Seven years and the media still lies about 9/11. Disgraceful, isn’t it? A million leaflets, dozens of films, but continued silence. Why is this happening? Why hasn’t the truth movement’s work broken through the media’s lies? The answer relates to the material the “truth movement” promotes.
Vladimir Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." A look through the “Global Analysis - International Intelligence” archives reveal many comparisons between Lenin and Bush.
Those in control of the world have top-secret exotic technologies. These technologies could replace oil and gas, but instead have been weaponized. 9/11 was orchestrated with these technologies. They plan a police state culture and don’t mind if a limited number of people are exposed to the 9/11 propaganda, as long as the advanced technologies remain secret. See “The 9/11 Truth Movement, Free Energy Suppression and the Global Elite’s Agenda” for full information.
Who controls the horizontal? Who controls the vertical? We know the corporate media to be our culture’s main source of news. Unfortunately though, our trustworthy media is completely controlled. Observe the graph below (sourced here) and note all this happened in just 20 years time. This chart details the corporations involved.
Did you know the Washington Post owns Newsweek? Or that the New York Times owns the Boston Globe? Believe it or not, getting the news “changed” to suit one’s preference isn’t that difficult. As this Saudi Prince and Rupert Murdoch know, all it requires is shares of a news agency and the owner’s phone number!
Not only do the media censor information, they’re a propaganda-promotion tool:
This March 2000 WorldNetDaily article gives some info on this. Note this quote: “…"psyops" (psychological operations) personnel, soldiers and officers, have worked in the CNN headquarters in Atlanta.” Why on earth would “PSYOPS soldiers” work at CNN? What possible purpose could they serve?
This April 2006 Washington Post article concerning the Iraq war reveals something too: “The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign.” Courtesy of the CNN PSYOPS Soldiers??
This June 2008 Washington Times article details Congress’ attempt to “ban Pentagon propaganda on the Iraq war”. What kind of system is this if Congress needs to create a bill to ban propaganda?
The perpetrators who orchestrated 9/11 are using these media-propaganda techniques to control the opposition.
The “truth movement” is the opposition.
Let’s start by sorting through some of the planted propaganda. Then we’ll examine the smoking gun evidence of exotic weapons, including a timeline of 9/11 events relevant to the technologies used. Following the timeline are some personal statements about a couple of individuals in the “truth movement”. In the final section, we’ll examine two non-9/11 “conspiracy theories”. These should help open up the mind to exotic weaponry should the reader still consider it science fiction. (Warning: The last section contains potentially upsetting material, and will permanently alter the average person’s perception of reality.)
* Lenin-inspired Propaganda *
Let’s look at four examples of this propaganda and how the media promote it. The reader will note that “prominent figures” within the “truth movement” who support the propaganda have affiliations with exotic weaponry and the Global Elite. See the “Global Elite Agenda” article (linked above) for a list of people who lost their lives as part of the cover-up.
** WTC 7 “Pulled” ** - Larry Silverstein, owner of WTC 7, referred to this building in a PBS documentary titled “America Rebuilds”, and said: “I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.”
The “truth movement” continues to waste time debating Official Government Conspiracy Theory (OGCT) believers as to what Silverstein meant: “Pull the building” or “Pull the firefighters” or “Pull the firefighting effort”.
Did anyone wonder why Silverstein made this statement? Why did PBS broadcast it?
Are we to believe that both Silverstein and PBS made this mistake?
Larry Silverstein is a member of the Global Elite. He owns Silverstein Properties and has given millions of dollars to Israeli causes. Promoting his “pull it” statement has labeled the “truth movement” anti-Semitic by many, which is exactly what the 9/11 perpetrators want. WTC 7 is the single most important propaganda that the perps want the “truth movement” to promote. Why else would they gauge its popularity in the May 2006 Zogby Poll? Christopher Story, editor of International Currency Review, explains the purpose of opinion polls: To Guide The Strategists And Manipulate Opinion. Just like the Twin Towers, WTC 7 was destroyed with directed energy weapons. See this paper by former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dr Judy Wood for information.
Message boards around the internet show many discussions of the recently published WTC 7 report by NIST. Regardless of how ridiculous the report is, why would NIST suddenly release it now? Certainly there must be a reason for its sudden release in August of 2008. According to leaked government documents as revealed here and here, the US dollar is expected to collapse in September 2008, with the US Federal Government’s finances collapsing by February 2009. Could the WTC 7 report convince people that the inside job “conspiracy theory” is solved and that Bush is the good guy? This is a distinct possibility.
We see here that the media covered the WTC 7 report. Notice that the article promotes the Lenin-inspired opposition of Richard Gage, Steven Jones, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), and molten metal.
The Silverstein/PBS piece was carefully crafted propaganda to steer the “truth movement” away from exotic weaponry. WTC 7 was purposely destroyed, but it’s a red herring.
** Molten Metal ** - AE911Truth, (a group that came out of nowhere after Dr Wood filed her Request for Correction with NIST regarding exotic weapons), claims [url=http://www.google.com/search?&q=“Tons+of+molten+metal+found”] “Tons of molten metal found”[/url]. Steven Jones, notorious for destroying free-energy Cold Fusion research in the 80s, claims [url=http://www.google.com/search?&q=“molten+metal+flowing+and+in+po ols”]“molten metal flowing and in pools” [/url].
One of the witnesses claiming (PDF) molten metal existed was Leslie Robertson, the structural engineer who designed the WTC: “As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.”
Are we to believe this guy? Leslie Robertson is a member of the Global Elite who has received millions of our tax dollars. If molten metal existed, why would he admit it?
As a theologian, Griffin certainly didn’t discover the molten metal “evidence” himself. For this we must bring in Steven Jones.
Jones, a former physics professor at Brigham Young University, is a Mormon whose paper “Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America” reveals his fascination with Maya/2012. Jones’ 9/11 paper “Why Indeed Did the WTC Completely Collapse” emphasizes two main propaganda points: molten metal and WTC 7. Jones uses the term “collapse” as a form of conditioning to divert people’s attention from the fact that the majority of the towers turned to dust, including 500 miles of structural steel.
Jones promoted his molten metal and explosives on MSNBC as a “hypothesis to be tested”.
