7/7 better planned than 9/11 ?

[fish5133]

When it comes to conspiracy theories in general I hold my hand up as a skeptic, thats why I believe the official 9/11 story is a lie, cover up LIHOP, MIHOP. There is so much evidence that points to the official account being wrong and thats why ever increasing numbers of people are waking up to it.
However I dont see the same happening with 7/7. Having reviewed much of the arguements about 7/7 i can see why many still believe the official account. As a conspiracy skeptic I would put myself on the fence regarding 7/7. The key piece of evidence that at least gets me on the fence is Peter Powers statement and to a lesser degree the wrong train time the "bombers" were supposed to be on. NTT (No train theory) or WTT (Wrong train theory)

This begs the question if 7/7 was indeed a false flagger was it better planned than 9/11, were mistakes learnt from 9/11 ?

For me Peter Power is definitely a key to 7/7. Pray for his protection and loosen his tongue to spill more beans.

[zimboy69]

[KP50]

7/7 was just much less ambitious. The basic tenet of people detonating bombs on public transport is evidently possible so the the main issue with 7/7 is the lack of evidence that the alleged bombers were even in the vicinity. Apparently all the CCTV images exist to prove the case of the Government Narrative - as were shown in the 21/7 trial. If they released all of the CCTV images, then maybe we could stop worrying about 7/7.

[Newspeak International]

I may be wrong, but imo the 21/7 event was staged with real CCTV images and dummy bombs to confuse and reinforce the 7/7 event in the eyes of the public.

[paul wright]

[zimboy69]