As if there is a difference!! _________________ "The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
Yes, i know.
But really Livingstone was a truly evil and truly disasterous ruler of London.
Totally corrupt and totally inept.
Livingstone employed ex CIA manager Bob Kiley in 2001.
A guy who is a total alcoholic and also a guy who was in charge of the South American desk during the early 1970s so was directly involved in major atrocities.
He gave Bob Kiley a million pound Belgravia mansion and a £750,000 per annum dowry.
Livingstone in 2004 awarded VERINT a no tender contract to manage security on London Underground.
Verint is run and founded by ex Mossad and Shin Beth officers many of whom are convicted criminals. One Jacob Kobi Alexander is on the run in Namibia.
Livingstone has awarded Billion pound contracts to companies like Bechtel. companies which are running the war in Iraq are being rewarded by Ken with huge contracts.
Livingstone procured Israeli made dum dum bullets which murdered Jean Charles de Menezes. Ken refused to censor Sir Ian Blair or any other policeman after this cold blooded murder of an innocent man.
The conservatives demanded Ian Blairs head.
Livingstone has blocked any inquiry into the 7/7 bombings.
London is a far more dangerous place after 8 years of Ken, more crime, more violence, bendy buses cause more accidents.
He only bought east european made bendy buses because of one reason:
JOhn Major became a director of the UK's leading bus manufacturer Maylfolwer corporation owners of Alexanders and Dennis.
KEn's transfer away from Mayflower of these bus contracts to Mercedes Benz was an act of pure revenge against John Major.
It resulted in the loss of many UK jobs at Mayflower and the bendy buses and more polluting, more expensive and frankly bad.
So as a lifelong Londoner who lives and works in London.
Good riddance to bad rubbish and hopefully Livingstone is prosecuted for corruption.
Boris Johnson is not the same.
His grandparents were Turkish Muslims.
His wife is an Indian Sikh.
And as far as i know he has not caused any wars or any deaths yet.
150,000 majority shows how much Londoners hate Livingstone and Labour. Me included as everyone on this forum already knows. _________________
Well he voted for the war in Iraq Karl, and for new nuclear weapons as well.
He's also an utter buffoon.
That said, he did vote against terror legislation, is against ID cards and rendition... so I guess we'll have to wait and see how it pans out... _________________
Yes indeed, Boris is a bufoon.
But he is probably not a calculating cunning operator like Ken.
This election was a toss up between 3 bad candidates.
Ken Livingstone being the worst.
Just imagine London after another 4 years of Ken it would be a ghost town, every shop to let and no go areas and curfews and gangs running wild.
How many more false flag terror alerts would ken particiipate in?
The difference between Tory and Labour is this.
Tory is CHEAPER!
I voted for Lindsay German so my conscience is clear _________________
Hooray.Goodbye to the overblown and evident reptilian
Hello to the short-trousered tousle-haired schoolboy
Londinium is much worse off as it is
Only the City will win _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
400,000 votes “spoilt” - was Robert Mugabe in London on Thursday night?
By News Team, May 4, 2008
When scores of ballot boxes were recently examined as part of the Zimbabwean elections, it was discovered that seals had been tampered with. So shocking was this discovery that the international media felt compelled to report upon it. The following story, from the Daily Telegraph of April 21st, described the situation as:-
“Zimbabwe’s regime has been accused of a “concerted effort” to rig the election for Robert Mugabe as it emerged that seals protecting ballot boxes have been broken.
A partial recount of the election – which was held on March 29 – is now taking place in 23 constituencies. A source at the recount at the Bulilima East constituency said: “There are 57 ballot boxes from 57 polling stations. We examined all the boxes from the presidential election and the seal on every one is slit. There is a foreign observer here so we hope this has been noted.”
The seals guard the keys to the padlocks on the boxes, which contain all the voting materials from a polling station, including the voters’ roll and ballot papers.”
