Paul Stott and Class War

[PaulStott]

[TonyGosling]

[Larry O'Hara]

So, Gosling posts on Indymedia, pretending to be Class War (the words 'By Class War' give a clue).

He denies it, and when Paul cites chapter and verse (above), removes the post from the original thread on Prince William, so it looks like I made an unsubstantiated allegation.

For good measure, adds a hilarious 'advisory' to my avatar that nothing I say is to be trusted--coming from him, an accolade indeed. Now been changed to 'may post in critics corner' only.

Not content with lying, palpably so, Gosling then throws around psychiatric terminology like 'schizophrenic'.

For good measure, he even adds a fictitious title to this thread--calling it Paul Stott & Class War, whereas the real title (if you want to have one) should be 'Gosling caught out lying about Class War'

And this is the person who claims he should be put in permanent charge of this 'discussion' forum!

All I would say is this: putting Gosling in permanent charge here is as eloquent a confirmation of the intellectually threadbare, evidence-free, cult-like nature of the 9/11 Denial Movement: so, go ahead and do it!! Giving Gosling supreme power shows exactly what type of a 'movement' you really are--reactionary, venomous, dictatorial, petty, spiteful and (thankfully) doomed to failure. Which will leave space for those of us genuinely committed to investigative research & holding the secret state/ruling class to account.

I have a career path suggestion for Mr Gosling--why not submit a resume of your actions as Web-Censor on this thread to the Chinese Embassy, and offer your services as host of a Beijing-controlled 'Tibetan Truth Forum', devoted to discussing how the Mossad-controlled Dalai Lama is head of an evil religious sect which even uses human skulls as ornaments, and is devoted to disrupting the wonderful democracy that is China today? They#ll love it! And take particular care to emphasise just how little you know (or care) about anything resembling historical evidence.

[chrisc]

[PaulStott]

That's a later one - the original was posted at 7.25pm on 14/1/02 and contained the words "by Class War".

On this one Gosling has simply removed the word "by", although it still demonstrates he was masquerading as a member of a group he has never been involved in, and was willing to smear that group by uncritically repeating whatever David Shayler's line was on that particular day.

[Alex_V]

I must say that this comes across as a load of trumped-up nonsense - a conspiracy theory, if you like. I don't see what the relevance is to... well... anything!

[chrisc]

[chrisc]

[TonyGosling]

It's clearly by me and not by Class War.

[PaulStott]

[TonyGosling]

I think you might have missed the point of the article Paul. And the fact that it is very clearly by me.

I can't honestly deny posting it on Indymedia because it's five years ago now and it's the first time anyone's asked me about it but I have always put my own name, never a pseudonym, on things I've posted on Indymedia.
But I don't expect you to believe me, you've already made your mind up.

If you've got the conviction to publish something you should also have the convictions to put your name to it. I hope you agree.