| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:22 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
It may be that it's the wrong question, in that there was no 'stand down order' as such.
All that was needed was to create a mess of confusing distractions of exercise and real world targets with Rumsfeld self-placed as the ultimate arbiter should USAF have actually got lucky.
Whether that's what actually happened at Shankville 20 mins after Rumsfeld was supposedly giving a presentation in Congress (never verified) or was an abort we don't yet know with th einformation available.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good point.
The idea of a stand down order, to me has always been preposterous.
I'm imagining RAF Wherever not reacting similarly.
My conspiratorial mind doesn't stretch that far.
So, all we have is the confusion. The fog of exercises. The delays. The blame. Tardy FAA notification. NORAD's ever evolving story. A rookie at the FAA.
Is it not possible that NORAD have been responding to their enforced position ever since?
Their ever changing narrative has been interpreted as an indicator of guilt.
What if they have been responding to the position that has been forced upon them by the 911 Commission and it's "official" time line. The NORAD rock and a hard place?
Why do we have Mineta?
What purpose does his omitted testimony serve?
Ultimately NORAD must answer.
All they have done is assuaged any responsibility by passing it off to the FAA.
How do we interpret all of this?
_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark Gobell wrote: | Good point.
The idea of a stand down order, to me has always been preposterous.
I'm imagining RAF Wherever not reacting similarly.
My conspiratorial mind doesn't stretch that far.
So, all we have is the confusion. The fog of exercises. The delays. The blame. Tardy FAA notification. NORAD's ever evolving story. A rookie at the FAA.
Is it not possible that NORAD have been responding to their enforced position ever since?
Their ever changing narrative has been interpreted as an indicator of guilt.
What if they have been responding to the position that has been forced upon them by the 911 Commission and it's "official" time line. The NORAD rock and a hard place?
Why do we have Mineta?
What purpose does his omitted testimony serve?
Ultimately NORAD must answer.
All they have done is assuaged any responsibility by passing it off to the FAA.
How do we interpret all of this? |
Wasn't it Tarpley who said that as with any coup, you look to see who gets promoted afterwards?
USAF General Richard Myers - Vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to Chairman, three days after 9/11 and:
NORAD Chief, General Ralph Eberhart to command of U.S. Northern Command.
Until such time as either the coup is exposed by civilian authority or there's a counter-coup, the truth will remain elusive.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dogsmilk wrote: | | Still, I'm sure you wouldn't link to a site hosted by Nick Griffin just because it had biting commentary on people on the left you don't like. What's Nico done to earn your blessing? |
funnily enough, I asked paul stott about this link to nico haupt about a month ago.
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=92851#92851
still no answer though.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