Yet when large numbers of London Mayoral/Assembly ballot boxes were brought from supposedly secure overnight storage in the various counting centres on Friday morning, they were found to have had their seals broken! Worryingly, there was no media outcry – not even a media whimper! Despite formal complaints being made to the proper electoral authority, not a single media outlet reported on what many perceive to be massive and organised ballot box tampering – presumably because the most likely target of said suspected vote tampering or “ballot box stuffing”, would be the BNP!
Indeed, without media comment, some 400,000 ballot sips were subsequently officially declared as “spoilt”! Are we really supposed to believe that there are hundreds of thousands of Londoners unable to complete ballot forms correctly? We can only wonder what forensic examination of these “spoilt” ballot slips would reveal?
And why is it that whilst the electoral authorities in Zimbabwe managed to provide steel or moulded plastic ballot boxes, secured with padlocks, that the best the Labour regime could provide were tamper-friendly cardboard boxes and paper seals?
_________________ "The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
Cheers Dogsmilk. What on earth would we be doing reporting the BNP's sleazy material in here?They're undoubtedly controlled by the Intelligence services anyway _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Is there any allegation of electoral wrongdoing coming from anyone other than bonehead scumf*cks whose website you just happened to be browsing?
I don't know. Are allegations untrue automatically because the BNP raise them? In any case the link was posted and plain for all to see and it doesn't mean I support them or agree with them, but since they are alleging electoral wrongdoing it makes for interesting debate and you can state your views without making snide assertions that I "happened" to be "browsing". In fact it was linked to from a newspaper site which I am sure would meet your high ethical standards and pass through your "thought crime" net. For the record, I post many articles about Bush and his ramblings but it does not mean I support him. Attack the message Dogsmilk, not the man. Do you have anything meaningful to say about that article, like is there any truth in it? If you could be bothered to do a smidgin of research you would see that electoral fraud is an increasing worry in the UK and that accusations of fraud are rife. BTW I do hope that Reuters falls within your "acceptibility" frame. Let me have a list of where I am able to go, better still maybe you could configure my computer using those parental settings to exclude sites you disapprove of.
Yet when large numbers of London Mayoral/Assembly ballot boxes were brought from supposedly secure overnight storage in the various counting centres on Friday morning, they were found to have had their seals broken! Worryingly, there was no media outcry – not even a media whimper! Despite formal complaints being made to the proper electoral authority, not a single media outlet reported on what many perceive to be massive and organised ballot box tampering – presumably because the most likely target of said suspected vote tampering or “ballot box stuffing”, would be the BNP!
Indeed, without media comment, some 400,000 ballot sips were subsequently officially declared as “spoilt”! Are we really supposed to believe that there are hundreds of thousands of Londoners unable to complete ballot forms correctly? We can only wonder what forensic examination of these “spoilt” ballot slips would reveal?
Whether you like it or not the BNP are a legal political entity in this country and if there is any truth to the assertions above it is very serious. It may be difficult to sympathise with any BNP complaints but fair democratic process is important and, if this corruption is true, it could happen to one of your acceptable political parties next. _________________ "The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
Well I was asking if there was anything to this allegation beyond the assertions of a gaggle of shaved apes. Pardon my extraordinary cynicism, but I would be reluctant to believe a claim simply because the BNP said it and would seek further corroboration which is what I asked for. Any fraud wouldn't just affect the BNP and it would be very surprising if no-one but they had noticed anything.
You have provided a string of links which, from a brief scan, do not appear related to this specific claim but rather express a general concern over the possibility of fraud on the back of a report from the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust and seemingly with a primary concern over postal voting. Indeed, your articles are from before the election.
Why you re-quote a portion of the same text from above I do not understand.
I agree any instance of electoral fraud would be of deep concern, but I would seek further corroboration than a say-so claim made by fascists.
Which newspaper did you get the link from? Did they have anything to say about it? Though I'm guessing you got it from a comments section or else you'd have already linked to it...?
...The mainstream political parties seem to have utterly failed in their attempts to prevent the odious "BNP" from getting a seat on the Assembly, but a least the differently odious "Respect" George Galloway did not get in, as some feared. ...
