| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
utopiated
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Location: UK Midlands
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:21 pm Post subject: Hutchison effect and 9/11 Exotic Destruction Tech |
 |
|
As previously hinted at here:
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=5677
Judy Wood and John Hutchison have got together and written an excellent piece visually comparing damage episodes at the WTC area on 9/11 to many of the "exotic" energy experiments conducted by advanced researcher Hutchison.
Conventional demolition charges do not turn cars to rubberized versions of themselves, cause bizarre metal anomalies, random fires yards away from ground zero, selective burning of various materials, strange heat shimmering and fuming of objects etc etc.
See for yourselves and open up to the possibility that most of you here are stuck in a research reality bubble...
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
Strange fires around ground zero and the Hutchison research:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ2.html
Why has research dead-locked most people at the point of conventional demolition?
Could one of the main secrets of September 11th be the link to vast energy systems that do not rely upon conventional power sources?? ie: highly efficient over unity or quantum vacuum energy systems are readily available to a section of the M.I.C. - systems that could end the reliance on conventional, polluting fuels and their associated damage to the deeper ecological elements of the biosphere??
| Quote: |
"If people want evidence of advanced energy systems already in use, they need only look to the wealth of information in our skies as reported in so-called UFO sightings. These vehicles use such systems". |
William Lyne - Author of Occult Ether Physics and Pentagon Aliens.
_________________
http://exopolitics.org.uk
http://chemtrailsUK.net
http://alienfalseflagagenda.net
-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:39 pm Post subject: Re: Hutchison effect and 9/11 Exotic Destruction Tech |
|
|
| utopiated wrote: | See for yourselves and open up to the possibility that most of you here are stuck in a research reality bubble...
Why has research dead-locked most people at the point of conventional demolition? |
I'd suggest that for many supporters of 9/11 truth, it is not a question of being stuck in the research. Once people are sufficiently convinced by the overall case to re-investigate 9/11, by the intelligence and 'defense failures', by the cover-up, lies and constantly changing official accounts, by the suspicious nature of the collapses and crash sites, then for many their main motivation is campaign to convince others and to unite around the strongest evidence not to endlessly research the details. For the majority that does not yet include Judy Wood's work. Add to this the relentless ad hominem attacks from some within the researchers community and it puts people off and closes their minds (which is may be the point).
Certainly those who have been most aggressive in their attacks on their opponents have a lot to answer for when explaining the resistence to this and other controversial research amongst more mainstream 9/11 campaigners. Thankfully Judy Woods and people like Andrew Johnson do not fall into this category.
Another reason for the resistence is that many many people are unaware of the long hidden history of teslaesque zero point energy technologies and the efforts of the establishment to keep them under wraps
This site is a good source of information
http://www.wanttoknow.info/newenergyinformation
It might interest readers to note that DRG is a 'key team member' for this website.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/aboutus
I have read around this subject quite a lot and I'm convinced that these technologies exist. Yet despite having an engineering MSc, I wouldn't presume or claim to be able to argue the science of any of this (very few people would). And this is another reason for the resistence. Since few people could explain the science or technology particularly in a langauge lay people would understand or be convinced by, it makes this evidence particularly difficult to communicate effectively or campaign on.
| utopiated wrote: |
Could one of the main secrets of September 11th be the link to vast energy systems that do not rely upon conventional power sources?? ie: highly efficient over unity or quantum vacuum energy systems are readily available to a section of the M.I.C. - systems that could end the reliance on conventional, polluting fuels and their associated damage to the deeper ecological elements of the biosphere??
|
Yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
utopiated
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Location: UK Midlands
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:35 pm Post subject: Re: Hutchison effect and 9/11 Exotic Destruction Tech |
|
|
| ian neal wrote: |
Certainly those who have been most aggressive in their attacks on their opponents have a lot to answer for when explaining the resistence to this and other controversial research amongst more mainstream 9/11 campaigners. Thankfully Judy Woods and people like Andrew Johnson do not fall into this category.
|
But Ian if you use just this forum as a kind of 'meta' model for how 9/11 info has developed since, say 2005, it looks the other way round. Those who have continued to push the envelope into the shadier [yes, even shadier!] directions of above-government naughtiness have faced a constant barrage of insults and collective p*ss taking for their efforts.
Remember it's difficult to be in a minority and to try and introduce new ideas - anyone can, on the other hand, shout down emerging new thoughts a nd research when they feel backed-up by a larger body of contributors. All I've seen whilst keeping a fair distance from both sides is significant patience and careful presentation of data on behalf of [most of] the exotic tech possibilities group despite facing a fairly solid brick wall of opposition amongst researchers who should have learned from this whole episode to expect the unexpected.
If anything - 9/11 should have introduced people new to the study of black agency strategy to the notion that reality is onion-like in how it presents itself. I don't see this lesson as one well learnt in most cases. Which is a shame.
| ian neal wrote: |
Another reason for the resistence is that many many people are unaware of the long hidden history of teslaesque zero point energy technologies and the efforts of the establishment to keep them under wraps
|
I think this is a vital point. The mistake ppl can make coming in "fresh" to this arena is counting 9/11 as the initiation episode when in fact it represents a continuum to the story of shaped geopolitics, denial, sequestered technologies, dumbed-down consciousness and so on.
Lets consider the possibility that Tesla and others had sussed the whole, wider mass energy generation system prior to the Hiroshima bomb and that Tesla himself was totally controlled in the last years of his life - some say even killed by the FBI/CIA. Given this AND the real possibility that sections of trans-national govts have obtained let's say "off-world" hardware - do we REALLY think that 60 years later we'd not use advanced energy systems in an event as key to geopolitics as 9/11 ??
| utopiated wrote: |
Could one of the main secrets of September 11th be the link to vast energy systems that do not rely upon conventional power sources?? ie: highly efficient over unity or quantum vacuum energy systems are readily available to a section of the M.I.C. - systems that could end the reliance on conventional, polluting fuels and their associated damage to the deeper ecological elements of the biosphere??
|
Hooray... so let's make it a reasonable and tolerated avenue of investigation. It's not either/or when it comes to the PR of 9/11 - we can still present a front that most ppl consider "useful" for bringing in new blood.
_________________
http://exopolitics.org.uk
http://chemtrailsUK.net
http://alienfalseflagagenda.net
-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
