EARTHQUAKE - into the rabbit hole

[rodin]

I am going to try to write a kind of e-handbook of 911 and all that flows from here. Something that takes ordinary people into the rabbit hole, leading them by the hand and giving it a squeeze when they get scared. This IMO is how to present truth. With consideration. What do you think?
__________________

EARTHQUAKE

Machiavelli in ‘The Prince’ advises that sitting on the fence is the most dangerous game where two camps oppose. For the uncommitted will become the enemy of both sides, not just one, and will lose the succour and support of a group.

Chapter one. Epicentre

On internet forums people have a tendency to divide along particular fault lines. One huge crack that has opened up between those not wasting this amazing technology surfing for porn was caused by the collapse of three buildings in Manhattan.

Yes, three. I know – many have forgotten the fact that the Salomon Brothers building, a 47 storey structure, also collapsed on September 11th 2001.

Very simply put, when a building collapses, the falling debris crashes into the floors below, and if the building is weak enough, then lower floors give way and add their weight to the collapse. All the time on the way down stones are smashing into wooden beams, or concrete slabs are hitting steal supports, and so on, depending on the materials and construction method employed.

In earthquake zones buildings are often required to be reinforced with steel to prevent catastrophic collapse. In cities like New York, buildings are built on a frame of steel, because this is incredibly strong and resistant to mechanical and fire damage. In fact, to get steel to lose significant strength it must be heated in a furnace. Consider the red-hot horseshoe the blacksmith hammers into shape. To get an idea of steel’s strength under fire one need only heat an iron bar with an open flame then attempt to bend it. In fact metal stoves testify to steel’s high melting point.

For this reason, before 911, no steel-framed building had ever collapsed due to fire. On 911 three did. Of course, two were hit by planes, an exceptional circumstance. Without any knowledge of engineering you could think the impact added to the resultant fire was sufficient to bring down World Trade Centre 1 and 2. The same cannot be said about the Salomon Brothers building, World Trade Centre 7, or WTC7 for short. For this reason our study of the earthquake that spread from Manhattan around the world will begin by concentrating on this lesser-known architectural casualty of 911.

Remember the description of a building collapse? When falling debris hits remaining floors, it is inevitable that downward momentum is arrested. This follows from Isaac Newton’s laws of motion. Specifically that to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Consider a billiard ball striking another. The target ball acquires some of the momentum of the cue ball, and as a consequence the cue ball slows down. Debris crashing through a building will experience exactly this effect.

As Scotty on Star Trek said – ye canna change the laws of physics!

Old buildings have to be brought down. The method used is called Controlled Demolition. In a controlled demolition, or CD for short, a building is first carefully wired with explosives. This is a complex and time-consuming operation that takes weeks. The object of the exercise is to collapse the building into its own footprint, so as to minimise collateral damage to surrounding structures. Simply put, this is accomplished by cleverly cutting all supports across the entire building simultaneously.

When you look at a controlled demolition you see a building that seems to literally melt into the ground, in a nice straight-down collapse. Because all resistance is carefully cut away, the rate of fall is very fast, and closely corresponds to the rate of fall of a large rock, for example, dropped from the same height in free air.

Here is a video directly comparing WTC7’s collapse with the free-fall rate of gravitational acceleration in air.


Link


As you can see - WTC7 was demolished by CD!

If you don’t already know this then stop reading this article now. Go away and think of what you have just learned. I say learned, because what you have just witnessed is 100% proof. Better than was used to convict most murderers. Not witness testimony. What you have just viewed is forensic evidence of impeccable provenance – the strongest there is – proving not just beyond reasonable doubt but beyond any doubt that WTC7 was already wired for demolition before 911.

OK

Once you have got over the shocking revelation (and I know how it feels having experienced this shock to the system myself) then I would ask you to not to prove Winston Churchill correct. He stated – I paraphrase - ‘People sometimes stumble upon the truth, then they pick themselves up and walk on as if nothing had happened’.

What flows from 911 is a broad and deep river of deceit uncovered

We can now observe the following to be true, just based on the evidence presented in the film of WTC7’s free-fall collapse.

1) Governments are promoting false stories about 911
2) The media refuse to investigate the incontrovertible physical evidence proving the use of explosives
3) WTC7 must have been wired for demolition long before 911

The following logical assumptions can be made

1) All three towers were wired for demolition before 911, not just WTC7.
2) The official story of a surprise attack by Arabs is nonsense.
3) The press and government have a vested interest in keeping the truth about 911 from the public
4) The press and government are supportive of an attack on the American people

The so-called democratically elected government and so-called free press is not just remiss in their respective duties to serve the interest of the people and to honestly report. The government is actually an accessory to the crime of mass-murder of its own people and the press is deliberately lying to the people to cover up the crime of 911. Are the government and the press actually part of the conspiracy that made 911 happen?

In short – are they party to the crime of high treason and murder?

There is a mountain of evidence out there that suggests they are.

Rodin

Jan 26 2008

[rodin]

Part 5

http://www.contrarianthinker.com/WTC%20proof%205.htm

In the thick of it

http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=233714

Just something I had to do

[rodin]

Points

1) we are only 20% away from freefall time over the entire first 4.5 seconds.

2) the rate of descent from +3 to +4.5 appears to be accelerating at actual free-fall speed. This assuming the curves for free-fall versus time as traced and scaled from Judy Wood's site are correct and I have measured and plotted the results correctly.

http://www.contrarianthinker.com/WTC%20proof%206.htm
[/img]

[rodin]

WTC7 definitely fell faster than freefall in air



http://www.contrarianthinker.com/WTC7.htm

[WyldeChylde]

That is baffling. I don't understand how something can fall faster than freefall unless there is something pushing down on it - I didn't think it was physically possible...