| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Newspeak International
Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 1158
Location: South Essex
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:48 pm Post subject: Hurricane Erin, September 11, 2001 |
 |
|
Intriging possibilities worthy of further study:
| Quote: |
Introduction,
by Andrew Johnson
In this pictorial study, information pertaining to the possible links between events on 9/11 and the occurrence in the Atlantic ocean of a Hurricane – Hurricane Erin – will be presented.
1. Development of Erin
Hurricane Erin was “born” on about the 1st of September 2001, and travelled up towards NYC. Hurricane Erin was the closest to NYC on 9/11/01 and was the largest on this date (although wind speeds were greater the day before). At the top of each page, the photo of Erin has an inset, where the plume of material from the destroyed WTC can be clearly seen.
The crew of the International Space Station (ISS) can see "terrorist Carnage" in NYC on 9/11/01, they did not report seeing a hurricane that was just out of there camera shot (this video was shown on CNN).
Hurricane Erin, September 11, 2001
2, Comparison of Hurricane Data
The development of the Erin is considered, and a comparison made to Hurricane Katrina, for the reason that Katrina and Erin were of comparable size (Erin was bigger, by most measures), yet we heard almost nothing of the risk Erin posed near 9/11 compared to what we heard about Katrina. Erin was also the subject of an extended study mission which united researchers from 10 universities, five NASA centers and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration”.
3. Levitation, Material Effects and Storm Effects
A short comparison is drawn between some of the effects seen with the materials in collision in Tornados and hurricanes with the anomalous changes in materials seen with Hutchison Effect.
4. Storms and Tesla Coils
The development of “supercell” storms is examined and a comparison of their structure to that of a Tesla Coil is considered. It is therefore suggested that the electrical properties of large storm systems may have some similarities to Tesla coils and there is a possibility that technology exists to utilise or manipulate the energy in these storm systems for “secondary” purposes.
5. Magnetometer Data
One of the most striking elements of the data presented is that from a set of magnetometers monitored by the University of Alaska. Several instruments show significant deviations from “background” or “normal” readings as the events of 9/11 were unfolding. Further selections of this data is presented in relation to variations during the hurricane seasons of 2001, 2004 and 2005.
6. Plume Study
An adjunct of the study is that of the development of and changes in the plume of material seen rising from the WTC complex following their destruction. Its “thinning” is noted, and a comparison made to other significant smoke plumes observed from space. The comparison indicates that the plume did not behave like particulate smoke from a chemical or wood fire. The relationship of the changes in the plume to dust particle sizes is briefly considered.
7. Earthquake Links?
A later part of the study examines some of the data relating to patterns of earthquakes and unusual weather patterns, which may be related to secret or partially disclosed environmental modification technology (such as HAARP), though no direct link to the events on 9/11 is established.
8. Beaming Power, Magnetic Reconnection, Rocks, Planet Earth
The possible role of the compound Barium Titanate, is noted both in reference to the possible residue from persistent jet trails (usually called ãchemtrailsä) and those used in some experiments by John Hutchison and Thomas Townsend Brown. Could there be some role for this compound in the manipulation of field effects? (It is noted here that the X-ray opacity of the Barium compound taken by patients before tests may also be significant in this area of study.)
|
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/glassasylum2
Dave Sherlock's:
http://www.myspace.com/GlassAsylum
http://www.myspace.com/chemtrailsuk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Newspeak International
Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 1158
Location: South Essex
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Spamming your own website with tons of irrelevant material may be Dr Wood's idea of scientific research, but it is not mine. Lots of graphs and pictures can never substitute for hard evidence and persuasive analysis. Lots of dots do not make a line even when they are squeezed close together. In Wood's case, the remaining gaps in her arguments are still canyons. Put simply, there is no intellectual coherence to her new addition to her website. No wonder Jim Fetzer went cool on her work.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International
Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 1158
Location: South Essex
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Time has simply stood still in the upper echelons of weapons developement since the "dirty" nuclear age.
|
no it has'nt. i take it your comment was sarcasm?
i still cannot believe there are people who think the exsistence of something somehow proves it must of been used simply because it exsists.
don't tell me beam weapons were used because theres a video showing a demonstration on youtube in iraq? and thats all thats needed to prove it? they exsist therefore..........
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Newspeak International wrote: | No problem Micpsi.
Time has simply stood still in the upper echelons of weapons developement since the "dirty" nuclear age. |
And some people's concept of scientific research seems to have stood still since their college days.....
What's that picture supposed to prove? Doing exactly the same thing as Wood does by posting material without showing any relevance of it to the primary issue of the modus operandi of destruction of the twin towers is hardly an adequate reply to my criticism of Wood's new work. Most people with common sense would say that it is pure coincidence that Erin got closest to New York on 9/11, as the picture indicates. You have not provided any argument or evidence that it was not.
But I guess it's par for the course for Wood and her acolytes. Pile up lots of dots and eventually you get some dupe to think that he sees a line. And you can't understand why people do not take Wood's work seriously? 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
