| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pikey
Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:26 pm Post subject: Statements not to make about 911 truth |
 |
|
| Quote: | | "If was definitely controlled demolition because they managed to transport all the steel member structure away immediately on lorries" |
Whilst I believe CD was 100% responsible for WTC7 I believe that for the twin towers(the north and south tower), re:WTC1 & 2 it was CD plus something else, a huge input of energy was required to create that level of destruction. Certainly a weapon of mass destruction there.
I often hear comrades make the above stetement and based on my construction technology knowledge I cringe.
Steel frame structures consist of steel members connected together usually by bolted connections and sometimes welded joints. In terms of structural integrity the connection joints are the weakest link!
The maximum length of the steel members in the design is determined by the transport available (usually articulated lorries) and also the site restriction regarding access. In other words the beams were delivered to site by lorry in the first place.
What statements do you feel should be avoided and why when in 911 truth campaigning mode?
_________________
Pikey
Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com
Last edited by Pikey on Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
these are proberbly obvious, but ill mention them anyway because i still hear the terms from time to time.
1. the fire was'nt hot enough to melt steel.
fire is'nt hot enough to melt steel, when the offical theory mentions the steel being weakened to cause collapse not melted.
2. (when refering to the towers) the buildings fell into their own footprint.
wtc 1 and 2 did not fall into their own footprints, the debris were in a vast radius around where the towers stood. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fish5133
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 2568
Location: One breath from Glory
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | 1. the fire was'nt hot enough to melt steel. |
This ones ok as long as you add "so what caused the pools of molten metal"
_________________
JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| fish5133 wrote: | | Quote: | | 1. the fire was'nt hot enough to melt steel. |
This ones ok as long as you add "so what caused the pools of molten metal" |
actually fish, upon looking for a example of where the comment is made unrelated to molten metal, i found the media using the term themselves and saying that the steel did melt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhRMoNGVaeY
so now im puzzled. ah well i suppose this clip goes in the stupiest media reports and claims thread in CC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