Is someone planning to steal Second Preference votes in the Mayoral election ?
By Mayor of London on May 1, 2008 1:06 PM
We have had a report from a friend, that at one west London polling station, people are being advised that they are supposedly not allowed to vote for the same person in both the First and Second preference columns.
This is false advice - you obviously can vote for the same person in both columns - it will not improve the chances of that person winning, but it may prevent some electoral fraud:
The London Elects website and leaflets state:
If you only mark a first choice, your vote will be counted - you do not have to cast your second choice vote. But making a second choice cannot reduce the chance of your first choice candidate being successful.
If you only mark a second choice vote and not a first choice vote, no vote will be counted.
If you vote for the same candidate for first and second choice, only one vote will be counted. You cannot improve the chances of your chosen candidate by giving them your first and second choice votes.
Is this an attempt to allow someone to tamper with the ballot papers of anyone who just ticks the First Preference column, leaving the Second Preference column blank ?
An insider could fraudulently fill in the empty Second Preference column to favour their own candidate.
We doubt that the scanning equipment will detect any difference in the style or colour of the crosses in the two columns.
Is this down to ignorance or to Russian / Zimbabwean style election rigging ?
We would be interested to hear if anyone else is being given this sort of false advice.
_________________ "The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
Which newspaper did you get the link from? Did they have anything to say about it? Though I'm guessing you got it from a comments section or else you'd have already linked to it...?
I do hope the Daily Telegraph meets with your approval Dogsmilk, although to my shame I now have to confess to having visited their site. There are some interesting comments on that blog about the importance of democracy versus giving BNP publicity. Here's some more!
Personally I see the BNP as a canary down a coalmine. Useful indicator as to how far wrong some of society has become and needs looking at.
Quote:
Elections Mugabe style
Posted by Lickyalips at 14:41 on 02 May 2008
BNP Lodges Complaint Over Broken Seals on GLA Ballot Boxes.
Keep the 'far right' out.
First reports from Olympia as the London count starts indicate that up to 40% of the ballot boxes have had their seals removed. Also some of the drop-windows on these boxes have been smashed in. An official complaint has now been made and the Evening Standard should be covering this.Turnout is reported to be in the 50-60% figure.
The newly elected British National Party councillor for Tilbury Riverside in Thurrock, Emma Colgate, reports from the Alexandra Palace counting station:
“We have lodged an official complaint with the Returning Officer here over the large number of ballot boxes, stored overnight, which have had their seals broken and the contents obviously interfered with. The ballot boxes here are quite literally hanging open.
The Returning Officer says they have taken note, but that there is 'nothing we can do about it.”
Councillors Richard Barnbrook and Bob Bailey, leader and deputy leader of the BNP on Barking and Dagenham Council, and also the number one and two candidates on the GLA top-up list for the BNP, have, just a few minutes ago of writing, lodged a complaint with the election observers at ExCel in Central London.
_________________ "The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 475 Location: North London
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: Boris = City clone
Karlos makes some good points about Livingstone, although, to be honest, I can't see a London Mayour blowing the whistle on 7/7 and continuing to live.
Question is, though, why the campaign to get rid of him?
It is clear to me that the objective of the Evening Standard/media campaign was to eliminate his personal vote. The campaign was a racist one and white voters were invited to regard Livingstone as a 'nigger lover'. People said how much they dislike Livingstone but couldn't come up with an explanation. This is because they disliked his 'nigger loving'.
Another question is why the Conservatives chose an air headed buffoon like Boris Johnson. And it is precisely because others will do his thinking for him. And Johnson announced a few days before the election that he had appointed as an adviser a City of London banker.
JOhnson is a City of London clone. Clearly, Livingstone was not doing a good enough job for them.
Are people saying that if the BNP get votes........we should refuse to count them?
No, they are saying
Quote:
I agree any instance of electoral fraud would be of deep concern, but I would seek further corroboration than a say-so claim made by fascists.
