View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ravenmoon Validated Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 410 Location: Sheffield
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What would the outcome have been if he were asian _________________ "The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." George Orwell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Source? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Having read the original report in full, I have to highlight this as being incorrect;
Quote: | Armed police held an innocent mechanic at gunpoint when they mistook his MP3 player for a pistol. |
The way this is phrased is very misleading - police didn't mistake his MP3 player for a gun - the woman who reported it did.
Plus he wasn't arrested for using an MP3 player - he was arrested because it was reported he was seen carrying a firearm - huge difference. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lawrence Phillips Validated Poster
Joined: 12 Dec 2007 Posts: 46 Location: North London
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah/.. good point above.. but why did they take his DNA?? was he found guilty of any crime? _________________ Lebanese proverb - Lower your voice and strengthen your argument |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lawrence Phillips wrote: | yeah/.. good point above.. but why did they take his DNA?? was he found guilty of any crime? |
Every person who is arrested is processed and part of the booking-in procedure now encompasses the taking of DNA /photos/fingerprints.
This is more a timing issue than anything else - before you can be questioned/interviewed, the booking-in process has to be followed to the letter (the custody officer oversees this).
Depending on the offence, whilst you are questioned, checks can be run on the information taken/supplied.
No, he wasn't charged with anything - obviously his 'guilt' could only have been established in a court - he was released without charge so there was no court appearance involved.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_artic le_id=513875&in_page_id=1770
It is so repetitive how headlines have to be embellished to show someone or a body of people in a bad light. This is a prime example of 'headline loading' taking things way out of context. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alwun Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 282 Location: london
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:27 pm Post subject: arrest? |
|
|
so TC,
you remain an apologist.
some fantasist reckons my mp3 player is a sophisticated weapon, and so I end up surrounded by armed polis. A very bad place to be, given their record over the years.
I imagine the polis would have taken the time to notice that they had been rendered overkill silly by some donuthead who pointed the finger at this young man.
ie "it's an mp3 player, sarge."
A sincere apology is now in order, given their gun-toting scarifying tactics.
- but no-- it's arrest for you and down to the station for DNA if you please.
Data theft, and right in front of your eyes.
Total BS and no denying that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:24 pm Post subject: Re: arrest? |
|
|
alwun wrote: | so TC,
you remain an apologist.
some fantasist reckons my mp3 player is a sophisticated weapon, and so I end up surrounded by armed polis. A very bad place to be, given their record over the years.
I imagine the polis would have taken the time to notice that they had been rendered overkill silly by some donuthead who pointed the finger at this young man.
ie "it's an mp3 player, sarge."
A sincere apology is now in order, given their gun-toting scarifying tactics.
- but no-- it's arrest for you and down to the station for DNA if you please.
Data theft, and right in front of your eyes.
Total BS and no denying that. |
Having read your response, you have now raised additional issues that you somehow believe I should account for.
I am not sure what you require in addition to what it clearly says in the report;
Quote: | Mr Nixon, from Stoke-on-Trent, has now received an apology from Staffordshire Police |
Perhaps some roses? A cuddle?
The point you choose to avoid is that it is more than conceivable that if the man had been carrying a firearm, he could have ditched it down the side of the seat on the bus, in a plastic bag in the used ticket bin, in a refuse bin having got off, wherever. At that point - the police were totally unsure as to what was happening - so simply immediately identifying that the MP3 player must be what the woman saw had to be clearly established. If he was carrying a gun and was approached by an unarmed officer - what could have happened, hence armed response?
I remember chasing a shoplifter and by the time she was caught, she had nothing on her that the store detective had seen her pocket. Going back over the route found it squirrelled away in all kinds of places. So to say, you haven't got anything on you, we've got the wrong person, doesn't exactly wash.
