Hitting A Karate Champion With A Block Of Wood

[gordboy]

I thought I would give it a go. I've always thought that the No Planes hypothesis was unnecessary and outlandish. So I have spent the last few hours sifting through a barrage of video evidence.

I never thought I would say this, but I am beginning to think that No Planes isn't quite as fanciful as I first thought. It is cheaper and has less attached risks. And some of the live footage seems to have been "improved" for subsequent replay.

However, I feel I really should make a very important point about some of the pseudo-science being peddled as evidence. Many people have said to me that it is impossible for aluminium to cut through reinforced steel. There are several problems with this naive view.

Firstly, the aluminium used in airplanes is *stronger* in the tensile sense than steel is.

And secondly, let me ask a little question here :

How is it possible that you can drive a wooden stake into the heart of a vampire AND be able to cut through a solid slab of wood with a well-placed karate or tai-kwondoe strike ?

Surely the objects are symmetrical ? Surely it is the same thing hitting a black belt with a block of wood as it is him hitting a block of wood ? Or maybe there is a tendency for people to believe what they want to believe.

I'll tell you what I find distasteful, people who have not the *slightest* understanding of inertia, lecturing me on elementary physics. As I said before, I am now more than open to the No Planes hypothesis, but I am absolutely *not* going to be lectured at by people whose intellect and scientific knowledge leave a lot to be desired.

[gareth]

[gordboy]

Thanks Gareth.

I gladly accept your kind links, in the spirit of objectivity, balance and the desire to move the argument forward, that they were undoubtedly given in

[blackbear]

Hello Gareth

In order to question.....no planes..

You link to.....http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/09/no-planes-theory-r ip.html....No Planes Theory: R.I.P.

Here are some of the earwitness accounts:

From the first dozen.......the majority didn't see any planes.

Strange....

+ who is ..coloneljennysparkes.....

[gareth]

[Stealth_0073]

[Snowygrouch]

NPT is carefully constructed Disinfomation;

Just for anyones interest, the damage imparted on one object by another is really cheifly goverened by ENERGY not mechanical tensile strength.

Hence why you can break a window or dent a car with an orange.

Its utter rubbish from start to end. No if`s buts or maybees.
Thats not a snap judgement either, I promise you.

C.

[Stealth_0073]

[Snowygrouch]

Been there, done it mate,

How about YOU look closely at the impacts; you can actually measure the decelleration as the fuselage hits....

If you are a video editor you should know all about the compression algorithms that are used to compress high quality video into the pixellated excuse for images that NPT love to talk about.

Digital video is just pixels compressed with computer algorithms into bigger pixels that look at the colour of the pixels around them and make adjustments to reduce an image of about 3million pixels to about 100,000 (which is about what you`ll get on google-video).

You loose quite a bit in those 2,900,000 missing pixels!

If you really choose to believe that over plane parts, decellerating impacts, seismic data, eyewitness data, (much higher quality still images)
and the rest then I question your motives/and or sanity.

I`m off because I`ve been bored to death having this exact conversation about 997 times. I dont need to see what the outcome of the 998th one will be to see a pattern either.

Cheerio

C.

PS Professional video editor my arse.....

[Stealth_0073]

i seen the impacts there fake as hell even the explosion don't match with the plane impacts.


i use no compression i take from dvd over 5000 bitrates & recorded ts wich is mpeg2 from cable over
3500 bitrates, usa archives are also mpeg2!! you aint going get any higher you dummy unless you get the
uncompressed avi video footage which = 1 hour = 12gb you moron

do you not ever wonder why they can bring out the oldest movies on hd and bluray? thats because they were filmed
at a higher resolution that your tv could display.

thats why you still see movies getting displayed on new formats lol its a market spinner.

[TonyGosling]

[Snowygrouch]

Thats funny,
I`ve met the producers of ZERO and talked to them at GREAT length about getting footage of the planes hitting.

According to them they could not get ANY broadcast grade footage of the event from the major media companies, and yes they did try.

So I`d be VERY interested to know how you managed to get broadcast quality footage of impacts.

Care to upload it?

C.

I wouldnt know about TV, dont watch it and use a very hires monitor which is better than HD anyway...."dummy".

[chek]

I wouldn't worry SG, it's just another tw*t like Arse Baker who doesn't know that any electronic video format is compressed by definition.

Now if he had optical film we'd be talkin'...

[gareth]

[TonyGosling]

No, I'm intrigued as to why you should take such an anonymous hate peddlar seriously.

[Stealth_0073]

[Stealth_0073]

[Stealth_0073]

[chek]

[Stealth_0073]

480 x 480 @ 3000 bitrate ntsc for the usa archives

dvds are 720x576 5000 > 8000 bitrate

digital tv which i recorded alot of the 911 documentaries
is 720x 576 upto 5000 bitrate depending on tv channel.

a 60 min 12gb uncompressed avi video file from my camera recorder
will compress to 1gb mpeg2 keeping the excat same aspect ratio,
as you no divx & xvid is poorer quality and lower bitrates

bring on the hd stuff