Jones did research at Los Alamos where exotic weapons are designed and is no newcomer to deception. In the 80s he was directly involved in the discrediting of free energy research and had called it “crazy, impossible”. This was not the only time Jones used “crazy, impossible” to ridicule something. As revealed in the previous link, he applied this technique again at a 9/11 “Arizona Truth” conference in February 2007 to discredit the directed energy weapon evidence.
A careful check of the evidence, such as the lack of enormous steam explosions from rain and fire hose water, shows there was no molten metal:
WTC Molten Metal: Fact or Fiction?
The molten metal and “high heat” claims were carefully crafted propaganda to steer the “truth movement” away from exotic weaponry. There may have been bits of short lived molten metal on the ends of cut beams, but it’s a red herring.
** Explosives / “Bombs in the Buildings” ** - In August 2005, the New York Times published the First Responders’ World Trade Center Task Force Interviews on its website. These testimonies were immediately scoured by the “truth movement” and much evidence for explosives was discovered. But why would the Times help the “truth movement” by publishing evidence for explosives? A later interview of one of the First Responders (conducted by a 9/11 Researcher) revealed evidence of exotic weaponry that was redacted from the Times publication (PDF). Take a look at the 20+ blacked-out lines! Other testimonies were redacted as well.
Exotic weaponry does a much better job addressing the evidence than explosives. As just one example, explosives does not explain tons of steel turning to dust. Note to newcomers: the “truth movement” has been conditioned by Jones and others into thinking the steel is “collapsing”. Most newcomers can see the obvious: it turned to dust. Here’s another video.
Griffin is a strong promoter of explosive-demolitions as well.
Bill Clinton and George W Bush, members of the Global Elite, publicly blamed Al Qaeda for explosives in the towers:
• On September 15, 2006, Bush said: “Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping”.
• On March 8, 2008, Clinton said: “America may not be perfect, but we don't blow up our own buildings-- al Qaeda does that”.
The explosives and “bombs in the buildings” claims were carefully crafted propaganda to steer the “truth movement” away from exotic weaponry. There may have been explosions, but it’s a red herring.
** War Games / NORAD Standing Down ** - This Associated Press article helped promote the “war games” propaganda. Here’s a quote: “In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings.”
Former Director of the Star Wars Program, Bob Bowman, is one of the “prominent figures” in the “truth movement”. As we see here, he promotes the NORAD red herring. Why hasn’t Bowman spoken up about the evidence for directed energy weapons?
Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta also helped spread NORAD “stand down” propaganda. In testimony to the 9/11 Commission and broadcast on C-SPAN, Mineta described what the “truth movement” interpreted as a stand down order issued by Cheney regarding the Pentagon.
Mineta’s quote: “There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"”
Just how long would it take this “young man” to check the radar screen, run in and out of different rooms, and talk to Cheney, all multiple times? Why hasn’t David Ray Griffin ever mentioned this?
There were no plane crashes at any 9/11 site. [url=http://www.google.com/search?q=“Here+we're+talking+about+plasti c+knives”+site:.mil]Rumsfeld himself admitted[/url] a missile hit the Pentagon and “similar” hit the WTC. Here’s his quote: "Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center."
The war games and NORAD claims were carefully crafted propaganda to steer the “truth movement” away from exotic weaponry. There may have been war games on 9/11, but it’s a red herring.
Once the Lenin-inspired 9/11 propaganda is separated from the real evidence, we see the truth. The truth is in exotic technologies and is quite easy to understand. Keep in mind that top-secret technologies are always light-years ahead of what’s publicly admitted. (Don’t fall for this new propaganda, designed to mislead people regarding the “magnetic forces” explained below.)
** Alaskan Magnetometer Data ** - Alaskan magnetometers went BONKERS with every 9/11 “event”. This includes the plane-shaped holes appearing in the towers! See this careful examination of the data by Dr Wood.
Smoking Gun: Why would a plane crash cause a magnetic shift 4000+ miles away??
This is an indication of HAARP, also located in Alaska, and known for its weather modification. Solid, hardcore proof of 9/11 is simpler than we think!
Okay, the plane-shaped holes were made with directed energy weapons. Then what, if not planes, did New Yorkers see?
** Holograms/Projections ** - This 1999 Washington Post article reveals the military’s psychological operation hologram project.
[I downloaded this graphic from a governmental website detailing the Holographic Projector mentioned in the Washington Post link. The government has since removed the article.]
Smoking Gun: There are no witness reports of hearing damage. No witnesses reported the deafening sound of wide-body commercial airliners at full throttle hitting the Twin Towers. From this analysis of WTC Task Force Interviews we learn that the sounds reported by First Responders were inconsistent with what one would expect.
CommercialairlinersareLOUD!
• Stephen Gregory, Assistant Commissioner, Bureau of Communications
Q. Where were you when the second plane hit?
A. We were down at the command post between Liberty and Albany on the west side of West Street. …
Q. Did you see or hear the second plane before it hit the World Trade Center?
A. I never actually saw the plane, but l heard it. You could hear it coming in and then we heard the explosion and you could hear the roar of the plane coming in. At first I didn't realize it was a plane. I thought it was like the roar of fire, like something had just incinerated, like a gas tank or an oil tank. It sounded like a tremendous roar and then you heard boom and then there was a big fire, a lot of fire, a big fireball. I never actually saw a plane hit the building. I never saw that. I saw it on television, but I never saw it while I was standing there.
• Gary Smiley, FDNY paramedic, was carrying an injured woman across Church Street who kept yelling "plane" and Smiley recalled, "I looked up at that point, and that's when the second plane hit the South Tower. The explosion was unbelievable. It was right over my head. You didn't hear anything. People ask me sometimes, 'What did you hear?' I heard nothing."
• Steven Bienkowski, NYPD Harbor Unit Scuba Team:"I happened to be sitting in the back left side of the (helicopter) ship. … We were on the southwest side of the South Tower, and I glanced over my shoulder and there came a United Airlines aircraft right at us, a little bit underneath where we were. And I do mean a little bit underneath us. It probably missed us by about three hundred feet, and it proceeded to fly right through the building, right in front of us. …. I don't remember hearing an explosion, although it must have been extremely loud. … When that second plane went into the building, it just looked like an evil magician's trick. It looked nothing like what I would have imagined a plane crashing into a building would look like. The plane just completely disappeared and turned into a giant fireball. Being there was surreal."