To cite the police for arresting the man for listening to music is untrue. The police didn't mistake his MP3 player for a weapon - someone else did - this is what I am saying. The man was arrested so the facts could be established - they were and he was freed. Everyone who is arrested is processed following PACE, processing involves DNA collection.
I have strived to be clear in that this site professes to be on the quest for truth, yet misinformation is proliferated by some here. My point isn't about what is 'due' this young man or overkill by the police, merely that the thread should read;
'Numpty Watch - shortsighted woman gets innocent man arrested'
The current title is blatantly and unquestionably designed to make a point based upon semantic distortion of the facts - that is not the quest for truth and it goes completely against what most people here stand for. The police got information and acted upon it, following investigation they realised it was incorrect. It couldn't be established he was innocent without playing it by the book - perhaps you'd rather he was shot and not arrested?
There was nothing at the time to suggest that the MP3 player was automatically the 'gun'. I genuinely have no clue what you expect of the police in this situation - they ignore the information and they are damned - act upon it and the same is true. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alwun Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 282 Location: london
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:33 pm Post subject: dissembly all round |
|
|
TC
what you omitted to point out then, is that
Quote: | The police apologized and Nixon was released without charges, but his DNA sample will permanently remain in the database and his record will show that he was arrested on suspicion of a firearms offense.
|
so he gets a jacket for no reason that even you can cook up - or?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uselesseater Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 629 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The police should have a more measured response in the light of the 'intelligence' they were going of.
I remember how they raided the house at forest gate on the strength of the word of a heavily retarded man.
Having DNA taken as a matter of procedure is no defence whatsoever. At the very least the police could offer to remove his data as an apology is worth nothing. _________________ www.wytruth.org.uk
www.myspace.com/truthleeds |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alwun Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 282 Location: london
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: well indeed |
|
|
hi uselesseater,
I am charmed by your delightful euphemisms. For 'raided' I read savage invasion. The polis shot a member of a large household in the chest. A household composed of all ages, from babies and toddlers to the elderly grandparents.
Was the trigger happy savage charged with attempted murder? arrested? fingerprinted? eh?
TC what do you say to that? eh? When has a polis guilty of murder EVER been even admonished? EH?
Custodians of the law?
LOL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: Re: well indeed |
|
|
alwun wrote: | hi uselesseater,
I am charmed by your delightful euphemisms. For 'raided' I read savage invasion. The polis shot a member of a large household in the chest. A household composed of all ages, from babies and toddlers to the elderly grandparents.
Was the trigger happy savage charged with attempted murder? arrested? fingerprinted? eh?
TC what do you say to that? eh? When has a polis guilty of murder EVER been even admonished? EH?
Custodians of the law?
LOL |
Hi alwun
I must firstly acknowledge that you approach me again for my opinion;
We appear now to be comparing an incident where someone was shot, to one where someone was merely arrested. The Forest Gate scenario was indeed apparently poorly handled and it appears that there was gross and extreme overreaction on the part of the police.
Having been a serving police officer, I have a perspective that few here can appreciate and as I have highlighted many times in other threads, there are both good and bad police officers and I do not condone the actions of the bad. This allows me a unique view and I can stand back and see things from many different angles.
I have seen bad decisions/poor judgement being construed as deliberate acts of malice, which can happen in any walk of life - we are all just human beings. Police officers are just people in uniform, the job cannot be blamed for the shortcomings of a few - don't blame the players, blame the game.
I note I am cited as being 'robotic', which is strange considering I only ever seek truth without being encumbered by agendas. Consequently, I stand back and question first before attempting to reach any conclusion. I do not automatically label and judge first and so have a much more free, less mechanical and liberal frame of mind, but can appreciate why people struggle to accept that.
The point about the police and murder is that murder is unlawful killing - an officer who takes life whilst on duty is not (depending on circumstances obviously), committing murder.
