View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
blackcat Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 2376
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:30 pm Post subject: Times person of the year 2007 is.....?? |
|
|
http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/
http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/article/0,28804 ,1690753_1690757_1695382,00.html
Vladimir Putin
Quote: | Vladimir Putin
His final year as Russia's President has been his most successful yet. At home, he secured his political future. Abroad, he expanded his outsize—if not always benign—influence on global affairs
A Tsar Is Born
By ADI IGNATIUS Platon for Time
No one is born with a stare like Vladimir Putin's. The Russian President's pale blue eyes are so cool, so devoid of emotion that the stare must have begun as an affect, the gesture of someone who understood that power might be achieved by the suppression of ordinary needs, like blinking. The affect is now seamless, which makes talking to the Russian President not just exhausting but often chilling. It's a gaze that says, I'm in charge.
Why We Chose Putin
At significant cost to the principles that free nations prize, he's brought Russia roaring back to the table of world power
This may explain why there is so little visible security at Putin's dacha, Novo-Ogarevo, the grand Russian presidential retreat set inside a birch- and fir-forested compound west of Moscow. To get there from the capital requires a 25-minute drive through the soul of modern Russia, past decrepit Soviet-era apartment blocks, the mashed-up French Tudor-villa McMansions of the new oligarchs and a shopping mall that boasts not just the routine spoils of affluence like Prada and Gucci but Lamborghinis and Ferraris too.
When you arrive at the dacha's faux-neoclassical gate, you have to leave your car and hop into one of the Kremlin's vehicles that slowly wind their way through a silent forest of snow-tipped firs. Aides warn you not to stray, lest you tempt the snipers positioned in the shadows around the compound. This is where Putin, 55, works. (He lives with his wife and two twentysomething daughters in another mansion deeper in the woods.) The rooms feel vast, newly redone and mostly empty. As we prepare to enter his spacious but spartan office, out walk some of Russia's most powerful men: Putin's chief of staff, his ideologist, the speaker of parliament—all of them wearing expensive bespoke suits and carrying sleek black briefcases. Putin, who rarely meets with the foreign press, then gives us 3 1⁄2 hours of his time, first in a formal interview in his office and then upstairs over an elaborate dinner of lobster-and-shiitake-mushroom salad, "crab fingers with hot sauce" and impressive vintages of Puligny-Montrachet and a Chilean Cabernet.
Vladimir Putin gives a first impression of contained power: he is compact and moves stiffly but efficiently. He is fit, thanks to years spent honing his black-belt judo skills and, these days, early-morning swims of an hour or more. And while he is diminutive—5 ft. 6 in. (about 1.7 m) seems a reasonable guess—he projects steely confidence and strength. Putin is unmistakably Russian, with chiseled facial features and those penetrating eyes. Charm is not part of his presentation of self—he makes no effort to be ingratiating. One senses that he pays constant obeisance to a determined inner discipline. The successor to the boozy and ultimately tragic Boris Yeltsin, Putin is temperate, sipping his wine only when the protocol of toasts and greetings requires it; mostly he just twirls the Montrachet in his glass. He eats little, though he twitchily picks the crusts off the bread rolls on his plate.
Putin grudgingly reveals a few personal details between intermittent bites of food: He relaxes, he says, by listening to classical composers like Brahms, Mozart, Tchaikovsky. His favorite Beatles song is Yesterday. He has never sent an e-mail in his life. And while he grew up in an officially atheist country, he is a believer and often reads from a Bible that he keeps on his state plane. He is impatient to the point of rudeness with small talk, and he is in complete control of his own message.
He is clear about Russia's role in the world. He is passionate in his belief that the dissolution of the Soviet Union was a tragedy, particularly since overnight it stranded 25 million ethnic Russians in "foreign" lands. But he says he has no intention of trying to rebuild the U.S.S.R. or re-establish military or political blocs. And he praises his predecessors Yeltsin and Mikhail Gorbachev for destroying a system that had lost the people's support. "I'm not sure I could have had the guts to do that myself," he tells us. Putin is, above all, a pragmatist, and has cobbled together a system—not unlike China's—that embraces the free market (albeit with a heavy dose of corruption) but relies on a strong state hand to keep order.