Okay, New Yorkers saw holograms. But what about the live footage shown on TV?
** Computer Generated Images (CGI) / Animations ** - We know the media broadcasted cartoons because the “airplane strike” videos violate Newton’s Laws of Motion. Retired aerospace engineer Joseph Keith says it best:"The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!" Not one scientist, not even Steven Jones, has explained this violation of Physical Laws.
We know the military and TV Networks have this technology and use it to alter world politics as that was reported in the July/August 2000 edition of Technology Review Magazine. “Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths” linked in the previous section contains full analysis.
Smoking Gun: These cartoons violate physical laws. They directly implicate the media for scaring America into invading Afghanistan and Iraq.
Okay, there were no plane crashes at any of the 9/11 “crash sites”. Exotic technologies were used instead. Were exotic technologies also used to destroy the towers?
** Directed Energy Weapons ** The visual evidence is quite clear and shows effects that could easily be explained by directed energy weapons. The graphic below reveals just a few key points. See “The Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)” by Drs Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds for tons more evidence.
The US Government’s goal is "full spectrum dominance" of air, land, sea, and space as [url=http://www.google.com/search?&q=“full+spectrum+dominance”+air +land+sea+space+site%3A.mil]these military documents[/url] explain. The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the 9/11 NIST Report, obviously to cover-up the evidence of directed energy weapons. (This is detailed in the “9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline”.)
The US Government even has a Directed Energy Directorate at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. Dr Wood has been in contact with one of their representatives and they did not deny that directed energy weapons were used on 9/11, but instead claim “phenomena that we cannot explain here”. The representative also finds “Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of further consideration”.
Smoking Gun: The above image.
Okay, the WTC was destroyed with directed energy weapons. But do weapons exist powerful enough to do the damage seen? Or, were other exotic technologies also used to eliminate the need for enormous power levels?
** Hurricane Erin ** - Not many know that a major hurricane - Hurricane Erin - was in the Atlantic Ocean in September of 2001. In fact, Erin was closest to NYC at its largest size on 9/11 itself. Interestingly, the National Hurricane Center projected Erin to be stronger than it projected Katrina to be four years later. Dr Wood performed an exhaustive analysis of Erin and discovered numerous similarities between hurricanes and “free energy” Tesla Coils.
Smoking Gun: Shouldn’t they have prepared the upper-east coast for this major storm?? How were they so sure this humongous hurricane would make a sharp right-hand turn away from New York and head back out to sea? Weather reports on Long Island indicated rain!
Erin was a controlled environment. It was steered toward New York before 9/11 and away from New York after 9/11.
Okay, Hurricane Erin was part of the mechanism used to turn the towers into dust. Is there evidence that hurricanes or its field effects could cause the damage seen?
• Storm data (upgrades, downgrades, pressure, wind speeds) taken from chart on this page.
• Magnetometer data taken from this page. (Each shift in the timeline is hotlinked to most relevant graphic.)
• Witness testimony source information available in Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths.
2001, September 8
EVENING EDT - Erin upgraded from Tropical Storm to Category 1 Hurricane with pressure/wind speed ratio of 987mb/75kt.
2001, September 9
MORNING EDT - Erin upgraded from Category 1 Hurricane to Category 2 Hurricane with pressure/wind speed ratio of 982mb/90kt, later changes to 979mb/95kt.
AFTERNOON EDT - Erin upgraded from Category 2 Hurricane to Category 3 Hurricane with pressure/wind speed ratio of 968mb/105kt, later (in evening) changes 969mb/105kt.
2001, September 10
MORNING EDT - Erin pressure/wind speed ratio changes to 969mb/100kt.
AFTERNOON EDT - Erin downgraded from Category 3 Hurricane to Category 2 Hurricane with pressure/wind speed ratio of 970mb/90kt.
EVENING EDT - Erin downgraded from Category 2 Hurricane to Category 1 Hurricane with pressure/wind speed ratio of 973mb/80kt.
2001, September 11
MORNING EDT - The eye slowly begins its right-hand turn away from NYC. Erin pressure/wind speed ratio changes to 976mb/80kt, where it remains until after 9/11.
08:20:00 AM EDT - Alaskan magnetometers begin shift.
08:45:00 AM EDT (approximate) - Murray Murad, Lieutenant Investigator, Bureau of Investigations and Trials is on the south side of the WTC Complex. He hears something hovering over the firehouse for two or three minutes, then hears a revving sound. (400MPH planes do not “hover”. Murad does not report the deafening sound of a wide-body commercial airliner.)
• Stephen Gregory, Assistant Commissioner, Bureau of Communications of FDNY is in the southwest area of the WTC Complex and hears the sound of a gas tank incinerating. (He does not see or hear a wide body commercial airliner.)
• Murray Murad, Lieutenant Investigator, Bureau of Investigations and Trials, sees a plane hit the South Tower. (He does not report the deafening sound of a wide-body commercial airliner at full throttle despite it being a few hundred feet above his head.)
• Gary Smiley, FDNY paramedic, is carrying an injured woman across Church Street who is repeatedly yelling "plane". Smiley looks up and sees a plane hit the South Tower right over his head. He does not hear anything. (In an interview he confirms to having heard “nothing”.)
• Steven Bienkowski, Harbor Unit Scuba Team of NYPD is in a helicopter on the southwest side of the South Tower. He sees a plane coming towards him 300 feet below, then sees it fly right through the building. He does not hear an explosion. (In an interview he says, “… it just looked like an evil magician's trick. It looked nothing like what I would have imagined a plane crashing into a building would look like.”)
09:30:00 AM EDT - 09:40:00 AM EDT - Pentagon Event - Alaskan magnetometers in middle of “wave”
09:45:00 AM EDT:
• Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta orders all civilian aircraft to land as soon as possible. (Mineta has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society. (See the DEW/TVF Suppression Timeline for full info.) Why would Mineta ground airplanes shortly before the South Tower was destroyed?)
• The Senior FAA Manager orders all aircraft to land.