I have only contributed to this thread, not to appluade or justify any actions by any police in any force. Merely to highlight, that this thread was constructed to endorse the misleading aspects of the original media report - the police did not arrest anyone for using an MP3 player, nor mistake said device for a weapon. My responses do not say I agree with what subsequently happened, however no-one was injured and the instant the facts were established, he walked. I have not commented on his DNA being retained - but I do believe it should be destroyed along with the record of his arrest.
I have simply answered what was asked of me with no endorsement of, or justification as to the rights or wrongs of any procedures or processes.
I hope this clarifies my position. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alwun Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 282 Location: london
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 7:08 pm Post subject: righty ho |
|
|
Hi TC,
indeed I did solicit your opinion, although not as elegantly as your prose suggests. I acknowledge your point about the good/bad apples etc. I have in my time met a number of thoroughly decent and intelligent polis. Nevertheless an innocent person now has an awful potential stain on his character for NO reason at all, and it is this unbalanced equation which disturbs me. That's all.
cheers Al.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One key issue I failed to include;
The set processes that are followed are laid down for the police to follow, they do not formulate them themselves. It isn't a handful of PC's in the canteen thinking up new procedures and implementing them. In my experience, most police officers would dramatically streamline the entire clunky blizzard of minutiae.
However, the key point here is that having followed the arrest/processing sequence, the police have no facility to remove DNA samples from the NDNAD. This is administrated and run by the FSS (Forensic Science Service), which I believe comes under the jurisdiction of the Home Office.
If the police could press a button and remove Darren Nixon's DNA/fingerprints and image but refused to do so, I can appreciate anti-police feeling being justified - but that is not the case. The police have no control over data removal from the interfaces they have available to them. They were obligated to process him like every other person who is arrested, his data entered the system, end of police involvement.
Unfortunately the system is such that data collection is carried out as the first stage post-arrest, prior to interview and if/wheninnocence is established, the way legislation stands, matters cannot be reversed by those responsible for his arrest, that lies with the courts.
To keep bashing 'the police' for following procedures they have zero control over is just plain shortsighted. They are as much slaves to a system as anyone else. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
911Eyewitness Validated Poster
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
telecasterisation wrote: | Having read the original report in full
he was arrested because it was reported he was seen carrying a firearm |
An apologist would find this okay.
When one reports a witch you first put them to the test.
If it were not for state terrorism instilling fear in the idiot subject who made the insidious report (who should be held accountable and fined as well as pay retribution to the injured party) the event would never happen. If sentient beings were in control of themselves there would be no need for police brandishing weapons at innocents who have no weapons upon being stopped. Neither should the innocent be taken from their way for no reason other than someone calling them a witch.
Apologists might find cause to bring the innocent down for DNA testing, blood testing, birthright testing and so forth just because some subject decided their eyes saw blood. On the other hand the woman who called him a terrorist gun toady went home thinking she's the hero. Justice in the UK?
Such is life under the queen. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alwun Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 282 Location: london
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:08 am Post subject: well put |
|
|
Mr Siegel,
the witch analogy is well suited to these times. We are encouraged to see demons amongst us.
cheers Al.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ian neal Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 3140 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
911Eyewitness wrote: | Such is life under the queen. |
Stop being a silly billy
Do you really imagine americans are any freer than britons? Do you think you have any more control over who is your president than we have over who is over our queen or prime minister. Does the 'royal lineage' play any less of a role in who governs you? This isn't some stupid game between republicans and royalists. Personally I don't ever remember being asked if wanted the queen to rule over me. We are all helpless little sheeple under the yolk of the same system, the same gangsters and sociopaths.
Unless of course we decide we are not. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish5133 Site Admin
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2568 Location: One breath from Glory
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Man arrested at gunpoint after police mistake his MP3 player for a gun
This all stems from the mistake made by senior people in our government and intelligence services that Iraq had WMDs when in fact it was an Aspirin factory.
Liverpool police also confused a central heating boiler in a loft for a cannabis factory.
Lets face it we all make mistakes. _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|