Tokyo Journal : The unanswered questions of 9-11

[TRUTH]

http://www.tokyo.to/255/911Conspiracy/

The truth is getting out!

[Dog]

Great post TRUTH

I'd just finished posting this http://www.thethe.com/forum/showthread.php?p=552#post552 when I came accross your post...I could have saved myself the bother and sent that.....b* it, I'll send it too.....

The word sure does seem to be getting out, huh?

Thanks

[Jim]

With reference to the top-down vs. bottom up controlled demolition statement made by the good Dr. on thethe.com forum:

Just found this link for US patent for remote controlled (radio) detonators:

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4884506.html

Don't know if that information is valid but it does suggest the possibility of controlled demolition using radio transmitters and encoded signals.

Given that WTC 7 was an obvious (admitted) controlled demolition and that explosions were heard (that can be felt/seen and heard in the 911 Eyewitness footage, and possibly other media sources) around WTCs 1 & 2, that the free fall theory weighs in heavier than the pancake theory and given the technology is available then it is all too easy to conclude that WTCs 1 & 2 were also taken down in a controlled demolition.

The only downside to top-down demolition that I see (with very limited knowledge of the physics of building demolition) is that the debris and dust footprint for top-down demolition would be wider and less controlled - which is exactly what we observe with the WTC collapses.

In summary, it seems plausible to demolish a building top-down or bottom-up and the technology to do this without "wiring" a building is available, so the argument that the CD theory is invalid because the buildings collapsed from top to bottom rather than bottom to top is very weak. The argument only highlights the unusual way in which the buildings collapsed which can be explained if the buildings needed to be brought down in a way that backs up the argument that it collapsed top-down as a result of the impacts and fire damage. The pancake theory is far more full of inconsistencies (theoretical and observed) than the CD theory will ever be.