Thank you BC for the further article - I realise how dirty visiting the telegraph site may have made you feel. I suppose we'll see how it pans out and if there is really anything to it.
insidejob wrote:
t is clear to me that the objective of the Evening Standard/media campaign was to eliminate his personal vote. The campaign was a racist one and white voters were invited to regard Livingstone as a 'nigger lover'. People said how much they dislike Livingstone but couldn't come up with an explanation. This is because they disliked his 'nigger loving'.
This is a very striking claim. Could you elaborate further? I do not live in London and have paid zero attention to what is going on with you bloody southerners and your mayoral election. Consequently, I know nothing of what the campaigning was like.
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 475 Location: North London
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:27 pm Post subject: Ken, the 'nigger lover'
Quote:
This is a very striking claim. Could you elaborate further? I do not live in London and have paid zero attention to what is going on with you bloody southerners and your mayoral election. Consequently, I know nothing of what the campaigning was like.
Andrew Gilligan wrote many articles for the Evening Standard that revealed corruption or something by Ken’s black adviser, Lee Jasper. Jasper commented on grants largely going to black organisations. The Standard claimed that these organisations ‘did no work’, ‘was run by Jasper’s black mates’ and ‘people walked off with public money’. The Standard could not come up with any evidence of corruption, but it was mainly innuendo. This Standard campaign was picked up by other media.
The campaign led to Jasper’s resignation. Emails concerning Jasper’s relationship with a worker in an organisation funded by the Mayor were leaked.
Jasper was one of the most prominent, national representatives on race.
The issue is ‘who the hell now cares about any of this corruption’? After Lee resigned, the media suddenly lost interest in this issue. No BBC Today Programme interviews, no Newsnight investigations, nothing. Yet, no one has got to the bottom of this. And if you asked those who were incensed by this ‘corruption’ whether anyone has been arrested and charged, they couldn’t tell you.
Whites who were angry or concerned about this corruption knew all along about what this was about. The Mayor of London should have no well-paid race adviser and shouldn’t be funding black organisations. The corruption charge was an excuse.
Boris will now ensure that (almost) no organisation dedicated to black interest gets funding. Because everyone knows that Boris is no ‘nigger lover’.
It is strange that on this site we are discouraged from using the J word but the N word is bandied about freely as if it is ok.
There was widespread electoral fraud which was 100% carried out by Ken Livingstone supporters.
First example of this is this:
There was a leaflet printed which was giving people instructions HOW to vote. This was printed in both English and Bangladeshi. It was distributed widely both door to door and through meeting places such as Mosques.
It was an A4 glossy folded leaflet and inside it had picture of the ballot papers and a cross marked next to Ken Livingstones name.
To me instructing people who can read English how to vote is bad enough but instructing them how to vote for Ken is wrong.
Secondly:
The GLA spent millions of pounds on TV advertising, radio advertising and leafletting and newspaper adverrtising telling people to vote.
Driving up the turnout is not the job of the Mayors office nor is it what we pay our council tax for.
These adverts were interceded by adverts about London Transport trying to fool people into thinking Ken has done a decent job.
Thirdly:
The postal votes scam and the gathered votes. I can provide many examples of people who voted for Ken because someone else instructed them on who to vote for. This included members of the Somali and Bangladeshi communities. Which number many in London.
Add to this the fake oppostion.
Respect MP George Galloway was for months urging his supporters and members to vote for Labour/Livingstone.
The Left List formerly Respect SWP were usring their voters to keep Boris out by voting Labour as a second choice.
The lies that were told.
Muslims gropus such as the MCB and MPAC have proved themselves to be offshoots of the Labour party. They printed over 100,000 leaflets urging Muslims to vote for Labour.
Surely this is in breech of electoral commission rules where Labour proxy groups can campaign for Labour without that spending being included in official expenses.
Ofcourse Ken is crooked and corrupt. The Lee Jasper business was just the tip of the iceberg. As was exposed in the Dispatches documentary Ken has given handouts of many millions to many companies. Most have directors addresses that are registered in Israel. So those who describe Ken as friend to the Palestinians need their heads teasted.
