and look up some of my posts on this forum.

Now, do tell me about yourself, including your real name.

By the way, thanks for the reminder to publicise the U-Tube version on this site.

_________________
The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Revealing Reply with quote

Anthony Lawson wrote:
I work for no one, although some no-planers offered me payment for promoting their theories.




The above is the first time I have ever seen or heard of anyone making such a revelation.

Are you able to tell us all any more about this?

By the way, Anthony. I really appreciated your film, "This Is An Orange."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Anthony Lawson
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Location: Phuket, Thailand

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:55 pm    Post subject: To kbo234 Reply with quote

9/11 Documentary Offer

In answer to your question, kbo234, here are the details, which I see no reason to keep secret:

[Quote)Ace Baker <ace@acebaker.com>
22 Aug to lawson911@gmail.com
date 22 Aug 2007 22:24
subject 9/11 video narrator

Hello Anthony:

I'm directing a documentary movie about 9/11, which will present the work of Judy Wood in a full length format. Dr. Wood has agreed to sit for an interview, as have several other prominent researchers. We've seen "this is an orange" and "towers of dust", and besides being excellent, persuasive little lessons, we love the sound of the narrator's voice. Is this you?

I would like to formally invite you (or whoever has that golden voice) to narrate our film. There would be some pay. If things go according to schedule, we'd be needing narration approximately late September.

Thanks.

Ace Baker[/quote]

The following is an excerpt from my reply:
Quote:
On such an important subject, I will not say anything which I do not believe to be accurate, or present rumours or theories as anything but what they are. This has not only to do with my conscience; it has to do with the 9/11 truth movement, in general, because there have already been so many wild claims made that people can get punch drunk trying to sort out the absolutely-way-out crazy ideas, from ones which seem to be more plausible. This is not to say that anyone's theories are 'out.'

For example, with regard to Judy Wood's, I have no idea whether they are likely to be proven accurate, or not, but I cannot rule them out. However, I certainly know that many things which we were told happened that day sure-as-hell didn't, which means that other things did.

A Boeing 757 did not crash into the Pentagon. Buildings like those in the WTC do not fall down, exclusively because of fires. I don't believe that all of the telephone calls could have come from the planes, but there is just a possibility that some might have....

The no-planes-hit-the-Towers theory is, possibly, the hardest one to deal with. The Naudet brother's video would have been extraordinarily difficult to fake, and I believe that there would have been many eyewitnesses--the firemen that the Naudets were working with--who saw the plane hit the building, as the camera was swung around following the aircraft's sound.

Unless there is some secret technology which can project a hologram onto nothing but thin air, then the no-planes theory is busted, notwithstanding that the second hit could possible have been faked, from a TV studio, but, again, there are too many camera angles.


From then on, it became apparent that the video was going to be wider ranging than at first proposed, because he attempted persuasion, regarding no-planes, then he became quite abusive, accusing me of having tunnel vision, etc.

Let’s just say that things deteriorated, even further, from that point.

_________________
The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anthony Lawson
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Location: Phuket, Thailand

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:57 pm    Post subject: To kbo234 Reply with quote

9/11 Documentary Offer

In answer to your question, kbo234, here are the details, which I see no reason to keep secret:

Quote:
Ace Baker <ace@acebaker.com>
22 Aug to lawson911@gmail.com
date 22 Aug 2007 22:24
subject 9/11 video narrator

Hello Anthony:

I'm directing a documentary movie about 9/11, which will present the work of Judy Wood in a full length format. Dr. Wood has agreed to sit for an interview, as have several other prominent researchers. We've seen "this is an orange" and "towers of dust", and besides being excellent, persuasive little lessons, we love the sound of the narrator's voice. Is this you?

I would like to formally invite you (or whoever has that golden voice) to narrate our film. There would be some pay. If things go according to schedule, we'd be needing narration approximately late September.

Thanks.

Ace Baker


The following is an excerpt from my reply:
Quote:
On such an important subject, I will not say anything which I do not believe to be accurate, or present rumours or theories as anything but what they are. This has not only to do with my conscience; it has to do with the 9/11 truth movement, in general, because there have already been so many wild claims made that people can get punch drunk trying to sort out the absolutely-way-out crazy ideas, from ones which seem to be more plausible. This is not to say that anyone's theories are 'out.'

For example, with regard to Judy Wood's, I have no idea whether they are likely to be proven accurate, or not, but I cannot rule them out. However, I certainly know that many things which we were told happened that day sure-as-hell didn't, which means that other things did.

A Boeing 757 did not crash into the Pentagon. Buildings like those in the WTC do not fall down, exclusively because of fires. I don't believe that all of the telephone calls could have come from the planes, but there is just a possibility that some might have....

The no-planes-hit-the-Towers theory is, possibly, the hardest one to deal with. The Naudet brother's video would have been extraordinarily difficult to fake, and I believe that there would have been many eyewitnesses--the firemen that the Naudets were working with--who saw the plane hit the building, as the camera was swung around following the aircraft's sound.

Unless there is some secret technology which can project a hologram onto nothing but thin air, then the no-planes theory is busted, notwithstanding that the second hit could possible have been faked, from a TV studio, but, again, there are too many camera angles.


From then on, it became apparent that the video was going to be wider ranging than at first proposed, because he attempted persuasion, regarding no-planes, then he became quite abusive, accusing me of having tunnel vision, etc.

Let’s just say that things deteriorated, even further, from that point.

_________________
The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Anthony.

It seems the usual suspects, be they right or wrong (personally, I have no time for the NPT at all), tried to reel you in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Anthony Lawson
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Location: Phuket, Thailand

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:20 am    Post subject: Rude people Reply with quote

mason-free party: a very Rude Person

mason-free party wrote:
reveal yourself mr. lawson...who are you working for?...establishment accent always worries me


So where is your response to my detailed answer?

You are the kind of person who gives the 9/11 truth movement a bad image; you ask a question loaded with innuendo, then you don't bother to reply to a civil answer.

You'll get nothing further from me, for your rudeness.

_________________
The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So how about it, Steve aka MFP? You demand others are open and reveal their identities and background, yet you choose not to do so yourself. Would you have a problem with me publishing your full name and home town? I wouldn't because to do so would allow anyone familiar with google to track down your home address and phone number.

You accuse this campaign / network of having masonic origins despite this being laughable, fact free hogwash, a fact that is known by anyone who was involved in its origins.

I respect your right to remain anonymous but it smacks of double standards that you demand openness from others whilst throwing around fact free innuendo and hiding behind your own pseudonym.

With the honourable exception of Andrew Johnson, who puts his name where his truth lies, there are remarkably few supporters of the NPTs who are similarly open about their names and professional backgrounds / qualifications, yet they have no qualms about digging into and smearing the backgrounds of others.


Last edited by ian neal on Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:33 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Anthony Lawson
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Location: Phuket, Thailand

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:49 pm    Post subject: Well said Reply with quote

Well said

Thank you, Ian, for an excellent appraisal of people whose double standards could well sink the truth movement, by building on its growing reputation of being mostly a mob made up of those who haven't got the guts to stand up and be counted, under their real names, but who are quite prepared to criticize those who sincerely believe that without an identity, their own convictions are meaningless.

_________________
The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> About this website All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group