GodSaveTheTeam Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 575 Location: the eyevolution
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The following pictures were released by NIST on a FOIA request submitted by Cryptome website.
They feature burning cars around GZ post-plane strikes and pre-collapse.
Here's a sample of the letter from NIST to Cryptome.
Here are images of burning cars.
The cars could be burning because of falling debris from the explosions caused by the "plane" impacts.
Notice how, in this picture below, post-collpase, the cars in the infamous parking lot are covered in dust. Many of them are burning, perhaps because of falling flaming debris.
Notice how the cars that are not burning are covered in dust but most (if not actually all) of them are not "toasted".
Is this fact indicative of the inconsistency of the Wood hypothesis?
Some cars appear to have sustained damage but between the ones that have sustained damage are noticeable remains of the buildings. Beams etc...steel beams that is...
Same here. Cars covered in dust. No noticeable "toasting". No tracks in the dust would suggest vehicles have been stationary for sometime as the dust settled. Notice also no sign of "levitated" cars. Vehicles remain upright.
A closer look confirms much of the above. Notice here the wide spread of debris. Steel beams etc. Indicative of what may have occurred in much of the surrounding area.
This also highlights a selectivity in the hypothesized DEW behavior. "Dustifying" some steel beams but not others?
Is the evidence presented here enough to prove to most that the Wood speculation of DEW ( or the dust from the dustification, I've heard both) causing damage to the cars is perhaps more than just a little unfounded?
Probably not. Just saying, you know. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/bobzimmerfan?feature=mhum#p/a |
|