Justin
9/11 Truth Organiser
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 500
Location: Cumbria / Yorkshire Dales
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:00 pm Post subject: Unanswered Questions by HMG |
 |
|
On the 14th December these questions were e-mailed to my MP Tim Farron (LibDem Westmorland and Lonsdale). Because of a new addition to the family arriving then and the Christmas hols, Tim finally sent these questions (after a few changes to suit etiquette which we haven't seen) in the middle of January with the assurance that letters from MPs to Ministers are usually answered within three weeks. It is now well over six weeks and still no reply today when I went round to Tim's office. In view of the surge of 9/11 activity we are currently experiencing, these unanswered questions may become a news story in itself.
HMG and MI5/6 - we know you are probably looking at this site - why no answers?
| Quote: | To the Government Minister responsible for media issues:
Why have the broadcast media not complied with their obligation to practice impartiality and instead consistently sided with the advocates of the official 911 conspiracy theory and against the advocates of alternative theories? These include the MIHOP (Made it happen on purpose) theory that the 911 attacks were an updated version of the Pentagon's documented Operation Northwoods plan or the LIHOP (Let it happen on purpose) theory that the 911 attacks were a cockup and with rogue elements of the US government capitalising on a decision by the Bush White House to let the next Al Qaeda attack happen.
To the Foreign Secretary:
1. After the intelligence services convinced US/UK politicians and the media of their Iraq WMD conspiracy theory, and given that all inquiries to date have assumed the official 911 conspiracy theory is true despite there being no hard evidence yet presented to date to support this theory, would the Foreign Secretary now agree that the time is ripe for an open minded inquiry into whether elements of the US government might have been complicit in the 911 attacks as they were in the anthrax attacks immediately after 911?
2. In view of the £4000 cash prize now being offered by the 9/11 truth movement for anyone who can produce photographic evidence proving that a Boeing jet airliner crashed into the Pentagon on the morning of 11th September 2001, would Her Majesty's government ask our US ally to put an end to the speculation that the Pentagon was not hit by a passenger jet, by releasing relevant photographs from the many security cameras around the Pentagon site, including the footage confiscated from a nearby filling station and hotel by the FBI immediately after the attack?
3. Would the Foreign Office press the US Government to publish the results of their investigation into the insider trading in put options which revealed investment by people who must have had foreknowledge of the September 11th attacks? |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