10:03:00 AM EDT - 10:10:00 AM EDT - Shanksville, PA Event
10:28:31 AM EDT - WTC1 goes poof - 2.3 (Richter Scale) - Alaskan magnetometers detect major shift
10:31:00 AM EDT - Military flights resume. (Why were planes only grounded during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction? Perhaps for least interference with a directed energy weapon?)
05:20:33 PM EDT - WTC7 goes poof - 0.6 (Richter Scale) - Alaskan magnetometers begin level off
• •Also on 9/11…
• Van Romero, a controlled demolition expert from Mexico Tech, says"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse". "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
Note: Romero retracts his statement 10 days later, but the “truth movement” promote it as “expert opinion”. He then receives recognition, awards and grants. Romero has made presentations about directed energy weapons at the Directed Energy Professional Society. (See the DEW/TVF Suppression Timeline for full info.)
Was this really from “a relatively small amount of explosives”?
Towers turn to dust: Photo 1 - Photo 2 - Photo 3
Ace Baker, known for his FOX 5 no-plane analysis, is 100% convinced the Hutchison Effect is fake. This assumption has caused a major disruption in the search for truth and is a clear example of how one gets blindsided by predetermined conclusions.
Baker offered John Hutchison $100,000 if he could duplicate the Hutchison Effect in front of him. But Baker’s highly insulting emails virtually guarantee that this will never happen. Take a look at the following excerpts from an email list. Would you invite this person into your home?
Well, we have a little issue with regard to the Hutchison Effect. Hutchison is a video faker, pure and simple. There is no Hutchison Effect. I'm sorry. Hutchison makes silly upside-down videos.
He's been caught red-handed using strings on the toy UFO thing.
[Comment from CB: Hutchison’s “Toy UFO on a String” was not a levitation experiment. The string was a wire to conduct a current. Baker made an assumption without checking the facts.]
I was quite civil today on Dynamic Duo. The truth is John Hutchison is an unabashed fraud and charlatan. He is a disgrace.
"I hate Judy Wood. Judy Wood is a liar, a fraud, and a despicable human being. Judy Wood knows perfectly well that there is no Hutchison Effect. In my opinion, based on the evidence, Judy Wood is a conspirator to mass murder, participating intentionally in the disinformation campaign associated with the crimes of 9/11. Judy Wood is therefore deserving of my hatred, and the hatred of all good and honest people."
[Comment from CB: Jim Fetzer was on the recipient list of the above email and continued supporting Baker.]
If H-Effect is real, then demonstrate it to me. It ought to be easy. And very, very rewarding to you. Unless you're the filthy fraudulent liar that I think you are.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
Who would want the author of those emails in their home? No one. But John Hutchison’s determination to expose the truth of 9/11 overcomes Baker’s insulting behavior, and continues to invite him as long as Baker will pay and act in a civil manner.
Jim Fetzer continued to support Ace Baker on his Dynamic Duo radio show even after those emails. Why? Dr Judy Wood is the research scientist. Exactly what is Ace Baker?
It should also be noted that, live on Fetzer’s radio show, Ace stated that Andrew Johnson sent him “hate correspondence”. This is completely untrue. Ace is a major disruptor and troublemaker.
Censor Reprehensor…
Reprehensor, an administrator at 911Blogger.com, put out [url=http://www.google.com/search?&q=“On+Disinformation+and+Damaging +Associations”]this[/url] highly ridiculous article. He does not seem to comprehend the idea of “planted plane parts”, nor does he apply high school level Laws of Physics. Instead, he cites articles by “prominent figures” such as Greg Jenkins. Obviously reprehensor didn’t see this new video. Good news is that reprehensor must be receiving pressure into allowing discussions of no-planes and directed energy weapons for him to spent time writing that article! At present, reprehensor is nothing more than a propagandist tool of the 9/11 criminals. Several individuals are even banned from posting on 911Blogger including James Fetzer (founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth), Kevin Barrett, and myself! 911Blogger/reprehensor certainly does not represent freedom. Other sites that also censor these topics are the forums at Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Loose Change, Truth Action, and PrisonPlanet (Alex Jones). I urge all readers to pressure those sites to stop their censoring.
Unfortunately, many people will assume the idea of exotic weaponry on 9/11 to be science fiction. The following two non-9/11 “conspiracy theories” should help the reader understand media conditioning and encourage them to open their minds a bit.
Note: Some people may find these examples jaw-dropping and even spellbinding; but no better time than the present for a dose of reality!
** Life On Mars ** - To many this is just a silly conspiracy theory. Some would actually break out in hysterical laughter at just the suggestion of intelligent life on Mars. But these NASA photos prove it. There’s no doubt. (See here for further analysis and source info on NASA’s site.)
Do 9/11 “truthers” laugh hysterically when Steven Jones calls the directed energy weapon evidence “crazy, impossible”?
Do mainstream scientists laugh hysterically when Steven Jones calls the free energy evidence “crazy, impossible”?
** Paul Is Dead ** - Let’s look at another “conspiracy theory”: the idea that ex-Beatle Paul McCartney was replaced with a look-alike in the 1960s. Not everyone is familiar with this one, but those who are usually consider it crazy. However, a before-and-after facial comparison makes one wonder if this so-called “conspiracy theory” should be renamed as “definitive fact”.
Observe the following photos. The first graphic is a comparison between two photos prior to 1966. The second graphic is post 1966. Distance between the eyes was equalized. Notice that the skull is the same shape in each graphic:
Now examine this comparison between 1966 and 1967. (Distance between eyes are equalized):
Paul was 24-25 years old in these photos so his skull structure could not have changed to that extent.
See the above link for a much more in-depth analysis and source info for the photos.
[If any reader can prove the analysis wrong, please do so. That way I can conclude that I did see the real Paul at Giants Stadium in 1993 and Madison Square Garden in 2002, after all.]
See here for an interesting interpretation of music by The Who put together by Dr Wood that explains what’s going on in the world.
We humans have been deceived big-time on a number of issues. Life on Mars?? Paul is dead??
What about Bigfoot? The Bermuda Triangle? Crop Circles? Atlantis?
Is it possible all these so-called “conspiracy theories” are completely true?
What about Roswell/Area 51? The Moon Landing Hoax? The Loch Ness Monster? Ghosts?
Who do the Global Elite represent? Us, or themselves?