Like President George W. Bush, he sees terrorism as one of the most profound threats of the new century, but he is wary of labeling it Islamic. "Radicals," he says, "can be found in any environment." Putin reveals that Russian intelligence recently uncovered a "specific" terrorist threat against both Russia and the U.S. and that he spoke by phone with Bush about it.
What gets Putin agitated—and he was frequently agitated during our talk—is his perception that Americans are out to interfere in Russia's affairs. He says he wants Russia and America to be partners but feels the U.S. treats Russia like the uninvited guest at a party. "We want to be a friend of America," he says. "Sometimes we get the impression that America does not need friends" but only "auxiliary subjects to command." Asked if he'd like to correct any American misconceptions about Russia, Putin leans forward and says, "I don't believe these are misconceptions. I think this is a purposeful attempt by some to create an image of Russia based on which one could influence our internal and foreign policies. This is the reason why everybody is made to believe...[Russians] are a little bit savage still or they just climbed down from the trees, you know, and probably need to have...the dirt washed out of their beards and hair." The veins on his forehead seem ready to pop. |
continued at link |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TmcMistress Mind Gamer
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
In the "Picture is worth a 1000 words" category, our winner is...
Time magazine; adding legitimacy to dictatorial a**holes since 2007.
_________________ "What about a dance club that only let in deaf people? It would really only need flashing lights, so they'd save a lot of money on music." - Dresden Codak |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blackcat Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 2376
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
uselesseater Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 629 Location: Leeds
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ravenmoon Validated Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 410 Location: Sheffield
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TIME Magazine's jabs at Vladimir Putin are as subtle as a tractor-trailer. The image used on the magazine cover is so blatantly insulting it is laughable.
First, here is the Russian RIA Novosti news service image used to report the story of his being named Man-Of-The-Year. RIA Novosti were also obviously disgusted with the TIME insults and presented their own TIME 'cover' with a respectful and reasonable photo of Putin.
Compare that image with the digitally-manipulated 'Putin' conjured up by TIME staffers for the cover. What's in a picture? In this case, Zionist propaganda and mind-control.
Think of the hundreds of thousands of Putin photos available that weren't chosen for the story page itself. The psychology of using this cold, threatening gangster-esque image is pitifully clear...
http://www.rense.com/general79/put.htm _________________ "The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." George Orwell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why do people assume that "Time person of the year" is a good person or has done good things?
Not necessarily.
Quote: | TIME's Person of the Year is not and never has been an honor. It is not an endorsement. It is not a popularity contest. At its best, it is a clear-eyed recognition of the world as it is and of the most powerful individuals and forces shaping that world—for better or for worse. It is ultimately about leadership—bold, earth-changing leadership. Putin is not a boy scout. He is not a democrat in any way that the West would define it. He is not a paragon of free speech |
_________________ Currently working on a new website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kc Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TBF I've got a copy of Time that has Martin Luther King as man of the year |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Time magazine have done that thing with the M behind the head being viewed as Horns before
It marks him out as one of theirs actually
Yep - old goaty horned Putin is one of their satanic frontmen
_________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blackcat Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 2376
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Why do people assume that "Time person of the year" is a good person or has done good things? |
The clue is in the title. "Man of the year" does not have the same ring as "Monster of the year" or "* of the year". It is meant as an honour. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
blackcat wrote: | It is meant as an honour. |
In what sense? _________________ Currently working on a new website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TmcMistress Mind Gamer
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
scubadiver, have you actually read the article? While it's not exactly a glowing, 5-star review, it's certainly no condemnation, and in fact serves as a pretty good endorsement besides.
Certainly, even regardless of article content, slapping a huge picture of a guy on your front cover with the tagline "Person of the Year" is a huge validation in and of itself.
And yes, you're right blackcat, 2007 was definitely a bad choice of year to use. Tbh, I wasn't actually aware that Hitler had been on their cover... yeesh. _________________ "What about a dance club that only let in deaf people? It would really only need flashing lights, so they'd save a lot of money on music." - Dresden Codak |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
TmcMistress wrote: | scubadiver, have you actually read the article? While it's not exactly a glowing, 5-star review, it's certainly no condemnation, and in fact serves as a pretty good endorsement besides.
|
I did. _________________ Currently working on a new website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|