| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
blackcat
Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject: Top New York Cop Thought Towers Were Bombed On 9/11 |
 |
|
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/031708_towers_bombed.ht m
| Quote: | Top New York Cop Thought Towers Were Bombed On 9/11
Former debunker Dietl admits he shares 9/11 truth activist's questions during confrontation
Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet, Monday, March 17, 2008
Highly decorated former New York City detective Bo Dietl admits that his first instinct on 9/11 was that the twin towers were downed with explosives, as he conceded that he shared many questions about the official story with 9/11 truth activists he had formerly debunked on national television.
What started out as a adversarial confrontation with members of We Are Change turned into a cordial discussion as Dietl contradicted some of his previous public statements on 9/11 and appeared to agree with the group on several issues, presumably prompted by the fact that his daughter was doing a research paper on 9/11 which lent credence to the suspect nature of the official story behind the attacks.
"I had a perfect view....next thing is I hear screaming, I looked up and when these are coming down you know what the first thing I said is? They had * bombs in those buildings - I'm telling you what was in my mind, I said there had to be bombs in the buildings," said Dietl.
"You're talking about two 110 story buildings that * evaporated," said Dietl, adding, "Where are the people....I ask the same questions it's such a devastating thing."
"Where the * did all these bodies go - it was pulverized - no bones, no DNA was found, I didn't see no body parts" added Dietl, who was on the scene to help rescue workers and firefighters shortly after the towers' collapse.
Dietl confirmed that the collapse of WTC 7 was known ahead of time and that he was told to stay away from the building.
Dietl also described it as a "* crime" that members of the Bin Laden family were flown out of the country under FBI supervision in the days following 9/11 when all other air traffic was grounded.
The former detective also mentioned how his former friend FBI agent John O'Neill, who died in the towers, was prevented by the FBI from prosecuting Bin Laden and other Al-Qaeda members.
However, Dietl's claim that "they never dreamt in a million years the tragedy that happened would happen" in the context of his assertion that the faulty construction of the towers contributed to their sudden collapse is demonstrably false.
Numerous different World Trade Center designers and construction specialists are on record as having ruled out the possibility that multiple commercial jetliner impacts could bring the towers down.
A February 3, 1964 white paper which was written during the design phase of the towers stated, "The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707 DC  traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact."
In 2001, Leslie Robertson, one of the two original structural engineers for the World Trade Center, stated, "The twin towers were in fact the first structures outside the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airplane."
Also in early 2001, Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, said on camera, "The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."
Since Dietl still serves as Chairman of the New York State Security Guard Advisory Council, his comments are of great significance in the quest for a new investigation. |
_________________
"The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 6060
Location: East London
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An interesting point which I was unaware of, and which should be taken on board by our campaigners : 'In 2001, Leslie Robertson, one of the two original structural engineers for the World Trade Center, stated, "The twin towers were in fact the first structures outside the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airplane." '
_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lee
Validated Poster
Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 246
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| outsider wrote: | | 'In 2001, Leslie Robertson, one of the two original structural engineers for the World Trade Center, stated, "The twin towers were in fact the first structures outside the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airplane." ' |
But as he also says in 9/11 mysteries they did not conceive of the damage the Jet fuel would do. Which just seems highly improbable.
But of course that then causes one to question if the jet fuel caused the weakening of the steel that they claim it did.
It's a bit of a truth movement paradox. By highlighting Mr Robertson's quote, you run the risk of debunkers coming back at you with the rest of it.
To linger on this counter-evidence can often reinforce the official story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scienceplease
Validated Poster
Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 288
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've written this elsewhere on the forum: Leslie Robertson changed his tune on the strength of the WTC immediately before 9/11... check out
http://americainjeopardy.blogspot.com/2007/02/yet-towers-fell.html
He appeared on the BBC apology documentary for why the Twin Towers fell - I felt he was deeply unconvincing...
The question is... why would he change his story? What is in it for him?
Try this, from his firm's website:
http://www.lera.com/sep11.htm
"...participated in the development of a database of structural information for the two towers of the World Trade Center (WTC1 and 2)"
The question is: how much was he paid?
Also the wording "two towers of the WTC" yet more reinforcing the popularly held view that only two skyscrapers fell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lee
Validated Poster
Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 246
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gareth
Suspended
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 398
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
