Pikey
Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:57 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Article on www.cognoscence.org from Andrew Johnson:-
| Quote: | What will happen as more people learn the truth of 911
Where Will We End Up?
There are now many hundreds - thousands even - of articles published that discuss the many aspects of 9-11 Truth and the history behind it.
It takes a while to get a feel for what the evidence really shows and it then takes a bit longer to divorce yourself from the old reality - the one where international terrorism is the only real threat to our freedom.
Once you have moved on from this paradigm, however, and realised the basic truths i.e. that WTC buildings 1,2 & 7 did not collapse as a result of fire and jet impacts alone, it is necessary to consider the wider implications of this.
In the early stages of truth acceptance, one seems to be given to ask "Hang on - this is so obviously true, and I'm generally an average sort of person - how on Earth can those who are supposed to have dealt with this issue, have missed a truth as obvious as this one?" This is one of the really key questions - and trying to answer it will, in my opinion, cause a subconscious reaction in some people resulting in a blind rejection of the evidence and truth with which the rest of us have now become familiar. This is one of the central areas of what Jimmy Walter described as the "rude awakening". It is the point where some people seem to reach out and press the "Snooze" button. Which implies that, after "5 minutes", the alarm is going to go off again and you are going to have to wake up, get up and "face the day's work". It is interesting to me that in discussing the issue with people I know, the 3 people who have reacted most strongly had all progressed the most through “the academic system”. They were not able to directly engage with the facts and evidence and were not able to offer any solid arguments as to where the facts, or the interpretation of them, were wrong.
Quite quickly, the realisation seems to be that all our institutions have failed us - Government, Media, the Academic Community, the Legal System, the Police, the Military, the Church, Banks and Big Business. They have all failed to flag the problems with the official story in a significant enough way - they have had almost 4 years to do it, and none of them have. There seem to be 2 reasons for this. Firstly, it shows our views and opinions are influenced so much by what is reported and the way that it is reported in the media (i.e. that all people who work in the above organisations primarily get their information from the media). Secondly, some group of people (let’s call them "The Control Group") must be manipulating events at an international level to be able to execute something like 9-11. It is my view that because none (or a number very close to zero) of the institutions have flagged up and presented any of this truth, they have either been manipulated by the Control Group, or they are simply rotten at the core (but not necessarily rotten to the core) and this has served to prevent the truth from coming out.
So, this notion that there is a Control Group seems to become clear – if there was not some group which was at least controlling the Media, the Police, Big Business, Government and the Military, then more of the serious problems with the official story would have come to light more quickly. Of course, we have had some coverage of certain problems with the Official Story, such as Greg Palast’s reports on BBC Newsnight and in “The Guardian” (also see http://www.gregpalast.com/) and Channel 4’s “The 9-11 Conspiracies”, but it seems to me that the problem is that these reports have not been given prime-time or front page coverage.
Once I accepted the possibility of there being a real Control Group, I began to look for further evidence of its existence. One of the things that really struck me was that we were warned about its activities in 1961, by a certain Dwight Eisenhower, when he left the office of the presidency.
“In the counsels of Government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the Military Industrial Complex.”
Hearing this speech today may send shivers up the spine of anyone engaged in 9-11 research and possibly lead them to a conclusion (like mine), that the Control Group has a very great deal of power and influence in areas where we might not have realised.
It seems to me that the Control Group have been going around and creating trouble for a fair number of years. Recent revelations, for example, that no attack actually took place in the Gulf of Tonkin (the event which precipitated the Vietnam War) are good evidence that this view is basically correct. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Resolution) The lengths to which this control group will go are extreme. For example, it seems they may even be able to create fundamentalist movements as a means of giving a face to terrorism that people can easily identify with through news broadcasts. Yes, this is done by a “spin” in the media, but it is also done “on the ground” with real people.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5339-2002Mar22 (You may need to register to view this story, or see a copy here: http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/USjihadABCs.html )
The Control Group want us to be angry (and confused as much as possible) - it allows them to keep their power over us. They prefer to see us in chaos - and in situations where our intellectual capacities are arrested or diminished. Many people rant and rave at Bush and Blair, but to me it is likely that they are, or will be, the Power Patsies – who themselves are controlled through the various “Skeletons in the Cupboard” that they may have, or be threatened with having. Bush and Blair may end up getting booted out of office, and possibly accused of War Crimes of one kind or another. However, what will happen before then? A legal case must be built against them, evidence collected. How would this activity be funded? Which courts would try them? How would they get a fair trial? Even if they were "locked up", how much will that help us deal with the 9-11 Truth issue in general?
We now have people like Michael Howard, Leader of the Opposition in the UK, calling for a "limited enquiry" into the London Bombings (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4673083.stm). Doesn't this show that the issue is unlikely to be properly addressed by any of the main political parties? It seems to me that the opposition (all but invisible in the UK in the last 5 years or so) is also under the influence of the Control Group.
It seems that no one in authority will truly engage with this issue yet - there is too much vested interest at stake. One of the things I feel quite strongly is that we need to engage each person in an individual capacity, rather than an "institutional" capacity. I have a feeling that, as the ripples of 9-11 Truth get bigger, few if any of our institutions will survive (in anything like their current form). The whole political system is at a point now where it is not functioning as it is meant to – political correctness and spin have stifled most of the freedom of expression. People seem to trust the system less and less and when there is such a lack of willingness to properly engage with facts and evidence (see here http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/9-11Letters.htm) the system no longer serves ordinary people – as it should – it serves those with power and vested interests.
The paradox for me is that this is the worst, most horrible truth to deal with and yet if we are angry and scream about it, we will end up being shunned and put in a corner. So I think we have to stay calm and just debate the evidence and what it means and what it proves and trust in a higher force that people really will wake up in time to stop civil war, or something approaching that, from happening.
There was another hearing in New York on Sept 9th 2004 (similar to Jimmy Walter's event). At this hearing, Dr Kahn, a New York MD, also spoke about how the opinion of, for example, Peace Activists has been intellectually arrested.
http://checktheevidence.com/audio/911/Dr%20Kahn%20at%20911%20Truth%20H earings%20NYC%209-Sep%202004.mp3
I therefore think that, whilst we have to try and educate people, or point them in the direction of information, so that they can educate themselves, we also have to think about our final destination and what the journey may be like.
The Control Group will want to keep things going “their way” and I think we might see more and more attempts to subvert the 9-11 truth movement in surprising and novel ways. This is their chosen agenda – and we have chosen ours.
It is also my considered view that the Control Group have kept a very great deal of other information secret from us and I have found my intuition to be a useful tool in uncovering this information. Some of the information could be of huge benefit to us and if we can reveal this information in time, and in the correct way, we could end up living in a world which is utterly and completely transformed in ways few would care to imagine. We are, I think, in for a wild ride – so it’s time for me to “belt-up”. |
_________________
Pikey
Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