Additions
The following entries were made 9/14/08:
War Games / NORAD Standing Down section: Replaced text of Mineta’s quote with version from 9-11commission.gov’s website.
The Real Smoking Guns section: Added “Keep in mind that top-secret technologies are always light-years ahead of what’s publicly admitted. (Don’t fall for this new propaganda, designed to mislead people regarding the “magnetic forces” explained below.).
Computer Generated Images (CGI) / Animations section: Added third animated gif (for better understanding of the violation of Newton’s Laws of Motion).
Paul Is Dead section: added “The Moon Landing Hoax?”
DEW image redone in better quality.
Several typos corrected.
:END
Last edited by CB_Brooklyn on Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
This is conspiracy overload. Typical of the fakery crowd.
yes - apart from the overload of waffle this is just another compilation of the same old drivel, which not surprisingly encourages you to brush aside real smoking guns (wtc7, molten metal etc) and replace them with fantasy beliefs that are based on nothing except CB_Brooklyn's delusions (eg "the plane-shaped holes were made with directed energy weapons", holograms etc) mixed in with the usual lies, some customary reinterpretations of eyewitness remarks, the completely bogus tv fakery claims and so on....
plus, there's the somewhat underwhelming news that Ace Baker - once one of Judy Wood's most fawning advocates - has now apparently convinced himself that she and john hutchinson are frauds.
I wonder if he'll flip back into the fold again in due course....
there's also some predictable whining about how sites that are sick of being spammed with bs by the likes of CB_Brooklyn have started banning it....
and finally some more meaningless waffle which tries to associate questioning the official 9/11 story with believing in silly stuff like the "paul mccartney is dead" rumours from the 1960s etc....
has anyone ever seen Judy Brooklyn and CB_Wood together? _________________ Nyetu pravdy v Isvyestyakh i nyetu isvyestyi v Pravde
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject:
Looks like CB_Wood is setting out to create an Global Empire of the Credulous.
Having said that, my own conspiracy theory is that the person passing themselves off as "Prof. Judy Wood" is an imposter. Probably the real Prof Wood is in the 12th year of her MK Ultra induced coma (all Virginia Tech witnesses to her past and nosey lab assistants having been eliminated) and the hospital cleaning lady nicked her ID for a better life in dumbed-down US academia.
Probably complete bollox, but since when did similar ever stop CB_Flake?
I notice CB_Underscore uses the usual lo-rent if not worst possible dodgy visuals in the all-encompassing-and-even-including Paul Is Dead conspiracy.
Which plainly tells me they know nothing about evaluating a musician's playing, singing and writing style. Or are there specially trained multi-talented government agents just waiting somewhere for that lucky break? Is there a chance I could I be trained up to be a Lemmy replacement maybe? I can get me own warts if so.
Still, hopefully this Best of top conspiracy hits - Now That's What I Call A Conspiracy perhaps, indicates the usual.
That decline has set in and the end is nigh.
Fingers crossed. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
I was quite disappointed by the "interesting interpretation of music by The Who put together by Dr Wood that explains what’s going on in the world", which is about as interesting as watching paint dry if you're blind....
I wonder if she's heard of the Ramones?
Link _________________ Nyetu pravdy v Isvyestyakh i nyetu isvyestyi v Pravde
American Idol beckons. It's just a shame the yanks can't compete in Eurovision.
But seriously:
Quote:
Smoking Gun: There are no witness reports of hearing damage. No witnesses reported the deafening sound of wide-body commercial airliners at full throttle hitting the Twin Towers.
Quote:
A. I never actually saw the plane, but l heard it. You could hear it coming in and then we heard the explosion and you could hear the roar of the plane coming in. At first I didn't realize it was a plane. I thought it was like the roar of fire, like something had just incinerated, like a gas tank or an oil tank. It sounded like a tremendous roar and then you heard boom and then there was a big fire, a lot of fire, a big fireball. I never actually saw a plane hit the building. I never saw that. I saw it on television, but I never saw it while I was standing there.
They heard a "boom" not a "deafening sound". Clearly, a "boom" is not the same as a "deafening sound". Case closed.
Quote:
I heard nothing
This casts doubt on there being an explosion at all. Further investigation pending.
Quote:
It looked nothing like what I would have imagined a plane crashing into a building would look like.
Everyone can imagine what an aircraft travelling at full speed crashing into a skyscraper looks like. We've all seen films with Bruce Willis in them where stuff a bit like that happens all the time. The fact the alleged 'reality' clearly deviated from how this hitherto never before seen event was imagined to look like by a given individual conclusively shows that this 'reality' is suspect.
Quote:
We humans have been deceived big-time on a number of issues. Life on Mars?? Paul is dead??
What about Bigfoot? The Bermuda Triangle? Crop Circles? Atlantis?
Is it possible all these so-called “conspiracy theories” are completely true?
What about Roswell/Area 51? The Loch Ness Monster? Ghosts?
Who do the Global Elite represent? Us, or themselves?
What about the Mongolian death worm?, the green children of Woolpit? the Devil's hoofprints? the Halifax slasher? Marathon being inexplicably changed to Snickers? Elvis still alive in an old people's home being played by Bruce Campbell?
It's Elvis...But it's also Bruce Campbell!!!
Has Paul Stanley been replaced by agents of the New World Order?...they did it because they can!!!!!!!
Real
Evil 911 perp replacement
Note - Kiss changed their appearance around the time they sang "these are crazy, crazy, crazy, crazy nights" - lyrics that seem to be describing the bombing of Baghdad over a decade later!
Is Paul McCartney an Atlantean bigfoot ghost operating a holographic projector from Loch Ness?
(as opposed to the Bermuda triangle as it makes people disappear - don't go too near!)
These are the questions directly pertinent to 911 credibility free goons like Jones and Griffin refuse to ask!!!!!!!!
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:15 pm Post subject:
Dogsmilk wrote:
Is Paul McCartney an Atlantean bigfoot ghost operating a holographic projector from Loch Ness?
(as opposed to the Bermuda triangle as it makes people disappear - don't go too near!)
...which reminds me of the classic Cooperism: "The London Symphony Orchestra today cancelled a concert in Bermuda after their triangle player disappeared". _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
See here for an interesting interpretation of music by The Who put together by Dr Wood that explains what’s going on in the world.
