flight 93 I'm confused

[evilgimp35]

Right we all know that 9/11 was an inside job but there's something about flight 93 I can't get my head around.I believe the plane was shot down,but why didn't the u.s government let the plane hit its target if that was the plan.or was the whole thing about 93 just pure fiction.I know I'm asking an answerable question but I'm intrested in peoples theorys.And does any one know what tim sparkes flight 93 theory is.

[scubadiver]

Tim's theory is that Flight 93 was destined for WTC7.

The problem with this flight is that it took off approximately 45minutes late and there would have been no possibility of the plane being landed.

[fish5133]

I suppose the answer may depend upon ones view of the flight.

a) was it a real plane with real passengers, crew and with real hijackers?

b) was it a real plane with real passengers, crew and with patsy hijackers?

c) was it a real plane with real passengers, NO crew and with hijackers or not

d) was it a remote control unmanned drone plane with fictitious passengers and crew with mock funerals (see Northwoods Document for this false flag scenario considered during Cuban Crisis)

e) was it a plane at all, with crash site formed by a missile (slipped that one in for the NPTers)

Was it shot down with conventional weapons or exotic weaponry to leave as little evidence as possible.

If the real perps had no conscience about killing thousands in the towers , to use real scheduled flights with real passengers wouldnt touch any consciences.

Whatever the truth is I tend to lean towards the scenaro which would involve the fewest "in on it"

[Lee]

I suggest that flight93's target is important.

It was on the way to the White House allegedly. But they didn't need the White House destroying in the same way as the towers and wtc7.

The Pentagon's reinforcements needed testing, so why not use 9/11 to do it?

93 is purely an embellishment to add credibility to the OCT. Including the red-neck rousing 'Let's Roll' legend. Think "Wag the Dog"...