Kens largesse to Israelis firms such as Verint and US war criminals such as Bechtel shows him to be another crooked psudo leftie just like ex CND Tony Blair and ex Commie John Reid.
Livingstone bucked the national trend by polling higher than polls suggested. Which is because of vote rigging in his favour.
Dont forget the BNP which is a product of Labour party policies. You have Jewish Labour ministers such as Margarette Hodge describing the BNP as the real opposition. So is that not talking up the BNP or what?
I voted Lindsay German for Mayor with Boris Johnson as my second choice.
I realsied my first preference was simply a protest vote but everything worked out ok because Labour lost.
The 7/7 bombings. I believe the conservatives on the GLA voted to hold an inquiry. Even if people accept the official version which i dont. Ken blocked the inquiry.
Another point for people on this forum to remember is the personal vendetta Ken Livingstone has conducted against Brian Haw and the peace protest. Ken is thoroughly evil. Using millions of our council tax money in this way.
Boris' grandparents were Turkish Muslim. His wife is a Sikh Indian.
I think i trust him more regarding race than i do Ken.
Boris is far more representative of todays London than Ken is.
And what is better is that he is not a lifelong career politician like Ken. _________________
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 475 Location: North London
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: Like I said, Ken's a '*igger lover'
Quote:
The lies that were told.
Muslims gropus such as the MCB and MPAC have proved themselves to be offshoots of the Labour party. They printed over 100,000 leaflets urging Muslims to vote for Labour.
Surely this is in breech of electoral commission rules where Labour proxy groups can campaign for Labour without that spending being included in official expenses.
Ofcourse Ken is crooked and corrupt. The Lee Jasper business was just the tip of the iceberg. As was exposed in the Dispatches documentary Ken has given handouts of many millions to many companies. Most have directors addresses that are registered in Israel. So those who describe Ken as friend to the Palestinians need their heads teasted.
Karlos,
Your complaints about Ken are a bit confusing because they come from both the Right and the Left. You complaint about his 'looney Left' antics with black people then attack him for being a supporter of the global elite.
I think if MCB and MPAC printing leaflets and asking to support Ken was against electoral law, there would have been complaints about it from the candidates. Although, whineging about this does smack of someone complaining about Ken the 'nigg*r lover' or 'Paki lover' in this case.
I think the idea that Somali and Bangladeshi voters couldn't work out for themselves to vote for Ken rather than Boris or anyone else probably means you know nothing about those communities.
If you have evidence of Lee Jasper's corruption, please point out what it is and tell the police because they don't seem to know. In fact, if you could state what has happened to all those accused of corruption, then please say. One of them, Yvonne Thompson, was re-elected as chair of the Afro-Caribbean Business Network while the attacks on her and the organisation was going on.
Funny, that the Evening Standard did not pick up on Ken's dubious financing of Israel organisations - which would raise questions about why Jewish groups thought him anti-Semitic.
It may be that Ken has done a lot of politically dubious stuff. But apart from his 'nigg*r loving', the vote against Ken had nothing whatsoever to do with any of that stuff that you site, all of which most people know nothing about.
You're right to pick up on how offensive 'nigg*r lover' is but it is a well-known term that sums up what many white people who voted against him feel, even if they don't want to admit it.
If it wasn't the leaders of the City of London who organised the press campaign against him, who did?
According to the polls Livingstone lost in the outer boroughs of London where there are still some English left as opposed to inner London where mass immigration has occurred in the last 10 years or so. As such the majority party as always has been abstention and for those who voted they voted not for the candidate they wanted but against the one they didn't. This was essentially a vote against globalist multiculturalism but already Boris is playing the Livingstone card emphasising all his ancestral roots and in such a manner preparing to go against his own electoral base.
In my opinion the Tories put Boris forward to ensure defeat as they didn't necessarily want him to win and now he has won they will end up having more problems than even they imagined. For the transport system cannot cope with endless waves of mass immigration and crime cannot fall as long as we are in Afghanistan and the supply of drugs continues unabated. So both Labour and Tory may be forced to co-manage London together drawing on each others parties.