Quote:
This is indeed A Nation Gone Blind.
The story of how "Tommy" became blind, deaf, and dumb reminds me of the aftermath of 9/11. Those who did see something are told they didn't see it, or hear it, (or breath it), and "how absurd it all seems without any proof." They are told what they saw, and told what they didn't see and didn't hear, and that they must not "tell a soul what they know is the Truth."
Fascinating.
I have drawn my own arbitrary conclusions from Spending about five minutes looking at the lyrics for the last decent album Metallica made some years before they declared war on normal people possibly preventing them from becoming obscenely rich.
from one
Quote:
I can't remember anything
can't tell if this is true or a dream
deep down inside I feel to scream
this terrible silence stops me
(Can't remember the plane hitting, heard only silence, challenging reality of what they saw)
Quote:
now that the war is through with me
I'm waking up I cannot see
that there's not much left of me
this terrible silence stops me
(NWO achieved WOT objectives, is waking up to reality of no planes but realises it's too late and the sheeple accept the video fakery in silence)
etc
Or from eye of the beholder
Quote:
Do you see what I see?
truth is an offence
your silence for your confidence
do you hear what I hear?
doors are slamming shut
limit your imagination, keep you where they must
Obvious really.
There's loads more on that album alone.
Even Mexican harsh EBM act Hocico are a goldmine, e.g.
from fed up
Quote:
don´t think too much about the things at night
don´t think too much those creatures have a price
don´t think too much and swallow all your pride
until your senses are fed up with this life
don´t read the warnings go straight and start to fly
don´t read the warnings, old road to paradise
if you want to believe
in a destiny, if you want to believe
in a twisted desire in a manic disease
if you want to believe
in a destiny, if you want to believe
in a twisted desire
in a plastic dream
A cry against people believing they will attain justice for 911 via deluded non NPT ideas if ever I saw one.
I found some good stuff in the lyrics for the Cannibal Corpse album Tomb of the Mutilated, but they're strong stuff and Tony would likely ban me if I quoted any of them.
Nevertheless, I think an "Interpret song lyrics as being somehow about NPT" competition would provide some light relief in these dark days...how about it?
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject:
Well, I'm currently reliving my Beatles (and Rutles) period so let's take a look in that context.:
Fixing a Hole (Sgt Pepper 1967)
"I'm fixing a hole
Where a plane came in"
Hmmmmm, never noticed that before.
"It came in Through the Bathroom Window" (Abbey Road 1969)
Obvious, really.
"Baby You can Toast My Car" (Rubber Soul 1965)
Bloody hell....!
I Am the Walrus (Magical Mystery Tour 1967):
"Sitting on a cornflake waiting for the van to come
Corporation teeshirt, stupid bloody Tuesday
Man you been a naughty boy. You let your face grow long
I am the eggman, they are the eggmen
I am the walrus, goo goo goo joob"
A clear reference to "dancing undercover Israeli art students", on the exact day.
"Here, There and Everywhere" (Revolver 1966)
Again, obviously about the fragments of human remains scattered over Deutsche Bank and elsewhere.
NWO Here Man (Rubber Soul 1965)
"He's a real NWO here man,
Sitting in his NWO here land
making all his NWO here plans for nobody"
This is Dave 'The Master' Rockefeller to a tee.
Then there's .... oh... hang on I've run out of papers.
I'll just have to nip out to the late night garage.
Anybody else want anything while I'm there? _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
Heh,heh. Amusing.Cheap and easy derision. You'd have to be a stoner, wouldn't you? What, to geddit? There's a grain of truth, though, it's perceptions, - different levels of...,what you see is what you get. Some here might see those sceptics, Borderlands folk,jref types as losing out badly, and way back beyond the TV dominated sheep struggling in the morass. Can't see that Brooklyn's saying anything too dumb or outre or stoned or ridiculous. It seems like a very clear summation to me.The Ondrovic testimony really ought to be enough, even given the black lines.
Don't set your filters too high. Let in everything you can, and then reject things that don't "square" with you, if that's not too kaballistic...or too much to ask _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
I'm sure the, for example, critics corner or jref people would say something similar about you. We have been branded by the 911Cult obsessional stalker cultists as a "cult". A thankfully ever-diminishing number of "sheeple" would condemn anybody who had a single thought about anything that was important as "bloody mad"
No- my views aren't bs any more than yours are, except regarding mine of course
I opened my eyes a long time ago, and object to being told to open them when the deed is done.
This is completely fruitless.
CB Brooklyns article is comprehensive, introduces some "mad" but interesting sidelines, is in no way long since debunked, any more than the truth movement is in any way long since debunked by, say, the "Loose Change debunkers"
There's still no proof or ultimate truth in anything, and you have to make what you can of the evidence available and the short and long term trends http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHI C/9110048.PDF
'Nuff said _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
We have been branded by the 911Cult obsessional stalker cultists as a "cult".
The problem occurs when many who share your belief system act in a cult manner.
Like those who blindly believe in tv fakery. Instead of actually engaging in all the valid questions of contention regarding films like S. Clues, from chek, gruts, myself and others, they simply choose to ignore them and dismiss them without consideration.
They simply post another video in response as though the material in question is immune to examination.
That's idolatry I'm afraid.
Quote:
No- my views aren't bs...
By acting in that manner, it taints the material in question and its followers. If you refuse to apply the scientific method to your belief system, it suggests that you'll believe anything just because you're open minded or question reality 'enough' to realise something or anything is possible.
Which is a truism, but sometimes evidence can suggest that things are not correct.
Quote:
There's still no proof or ultimate truth in anything
Yes, including tv fakery. But many of its followers believe that anyone who disagrees with it is a 'shill'. I have been accused of being a "traitor", "shill" and "protecting mass murderers" just because I pointed out the inconsistencies in their objects of worship.
The phrase above, whilst it may be philosphically correct doesn't mean therefore that anything, everything is true. It doesn't mean you should ignore or dismiss evidence to the contrary. That's just blind faith.
Quote:
and you have to make what you can of the evidence available
Yes, and up til now, nobody has even slightly engaged with the evidence to the contrary that I have posed to those who worship blindly at the altar of S. Clues, even with the glaring errors as pointed out in the link below.
