wake turbulence - real world plane physics

[jfk]

Link

[chek]

I think I can guess where this is going, but it'd only be fair to give you enough rope first, jfk.

So, in your own time, please explain the relevance.

[jfk]

chek, if it needs to be explained to you,
the wake from the plane should have been visible in the explosion/smoke.
for example in the naudet film.

[chek]

Yes, I think it does need to be explained to me what this wake "should" have done. What particular physical phenomenon do you base this "should" on?
Let me guess: someone at 911Idiots said so, and without considering it for more than 2 seconds you decided to spam it here. Correct?

Be that as it may, once an object stops moving and displacing the fluid it's travelling through, it stops generating a wake however suddenly that occurs.
The wake itself has no forward momentum - it's merely a trail that peters out when the generating mechanism ceases.

Can't see what's so difficult to understand about that, especially since it must be only a year or so since this particular red herring was last brought up.

So - explain away, jfk.

I'm all ears.