7/7 Inquests May Finally Go Ahead - In Secret

[TonyGosling]

A long put off inquest where the prime suspects use political leverage so they don't have to testify - remind anyone of the Diana inquest? Sure sign of a cover-up. The frightened criminals gravitate closer and closer to positions of authority until the political system itself is criminalised. Such is the unjust and sad state of 21st Century Britain.
Can we somehow force these and other war provocation false flag terror suspects to answer questions on camera - as good old Roger Cook used to do? These shysters must be nailed somehow.
7/7 Inquests May Be Held In Secret..... so poor old Peter Power doesn't have to go to prison

July 7 inquests 'could be secret'

Relatives of those who died in the 7 July bombings fear the inquests into their deaths could be heard in secret. Proposals in the government's Counter Terrorism Bill could see a special coroner appointed for an inquest where national security is an issue.

The Justice Secretary could also ensure the coroner could sit in secret and without a jury. Robert Webb, whose sister Laura died in 2005, said that families and society in general needed answers from inquests.

The clauses involved are clauses 64 and 65 of the Counter Terrorism Bill currently going through Parliament. Those proposals are controversial and the worries of the 7/7 relatives will only add to the concerns, says BBC home affairs correspondent Daniel Sandford.

[Sinclair]

More info/research on the subject of the Counter Terrorism Bill 2008, and the proposed changes to the Coroner Inquests & Inquiries process is HERE.

If an inquest into a July 7th victim is held without a jury or a family member present, because the inquest would involve the consideration of material that the Secretary of State considers should not be made public, we must ask:
WHY - WHAT IS BEING HIDDEN?

If any July 7th victims’ inquests are carried out under these new proposed arrangements (& remember - we won’t be explicitly told as such), this only reinforces the notion that the (unwitting) suspects received facilitation/direction from ’others unknown’ (agents of the state?) whose identity continues to be cosseted by this insidious change to inquest legislation.

This is a further setback for openness and transparency and compounds the extensive use of the Public Interest Immunity (PII) mechanism that sheltered much of the ‘Operation Crevice’ Trial court reporting, which we know played a part in the real July 7th Narrative.