If you ask me, these sorts of posts shouldn't be moved to 'controversies'.
It's this very argument that is now at the centre of the 'truth movement'.
Moving this stuff to controversies means it never gets dealt with.
Apart from by the usual players.
I think it's important to have it discussed at length, however long, until people begin to see either the error of their ways, or the nature of those who believe in certain 'truths'.
If you ask me, these sorts of posts shouldn't be moved to 'controversies'.
It's this very argument that is now at the centre of the 'truth movement'.
Moving this stuff to controversies means it never gets dealt with.
Apart from by the usual players.
I think it's important to have it discussed at length, however long, until people begin to see either the error of their ways, or the nature of those who believe in certain 'truths'.
This is the only way we're eventually going to be able to sort the wheat...etc
I absolutely agree with you on this, Lee
But one thing - I wont see the 'error of my ways'.
I never thought for a moment to promote any kind of theory regarding methods used on here for a couple of years or more
Still,I'm increasingly pissed off with the smugness of the rejecting regulars
I ignored it all for a long time, but now CB_Brooklyn comes in with a long cogent piece, and I see just an awful lot of sneering
I'm really pissed off with it to tell you the truth
I won't start to present the argument because of all it entails...ie you're debunked, man, long ago
Still, there is so much spin-off from Judy Wood, the Hutchinson effect, chemtrails, Haarp and so on, that you need to take yourself far from media-mediated - a nice twist - reality and lock in
Still I'm not too bothered, we have the other one to post in freely, and perhaps the doubters should post in there
All due respects to Tony, John, gruts, chek, yourself etc etc
There's so much I agree on, it outweighs the rest, probably
Though I have some doubts _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:52 am Post subject:
paul wright wrote:
Lee wrote:
If you ask me, these sorts of posts shouldn't be moved to 'controversies'.
It's this very argument that is now at the centre of the 'truth movement'.
Moving this stuff to controversies means it never gets dealt with.
Apart from by the usual players.
I think it's important to have it discussed at length, however long, until people begin to see either the error of their ways, or the nature of those who believe in certain 'truths'.
This is the only way we're eventually going to be able to sort the wheat...etc
I absolutely agree with you on this, Lee
But one thing - I wont see the 'error of my ways'.
I never thought for a moment to promote any kind of theory regarding methods used on here for a couple of years or more
Still,I'm increasingly pissed off with the smugness of the rejecting regulars
I ignored it all for a long time, but now CB_Brooklyn comes in with a long cogent piece, and I see just an awful lot of sneering
I'm really pissed off with it to tell you the truth
I won't start to present the argument because of all it entails...ie you're debunked, man, long ago
Still, there is so much spin-off from Judy Wood, the Hutchinson effect, chemtrails, Haarp and so on, that you need to take yourself far from media-mediated - a nice twist - reality and lock in
Still I'm not too bothered, we have the other one to post in freely, and perhaps the doubters should post in there
All due respects to Tony, John, gruts, chek, yourself etc etc
There's so much I agree on, it outweighs the rest, probably
Though I have some doubts
Your pissed off with it? How do you think the rest of us feel
Paul you really have to face the fact that it IS all debunked: every single bit of it. What's the point of saying it isnt?
CB Brooklyn's only "redeming" feature is the charming bloodymindedness of making the effort to stich all the * together again and spam it across the internet repeatedly
I'm sure that post will appear on hundreds if not thousands of sites: anything written here about it certainly wont be
And I also feel you have to face the fact that it is the CB brooklyn's of 9/11 Truth, together with the Killtowns and the Fred's, the MFP's and Pixies, who make it possible for both the JREF'ers and Stott's Cultwatch to tar and brand 9/11 Truth as they do
They COULD NOT DO IT without them!
Have a think about that
I suspect the last laugh could very well end up belonging to the "CB Brooklyns" who have taken this piss out of 9/11 Truth all along
About time you noticed? _________________ Free your Self and Free the World
I'm sure the, for example, critics corner or jref people would say something similar about you. We have been branded by the 911Cult obsessional stalker cultists as a "cult". A thankfully ever-diminishing number of "sheeple" would condemn anybody who had a single thought about anything that was important as "bloody mad"
No- my views aren't bs any more than yours are, except regarding mine of course
I opened my eyes a long time ago, and object to being told to open them when the deed is done.
This is completely fruitless.
CB Brooklyns article is comprehensive, introduces some "mad" but interesting sidelines, is in no way long since debunked, any more than the truth movement is in any way long since debunked by, say, the "Loose Change debunkers"
There's still no proof or ultimate truth in anything, and you have to make what you can of the evidence available and the short and long term trends http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHI C/9110048.PDF
'Nuff said
You've said before you don't get caught up in these endless pro/anti NPT arguments, I understand that and I respect it. However, the major problem remains that many counter arguments have been presented here and elsewhere and the vocal champions of the notion have been unwilling or unable to provide reasoned responses. Now if the idea is to convince the world that TV fakery did indeed occur on 911, this is surely very unlikely to occur if those who believe it cannot provide responses to objections raised by people who are already sympathetic to their general core beliefs regarding 911 as an event.
Quote:
I ignored it all for a long time, but now CB_Brooklyn comes in with a long cogent piece, and I see just an awful lot of sneering
But are you surprised?
I don't think CB Brooklyn is doing the NPT camp itself any favours by randomly ruminating on assorted forteana. Whether hitherto unrevealed hairy hominids prowl the isolated corners of the earth, whether a mysterious beast is lurking in a Scottish Loch or whether those big worm things from Dune frolic on Mars are questions that some people find interesting, but I cannot for the life of me see what relevance they have to NPT let alone 911 in general. Or does CB believe the NWO stuck a big creature in Loch Ness to attract tourists and Yetis up mountains to startle mountaineers as part part their devilish plans for world conquest?
That CB terms such things "so-called conspiracy theories" is bizarre in itself. Since when were ghosts a "conspiracy theory"??
And furthermore, as a sober and credible organisation, the truth movement in the United Kingdom demands that the government releases all their files concerning the Loch Ness monster, bigfoot and ghosts. We seek disclosure on who Doris Stokes was really working for. We have appointed the late Peter Cushing to lead an investigation via ouija board from a cramped antiques shop in London that sells sinister items which lead to the buyer dying horribly from paranormal events if they commit some minor infringement like switching price tags to get a bargain
And if Paul McCartney was "replaced" (which I don't for a second think he was); who cares????