Livingstone inevitably became tainted with Labour and he enraged his own base supporting nearly all of the City of Londons plans for London, expansion in every borough when it comes to housing, creating Low Emission zones aiming to wipe out small business and basically arguing everything in London is a success...
As for Boris using City of London advisers then he isn't breaking out of major trend. Brown uses Goldman Sachs advisers to determine his economic policy and so far its only worked in one direction, handing taxpayers money over to bankers, something even Respect agreed with in their manifesto for London!
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 475 Location: North London
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: We're agreed then and not
Quote:
According to the polls Livingstone lost in the outer boroughs of London where there are still some English left as opposed to inner London where mass immigration has occurred in the last 10 years or so. As such the majority party as always has been abstention and for those who voted they voted not for the candidate they wanted but against the one they didn't. This was essentially a vote against globalist multiculturalism...
So, those who voted against Ken did so because they thought he was a 'nigg*r lover'. I wonder if conspiracy analyst and Karlos would like to declare their opposition to 'nigg*r lovers'.
We've been through this gobbledygook argument about New World Order multiculturalism before. Which of course is in line with NWO lynchpin, Albert Pike, who created the KKK, clearly, he too was a 'nigg*r lover'.
We're supposed to believe that the NWO are attacking English culture via multiculturalism and immigration when they've used English people and their domination of the UK for centuries as the main base for executing their NWO plans. Duped many English have been and are, but they've also been quite happy with their City of London created empire.
I hope most 'truth seekers' see that the NWO plan is to create racial antagonism, particularly to mobilise white hatred of non-whites. They need to have some black people on board but mainly they are about fostering racial division. People of African descent don't cut it as a threat to global peace but the 'mad, oil owning Muslims' will do just fine.
Frankly, I don't see how the NWO are in one move promoting multiculturalism, then attacking multiculturalism and then creating the clash of civilisations all in one go.
If English people who have done so much to sustain the NWO are now going to be the main means of destroying it, I'd like to hear the argument.
Frankly, I don't see how the NWO are in one move promoting multiculturalism, then attacking multiculturalism and then creating the clash of civilisations all in one go.
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 12:07 am Post subject: Re: Like I said, Ken's a '*igger lover'
insidejob wrote:
Although, whineging about this does smack of someone complaining about Ken the 'nigg*r lover' or 'Paki lover' in this case.
My North london colleague.
I cannot see why calling people a N lover or a P lover are acceptable for you to be posting.
That aside, the fact that Ken bunged some of his mates some money does not make him a friend of ethnic minority groups. It makes him a very cunning and crooked career politician.
insidejob wrote:
Funny, that the Evening Standard did not pick up on Ken's dubious financing of Israel organisations - which would raise questions about why Jewish groups thought him anti-Semitic.
Again, Ken probably is anti Jewish. But granting a contract to an Israeli company and raking off a kickback for himself do not excuse him from being anti Jewish.
Alot of his rhetoric is fork tongued anyway.
He pretends to be green yet has created more pollution that anyone person on this earth.
insidejob wrote:
It may be that Ken has done a lot of politically dubious stuff. But apart from his 'nigg*r loving', the vote against Ken had nothing whatsoever to do with any of that stuff that you site, all of which most people know nothing about.
Mods
Can we please stop the N word being used. _________________
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 10:02 am Post subject: Re: We're agreed then and not
insidejob wrote:
Frankly, I don't see how the NWO are in one move promoting multiculturalism, then attacking multiculturalism and then creating the clash of civilisations all in one go.
As Paul says this is precisely their MO. Smoke and mirrors.
I can see quite easily how different arms of the 'the powers that be' can be persuaded to promote the following messages
1) For 10 years promote Ken as a liberal maverick leader who supports 'multiculturalism', 'ethnic' communities and immigration. Then come the election, use Associated Press and others to associate Ken and 'his cronies' with sleaze and questionable 'community organisations' such as those Lee Jasper is linked to.