It was revealed today that Paul McCartney actually died in the 1960s and was replaced by an imposter. The government issued a long statement in which they said all troops would be pulled out of Afghanistan and Iraq, detention without charge would be repealed and two full public enquiries held - one on the London bombings and the other to make sure Mick Jagger is who he says he is - as a direct and relevant response to this information coming into the public domain
And scraping the barrel even further, why bother trawling old Who lyrics trying to read things into them? If Judy wants old bands that tell it like it is, she should just listen to Crass or the Dead Kennedys or something.
On one hand, people decry the public being distracted by fluff and say the TM is serious and important, on the other CB Brookyn seemingly wants everyone in it glued to most haunted, speculating about pop stars and dredging Loch Ness to see if a plesiosaur lives there. If people are interested in this sort of stuff, well there's a long history of people looking into it, but where is the relevance?
I'm sorry Paul, I just really don't think CB is doing your angle any favours at all.
Ferchrissake, I'm not saying believe everything you read or disbelieveJust don't knee-jerkingly react to stuff that doesn't immediately accord
I could no doubt forever pick apart CB Brooklyn, Judy Wood, Steven Jones, Alex Jones, Zionism, tarataratarah
Just take what's good and accept what's in accord and * the rest
Just wonder for a moment why you can only asterisk the rest
Asterisk off if you want it that way _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
I'm quite happy to agree to disagree with you about the merits of Judy Brooklyn's relentless output of spam (it's amazing how some people seem to have so much time on their hands to write/compile this kind of stuff and post it on pretty much every forum on the internet)....
but it really is true that most the aforementioned spam is just a rehash of what has already been posted many times before, and is either transparent garbage or has been shown over and over again to be garbage - with stuff like facts, truth, science, logic, reason etc - not just derision (as you claim).
so when the same garbage is posted yet again - what's wrong with pointing that out? and when some of the spam is frankly laughable, you can't blame people for taking the piss....
and it's typical that the spammer hasn't contributed anything to this discussion beyond the first post, leaving the likes of you to try and defend it while running away to work on the next repetitive dollop of spam which will be coming our way in the not too distant future.... _________________ Nyetu pravdy v Isvyestyakh i nyetu isvyestyi v Pravde
American Idol beckons. It's just a shame the yanks can't compete in Eurovision.
I'm waiting with baited breath for the david hasselhof cover version of Ace's masterful power-ballad....
How is a tower like a tree?
What does this mean to you and me?
Can we solve this mystery?
Can we find the energy?
Can we get our mind around disintegrating walls . . .
. . .with billiard balls?
sheer genius _________________ Nyetu pravdy v Isvyestyakh i nyetu isvyestyi v Pravde
American Idol beckons. It's just a shame the yanks can't compete in Eurovision.
I'm waiting with baited breath for the david hasselhof cover version of Ace's masterful power-ballad....
How is a tower like a tree?
What does this mean to you and me?
Can we solve this mystery?
Can we find the energy?
Can we get our mind around disintegrating walls . . .
. . .with billiard balls?
sheer genius
I think there should be a response in the form of Gordon Ross swinging his snake hips and belting out
How can columns just buckle and fall?
Can molten metal help us understand at all?
Is it solved by a nanothermatic theme
From our funky homeboy truth machine?
whoah yeah!
However, I think Ace should not be usurped by the Hasselhof and should have a fair crack at crooning
And iiiiiiiieeeeeeiiiiiiieeeeeiiiiii will always love yoooooooooooeeeeooooowhooooaaah-oh-oh!
in front of Simon Cowell as a prelude to unleashing his masterpiece on the public when he wins.
*sigh* It figures, I take a break, and you people break out the drugs while I'm gone... _________________ "What about a dance club that only let in deaf people? It would really only need flashing lights, so they'd save a lot of money on music." - Dresden Codak
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:23 pm Post subject:
TmcMistress wrote:
*sigh* It figures, I take a break, and you people break out the drugs while I'm gone...
Did you miss the nazi invasion too?
There's just so much more non-stop excitement here than any one website can decently cope with. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
I see a lot of knee-jerk reactions, but very little rigorous debunking of Dr Wood's material.
As a theoretical physicist (M.A.(Cantab), M.Sc., Ph.D.), I have analyzed her claims in detail. Her modus operandi consists of presenting many dots (such as photos) and then creating the illusion that they are joined. As an example of her sloppy standard of research, she says that the magnetometer readings in Alaska went wild around the time the planes hit the North and South Towers. No, they did not. If you look at the data chart for 2001
http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/table_index/2001_table.html
and compare the charts for September 11 with those of previous days (just click on the hyperlinked dates - or better still - choose a day and then click on the 'Previous Day's Data Plot' hyperlink)), you will find that some of the fluctuations in the magnetic field strength recorded by the stations in Alaska on previous days were just as large as those recorded in her graph for that day. Indeed, some are much larger! For example, compare the Fort Yukon readings for September 4:
http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/display_plot.cgi?site=FtYukon&year =2001&doy=247
with those of September 11:
http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/display_plot.cgi?site=FtYukon&year =2001&doy=254
Evidently, Wood saw fluctuations from the average background level growing large in the morning of of that day and persisting until the early evening and concluded that this had to be significant evidence for some exotic physics at work (perhaps an attack by HAARP). What she did not do (or at least did not show on her website) was to check whether these fluctuations were really anomalous by extending the time line back over weeks. When you do this, you find there is nothing out of the ordinary for the magnetic field fluctuations on September 11, 2001 that she claims are anomalous. Far more violent fluctuations can be found on some days! Sometimes, there are very visible fluctuations, some days there are none at all. September 11 happened to be a day where there were purely natural (non-man-made) fluctuations, but only moderately sized ones. Therefore, there is no statistical basis for her claim that these fluctuations were anomalous on 9/11. Similar (or larger) variations occurred with regular frequency on days prior to that date.
Either Wood has been unforgivably sloppy in her research or else she has deliberately cherry-picked her data in order to provide evidence supporting her belief that high-energy DEWs were used to destroy the WTC towers.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