2) By focussing on Ken and Lee Jasper's alleged sleaze, a major part of this election was fought on issues of immigration, race and community relations as a result. Those promoting this agenda are doing a great service to the BNP. Stick in a few timely documentaries about Enoch Powell and immigration from the BBC and hey presto 'race' and immigration is suddenly top of 'the political agenda' again.
3) This leaves the door ajar for Boris to promote 'common sense solutions', a clean broom to sweep away all this loony left nonsense, blah, blah, pass the port, talley ho. Full speed ahead with whatever agenda the NWO decide suits them.
4) Meanwhile get the BNP to promote accusations of electoral fraud (which may or may not be true, although scant evidence for ballot box tampering has yet been provided). In this way, the pantomime villians (ie the BNP) (i) maintain a higher profile than they otherwise warrant, (ii) associate in the public's mind, crazy conspiracy theories about ballot rigging and media censorship with groups from the far right (highly convenient).
Now how much of this agenda setting has been manufactured and how much is 'co-incidence' that just happens to play to the NWOs wider agenda is nigh impossible to tell. But that is the beauty of the system the elite have created.
If your agenda is to provoke fear and mistrust and get or keep immigration, 'community tensions', 'multi-culturalism', race and terror at the top of the political agenda to provoke a longer term goal of 'a clash of civilisations'/end times scenarios, there are just so many ways (often quite subtle ways) that those in the media, politics, etc can intervene to promote this agenda in ways that the players involved may not even be aware of.
And I agree with Karlos, it is quite possible to discuss the following without needing to use racist labels as a way of describing where the BNP and their sympathisers are coming from.
I totally agree Ian. Throw a few spanners into the working of Brown's government like an outbreak of Foot & Mouth, a banking collapse and huge increases in oil prices plus manufactured food shortages, and everyone blames New Labour and turns to the "others" who just happen to be EXACTLY the same. _________________ "The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
· Having lost the Olympics to London, and put up with years of Anglo-Saxon pontificating on the virtues of multiculturalism, you will have to forgive the French if they feel a little smug this week, what with Boris and the BNP in City Hall. But there's another reason for their mirth. Boris Johnson is not a buffoon, c'est un bouffon. He's as French as Nicolas Sarkozy, far Frencher than Carla Bruni; Frencher even than Cecilia. "Je suis le candidat de la [sic] changement," he declared to a select meeting of his compatriots in Kensington last week, "et ma grandmère est française". So to Boris the American, Boris the Belgium, Boris the Turk, Boris the father of "quarter-Indian children", and Boris the descendant of a Circassian slave girl, we can now add Boris the Frog. As the guy keeps saying: "You can't out-ethnic me."
The circus once more has definitely come to ...town.
I totally agree Ian. Throw a few spanners into the working of Brown's government like an outbreak of Foot & Mouth, a banking collapse and huge increases in oil prices plus manufactured food shortages, and everyone blames New Labour and turns to the "others" who just happen to be EXACTLY the same.
But youre saying that Gordon Brown selling off all our gold to the Rothschilds at a discount was not 100% his own crooked doing?
Foot & Mouth which was traced back to a Lab and which was part of Labour's plan to concrete over the countryside and build new housing estates for people like Labour party donors.
Michael Meecher has 20 houses. Every single Labour MP has been weighing in on the buy to lets even the top man Tony Blair.
These oil price hikes you are suggesting have nothing to do with Labour's never ending wars and the threat of more invasions to come.
Really it is time to call a spade a spade. Gordon Brwn is a complete NWO tool and an incompetant one at that.
You cannot constantly blame the opposition.
That is another old Labour trick
"we might be rubbish but you dont want to let the tories in do you"
Do you know how many times i have heard words to this effect?
ps:
On a different note.
I think Boris is less of a NWO puppet than the others.
dont forget his Grandfather was an MP in Turkey when it was still ruled by the Sultan and the family left Turkey when it became a Zionist controlled secular republic.
He has studied aincient Greek politics and is likely to be anti EU _________________
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
There are some interesting comments on that blog about the importance of democracy versus giving BNP publicity. Here's some more!